Slashdot Mirror


User: Eccles

Eccles's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,740
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,740

  1. Re:Could someone... on ESA Completes Important Step Toward Vega Launcher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could someone...enlighten us to some details of the 'vega launcher' and why its special ?

    If you had ever owned a Vega, you would understand why they want to launch any remaining ones into space...

  2. Re:Sounds Good on Future of Visual Gadgets Rolled Out · · Score: 5, Funny

    But what would you use a tv on your jeans for?

    Flashers might use one when it's really cold...

  3. Re:Broil? on Dinosaurs Died Within Hours of Asteroid Impact, says New Study · · Score: 1

    Yes but it doesn't make any difference whether the heat source is above or below since you just need to turn the steak over to cook a different side.

    It doesn't make a difference as far as the heat applied goes, but with (American) gas/charcoal grills, the fluid from the meat drips down onto the elements or coals, gets superheated, and flavors the meat. With the heat source above, the liquid tends to pool on top of the meat. That also tends to make the meat sear less than a heat source below.

  4. Re:This shouldn't come as a surprise.... on China Developing own Standards · · Score: 1

    If the USA had a national team that was respected in a "world standard" sport such as football, then perhaps 9/11 wouldn't have happened.

    The last FIFA rankings have the U.S. ranked 10th in (association) football. Granted, that's different from respect, which would come from winning World Cups. But then you would get a backlash from people who are sick of Americans winning everything...

  5. Re:What about using the most obvious Nuclear Energ on Creator of the Gaia Hypothesis Urges Nuclear Power · · Score: 1

    A hollow voice says, "Ford Windstar"

    A slap and a hollow echoing sound accompany "D'oh!"

  6. Re:What about using the most obvious Nuclear Energ on Creator of the Gaia Hypothesis Urges Nuclear Power · · Score: 1

    Style? I couldn't care less about style.

    Yet none of your tests were of minivans.

  7. Re:A Good Thing(tm) on Process Improvements in the Kernel Development · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anything that prevents the possibility of another SCO-type BS lawsuit is a Good Thing.

    One horse's head in Darl McBride's bed comin' up!

  8. Re:Most sensible people would on What's Your Terrorism Quotient? · · Score: 1

    And we're losing a guerilla war where we're killing 20 times more of the guerillas than they are of us (at least)?

    One word: Vietnam.

    (Ok, further explanation: ~58,000 American dead, ~1,000,000 North Vietnamese dead. Looks damned close to 1:20 to me...)

  9. Re:Fuck you America on What's Your Terrorism Quotient? · · Score: 1

    I think that the technically-oriented, educated, well-read citizens of the World watch very little television to begin with.

    Not to mention many of us use TiVo/ReplayTV/HTPCs, and skip the commercials anyway...

  10. Re:Well on Monsanto Wins Case Over Patented Canola · · Score: 1

    I was think maybe New Zealand. If enough of us geeks move down there, perhaps we can make a haven...

  11. Re:If you recall... on Monsanto Wins Case Over Patented Canola · · Score: 1

    If you look at the court document linked by another poster, you'll see that 95-98% of his crop was found to be Monsanto's GM canola. It wasn't an accident. The source of the seeds is unclear, but the guess is that the farmer intentionally collected seeds from other plants grown from other farmers' seed which blew off of their fields. So he deliberately targeted those seeds.

    Apparently the other farmers had an agreement to keep purchasing seed from Monsanto, not to harvest their own seeds.

  12. Re:Remind yourself and your family on Schizophrenia Experiences and Suggestions? · · Score: 1

    Can we have your liver, then?

  13. Re:Please Press 6 If You Have a Clue on Worst Explanation From Tech Support? · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everything else has 'advanced user' setup. Why can't we have advanced tech support?

    Because everyone will choose that. You may have to add a warning, "If you demonstrate that you aren't in fact at advanced user, you will be mocked mercilessly."

  14. Re:dim sales assistants are just as bad on Worst Explanation From Tech Support? · · Score: 1

    Huh, milliamps are virtual amps, they don't have real current at all, they just appear to via other circuits.

    Oh wait a moment, that's millivanilliamps. My mistake.

  15. Re:I smell lawsuits, how about you? on Indiana First With Computerized Grading · · Score: 1

    In that case, you've done a hell of a lot of work on that paper, a good bit of which is educational if the program is "competent."

  16. Re:I smell lawsuits, how about you? on Indiana First With Computerized Grading · · Score: 1

    It is a fallacy to believe that an employer will value average work from a clearly above-average worker the same as average work from an average or below-average worker.

    An employer will pay the above-average worker more to begin with.

  17. Re:I smell lawsuits, how about you? on Indiana First With Computerized Grading · · Score: 1

    Bell's commandment: Judge not syntax, lest ye be judged.

  18. Re:Tanenbaum was wrong about microkernels on Andy Tanenbaum on 'Who Wrote Linux' · · Score: 1

    ouch didn't even last 10 minutes.

    Was the server running a microkernel OS?

  19. Re:Plug-in Prius? Probably not an option on Out of Gas · · Score: 1

    The problem I can see is that you can only charge the battery back up to full, so to use meaningful amounts of grid power you'd have to run the battery down just as you get to a charging spot.

    I'm not seeing the logic here.

    If I drive to work and back and that doesn't drain the batteries fully, but I plug them in and recharge them to full, I'm still avoiding having to use fuel. I don't see why fully draining the batteries is a requirement, I assume these cars' batteries don't have a memory issue or they wouldn't be very effective.

  20. Re:Unions are good for everyone on SBC CWA Strike Imminent · · Score: 1

    The 40 hour work week etc are now all protected by law. Unions are unnecessary, as all basic worker protections are protected via laws.

    Laws can be changed, and the Bush administration recently tried to change how certain classes of workers were classified WRT the 40 hour work week. So that exact protection you're talking about was just about to lose some of its strength.

  21. Re:Say what you will... on SBC CWA Strike Imminent · · Score: 1

    If labor is in control, then why are CEO salaries skyrocketing relative to worker wages?

    Shareholders care about profit, not control (except insofar as control helps profit.)

  22. Re:please OMG on Is Linux Improving Life Of Poor In India? · · Score: 1

    Governments do not create wealth, even when they try.

    No, but they can destroy it. Let's say that a government can choose between two otherwise equal alternatives for a service, one free, one not free. Which should they choose? A free one would allow them to reduce spending or spend more on other vital services.

  23. Re:Who's going to cry...?! [Excessive Trolling] on Trained Rats for Mine Detection · · Score: 1

    I love rats, especially the Gambian Giant Rats, and just the thought of them scurrying to their potential deaths apalls me.

    As stated from the article, one reason to use the rats is because they won't set off the mines. I suppose there's potential death from predators in the area, but...

  24. Re:laptop market yes, desktop market no on Samsung Announces Largest-Ever OLED Display · · Score: 1

    Have you looked at the Syntax Olevias at tigerdirect.com? 27" and 30" LCDs under $2K. (May bust your budget, of course, but for failing vision, I can think of nothing better.)

  25. Re:Bad economics and incorrect facts. on Out of Gas · · Score: 1

    D'oh! Although the original poster said gas, not crude oil, so your objection is incorrect. It may be what you were talking about, but it was not what the original poster was talking about. Fewer refineries wouldn't increase the $40+/barrel price, but could increase the $2+/gallon price at the pump.