The dust is not a problem, it might become a problem, e.g. if more astronauts walk on the moon or if outposts are built, both of which are highly likely to happen.
Another NASA article says the dust stuck on the astronauts, and that they noticed weird symptoms inside the spaceship.
The explosion was "equal in energy to about 70 kg", which does not mean it exploded like 70 kg of TNT would have. This explosion was much more concentrated. It is unknown how much and in which shape the dust is blown around, but it is probably quite a big area, which means you don't have to be hit by the meteoroid.
Rocks aren't really intercepted by the moon, they hit it because the moon lacks an atmosphere. Earth's atmosphere reduces rocks to harmless strims of heat.
Why did Symantec verify officially that this bug was present before fixing it? Now, evil RAR packages will probably be much more wide-spread than before.
Am I right in saying this will not make any difference to the end users? Making X module-based seems to greatly simplify coding for developers, but does it have any effect for the end user at all?
If I understood the article correctly, this version is exactly like the last one, except that it is modularized, and therefore built in a different way. How is this a "major version release"?
The weakest link(s) in your security is/are human.
Unless you're using Windows, that is, since then Windows is a giant weak link, which is in turn made up of lots of more weak links, e.g. the user and the programs.
That devil is only a symbol, don't interpret it literally.
Seriously consider the disadvantages. When you try to type freebsd.org into the location field in your browser, free6.com appears before it.
Is there any way to stop users from redirecting the out-stream and saving the movie in another file?
XINE and other movie players for *NIX seem to have problems with certain codecs and DRM. Will they really release movies playable on all OSes?
This new technology has created a whole wave of crimes
Behold the refresh button, the wonder of modern technology.
I doubt the DNA language is layout free: Back to the BASIC syntax.
The dust is not a problem, it might become a problem, e.g. if more astronauts walk on the moon or if outposts are built, both of which are highly likely to happen.
Another NASA article says the dust stuck on the astronauts, and that they noticed weird symptoms inside the spaceship.
The explosion was "equal in energy to about 70 kg", which does not mean it exploded like 70 kg of TNT would have. This explosion was much more concentrated. It is unknown how much and in which shape the dust is blown around, but it is probably quite a big area, which means you don't have to be hit by the meteoroid.
Rocks aren't really intercepted by the moon, they hit it because the moon lacks an atmosphere. Earth's atmosphere reduces rocks to harmless strims of heat.
It is dangerous to future astronauts and outposts.
Danger to whom exactly?
To the astronauts. The dust is poisonous, is flung rapidly, and sticks to the astronauts.
You replied to another post, how was your reply supposed to have been the first post?
Oh, you just clarified the post above was the first post. Sorry.
Why did Symantec verify officially that this bug was present before fixing it? Now, evil RAR packages will probably be much more wide-spread than before.
If they did not exist, then what would unimaginative webmasters fill their sites with?
Am I right in saying this will not make any difference to the end users? Making X module-based seems to greatly simplify coding for developers, but does it have any effect for the end user at all?
If I understood the article correctly, this version is exactly like the last one, except that it is modularized, and therefore built in a different way. How is this a "major version release"?
Are those colours there on the real keyboard, or are they only on the pictures in order to show where the keys are?
What if there actually was a pair of hot 18yo lesbians longing for me? I'd think it was spam and delete it. I'd be spam-damaged.
About 70 percent of the world's e-mail messages continue to be spam. But the number is leveling off,
No way. I've got more than 95% of spam and have had so in years.
One would be stupid not to invest in Google stocks. They've already risen more than 300%, and they're comming up with new services all the time.
1) and 3) kind of contradict each other. What if someone said "Oh, rm -r * will never work"?
Top 10 lists are great. Is there any easier and faster way to write pseudo-quality content in order to draw traffic?
If it was #1, you'd try it before everything else fails.
The weakest link(s) in your security is/are human.
Unless you're using Windows, that is, since then Windows is a giant weak link, which is in turn made up of lots of more weak links, e.g. the user and the programs.
Flamebait perhaps, but yet so true.