Slashdot Mirror


User: RalphTheWonderLlama

RalphTheWonderLlama's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
509
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 509

  1. Re:Apache vs IIS on Virtues of Monoculture, Or Why Microsoft Wins · · Score: 1

    Hey, I'm not a hosting company or a sysadmin. I'm a developer. So much configuring before even testing my apps is not developing. It's just a pain in the butt.

  2. Re:Apache vs IIS on Virtues of Monoculture, Or Why Microsoft Wins · · Score: 1

    It's exactly the same experience as editting text files as if you were standing at the physical machine.

    Well, I don't think I can use my favorite text editor that way so it's not the exact same, is it.
  3. Re:Apache vs IIS on Virtues of Monoculture, Or Why Microsoft Wins · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the extra post but I just found this image that shows what I was talking about for the php mapping. It's within the properties of the virtualhost website you are working with that you got to by right clicking the icon for it :)
    There would be a .php entry in there with the path going to your php executable.

    http://www.direct-link-ads.com/Images/html_to_asp_ iis.png

  4. Re:Apache vs IIS on Virtues of Monoculture, Or Why Microsoft Wins · · Score: 1
    Yes. Sorry I forgot to mention it was in Windows.

    ...but the point is that IIS seems more intuitive because that's the environment in which the parent's comfortable.
    No, actually it is more intuitive because you don't have to know how to do something before you do it with IIS since it's a GUI. You can click around and find the settings to change. When editing conf files, you have to already know everything you can set there and what each does, and where to type it, or look it up which seems to take quite a while for me.

    Ok, you got me on the remote access. I'm developing on my machine first so it's nice to use the GUI but once the project moves to the server I use Remote Desktop or something to access the IIS config GUI. Our Remote Desktop is quite fast, but yes that is a clunky way of doing things. So how do you do it? Do you edit text files over SSH? That's pretty darn clunky too.

    Actually it's very easy to create a virtual host in IIS. There are friendly icons on the left for each of your websites and you can create a new one right there. As for PHP, well I got that working with IIS a while ago so it works with all my virtualhosts currently but to add or remove PHP interpreting once it's already set up, you just go to your virtualhost's properties and then click the configuration button on the home directory page, and it lists all the mappings of various types of files. Edit the mapping for the .php extension (delete it or set it to the php executable).
  5. Re:Apache vs IIS on Virtues of Monoculture, Or Why Microsoft Wins · · Score: 1

    duh you dummy dumbass, how could you not know that??!!

    lol

    Actually with the regular windows installation of Apache httpd, the wizard asks if you want to install it as a service I believe. Anyway it just happens very easily so I guess that's another advantage of MS, this time Windows vs Linux.

  6. Re:Apache vs IIS on Virtues of Monoculture, Or Why Microsoft Wins · · Score: 1

    It's like the installation docs intentionally withhold useful information to increase the fun!

    Haha, amen. It did take me more than a day and lots of hair pulling to get it all working the way I wanted. You can bet I saved how I set those up and also the most useful websites I used.
    Something is seriously wrong when I have to google all day to find a step by step method after going over the "real" documentation over and over and getting frustrated as hell.
  7. Re:Entry Level Programmer wanted, good pay, benefi on Tech Sector Expansion Blunting U.S. Job Outsourcing · · Score: 1

    Damn right. Those jobs didn't exist when I graduated in 2002.

  8. Apache vs IIS on Virtues of Monoculture, Or Why Microsoft Wins · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I prefer Apache since it's free but....

    This goes for virtually every non-default configuration of Apache and IIS but here are a couple examples.

    Allowing only certain IP addresses to access a website:
    Apache -
    1. Research on the web how this is done using Google.
    2. Find something called "mod_authz_host" and an example of its use here http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_authz_hos t.html .
    3. Get confused by all the different examples.
    4. Attempt to insert "code" into httpd.conf to limit access to certain IP addresses.
    5. Test to see if it worked.
    6. Research, edit, test more as needed.

    IIS -
    1. Click a few buttons
    2. Enter IP addresses allowed.
    3. Test (it works first try as expected since editing was intuitive).

    Use SSL:
    Apache -
    1. Research on the web how this is done using Google (lots of research).
    2. Install something called OpenSSL
    3. Copy a few files to a windows directory
    4. Find an openssl.cnf file that doesn't exist with the OpenSSL install for some reason.
    5. Create a SSL certificate using command line.
    6. Due to legal/political constraints, download a different copy of Apache with SSL from a strange 3rd party website and replace current copy of Apache that you had installed.
    7. Make several changes to httpd.conf file.
    8. Install this new Apache as a service using command line if needed.
    9. Make several more changes to httpd.conf file (uncommenting LoadModule line, including ssl.conf in an IfModule thing).
    10. Copy the certificate files made earlier to an Apache directory.
    11. Edit ssl.conf file on several lines to identify server name, document root directory, then also include the certificate path.
    12. Restart Apache, pray it works.

