What facts have I denied? What lies have I told? I get this a lot, but... still... nobody can ever back it up. Just like right now; you make empty claims.
If I'm lying, put the truth out there so anyone reading along is not mislead. If I'm denying facts, set the story straight so misinformation does not spread.
Simply calling one a liar and screaming that they're denying facts does not make it so. It doesn't work for Trump and it's not working for you.
What facts have I denied? What lies have I told? I get this a lot, but nobody can ever back it up. Just like right now; you make empty claims.
If I'm lying, put the truth out there so anyone reading along is not mislead. If I'm denying facts, set the story straight so misinformation does not spread.
Simply calling one a liar and screaming that they're denying facts does not make it so. It doesn't work for Trump and it's not working for you.
This is why you think i can never admit being wrong. You want to make it a painful experience, rather than a learning or growth experience. Well, sorry, I won't consider myself wrong over a quibble unless I can learn or grow from it, you simply lack the power to hurt me. I learn and grow here all the time; if I didn't, I wouldn't bother returning to this site on a daily basis. When I'm wrong, when someone shows me that I've been wrong, I learn from that, grow from it, admit it, and - perhaps most importantly - thank whoever showed me that I was wrong for correcting my understanding.
Now, ask yourself why I'm not doing that here.
Actually, no, don't bother. I'll just explain it: neither of us are really wrong here. Well, about the subject at hand, at least. You're wrong about me supposedly lying and being unable to admit when I'm wrong, but you put yourself in that position by being unable to admit that the distinction between primary and secondary display is a mere quibble. For proof of that, go up to people you see using multiple-display computers and ask them to identify the pri.ard and secondary displays; you might be lucky and find one person who can, but most don't care. You're choosing to argue and raise objections about a trivial matter, the literal definition of quibble, yet you refuse to admit it when I put the proof right in your face. Yes, the distinction between primary a d secondary display is trivial, I just showed you how to prove it (or prove me wrong, but I know you won't put in the work, you literally never do), now the ball is in your court. Prove me wrong, show me that people give a shit about that distinction, let me learn that and I will thank you for it and admit that I was wrong. Simply telling me I'm wrong without shit to back it up is not enough; cite some goddamn proof.
If you really want that example, though... Any computer with one of these attached, really. I'll cede that it's not built in, but that's yet another quibble. When I connect my iPad to my PC or Mac with Air Display (I'll let you Google that yourself), it becomes a secondary display, as well - and a touch interface, to boot! Capacitive, too, and we've already estaished that those are intrinsically pressure sensitive.
So, no, I am not wrong. You, however, have repeatly been wrong here. Wrong about me being wrong, wrong about me being able to admit when I'm wrong, wrong about me lying, wrong about whether or not this argument is a quibble, wrong about whether or not you initially asked a question... Need I go on? Mind you, you also don't appear to be wrong about your side of the quibble; nobody has made a dual-screen device with a capacitive touch secondary display built in, as far as I can tell. But, if you think I ever claimed otherwise, that's just another thing you're wrong about.
I admit I'm wrong all the damned time when someone actually proves me wrong; I've simply never admitted it to you. The thing is, really, me being wrong here is just a nit-pick and I've already owned that.
I can't imagine there won't be, though, so the discussion's really moot. I just wanted to point out the logical fallacy... I didn't even notice that it was you when I posted;)
We're talking about BootCamp. macOS isn't running when booted into Windows, so I reiterate, where, pray tell, do you imagine the SMB server capable of reading the AFPS partition would run?
Ah, I see the disconnect now. In the medical world, safe is a relative term. Brain surgery is often referred to as safe, and in context it is, but it's not something we do without good reason because it's not without risk; just as an example.
Well, your sample size of one surely dictates reality for the rest of the world. My sample size is considerably larger and disagrees with yours, so I must be wrong, right? Mind you, neither of us have a sample size large enough to determine how common that particular side effect is, but mine's certainly large enough to determine that it exists.
No, the difference is that one is not intended to be used on one's lap (for one or more of a multitude of reasons). On a proper desk or table, you shouldn't be looking down at it but, rather, have the screen much closer to eye level. That might be what the AC before me was getting at; and he/she/it was right. The bottoms of Apple notebooks get too hot for lap-top use, which is why they stopped calling them laptops; if you're using one on your lap and you call Apple to complain about the heat, they'll literally tell you you're using it wrong. And they're right to do so, as they don't sell laptops.
