Can we start the discussion by not immediately going to the "NAT will save us" argument? Just accept that while NAT deployments might put it off, IPv6 deployment is inevitably necessary.
by Anonymous Cowardon Sunday January 03, @07:07PM (#30635740)
I understand that many breat questions exist, but that many basic ones are hidden. I was delted from the economy and now have no affect on the decisions that others may think they have. My pre-GUI and pre-WWW knowledge has been avoided esp when the rule of the internet is now determined (and it ain't the users!).
Could you explain NAT as a resolve?
I must say, that after completing my "computer science" degree in 1983, that i see less-and-less ""science" and more business, especially 'monopolization' "business as a dumbified replacement.
Why do today's "resolutions" always feel like they were figured out BEFORE their 'problem requiring resolve' was?
It's as if the Rothschild 'play both sides of a war' and 'create that war' is the only "science" that exists.
Oh, and of course, there is the "science" of "the choiceless choice"....
Idiotology is the 'brain-power' that is schooled in lieu of "science".
Whenever ANY government agency now resolves, it is as FOR MONOPOLY and subjugation.
In any "standards" committee decsion these daze, where the committee is tacked by commercial interests, I smell the smoke of a coming "Reichstag fire" as some protocol, standard, or enforcement body rationing-away "unapproved" communication?
The loss of computer science programming languages, human languages, and rights to having other than the "politically correct" view of anything, exposes the Orwellian inversion of reality.
In other words, why wouldn't the current puppet government use "the need for" some "internet upheaval", or an "attack" by its NSA operatives at Microsoft/Google/Yahoo/Cisco as an excuse for shutting it down for a tighter/less-polite State-corporate-banking-military-security consolidation? Who is going to argue? The "Open Source" pseudo-community acquiesced with CSS to Microsoft and MySQL to Oracle. Why not life in general? So well practiced....
After all, we all have proved that we really have very little talent at much other but taking our daily order of "sell your life", as in Wilhelm Reich's "The Mass Psychology of Fascism" and Theodor W. Adorno's "The Authoritarian Personality".
We may dream, but we cringe at realizing dreams beyond a merely-dysfunctionalized reality. Ideologizing via idiot "left" and "right" spewages and falsified "freedom" as droned from the common master's mouth seems to be beyond our vision.
We are truly "good citizens". So, in that sense, will we choose between which Tweedledee-Tweedledum "choice"? Will NAT/ipv6 just be a choice of the surveilled and blocked and filtered and censored "access" we shall have? What humanity! What marvel! What rites!
Of course, I hope otherwise.
I hope that calls for "plugging holes" and "expanding possibilities" are NOT just disguised complicity and compliance.
best,
chris
Slashdot Mirror
Can we start the discussion by not immediately going to the "NAT will save us" argument? Just accept that while NAT deployments might put it off, IPv6 deployment is inevitably necessary. by Anonymous Cowardon Sunday January 03, @07:07PM (#30635740) I understand that many breat questions exist, but that many basic ones are hidden. I was delted from the economy and now have no affect on the decisions that others may think they have. My pre-GUI and pre-WWW knowledge has been avoided esp when the rule of the internet is now determined (and it ain't the users!). Could you explain NAT as a resolve? I must say, that after completing my "computer science" degree in 1983, that i see less-and-less ""science" and more business, especially 'monopolization' "business as a dumbified replacement. Why do today's "resolutions" always feel like they were figured out BEFORE their 'problem requiring resolve' was? It's as if the Rothschild 'play both sides of a war' and 'create that war' is the only "science" that exists. Oh, and of course, there is the "science" of "the choiceless choice".... Idiotology is the 'brain-power' that is schooled in lieu of "science". Whenever ANY government agency now resolves, it is as FOR MONOPOLY and subjugation. In any "standards" committee decsion these daze, where the committee is tacked by commercial interests, I smell the smoke of a coming "Reichstag fire" as some protocol, standard, or enforcement body rationing-away "unapproved" communication? The loss of computer science programming languages, human languages, and rights to having other than the "politically correct" view of anything, exposes the Orwellian inversion of reality. In other words, why wouldn't the current puppet government use "the need for" some "internet upheaval", or an "attack" by its NSA operatives at Microsoft/Google/Yahoo/Cisco as an excuse for shutting it down for a tighter/less-polite State-corporate-banking-military-security consolidation? Who is going to argue? The "Open Source" pseudo-community acquiesced with CSS to Microsoft and MySQL to Oracle. Why not life in general? So well practiced.... After all, we all have proved that we really have very little talent at much other but taking our daily order of "sell your life", as in Wilhelm Reich's "The Mass Psychology of Fascism" and Theodor W. Adorno's "The Authoritarian Personality". We may dream, but we cringe at realizing dreams beyond a merely-dysfunctionalized reality. Ideologizing via idiot "left" and "right" spewages and falsified "freedom" as droned from the common master's mouth seems to be beyond our vision. We are truly "good citizens". So, in that sense, will we choose between which Tweedledee-Tweedledum "choice"? Will NAT/ipv6 just be a choice of the surveilled and blocked and filtered and censored "access" we shall have? What humanity! What marvel! What rites! Of course, I hope otherwise. I hope that calls for "plugging holes" and "expanding possibilities" are NOT just disguised complicity and compliance. best, chris