    IIS -
    1. Go to website properties using GUI
    2. Click Directory Security tab
    3. Click Server Certificate
    4. Follow Web Server Certificate Wizard to create certificate.

    For extra credit, require SSL connection - In Directory Security tab, Secure Communication area, click Edit, and check the Require secure channel SSL checkbox. I gave up on that for Apache and figured out some way to just forward requests to https (a bit of a hack it seems).

    Things just seem more intuitive when using IIS rather than editing conf files and hoping things work in Apache. There is a lot less frustration. It's a shame. Yes I did look for 3rd party Apache config GUIs and couldn't find anything that looked good.

  9. Re:Won't somebody on Cell SMS in Planes on Trial Down-Under · · Score: 1
  10. Mod Parent +88 Funny on Cell SMS in Planes on Trial Down-Under · · Score: 1

    AAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHA

    You has laughed too hard
    You has died

  11. Re:FCC? on Cell SMS in Planes on Trial Down-Under · · Score: 1

    I consider the few inches of air around my face to be temporarily my posession. I would let you know if you talked on the phone with that space for a significantly annoying amount of time.

  12. Re:Procrastinators, will they ever learn? on Turbo Tax Melts Down on Tax Day · · Score: 1

    Perhaps we should contract the chimpanzees to help us with this crisis.

  13. Re:That makes sense on T. Rex Protein Analysis Supports Dinosaur-Bird Link · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You Six Piece Chicken McNobody!

  14. Re:anti-aliasing makes me need glasses on openSUSE Hobbled By Microsoft Patents · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I HATE clear type. I want my text to be razor sharp, not fuzzy. The damn thing keeps turning back on by itself too!

  15. Annoying Link System on Solar Power-Cell Breakthrough · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one annoyed by how the links show up within the slashdot blurbs? The words that are contained in the link aren't what the link goes to half the time. What do you think a link for "one tenth of the cost" will go to? WTF. There could just be one or two links at the bottom of the blurb that actually contain text relevant to the target of the link so you know what you might see if you click that link.

  16. iFart on Google Desktop for Mac Released · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    iFaaaaaarrrt in your general direction

  17. Re:He's finally done it... on Steve Jobs Announces (some) DRM-free iTunes · · Score: 1

    Yeah that stinks too, same dueling compressions but with more hassle even.

    I was on the Apple hate bandwagon but I'm coming off now I think. I am definitely willing to use ITMS, I just wish other players would support AAC or they would sell MP3 on iTunes.

  18. Re:He's finally done it... on Steve Jobs Announces (some) DRM-free iTunes · · Score: 1

    That's stupid. They are different lossy compressions so they will sound like shit if you do that. It's not an option.

  19. Re:He's finally done it... on Steve Jobs Announces (some) DRM-free iTunes · · Score: 1

    you'll still have to pry my iRiver out of my twitching, techno-spazzed fingers.
    The iRiver doesn't play AAC, whoops.
  20. Re:Good job everyone! on Steve Jobs Announces (some) DRM-free iTunes · · Score: 1

    Not only that, but just about every player that can handle MP3 can also handle LC AAC.

    Sandisk doesn't show AAC for their players on their website. They are the #2 MP3 player company. I'm too lazy to check others like Creative or Samsung.
  21. Re:Why do they even bother? on Why the RIAA Doesn't Want Defendants Exonerated · · Score: 1

    Time for a new business model.

  22. Re:Why do they even bother? on Why the RIAA Doesn't Want Defendants Exonerated · · Score: 1

    500 GB drives are at $110 now if you're a slickdealer.

  23. Wireless Internet Giving Stratellites on Drive-By Internet In Hard-To-Reach Places · · Score: 1

    http://www.globetel.net/

    This company and several others are working to make wireless internet access for wide areas available and it's particularly suited to developing countries where they don't have a wired infrastructure already like the US does.

  24. Re:Probably not fair use. on Students Sue Anti-Plagiarism Service · · Score: 1

    Woohoo, University of Illinois:
    "Unless subject to any of the exceptions specified below or in Section 4(c), creators retain all rights to traditional academic copyrightable works as defined in Section 2(b) above."

  25. Re:Talk about undue burden... on Google to Viacom - The Law is Clear, and On Our Side · · Score: 1

    Well there is a burden for Viacom to find every single video that infringes their copyright on someone else's site as well. As they see it, it's not their fault that someone else is hosting all their copyrighted stuff and making money off of it so why do they have to police the internets looking for every instance of that when it's clearly illegal. Rather than having them searching every website all the time for things like this, maybe they should have some sort of way to notify everyone ahead of time what content they own that they don't allow everyone to show without permission. Oh yeah, isn't that a copyright?