Have you actually read these leaflets you're referring to? They cite an increase in suicidal thoughts in the first month of treatment. That could very well be an increase from zero and no, it does not only affect people 25 and younger. Do you have any actual experience with these things or are you just looking at random articles online?
Let's just say there are a couple antidepressants someone very close to me can't take because they make her very suicidal; she's not suicidal without them, so they're not amplifying existing urges, and she's fine on what she's currently talking (if the dosage is right -- otherwise, suicidal thoughts again). She's been on antidepressants for years, so it's not just a "first month of treatment" thing, either; and it's been a while since she was under 25.
And she's not the first person I've seen actually exhibit that behavior on certain antidepressants, either. But, then, I literally grew up around depression and antidepressant use and I've been around it through every stage of my life. I've got over 3 decades of real world study here, even discounting events prior to my earliest recallable memories.
And you've got some printed leaflets stuffed in boxes with pills. Which you clearly didn't read. Because most of them actually list suicide with the side effects, along with the warning you mentioned.
Indeed. Beyond that, everything is dietary so long as you don't let things get out of the range of what natural andimicrobials and antifungals can handle (and you actually use them when necessary) and you maintain your gut flora.
If you fail that, you're in the danger zone anyway. There's a certain threshold where the danger of not using a drug is greater than the potential danger of using it; that's when you should start considering drugs. Specifically on the subject of antidepressants (as raised by dunkelfalke), they should only be considered when the patient's symptoms are worse that the potential side effects. Why give someone a pill that might make them want to kill themselves? Seriously, why? I mean, if they're in your office already talking about doing it, well, there ya go! But if they're not? Why?
Similarly, why give someone with non-aura-inducing migraines a hallucinogen? That's how migraines are typically treated, by the way. Now, for someone whose migraines already make them trip balls, the hallucinogen often works wonders. I know Cafergot and Immitrex were both great when I had aura-inducing migraines but they both really fucked me up (e.g. put me out of commission for a couple days) for non-aura migraines. Then I discovered CBD, which just plain fucking works with no mental fog or nasty effects.
And still, we give people with potentially nerve-compromising conditions opioid painkillers to mask the "HEY! STOP FUCKING MOVING LIKE THAT BEFORE YOU SEVER THAT NERVE!" pain signals. Sure, it lets them get up and do things (as well as you can when you're effectively stoned on heroin), but at the very real risk of doing permanent and potentially immobilizing nerve damage. At least, that's the experience I and others I know have had with them; and that's when they did anything for the pain at all. I have a basically pulverized spinal disc which causes intermittent and severe sciatica, I have plenty of experience with (prescribed) opiods. One day, I was suffering that and got a migraine; imagine my delight when the CBD I took for my migraine dulled the constant pain, without any shitty mental fog, and still let me feel the "HEY! STOP FUCKING MOVING LIKE THAT BEFORE YOU SEVER THAT NERVE!" pain signals well enough to know when I needed to take a break.
I'm so glad I live in a state where CBD is legal with a recommendation (and I have that recommendation as I have a legitimate need for it); if I lived elsewhere I might not be able to be productive most days.
And while it may seem that I've veered off topic, I've actually brought this line of discussion closer to where it started. Dunkelfalke's supposed "safe antidepressants" are not schedule 1 drugs like MDMA, the drug this discussion is supposed to be about; CBD, on the other hand...
I'm still calling [citation needed] on this. We must have very very different definitions of the word safe when "suicidal urges" are listed as a potential (and common) side effect.
So wait, in a story about Microsoft trying to tear down the walls between consoles and PC and encourage cross-play... you say game designers should be able to allow cross-play (or not) if they so choose. Then, you say Microsoft pushing to make that a reality doesn't help that?
I think, then, that you should never look at what Sony is doing. Your head might explode.
I specially ask for a force sensitive secondary screen. FORCE SENSITIVE SECONDARY SCREEN. All those words mean something. You want to equate any touch screen as ample.
First of all, the distinction between primary and secondary display is a quibble at best. Second, as I've stated time and time again, capacitive touch interfaces are inherently force sensitive. Third, no, not any touch screen, just capacitive touch screens, for the aforementioned (and much repeated) reason.
Those are details was what I was talking about in the very beginning. Again this was my original post: "Also there is the underlying assumption that the Touch Bar never changes. Could it become a force touch sensitive in the next iteration? Could Apple use the same tech and make the entire Track Pad double as a screen?" It was there at the start. Many posts down the thread, you call those details which I mentioned at the start as "nitpicking."
So you finally quote the question I answered in my initial post. Yes. Yes, Apple could do that. It's simply touch screen technology that we've had for decades and secondary display technology that almost every consumer laptop has supported for at least as long.
You asked a question (which you then repeatedly denied asking despite my having quoted and referenced that exact question multiple times) and I answered it. You simply did not like my answer, although it affirmed your suspicion that yes, Apple could in fact implement this.
And you think I'm the one with the cognitive deficit? Sorry, no.
First of all, the distinction between primary and secondary display is a quibble at best. Second, as I've stated time and time again, capacitive touch interfaces are inherently force sensitive.
Actually, Apple advertises their portable computers as "notebooks", not "laptops".
Our goal with MacBook was to do the impossible: engineer a fullsize experience into the thinnest, lightest Mac notebook yet.
It's literally the first proper sentence on the page, and also an important distinction as the older plastic MacBooks and the PowerBook line before them were termed laptops; Apple began recommending against laptop use and started calling them notebooks instead of laptops when people started complaining of burns from the first unibody MacBook Pros.
In short, if you're looking down at your Apple notebook, you're clearly using it on your lap. If you contact Apple support about this, they will, quite literally, tell you you're using it wrong.
Feel free to disagree, but don't bother arguing with me over it, complain to Apple; I'm merely relaying their message.
It's actually stated in the printed materials that came with my 2012 rMBP.
Slashdot Mirror
What facts have I denied? What lies have I told? I get this a lot, but... still... nobody can ever back it up. Just like right now; you make empty claims.
If I'm lying, put the truth out there so anyone reading along is not mislead. If I'm denying facts, set the story straight so misinformation does not spread.
Simply calling one a liar and screaming that they're denying facts does not make it so. It doesn't work for Trump and it's not working for you.
What facts have I denied? What lies have I told? I get this a lot, but nobody can ever back it up. Just like right now; you make empty claims.
If I'm lying, put the truth out there so anyone reading along is not mislead. If I'm denying facts, set the story straight so misinformation does not spread.
Simply calling one a liar and screaming that they're denying facts does not make it so. It doesn't work for Trump and it's not working for you.
Oh? It mattered enough for you to reply, didn't it?
What lie did I tell? Point it out, then state the truth so others are not mislead.
It mattered enough for you to reply, didn't it?
What lie did I tell? Point it out, then state the truth so others are not mislead.
This is why you think i can never admit being wrong. You want to make it a painful experience, rather than a learning or growth experience. Well, sorry, I won't consider myself wrong over a quibble unless I can learn or grow from it, you simply lack the power to hurt me. I learn and grow here all the time; if I didn't, I wouldn't bother returning to this site on a daily basis. When I'm wrong, when someone shows me that I've been wrong, I learn from that, grow from it, admit it, and - perhaps most importantly - thank whoever showed me that I was wrong for correcting my understanding.
Now, ask yourself why I'm not doing that here.
Actually, no, don't bother. I'll just explain it: neither of us are really wrong here. Well, about the subject at hand, at least. You're wrong about me supposedly lying and being unable to admit when I'm wrong, but you put yourself in that position by being unable to admit that the distinction between primary and secondary display is a mere quibble. For proof of that, go up to people you see using multiple-display computers and ask them to identify the pri.ard and secondary displays; you might be lucky and find one person who can, but most don't care. You're choosing to argue and raise objections about a trivial matter, the literal definition of quibble, yet you refuse to admit it when I put the proof right in your face. Yes, the distinction between primary a d secondary display is trivial, I just showed you how to prove it (or prove me wrong, but I know you won't put in the work, you literally never do), now the ball is in your court. Prove me wrong, show me that people give a shit about that distinction, let me learn that and I will thank you for it and admit that I was wrong. Simply telling me I'm wrong without shit to back it up is not enough; cite some goddamn proof.
If you really want that example, though... Any computer with one of these attached, really. I'll cede that it's not built in, but that's yet another quibble. When I connect my iPad to my PC or Mac with Air Display (I'll let you Google that yourself), it becomes a secondary display, as well - and a touch interface, to boot! Capacitive, too, and we've already estaished that those are intrinsically pressure sensitive.
So, no, I am not wrong. You, however, have repeatly been wrong here. Wrong about me being wrong, wrong about me being able to admit when I'm wrong, wrong about me lying, wrong about whether or not this argument is a quibble, wrong about whether or not you initially asked a question... Need I go on? Mind you, you also don't appear to be wrong about your side of the quibble; nobody has made a dual-screen device with a capacitive touch secondary display built in, as far as I can tell. But, if you think I ever claimed otherwise, that's just another thing you're wrong about.
I admit I'm wrong all the damned time when someone actually proves me wrong; I've simply never admitted it to you. The thing is, really, me being wrong here is just a nit-pick and I've already owned that.
LUL! I'd say try Edge but I don't hate you...
Hopefully that will prove less shocking and more illuminating. Good luck!
I can't imagine there won't be, though, so the discussion's really moot. I just wanted to point out the logical fallacy... I didn't even notice that it was you when I posted ;)
We're talking about BootCamp. macOS isn't running when booted into Windows, so I reiterate, where, pray tell, do you imagine the SMB server capable of reading the AFPS partition would run?
no (a positive) and yes (a positive).
Another misinterpretation. Keep 'em coming, buddy!
And I would imagine that file-sharing between macOS and Windows OSes will be handled like Network Shares, through SMB.
Where, pray tell, do you imagine the SMB server capable of reading the AFPS partition would run?
Ah, I see the disconnect now. In the medical world, safe is a relative term. Brain surgery is often referred to as safe, and in context it is, but it's not something we do without good reason because it's not without risk; just as an example.
Sorry, not willing to lie just to appease you, but you can admit you're purposely misinterpreting what I write -- as usual -- any time now.
Well, your sample size of one surely dictates reality for the rest of the world. My sample size is considerably larger and disagrees with yours, so I must be wrong, right? Mind you, neither of us have a sample size large enough to determine how common that particular side effect is, but mine's certainly large enough to determine that it exists.
No, the difference is that one is not intended to be used on one's lap (for one or more of a multitude of reasons). On a proper desk or table, you shouldn't be looking down at it but, rather, have the screen much closer to eye level. That might be what the AC before me was getting at; and he/she/it was right. The bottoms of Apple notebooks get too hot for lap-top use, which is why they stopped calling them laptops; if you're using one on your lap and you call Apple to complain about the heat, they'll literally tell you you're using it wrong. And they're right to do so, as they don't sell laptops.
Have you actually read these leaflets you're referring to? They cite an increase in suicidal thoughts in the first month of treatment. That could very well be an increase from zero and no, it does not only affect people 25 and younger. Do you have any actual experience with these things or are you just looking at random articles online?
Let's just say there are a couple antidepressants someone very close to me can't take because they make her very suicidal; she's not suicidal without them, so they're not amplifying existing urges, and she's fine on what she's currently talking (if the dosage is right -- otherwise, suicidal thoughts again). She's been on antidepressants for years, so it's not just a "first month of treatment" thing, either; and it's been a while since she was under 25.
And she's not the first person I've seen actually exhibit that behavior on certain antidepressants, either. But, then, I literally grew up around depression and antidepressant use and I've been around it through every stage of my life. I've got over 3 decades of real world study here, even discounting events prior to my earliest recallable memories.
And you've got some printed leaflets stuffed in boxes with pills. Which you clearly didn't read. Because most of them actually list suicide with the side effects, along with the warning you mentioned.
Indeed. Beyond that, everything is dietary so long as you don't let things get out of the range of what natural andimicrobials and antifungals can handle (and you actually use them when necessary) and you maintain your gut flora.
If you fail that, you're in the danger zone anyway. There's a certain threshold where the danger of not using a drug is greater than the potential danger of using it; that's when you should start considering drugs. Specifically on the subject of antidepressants (as raised by dunkelfalke), they should only be considered when the patient's symptoms are worse that the potential side effects. Why give someone a pill that might make them want to kill themselves? Seriously, why? I mean, if they're in your office already talking about doing it, well, there ya go! But if they're not? Why?
Similarly, why give someone with non-aura-inducing migraines a hallucinogen? That's how migraines are typically treated, by the way. Now, for someone whose migraines already make them trip balls, the hallucinogen often works wonders. I know Cafergot and Immitrex were both great when I had aura-inducing migraines but they both really fucked me up (e.g. put me out of commission for a couple days) for non-aura migraines. Then I discovered CBD, which just plain fucking works with no mental fog or nasty effects.
And still, we give people with potentially nerve-compromising conditions opioid painkillers to mask the "HEY! STOP FUCKING MOVING LIKE THAT BEFORE YOU SEVER THAT NERVE!" pain signals. Sure, it lets them get up and do things (as well as you can when you're effectively stoned on heroin), but at the very real risk of doing permanent and potentially immobilizing nerve damage. At least, that's the experience I and others I know have had with them; and that's when they did anything for the pain at all. I have a basically pulverized spinal disc which causes intermittent and severe sciatica, I have plenty of experience with (prescribed) opiods. One day, I was suffering that and got a migraine; imagine my delight when the CBD I took for my migraine dulled the constant pain, without any shitty mental fog, and still let me feel the "HEY! STOP FUCKING MOVING LIKE THAT BEFORE YOU SEVER THAT NERVE!" pain signals well enough to know when I needed to take a break.
I'm so glad I live in a state where CBD is legal with a recommendation (and I have that recommendation as I have a legitimate need for it); if I lived elsewhere I might not be able to be productive most days.
And while it may seem that I've veered off topic, I've actually brought this line of discussion closer to where it started. Dunkelfalke's supposed "safe antidepressants" are not schedule 1 drugs like MDMA, the drug this discussion is supposed to be about; CBD, on the other hand...
No medical benefit, my ass.
I'm still calling [citation needed] on this. We must have very very different definitions of the word safe when "suicidal urges" are listed as a potential (and common) side effect.
So wait, in a story about Microsoft trying to tear down the walls between consoles and PC and encourage cross-play... you say game designers should be able to allow cross-play (or not) if they so choose. Then, you say Microsoft pushing to make that a reality doesn't help that?
I think, then, that you should never look at what Sony is doing. Your head might explode.
Safe antidepressants? This term is foreign to me. Please, elaborate.
I specially ask for a force sensitive secondary screen. FORCE SENSITIVE SECONDARY SCREEN. All those words mean something. You want to equate any touch screen as ample.
First of all, the distinction between primary and secondary display is a quibble at best. Second, as I've stated time and time again, capacitive touch interfaces are inherently force sensitive. Third, no, not any touch screen, just capacitive touch screens, for the aforementioned (and much repeated) reason.
Those are details was what I was talking about in the very beginning. Again this was my original post: "Also there is the underlying assumption that the Touch Bar never changes. Could it become a force touch sensitive in the next iteration? Could Apple use the same tech and make the entire Track Pad double as a screen?" It was there at the start. Many posts down the thread, you call those details which I mentioned at the start as "nitpicking."
So you finally quote the question I answered in my initial post. Yes. Yes, Apple could do that. It's simply touch screen technology that we've had for decades and secondary display technology that almost every consumer laptop has supported for at least as long.
You asked a question (which you then repeatedly denied asking despite my having quoted and referenced that exact question multiple times) and I answered it. You simply did not like my answer, although it affirmed your suspicion that yes, Apple could in fact implement this.
And you think I'm the one with the cognitive deficit? Sorry, no.
First of all, the distinction between primary and secondary display is a quibble at best. Second, as I've stated time and time again, capacitive touch interfaces are inherently force sensitive.
Our goal with MacBook was to do the impossible: engineer a fullsize experience into the thinnest, lightest Mac notebook yet.
It's literally the first proper sentence on the page, and also an important distinction as the older plastic MacBooks and the PowerBook line before them were termed laptops; Apple began recommending against laptop use and started calling them notebooks instead of laptops when people started complaining of burns from the first unibody MacBook Pros.
In short, if you're looking down at your Apple notebook, you're clearly using it on your lap. If you contact Apple support about this, they will, quite literally, tell you you're using it wrong.
Feel free to disagree, but don't bother arguing with me over it, complain to Apple; I'm merely relaying their message.
It's actually stated in the printed materials that came with my 2012 rMBP.