Slashdot Mirror


Felony For Refreshing a Web Page?

therandomw writes "An 18 year-old boy was recently arrested in Ohio for telling fellow students to refresh the schools web page in order to slow down the server. He is being charged with a felony and is currently being held in jail. According to Canton City Prosecutor Frank Forchione 'This new technology has created a whole wave of crimes, and we're just trying to find ways to solve them.'"

965 comments

  1. must be more zero tolerance by yagu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    AFAIK this barely even brushes up against being a felony, but let the school officials have their fun! Had they just ignored this and let it go (maybe take the kid aside and dress him down a bit), this would have slipped off the radar in half a day. As it is, they've loaded, locked, and are about to fire, aiming right at their own feet.

    BTW, I'm just wondering who the first brave soul in slashdot is who will actually post the schools URL. (Also, BTW, it's pretty easily found in Google: Lake High School Uniontown Ohio, duh).

    1. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:must be more zero tolerance by mgrennan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      or more simply go to:

      http: // lake.stark.k12.oh.us/hs

      --
      There are 10 type of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    3. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Noxx · · Score: 1, Informative

      How strange, all the results I found on Google are showing server errors...

      --
      Study everything, you'll find something you can use - Jason Bourne
    4. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Bin_jammin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe someone will post a mirror and we can reload that. That'll show 'em.

    5. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Boy if they thought a few people in a chat room would be bad....

      Or

      Witness the firepower of a fully armed and operational slashdotting!!

    6. Re:must be more zero tolerance by thx1138_az · · Score: 0

      They've been ./'d already. Is this a crime? :-)

    7. Re:must be more zero tolerance by SoCalChris · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From TFA:

      It's not the first time local officials have investigated situations where students are misusing computers. Forchione noted a 2005 case in which four Jackson High School students were charged with misdemeanors after being caught accessing the school computer system. Some grades were changed.

      So, breaking in to the school's computer system, and changing grades is a misdemeanor, but encouraging people to visit the school's publicly posted website is a felony?

      Yeah, I know the kid had malicious intentions, but why is this a felony when actually breaking into their system and causing damage is only a misdemeanor?

      "Michael said it was a joke," Forchione said. "We showed him how we deal with this kind of joke."

      This prosecutor needs to be smacked.

    8. Re:must be more zero tolerance by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny
      Does this mean I'm going to be charged with a felony? I can't wait for the extradition hearing?

      "Your honor, the defendant is accused of taking part in a Slashdotting of a high school web server in the United States, and faces felony charges."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:must be more zero tolerance by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I tell all my friends to drive up and down mainstreet a thousand times a day to wear down the pavement, have I committed a felony?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:must be more zero tolerance by jfern · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's been Slashdotted due to lots of felony web page refreshings. The irony.

    11. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the clever bugger posted AC. This one could go unsolved for some time, boys ;)

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    12. Re:must be more zero tolerance by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I tell all my friends to drive up and down mainstreet a thousand times a day to wear down the pavement, have I committed a felony?

      If your friends deny the use of Main Street to other motorists, you can expect to be hit with at least a misdemeanor charge for being a public nuisance. Operating a motorcade with out a permit and "cruising" too, if laws against those behaviors exist in your town and the police who trace the activity back to you want to send a message.

      It's common sense. "Take a penny" trays don't give you the right to reach over and empty the register, and neither does granting of access to any other resource give you the right to hoard and abuse an unreasonable share of that resource.

    13. Re:must be more zero tolerance by bogd · · Score: 1
      And "the first brave soul in slashdot" is an Anonymous Coward.

      Just another /. paradox... :P

    14. Re:must be more zero tolerance by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      It was probably the kid posing as an AC. If he shot his mouth off in a chat room, he would make an excellant AC on Slashdot. :P

    15. Re:must be more zero tolerance by User+956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Michael said it was a joke," Forchione said. "We showed him how we deal with this kind of joke."

      Yes. They deal with this kind of joke by wasting actual public resources (police, prosecutor, court staff, et cetera). Splendid.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    16. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell,

      Doing F-5 on /. is normal, no?

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    17. Re:must be more zero tolerance by DarkClown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, this 'kid' is 18, as in he's an adult legal record wise, so if he's found guilty, and then say gets deferred adjudication he will still have a felony arrest on his record for life.
      Pretty whack.

    18. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Schickie · · Score: 0
      This is a far too reasonable response for \.

      You must be a fascist infiltrator.

    19. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      If anyone wants to try and reach the kid (Michael Stone) to offer support, the Stark County Jail's contact info is:

      4500 Atlantic Blvd. NE
      Canton, OH 44705
      Phone: 330-430-3850
      Fax: 330-430-3839
      Sherriff W. Bruce Umpleby

      I can't find the boy's home phone to leave support messages there, although the article mentions that his address is:

      13634 Mogadore Ave N.W.
      Canton, OH (44685? Google maps finds the address, but USPS's site doesn't)

      Which is a nice looking suburban home:

      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=13634+Moga dore+Ave.+NW.,+Canton,+OH&btnG=Search&ll=40.95199, -81.39827&spn=0.005348,0.013465&t=k

      --
      South Park pokes fun at sacred cows to make a point. Family guy pokes cows to hear them moo.
    20. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1, Informative

      LAKE HIGH SCHOOL

      HOME OF THE FLYERS

      Victory Bell at Flyer Stadium

      "The Mission of Lake High School, a challenging, caring, and safe learning environment, is to empower students to achieve their full potential for intellectual and personal growth, by providing a variety of excellent opportunities and services in partnership with our community."

      Lake High School

      28080 Lemoyne Rd.

      Millbury, OH 43447

      Phone: (419) 661-6640

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    21. Re:must be more zero tolerance by TBone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not a "zero tolerance" issue, the kid, in a low-tech, manual way, instigated a Distributed Denial of Service attack against his school's computers.

      The only difference here is this kid used a bunch of friend's fingers on the F5 key instead of a BotNet to get the job done.

      --

      This space for rent. Call 1-800-STEAK4U

    22. Re:must be more zero tolerance by el+americano · · Score: 1

      This prosecutor needs to be smacked.

      Amen to that. How often I see police and prosecuters get this "we showed him" attitude after abusing their authority. They're only big fish in their small pond.

      I'm also wondering how anyone can claim DDOS with a server that weak. If it's something that could happen with normal usage, then give me a break. The kid didn't conduct a wide-spread campaign, just a single website mentioned on a single IRC channel. It really was a joke to say that the site would crash, because it wouldn't - and didn't. Furthermore, if service was only slowed, not denied, then what are people going on about?

      As a general rule, I'd say if it wasn't automated, it's not an attack.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    23. Re:must be more zero tolerance by metternich · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know gouys, They might just use the /.ing of the site as evidence against him in the trial.

      See how destructive his actions were, your honor. The school's servers were down for days.

      --
      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
    24. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google maps finds the address, but USPS's site doesn't

      Well, what you're doing (coverting from an address to a map location) is called geocoding and it isn't quite an exact science. local.live.com points the same address to a location a ways south on the same road. So the house you're seeing is quite possibly not his at all. Oftentimes, the only data to go on is a start address and end address for a long section of road. Then interpolation is used in the middle. So take that stuff with a grain of salt.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    25. Re:must be more zero tolerance by MikeFM · · Score: 1, Funny

      Great, I now have my scripts bitch slapping their server 24/7. Nothing these dick wads don't deserve. I hope someone donates a lawyer to the kids cause.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    26. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the kid could have a case on the grounds of Brandenburg v. Ohio. His speech could only be illegal if it was directed to inciting and likely to incite imminent lawless action. In the case, Brandenburg was a KKK leader who invited a reporter to come see a clan meeting. The reporter taped him referenced the possibility of "revenge" against blacks and jews, and hostilly announced a march on congress. He was charged and convicted with trying to incite violent action, and the courts reaffirmed it, up to the Supreme Court which overturned it under the "intent", "imminence" and "likelyhood" standard for the inciting of lawless behavior.

      1) The kid denies intent. That might be a hard sell, but it has potential.

      2) Imminence and likelyhood: did any other kids even care about the site? Did anyone follow through? Quickly? That could be a show stopper right there.

      --
      South Park pokes fun at sacred cows to make a point. Family guy pokes cows to hear them moo.
    27. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Aeiri · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's common sense. "Take a penny" trays don't give you the right to reach over and empty the register, and neither does granting of access to any other resource give you the right to hoard and abuse an unreasonable share of that resource.

      It's also common sense that your analogy doesn't work. If you are driving up and down on the public road, and "hoard and abuse an unreasonable share of that resource", you are driving up and down on the road all day. If you take a penny, and "hoard and abuse an unreasonable share of that resource", you are taking all the pennies in the tray, not taking from the register.

      Taking from the register in this case is like driving around on someone's private property, not on public property. The gas station never said you could touch the register whatsoever, but the tray they said you could. Likewise, the private property owner never said you could drive around on his property, but the public property is okay.

    28. Re:must be more zero tolerance by floamy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Suburban? Maybe Sub-suburban. I see a lot of fields. Probably would explain the local redneck cops having no clue.

    29. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That does look like a nice house. It has what appears to be an olympic sized swimming pool, too!

    30. Re:must be more zero tolerance by superdominican · · Score: 4, Funny

      This story is very important. Slashdot should follow for the next few months. Make sure the URL is posted during that time so that we can be kept up to date on what their side of teh story is.

    31. Re:must be more zero tolerance by aplusjimages · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think they took it down. Now I can't see whats for lunch on Monday.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    32. Re:must be more zero tolerance by oc-beta · · Score: 1

      Awsome heh, one click at a time. /.'d for a good reason.

    33. Re:must be more zero tolerance by mindaktiviti · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tried your link but it didn't work, so then I tried refreshing a bunch of times but it still didn't work! :(

    34. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, slashdotted and streisanded in the same day...

    35. Re:must be more zero tolerance by ABaumann · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, I think it's just the opposite.

      "It couldn't possibly be him. He was in jail at the time of the second attack."

    36. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't they use zero tolerance against script kiddies who initiate REAL DDoS attacks, instead of this half-assed attempt? That would send a better message.

    37. Re:must be more zero tolerance by jimicus · · Score: 4, Funny

      It really was a joke to say that the site would crash, because it wouldn't - and didn't.

      Until it was slashdotted.

    38. Re:must be more zero tolerance by symbolic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That server (or those servers) are getting a real workout - this was also on digg a bit earlier.

    39. Re:must be more zero tolerance by chphilli · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow - you saw how much trouble this kid is in for refreshing his school's website, now you're trying to Snail-Slash the Stark county jail? You're brave!

      --
      Please ignore any obvious problems in this post.
    40. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Feyr · · Score: 1

      this wouldn't hold up, but they can use it as a refutation

      "your honor, the defendant rightfully linked to the school's website. but as evidenced by the second wave of traffic, the school servers were simply not up to the task they were intended for, my client should be found innocent as he merely linked to a site, which is the internet*'s primary purpose and its intended purpose"

      can you see the judge ruling the internet an "illegal tool" as a whole? i don't :)

      *yes i know, it's not. but lets not confuse the judge here

    41. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the current COTD at the bottom of the page is quite fitting for this discussion:

      The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.

      0wn3d.

    42. Re:must be more zero tolerance by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      Sounds like the kid was actually busted for encouraging people to wilfully impede the operations of a legitimate government enterprise.

      If he'd encouraged his fellow to cut off UPS trucks and drive real slow, to prevent them from completing their rounds on time, UPS would sue, and with good reason.

      If he'd encouraged his classmates to camp out in front of the Sherrif's intake gate at the local courthouse, for the purpose of inhibiting the in-processing of prisoners for their trials, he'd be arrested for sure, and probably not on a misdemeanor count, either.

      This isn't "felony for refreshing a webpage" at all. It's "felony for promoting the wilful obstruction of the government in the discharge of its obligations to its citizens". Seems about right to me.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    43. Re:must be more zero tolerance by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That explains it right there. The prosecutor is just grandstanding; trying to look progressive by "fighting cybercrime". I don't think he has the slightest clue what an ass he will look like once this filters throught the national news. The taxpayers probably won't appreciate his waste of public resources either. In fact, I think the kid's family will probably succeed with a malicious prosecution lawsuit and get a settlement for "unspecified damages".

    44. Re:must be more zero tolerance by CowsAnonymous · · Score: 1

      > http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/hs/

      > this one?

      Wow, those kids hitting F5 must've really done a number on that server! It's still down!

      --
      CowsAnonymous: We're here to help moo.
    45. Re:must be more zero tolerance by m-wielgo · · Score: 1

      In Tempe, AZ, on S. Mill Ave, they have street signs posted that say "No Cruising" (or joyriding... one of them. you can't just circle up and down the street according to it)

    46. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've been ./'d already. Is this a crime? :-)

      I dunno... ask digg or fark. They've had this story running for over 9 hours now.

    47. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Headcase88 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a very valuable page. No wonder the school and police were after this fellow. He wasn't just taking some lousy page that no one read in the last 3 months temporarily out of service, he was trying to stop students from "achiev[ing] their full potential for intellectual and personal growth". Clearly, he had to be stopped before he went on to more illustrious crimes like overwhelming the server that powers the site about sidetalking.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    48. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're required to get a permit for a public gathering over a certain size in almost every city in the US (and probably the world).

    49. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In Tempe, AZ, on S. Mill Ave, they have street signs posted that say "No Cruising"

      Damn, those Arizonans(sp?) are homophobic!

    50. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Brent_Litzer · · Score: 1

      So.....IF I told everyone on slashdot to make the school their homepage for 2006(cause it's a really great site), would I be a felon or a hero for helping them promote the site?

      --
      - Just because you can't, doesn't mean you shouldn't
    51. Re:must be more zero tolerance by lewp · · Score: 1

      Were you just dissin' sidetalking?

      It's on.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    52. Re:must be more zero tolerance by rhacquer · · Score: 1

      Need to bump the post from below!

      ============

      Canton Law Dept page
      (Score:5, Informative)
      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 06, @05:22PM (#14412581)
      Since the school's site is already DDoS'd, here is the Canton Law Dept [ http://www.cityofcanton.com/citygov/lawdept/ ]. Let's see how fast we can take the prosecutor down.
      ============

    53. Re:must be more zero tolerance by mctk · · Score: 1

      It depends on who your friends are...

      --
      Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    54. Re:must be more zero tolerance by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      kinda like organizing a group of people who will be filling up their cart at walmart and then abandoning it in the isle?

      http://www.organicconsumers.org/btc/walmart11.cfm

      if they're not advocating breaking the law, and are not breaking the law, then they're merely protesting in a civil manner. nothing there to go to jail over. if i can organize a bunch of people to start driving the speed limit during rush hour, it's going to annoy a lot of people, and maybe if they hear the reason we're driving that way, they'll take notice. but there's nothing illegal about that.

      having a group of people refresh a web page (slashdotting) not obstruction of the government. if they advocated for the people to break into the servers, that's a different story. (though while many courts would probably find them guilty for breaking into the computers, some might argue that they were merely taking advantage of the public api that was made freely available).

      it's quite a shame that after 200 years we still need to fight daily for our civil liberties, and protect ourselves against the injustices caused by arrogant officers and prosecuters.

    55. Re:must be more zero tolerance by BrainDebugged · · Score: 1

      My friends and I used to do this to the lunchpage at our high school. It was something fun and retarded to do in class, seeing how high we could get that little counter at the bottom of the page. We managed to trip it over a few times, (I think it was after a million hits). Well, one day in my programming class I was doing this and I received a NetSend message from our administrator which read,

      "Please stop stealing my bandwidth ;-)"

      Smiley face and all. The fact that he knew who I was, where I was, and could take it to the administration was enough to make me stop playing the refresher game again. Plus the winking smiley face he used weirded me out a bit.

    56. Re:must be more zero tolerance by gQuigs · · Score: 1
    57. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      What if you were a parent or non 133t kid and actually needed to visit that www page?

      So, is it a right to DOS a poor school webserver probably maintained by some students or already overworking computer teacher?

      YRO?

    58. Re:must be more zero tolerance by chrpai · · Score: 1

      Don't blame the school, blame the over zealous city atty.

      Maybe we should all visit him over at:

      http://www.cityofcanton.com/citygov/lawdept/crimin al.html

    59. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Firehed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If refreshing is a felony, what does a slashdotting and being dugg count for then? I'm thinking whatever a DDOS gets you, by their standards. No wonder prisons are overcrowded.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    60. Re:must be more zero tolerance by mazarin5 · · Score: 1
      --
      Fnord.
    61. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just a traffic violation.

      http://library2.municode.com/mcc/home.htm?infobase =10122&doc_method=cleardoc, scroll to Sec. 21-259

      Every city has weird laws like this. If they want to nail the kid, there's a good bet they'll find SOMETHING to pin on him.

    62. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kid must also have hacked the site. All I see is a page telling me to check the web address and reload the page...

    63. Re:must be more zero tolerance by dogbreathcanada · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does this mean we're all going to be charged with a felony too?

    64. Re:must be more zero tolerance by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would think that one criteria you didn't list would be even more significant to this case: inciting imminent lawless action.

      Since when is it "lawless action" to reload a web page with the refresh button? Is a person "incit[ing] imminent lawless action" if they ask a bunch of friends to call the school's main office (for example)? Why should that be any different? If it was illegal to call the office (or load the web page) then this would make sense, but those actions are not illegal at present. How can it be a felony to incite lawful action?

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    65. Re:must be more zero tolerance by dogbreathcanada · · Score: 1
    66. Re:must be more zero tolerance by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      The same cafeteria lunch as every other Monday: green-meat-surprise sandwich with wilted lettuce, mac-and-cheese, and a fruit cup for dessert. (I'm assuming nothing has changed over the years.)

    67. Re:must be more zero tolerance by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I am er, very glad that I wasx drunk when I clocked tat link. It made soem sense. I bet tnat tomorrow when I see it, it wil make little sense. Good timinh.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    68. Re:must be more zero tolerance by ingoldsby · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh...

      Unable to connect
      Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at lake.stark.k12.oh.us.

      * The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments.

      * If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.

      * If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.

    69. Re:must be more zero tolerance by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      I really like the way this thing went... charge someone for something stupid, be unlucky enough for the story to make some waves and moments later, be flooded by the backlash.

      Hopefully, this will be enough for the school to realize its uber-stupid mistake and for that case to be thrown out.

    70. Re:must be more zero tolerance by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Lake High School
      28080 Lemoyne Rd.
      Millbury, OH 43447
      Phone: (419) 661-6640


      I'm curious. By posting an address and phone number, are you suggesting that we give them a manual Slashdotting?

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    71. Re:must be more zero tolerance by cbirkett · · Score: 1

      Backslashdot, eh?

      --
      "My fellow Americans, these are not the droids the nation is looking for."
    72. Re:must be more zero tolerance by sploxx · · Score: 1

      If I tell all my friends to drive up and down mainstreet a thousand times a day to wear down the pavement, have I committed a felony?

      Instead of bad analogies, how about a little reality for those over-important IT folks, huh?

      The school 'suffered' more hits and a 'clogged' line to the ISP, partly because of the guy's action and the slashdotting following.
      First, the /.ing probably amounts to more than 100x the traffic he and his friends produced - so the school made the situation much worse than it would be.
      Second, what exactly is the physical damage here? Only a little more waste heat has been produced by the routers and computers involved in this. Maybe the amount of energy the food in my fridge releases when burned. WOW.

    73. Re:must be more zero tolerance by el+americano · · Score: 1
      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    74. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    75. Re:must be more zero tolerance by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe if you design a mod for GTA that involves sodomizing a high school student in a small cement room with barred windows, Jack Thompson will donate his legal services.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    76. Re:must be more zero tolerance by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Since when is encouraging people to participate in a DDOS attack on a government server, for the purpose of preventing that server from performing its intended function, not a crime?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    77. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      Amen! x)

    78. Re:must be more zero tolerance by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes the good old book thrown at this criminal

      Date Docket Entry
      01-06-2006 COPIES OF COMPLAINT SERVED ON DEFENDANT AND DEFENDANT APPEARRED AND ADVISED OF
                                      CHARGES PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 01-12-2006 @ 3:15 PM
      01-06-2006 ON THIS DAY THE DEFENDANT APPEARED WITH 20850-JOHN GIUA ATTORNEY OF RECORD
      01-05-2006 BOND POSTED $2,500.00 UNSECURED WITH SUPERVISION OF PTS DUE TO EMERGENCY
                                      RELEASE ON 01-04-2006
      01-05-2006 ARRAIGNMENT SET FOR 01-06-2006 @ 9:00 AM
      01-05-2006 DEFENDANT ARRESTED ON WARRANT 01-04-2006. TRANSFERRED TO STARK COUNTY JAIL IN
                                      LIEU BOND. FORM 8 FILED
      01-04-2006 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND. REFER TO BOND SCHEDULE FOR BOND INFORMATION BY JUDGE
                                      RICHARD J. KUBILUS
      01-04-2006 DEFENDANT'S PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FORM FILED AND ISSUED
      01-04-2006 WARRANT ISSUED ON 01/04/2006; (UNTWN)
      01-04-2006 2909.04 (F4) - DISRUPTING PUBLIC SERVICES COMPLAINT FILED

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    79. Re:must be more zero tolerance by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The point is that this kid really committed any kind of felony. Mischieve that does no long-term harm, costs no real substantial amounts of money, and is based solely off the kid saying "yeah, make sure to hit refresh guys" is hard to even see in the misdemeanor category.

      Is it me, or are school administrations and school boards in the US being populated more and more frequently with the kind of people who don't seem to have actually graduated?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    80. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Furmy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    81. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Does this mean I'm going to be charged with a felony? I can't wait for the extradition hearing?

      30,000 nerds in jail? Naw, just give us a computer and we probably wouldn't even know the difference. Just don't bend over if you drop the soap, which we probably don't use anyhow :-)

    82. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Welcome to slashdot, not only do we do your job 100 times better for you, we also stalk you so we can slip into your life seemlessly..

      Seriously, you're going WAY beyond the "sane" limit here. It's kinda scary that you want his phone number and have his address..

      --
      I like muppets.
    83. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If I tell all my friends to drive up and down mainstreet a thousand times a day to wear down the pavement, have I committed a felony?

      It is a misdimeanor if you are skinny, but a felony if you are chubby.

    84. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schools are known for overreacting. I know one that has a no drug tolerance policy and to show they meant business expelled a young girl, who for obvious reasons (i.e. puberty), had a Tylenol.

      Yeah, they showed all the dope smokers who was boss with that one.

    85. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... Living 30 minutes down the road, in Lovely Akron Ohio,I can tell you that if the home is in Canton (Home of the Pro Football Hall of fame, and countless empty buildings!!!), it is not a nice home...

    86. Re:must be more zero tolerance by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      How can it be a felony to incite lawful action?

      The effect of your action matters. If I call you once, it's legal. If I call you thirty times a day just to be a dick, it's harrassment. And if I ask 30 friends to call you once a day, it still should be harrassment.

    87. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      They graduated with flying colors, because they love authoritarianism. This is why they go on to perpetuate more of it.

    88. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.lakelocal.k12.oh.us/lhshome.htm is still up... They just removed www from the dns

    89. Re:must be more zero tolerance by hjf · · Score: 0

      oh what a lovely asshole. are you sure you understand the difference between a DDoS (thousands of computers throwing ALL their capacity, hundreds of packets per second, per machine at a single server), and the "manual way" (a few kids hitting F5 about 10 times a second)? anyways you should have a little bit of you priorities checked. if you think that someone deserves to go to jail for recomending people to "take down" a website manually (the equivalent of 10 people pushing a brick wall as hard as they can to take it down...), then this world is not the place for you. the world is as screwed as it is because of people like you: people who voted for bush twice. quoting maddox, the pirate: I HOPE YOU CHOKE.

    90. Re:must be more zero tolerance by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      It has been done before.

      But that would be *wrong*. :)

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    91. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yes. They deal with this kind of joke by wasting actual public resources (police, prosecutor, court staff, et cetera). Splendid."

      Yes indeed. They are bored. There's no real crime, despite the hype and fear in the media and all over shows on television. So they do what they always have done, harrass and intimidate local kids. Shouldn't the prosecuters be prosecuted for wasting public resources? Anyways, they did a great job, this one totally blew up in their face. Probably people posting the link all over the place in blogs and chat rooms now just to spite them. If they actually go through with charging this kid with a felony, or even if they offer a plea bargain to misdemenor over this situation, that would be criminal in my book.

      Next thing you know the "keep off grass" sign will include an implicit agreement that violators will be shot on sight. It makes me proud to be a freedom loving American in the land of liberty and freedom, where we're free... and stuff. *cough*

    92. Re:must be more zero tolerance by chrpai · · Score: 1

      Hmm, this one is still working...

      http://www.stark.k12.oh.us/

    93. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "I asked for a car, I got a computer. How's that for being born under a bad sign?"

      My plan worked perfectly.

      http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ferris_Bueller's_Day_ Off

      Yours truly,
      Ferris Bueller

    94. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anywhere else in the world they'd just suspend him, and tell his parents why there son's not going to school for a month.

      Guess at any rate it's a huge smack of bad publicity for the school, well done :)

    95. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow, that makes you sound SO intellergent and interlectuall!!!! I mean, thats great, how you see that there is some open land, and then make a joke about Rednecks!!! That really shows your wit!!! I live about half an hour away from there in a suburb of Akron. I mean, that's sooooo funny. It makes you sound sooooo smart and cosmopolitan to insult semi-rural places!!!!!!!

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    96. Re:must be more zero tolerance by thisislee · · Score: 1

      hmm the site is down............ oops

    97. Re:must be more zero tolerance by scotch · · Score: 1

      Since December 15, 1791 when the bill of rights was passed. HTH.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    98. Re:must be more zero tolerance by mhearne · · Score: 1

      The site's offline now, although the Schools main page is still up. I'll bet a shiny new dime this site gets passworded over the weekend.

      Hard to beleive how far zero tolerance has gone. I wonder if they expell the girls for having midol in their purses as well?

      It may have been a poorly thought out prank, but surely not a felony!

      Michael

    99. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should have zero tolerance on stupidity.

    100. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally I have a use for this extension

    101. Re:must be more zero tolerance by piper-noiter · · Score: 1

      I clicked the link. I'm a felon!

      Mom would be so proud. :)

      --
      Shick's Law: There is no problem a good miracle can't solve.
    102. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful
      the school servers were simply not up to the task they were intended for,

      You know, if the school was trying to run a version of /. on their servers to provide a discussion forum for tens of thousands of people around the world, you'd be right.

      I doubt that is what the web server was intended to be doing, however. It was probably intended to provide information to local parents and students and people moving to the area.

      To pretend that anyone who wants to run a webserver needs to have the amount of hardware and bandwidth that /. uses just so it can do "the task [they] were intended for" is silly.

      ... as he merely linked to a site,

      Read the article. He did not "merely link" to a site. He created a link with an explicit request for people to repeatedly refresh the page with the intent to crash the school's site. It's a static page, so repeatedly refreshing it serves no purpose other than create needless page requests and services, which was his intent. And he got caught. Good.

      If it happened to a server you ran, you'd call it "denial of service". When it happens to someone else, it's "just the way the internet is supposed to work". Right.

    103. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Suburban? Maybe Sub-suburban. I see a lot of fields. Probably would explain the local redneck cops having no clue.

      What are you, 15 years old?

      I am surrounded by many fields and forest, and CPAs, lawyers, doctors and business owners. I'm the closest thing to a redneck for miles.

      Population density != intellegence. Thank you for proving this point.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    104. Re:must be more zero tolerance by HexRei · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, doing it yourself, but encouraging others to do so is also a crime? Then Abby Hoffman should be guilty of many crimes just for writing "Steal This Book".

    105. Re:must be more zero tolerance by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Uniontown PD takes bad behavior in others very seriously. They're a little fuzzy on their own behavior, though. They were recently fined $400,000 for an astonishing string of events, including

      [Police Chief] Wolf swore at [their only female officer] in public, including one incident Feb. 27 in which he pulled into a gas station in a ``sweat suit and slippers, (and) began to scream profanities at [the officer] while spitting in her face.''

      http://www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/2005/12/17/news/13429 761.htm

    106. Re:must be more zero tolerance by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

      Already down. Firefox claims it can't establish a connection.

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
    107. Re:must be more zero tolerance by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      Population density != intellegence.
      'nuff said.

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    108. Re:must be more zero tolerance by eliasen · · Score: 1

      " In the first place God made idiots. This was for practice. Then he made School Boards." --Mark Twain

      --
      Make your computer ten thousand times larger--try Frink
    109. Re:must be more zero tolerance by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      Wow, that makes you sound SO intellergent and interlectuall!!!! [...] I live about half an hour away from there in a suburb of Akron. [...] It makes you sound sooooo smart and cosmopolitan to insult semi-rural places!!!!!!!
      Well, living there does definitely not seem to help your spelling.

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    110. Re:must be more zero tolerance by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Still, those 30 friends should bear most (possibly all) of the responsibility, since they're the ones actually calling me. You haven't actually done anything to me. Either way, taking you (or them) to court isn't going to resolve any personal differences between us. We'd both be better off if I found out why you had all your friends try to annoy me, and fixed that instead. If it can't be fixed (which is quite rare), I can always stop answering the phone. Jumping straight to coercion (e.g. lawsuits) is how wars get started...

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    111. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you HAVE to checkout the lesson plan for provided by their compsci teacher Tansel:
      http://www.lakelocal.k12.oh.us/tansel.htm
      (HINT: Look at Monday's "Pirates of Silicon Valley")

      BTW, presentations on you life on Friday. Don't forget!!!

    112. Re:must be more zero tolerance by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      Slashdupe will take care of that anyways.

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    113. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm- Sarcasm. Get it? After being called a redneck, the poster makes deliberate spelling errors...

    114. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Upsilon+Andromedea · · Score: 1

      So does this mean that flushing all the toilets concurrently in a large building is a felony?

      --
      freeman
    115. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Steepe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Population density != intellegence

      Actually I have found the reverse to be true, to a point. With a dense population, you have more stupid people per square block.

      --
      Just three more hours seapeople and you can finally take me away from this crappy God Damned planet full of hippies
    116. Re:must be more zero tolerance by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

      I can't find the boy's home phone to leave support messages there, although the article mentions that his address is:

      No, you got it all wrong. The place to leave "support" messages is the school administrator's home phone. :-)

    117. Re:must be more zero tolerance by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

      A more basic question is whether he incided lawless behavior at all; is reloading a web page against the law now?

    118. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      But if you break in to the bank to change how much money they think you have, that's only a misdemeanor.

    119. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU, kike.

    120. Re:must be more zero tolerance by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      So DDOS attacks aren't crimes?

      Does the Bill of Rights also invalidate all those convictions of "obstruction of justice" that have been handed down over the years?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    121. Re:must be more zero tolerance by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      i'm just curious which law it does violate?

      it's all a perception of intent. maybe it's not our socialistic way, but i believe that intent has no place in law. i believe it can be considered in the punishment, but not in the law. laws should not be grey, but black and white. the slashdot effect is certainly a ddos, and one could argue that by posting this story on /. that it was intentionally denying the services of the government server. certainly a reasonable person would assume that a small government server would not survive the /. effect. i'd be surprised if any of the commercial business sites i've worked on would survive the /. effect.

      the link i posted originally showed that the group in alaska had intentions to financially harm a merchant by causing extra hardship on them. certainly this would be a crime according to the intent standards? but if one person is shopping around the store and notices they left their wallet at home, and does not want to use a lay-a-way service, they just leave their cart and walk away. that causes the same hardship on the merchant,on a smaller scale, but still the same proportionally. should that be a crime? of course not, the merchant takes a risk by allowing people to freely wander the premises. i've seen many gas stations that allow only two people at a time in the store.

      along that same premise, if someone runs a stop sign and hits another vehicle, killing another person, they are guilty of murder. their intent should only come into play when sentencing arrives. it's a risk you take for driving, and for missing a stop sign.

      anyway...

    122. Re:must be more zero tolerance by TWoodham · · Score: 1

      Witness the firepower of a fully armed and operational slashdotting!!

      As well as Farked, Google Newsed, Digged, Delicioused, blogged, newspapered, Drudged...

      I'm no doctor, but I think it's dead...

      --
      THINK! It's not illegal...yet.
    123. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Arcturax · · Score: 1

      Ok but it's not a felony by any stretch of the imagination, or it shouldn't be. But then I guess taking away his gun and voting rights is great civics lession in the current nazification of the country isn't it?

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    124. Re:must be more zero tolerance by MadAhab · · Score: 1

      damn, if i had mod points, i'd give that +10 underrated. t'old diagonal argument.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    125. Re:must be more zero tolerance by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Our law has always made a clear and intuitive distinction between unfortunate accidents of varying degrees and actions take with intent to bring harm.

      You would make an exception for DDOS attacks that is not made anywhere else in our criminal code.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    126. Re:must be more zero tolerance by scotch · · Score: 1

      There is no DDOS. This is a social phenomenon that is (thankfully) not illegal. In order for the accused to be guilty of enticing others to commit a crime, there must be a crime that the others are committing. What is the crime the others are committing? Each of them could not be accused of a DDOS - it's laughable to consider one person hitting a reload to be a DDOS. So where is the crime? That you are so ready to allow speech to equate to a felony, even where there is no demonstratable crime or enticement, is scary indeed. Think about what you are arguing for.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    127. Re:must be more zero tolerance by scotch · · Score: 1
      No but unless you are arguing that this case is an obstruction of justice, which it isn't, your point has no bearing on the legality of his actions. The fact that one exception to the absolute right of free speech has been granted by the court does not make all such categorical exceptions permissible. In the absense of clear legal precedence, the right to free speech trumps any such claims the executive branch makes to those rights. What is the legal precendence for treating this man's speech as a crime? People like you are why the government finds it so easy to abridge freedoms when they feel it appropriate (e.g. patriot act, domestic spying, etc). There's always some lackey like you to champion their cause.

      This man was charged a felony for his speech!! There better damn well be a whole ton of harm from this speech before I'll admit there is legal justification for outlawing his speech. Where is the harm? What crime did he enitice?

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    128. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 2, Informative

      Starting nmap 3.83.DC13 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-01-07 00:06 EST
      Interesting ports on 66.144.97.98:
      (The 1665 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered)
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      80/tcp closed http
      110/tcp open pop3

      Interesting. Look like they just shut down HTTP.
      Guess they are waiting for this to blow over.
      I mean - it could just be on different machines, or have crashed the server, but POP was still quite responsive.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    129. Re:must be more zero tolerance by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      here's the lunch menu and apparently they haven't updated the menu since september. So why punish this kid for a site no one updated?

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    130. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      ... I mean, crashed the web server but not the pop mail server - still think it is more likely they are ducking and covering for now.
      Also.
      +OK lake.stark.k12.oh.us Cyrus POP3 v2.2.12-OS X 10.4.0 server ready

      OS X 10.4 - that's kind of neat
      Fortunately their version of Cyrus is fairly up to date - some old ones had some fairly serious security holes - I think 2.2.12 is probably ok.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    131. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      GOOGLE LOOK UP

      Forchione Frank G Atty - 0.1 miles E - National City Bank B, Canton, 44702 - (330) 453-7676
      Forchione, Frank G Atty: Res - 3.5 miles N - 4601 Logan Ave NW, Canton, 44709 - (330) 305-0084 /body

    132. Re:must be more zero tolerance by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      True. I know a number of professors who live off in what I would believe to be a fairly rural area.

      When John Stewart came to my campus, he commented that he didn't see anything for miles that he couldn't milk.

    133. Re:must be more zero tolerance by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1
    134. Re:must be more zero tolerance by gertsenl · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. It wasn't lawless action that he was inciting, so it already doesn't meet the standard set by the court case. My 2 cents.

      --
      --Leo
    135. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Pasc · · Score: 1

      It would be a civil suit... not a felony. BIG difference.

    136. Re:must be more zero tolerance by ClydeWJones · · Score: 1

      Apparantly USPS believes he's in Uniontown: 13634 MOGADORE AVE NW UNIONTOWN OH 44685-9372

    137. Re:must be more zero tolerance by True+Grit · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, No, there's no "think" in there, and you forgot "Jim".

    138. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, this will be enough for the school to realize its uber-stupid mistake and for that case to be thrown out.

      More likely this will be used as "proof" of the extent and seriousness of the damage done when they argue for a harsh sentence.

    139. Re:must be more zero tolerance by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Which would be a civil suit? Preventing UPS drivers from completing their rounds and thus costing the company money and possibly putting it in breach of contract with its customers? I'd wager that's a criminal offense.

      Obstructing the local Sheriff's department? Again, probably gonna be a criminal offense.

      I'm not sure you can interfere with legitimate government business and have it be a civil suit kinda thing, really. Messing with the government tends to be a criminal thing, every time.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    140. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Jafar00 · · Score: 1

      Hahah Nice one. It's been well and truly Slashdotted. It's been knocked off line hehe :D

      --
      RebateFX.com - Spread rebates for Forex traders
    141. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. There was an intent here to harm the property of others. If you find out that your garage door opener causes your neighbors satellite to go out when used, then it would be a crime to intentionally open and close your door over and over and over again. Whether it is a felony or not is debatable, but anytime you try to cause harm to someone else or their property, it is a crime. Now, if he had just tried refreshing to see what it does, that is one thing. Refreshing because you want to do harm is another.

    142. Re:must be more zero tolerance by MntlChaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fair enough. He encouraged others to do something which would harm the school district. So is organizing a massive write-in or phone-in campaign. It ties up resources for the target in all cases, but is still legal. The one exception to this is with regard to faxes (junk fax laws). It's up to the target to respond accordingly. He has the right to ask people to join in his campaign. Those people have a right to join him. Is he an asshole? absolutely. But dealing with assholes is a part of the cost of a free society.

    143. Re:must be more zero tolerance by tqft · · Score: 1

      So when does organising mas access to a public resource to cause a nuisance become an offence?

      All those people who encourage people to write to politicians - when does that cross the line?

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    144. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been noted that the sidetalking never went down, even at the height of its popularity when it was linked from slashdot and a number of other sites besides. Makes one wonder who is it that was paying their bandwidth and server bills, especially since the site does not say. To me, this looks like a hugely successful viral marketing campaign by a competitor. Not that I mind, the pictures on the site really are hilarious!

    145. Re:must be more zero tolerance by mrjb · · Score: 1

      Now I'm not saying you all should do this (wouldn't want to be charged with felony), but imagine the power of a *REFRESHING* slashdot crowd!

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    146. Re:must be more zero tolerance by trewornan · · Score: 1

      Jeff Wendorf, Lake High School, 1025 Lake Center Street, Uniontown, OH 44685, 330-877-4282.

    147. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Information+Architec · · Score: 1

      Shucks, the server's down...do we get a "get out of jail free" card?

    148. Re:must be more zero tolerance by trewornan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Home:

      Jeff Wendorf
      1602 Cornerstone St SW
      Hartville, OH 44632-8913
      (330) 877-0468

    149. Re:must be more zero tolerance by gmby · · Score: 1

      Is'nt there some laws against a school publishing students information?
      Or is he a criminal to be scorned and ridiculed. Maybe we should put him in the City Square and Stone Him!

      I say the carelessness of this school should be carefully investigated to make the children safe. Not all /.'ers (and other sites this hosting this story) are interested in "helping" this child. Some are perverts!

      This school needs it's priorities shifted!

      --
      I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
    150. Re:must be more zero tolerance by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      In Everett, WA you don't even have to tell your friends. Simply "Cruising" can land you a 200 dollar fine.

    151. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Schickie · · Score: 0

      Think about it, Error 404.

    152. Re:must be more zero tolerance by carl0ski · · Score: 1

      contiuously refreshing a page and summoning assistance from others in order to slow down a network can be linked to two illegal activities.

      DOS - Denial of Service attacks

      and

      Spam

    153. Re:must be more zero tolerance by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      "More likely this will be used as "proof" of the extent and seriousness of the damage done when they argue for a harsh sentence."

      Agreed. What we need are email addresses, and slashdot their mail server with polite, articulate, individual expressions of concern over their vapiditity.

    154. Re:must be more zero tolerance by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      You mean, "don't bend over if you drop your flashram".

    155. Re:must be more zero tolerance by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      If the kid is guilty of posting and thereby causing a denial of service, is their negligence somewhere in the curiosity of the public? Should we stop the media from publishing stupid acts for fear that people might go look and laugh? Could the negligence be a school that would rather have a student arrested than have their administrator block incoming requests refered from a single website? Sounds to me like an administrator is playing "now I've got you, you son of a bitch" which a child under their care. Can you say "fiduciary" ? I knew you could! But can they?

    156. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Schickie · · Score: 0
      924334's score for 14413635 reconfirms the validity of my New Year's resolution:

      "Discover what /. moderators are smoking and have it banned" ... after I get a kilo or two.

    157. Re:must be more zero tolerance by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In the UK, wasting police time is a criminal offence. Perhaps there is a similar law in this jurisdiction that could be used?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    158. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Stachybotris · · Score: 1

      I submitted this story with the school's URL in the summary... In either case, what's worse is that the four students who 'hacked' into the school's server to change their grades were only charged with Misdemeanors.

    159. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Rinkhals · · Score: 1

      But dealing with assholes is a part of the cost of a free society.

      Yes. And, Boy! do you know how to deal with them!

      Does he face the death penalty?

      --
      "I'm a snake if we disagree"-Jethro Tull, Bungle in the Jungle
    160. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      The guy's clearly a townie. If only he could see the peoplein the countryside(where I'am), can't stand townies for their fashion obsessed trinket filld lives.. :/

      --
      I like muppets.
    161. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not waste if you're the one administering the whole thing (and spending other people's money). Refer to public education, which spends more money on administration than everything else (books, teachers, etc) combined.

    162. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Caiwyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He encouraged others to do something which would harm the school district. So is organizing a massive write-in or phone-in campaign. It ties up resources for the target in all cases, but is still legal.

      And that's exactly where the similarities end. A write-in or phone-in campaign is protected free speech, and has an explicit goal which is stated in the act itself. Your reference to "harm" being done to the district is dubious at best -- that is not the intended goal of such a campaign.

      This kid's actions were not "speech" in any form, and did not have an explicit goal other than to directly harm the district. If another goal was intended, it is not stated in the act itself.

      Grandparent poster is right. This kid pulled an easy denial-of-service attack. He SAID as much when he posted the link to the school's website and asked people to try to crash it.

      You will find that most crime requires both execution and intent. That's why refreshing a webpage as a matter of course isn't illegal, but doing so in an attempt to take down a web server is. It's also why "manslaughter" and "homicide" are separate criminal acts.

    163. Re:must be more zero tolerance by aaronl · · Score: 1

      Except nobody called anybody, and your analogy has no relation. This was an automated system response to a computer generated query.

      Would it be illegal for you to convince 30 friends to continously check their mail box?
      How about convincing them to call a voice response unit?

      There is no human interaction involved by the school in having someone refreshing the web page. The computer transmits the page automatically.

    164. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Jonathan+the+Nerd · · Score: 1
      ...slashdot their mail server with polite, articulate, individual expressions of concern over their vapiditity.

      Something is not right here...

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are not necessarily my own, as I've not yet had my medication today.
    165. Re:must be more zero tolerance by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you're going WAY beyond the "sane" limit here. It's kinda scary that you want his phone number and have his address..

      He's just too cheap to pay the $110 to these guys more info at http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/06/15 33209&tid=158&tid=215.

    166. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the correct link to the school

      http://www.lakelocal.k12.oh.us/lhshome.htm

    167. Re:must be more zero tolerance by kimvette · · Score: 1

      {
      can you see the judge ruling the internet an "illegal tool" as a whole? i don't :)
      }

      You underestimate the level of stupidity in the American "justice" system nowadays. By far.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    168. Re:must be more zero tolerance by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      Hey the City's website is working again so you can now get all the city officials email address at http://www.cityofcanton.com/reachus.html or email the Mayor Janet Weir Creighton at jwc@ci.canton.oh.us Please lets not have this go by as a one day event. This is something we have the power to make a direct differnce in. Lets stay on it. That first link is full of email and snail mail address. Hammer time, lets make sure they know how we feel about this.

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    169. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Alioth · · Score: 1

      He is not a 'kid' or a 'boy'; in most of the world, being 18 means you are an adult - you can vote, you can die for your country, and in most of the western world (execpt of course the United States) you can have a beer. If you are 18, you are responsible for your actions as an adult. It was still an attempt at a denial of service attack and if there are consequences for organizing a DOS attack, he should face them.

    170. Re:must be more zero tolerance by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      That is not correct, this is: and is still up
      http://lakelocal.oh.schoolwebpages.com/education/d istrict/district.php?sectionid=1
      Counter: 377,811
      Its a big county, but not that big.
      both :
      http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/
      http://www.lakelocal.org/

      are still down, and it looks like you killed their web conferencing site too:
      http://198.234.131.195/

      also the library is still working:
      http://www.mslake.stark.k12.oh.us/

      But I think this /. has no legs in the long term
      just another ant on the sidewalk

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    171. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Lothsahn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not quite. A massive phone in or write-in campaign to express your opinions is protected under free speech. It's the act of expressing your opinion on a specific issue, and that is protected.

      Hammering a server for fun and games is NOT free speech. He is not attempting to discuss a political or social issue; it is simply a DDOS, even if it is a very simple one.

      The issue isn't that he did something wrong. He did. The issue is the COMPLETE overreaction of the school officials.

      He's a KID (not an asshole, an 18 year old KID), for gosh sakes, and he's just having fun. Since when was fun so wrong in our society?

      Let's compare:
      1) Fifty years ago, when a kid made a minor offense such as:
      a) scratching some graffiti on a barn
      b) scaring a farmer's animals to create havoc

      He/she was forced to help the farmer for a few hours, or clean up their graffiti (community service). Now we throw them in JAIL and give them a FELONY charge which will follow them for the REST OF THEIR LIVES.

      It's not like he hacked the computer or tried to change his grades. He's probably a smart kid wondering if it's possible to overload a server simply refreshing a page. Let him learn, both about computers and the (reasonable) consequences of his actions. Wanna teach "computer ethics" in school? This is how. Make him clean the school or suspend him for a day or something.

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    172. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Alioth · · Score: 1, Troll

      Offer him SUPPORT?

      This luser was trying to set up a DDOS attack (even if it was a feeble one). