After the reorganization once Larry took over and Marissa was left with Google Local I think the writing was on the wall and she was just looking for the right opportunity .
yeah...they miss the part where you are suppose to design tests, document what feature is being tested and build against those test and comment the crap out of your code so you can run a nice utility to generate documentation automatically for you.
That is actually a really cool way to make the customer feel like they are in control... they can request many changes, and choose the priority for the next release....not bad.
Waterfall is the basis of all engineering....the difference is you can not use it in its classic sense in a software engineering project. Iterative is the modification you are talking about and yes...it takes smaller chunks and applies the waterfall to each...what separates basic iterative from Agile is the methodologies used to decide what belongs in the iterations.
umm...if a language is Turing complete then there is nothing that can be done in one language that can not be done in another, so no...you would not see a comparison like that.
Any system would need to start with a very basic concept that generates the particles. String theory's initial conjecture made sense....the problem was that the mathematical contortions to describe the theory could not produce any predictions that were useful because we do not have the instrumentation to observe them. Furthermore no-one could produce a prediction for anything that we have confirmed by observation. At least GR could be used to predict observations made by classical physics and QM predicted all the weird behaviors that were observable very early on in the theory's life.
suspect it is an approximation? Everyone who knows what science is knows that it is an approximation of reality...that is part of the definition of a theory.
14.6 trillion dollar GDP for the US....the government spends half that... but what do they spend it on? PRIVATE INDUSTRY....they are not producing anything and they are not mandating private companies produce any product (regulation is not planning)
I don't think you understand how pre-existing condition exclusions work.
You had cancer 5 years ago...under old pre-existing conditions, they could deny you coverage because you are at a very high risk of relapse, costing them a lot of money with very little money put into their coffers.....
You just got in a car accident....under old pre-existing condition rules they could technically deny you but are not likely to do so since you have little risk of costing them a lot of money in the short to mid term...HOWEVER....they can deny any coverage for the care that you need to pay for related to the car accident... usually for a period of 6 to 12 months depending on the plan....
Under the new rules neither case above can be denied for coverage, however the law does not force insurance companies to cover current catastrophic care at the time that you sign your contract so you are still on the hook for the bills related to the car accident in case 2.
Slashdot Mirror
After the reorganization once Larry took over and Marissa was left with Google Local I think the writing was on the wall and she was just looking for the right opportunity .
Bug fixes do not take precedence over features and the two should not be mixed.
yeah...they miss the part where you are suppose to design tests, document what feature is being tested and build against those test and comment the crap out of your code so you can run a nice utility to generate documentation automatically for you.
That is actually a really cool way to make the customer feel like they are in control... they can request many changes, and choose the priority for the next release....not bad.
Waterfall is the basis of all engineering....the difference is you can not use it in its classic sense in a software engineering project. Iterative is the modification you are talking about and yes...it takes smaller chunks and applies the waterfall to each...what separates basic iterative from Agile is the methodologies used to decide what belongs in the iterations.
Clovis culture is very European. Perhaps all Clovis people died out so there is no DNA evidence.
No....it isn't.
uhh...it sends the data back to MS during usage and crashes.....
in C and C++ it is absolutely NOT an object. in Java and C# and other modern languages...sure, just like any other data type is an object.
because that is soooooooooo much better than just using C++.
I was talking about the capability of the language to build software, not a feature of the language(pointer usage).
Thanks.
perhaps he was told that he either cut the IT costs by X amount of money or outsource it all.
it's a struct. no inheritance, no polymorphism. not a class/object.
duh... you can use cin and cout in C++.
umm...if a language is Turing complete then there is nothing that can be done in one language that can not be done in another, so no...you would not see a comparison like that.
I think you mean the Koreans.
Any system would need to start with a very basic concept that generates the particles. String theory's initial conjecture made sense....the problem was that the mathematical contortions to describe the theory could not produce any predictions that were useful because we do not have the instrumentation to observe them. Furthermore no-one could produce a prediction for anything that we have confirmed by observation. At least GR could be used to predict observations made by classical physics and QM predicted all the weird behaviors that were observable very early on in the theory's life.
it will put constraints on GUTs since they now know a GUT will not work if it can not account for a Higgs like effect.
suspect it is an approximation? Everyone who knows what science is knows that it is an approximation of reality...that is part of the definition of a theory.
It happened to me. I was pissed.
You are wrong.
tax/spend and mandate? seriously?
14.6 trillion dollar GDP for the US....the government spends half that... but what do they spend it on? PRIVATE INDUSTRY....they are not producing anything and they are not mandating private companies produce any product (regulation is not planning)
Stop the ignorant teabagger bullshit hyperbole.
it is free... just like Food Stamps.....
that is MEDICAID..... Totally different plan.... totally different payer (the state for Medicaid)
the more I read in this thread the more I find those against HCR have almost no understanding of how the old or new systems actually operated.
I don't think you understand how pre-existing condition exclusions work.
You had cancer 5 years ago...under old pre-existing conditions, they could deny you coverage because you are at a very high risk of relapse, costing them a lot of money with very little money put into their coffers.....
You just got in a car accident....under old pre-existing condition rules they could technically deny you but are not likely to do so since you have little risk of costing them a lot of money in the short to mid term...HOWEVER....they can deny any coverage for the care that you need to pay for related to the car accident... usually for a period of 6 to 12 months depending on the plan....
Under the new rules neither case above can be denied for coverage, however the law does not force insurance companies to cover current catastrophic care at the time that you sign your contract so you are still on the hook for the bills related to the car accident in case 2.