Slashdot Mirror


User: void+bear(void)

void+bear(void)'s activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
17
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 17

  1. Re:Ellch and Manor??? RTFA! on Five Hackers Who Left a Mark on 2006 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The poorly written code was in the Atheros driver, which was nothing to do with Apple, and indeed other platforms using the same hardware were also vulnerable.

    They still haven't clearly stated that a stock Airport Extreme setup is as vulnerable as shown, as they clearly used a usb wireless device for the demo.

    I would have more respect for these guys if they hadn't come out with the 'poke a lit cigarette in every Apple user's eye' comment which proved they had an axe to grind.

  2. "Episode IV Title" bullshit on Original Star Wars on DVD... Sorta · · Score: 1

    According to the TV advert in the uk, this is the original thatrical release of all 3. So the reader claiming it would still have Episode IV in the titles is talking bullshit. Legally they couldn't advertise it as such, and besides, there is a clear few seconds of the trail without "Episode IV" in it. Better research needed, /. really is going down hill lately.

  3. Re:Boot Camp on Why Microsoft Is Beating Apple At Its Own Game · · Score: 1
    You never get half drawn windows on the Mac, yet every little singe thing seems to draw at a different rate in Windows.

    That just pins the elegancy debate for me.

    And there was no need to get anti-mac-fanboy at the bottom of your post, made you look like an inarticulate uneducated fool.

  4. er, no on Some Bands Still Refuse Music Downloads · · Score: 1

    apple vs apple admission that the beatles back catalogue is being remastered and will be released on itunes?

  5. Move along... on Skin Sensing Table Saw · · Score: 1

    How does something that has been around for this long, make it on Slashdot? slow news day?

  6. Re:multiple desktop switching on Knock Some Commands Into Your Laptop · · Score: 1

    Pretty much all the smack mods for macs use Amit Singh's handywork. The 'creators' of the smackbook virtual desktop thing decided it wasn't good to smack computers and went for the ambient light sensors as an interface instead.

  7. What? on Will OSX Build In Torrenting? · · Score: 1

    1. They are not talking illegal downloads, more software updates, and *speculated* itunes content. 2. It's not an upload for credit, it's a permission to use you as a node for credit. 3. MS has already bought groove networks and ray ozzie helped build p2p into vista - go look it up - Apple just following suit.

  8. Re:Article is a troll on Macs May No Longer Be Immune to Viruses · · Score: 0

    Errrrr, Now who can't read :O

  9. Re:Article is a troll on Macs May No Longer Be Immune to Viruses · · Score: 0

    and i suppose it's a little too much to expect that you actually know what you are talking about and have a point! What exactly is OSX, a fancy GUI based on the free distro darwin - which is a bastardised form of BSD. So, your point is, linux community is now more proactive, so that includes OSX then ?!?!?!? Nice try

  10. Re:Article is a troll on Macs May No Longer Be Immune to Viruses · · Score: 1

    "To these people, lowering the barrier to entry from $500 to $0 will make a tremendous difference." hmm, just like all those expensive linux distros that have been littered with viruses ever since they cost $0 to install.

  11. Not again! on Macs May No Longer Be Immune to Viruses · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Nothing to see here, move along. This has already been covered to death EVERYWHERE, why is it being talked about again YAWN!

  12. Decoded message on Help Break Original Enigma Messages · · Score: 1

    "All your uboat belong to us"

  13. Gates vs Jobs on Who is Your Hero, Gates or Jobs? · · Score: 1

    Some people are criticising Jobs for not doing as much charity work as Gates, ok fair cop. Let's look at how they made their fortune ;- Jobs - by hiring the most talent people to produce very good innovative hardware and software (at both Apple and NeXT [and also animation at pixar]), he has been rewarded with stock and good wages from both current jobs. Gates - started by developing for the Altair - poor choice - managed to get Apple to license basic from them - tried to buy a version of DOS, failed so built a crappy bug-ridden alternative, and repeated this process with any number of products - built on the shoddy core of DOS. Not worried about the product just box shifting. You may think of this as Apple Centric, but I think Gates is just trying to even his Karma out.

  14. Common practice on Apple Breaks RSS with Photocasting · · Score: 1

    The article actually only says Apple breaks with common rss practice. RSS isn't a standard anyway, at best it is like html in the early days, widely adopted, but browser, or in this case feed readers, are dominating how rss should be. I don't see the harm in this, especially if RSS doesn't really do what iPhoto needs, do all browsers render pages the same? Maybe we should look at why RSS only supports one date format, and maybe re-title the article "Apple helps improve RSS" just a thought.

  15. Computer vs Hard Drive on What Should People Understand About Computers? · · Score: 1

    Please for the LOVE OF *insert deity reference* teach people the difference between a hard drive and a case. The amount of times people say 'my hard drive died' meaning "the box in the corner which is my computer just stopped working correctly". Just because it annoys me sooooo much!

  16. I did once work on The Unspoken Taboo - The Never Expiring Password · · Score: 2, Funny

    for a company which handled a LOT of oil industry data. They had a windoze domain admin account for sophos to do it's stuff to all the pcs. The password was 'antivirus' an audit team got it on their third guess.

  17. Apple patents on Apple Files Patent for "Tamper-Resistant Code" · · Score: 1

    Apple patented the mighty mouse - maybe 2 years before they actually produced it. They also have a tablet mac patent too. My point is, this could all be a smokescreen, get everyone excited about their new 'tamper-resitant' code, and then on day one Intel suprise us with a totally new type of instructions set and chip for the MacIntels. I'll wait to judge this one, when I have a MacIntel sat in front of me.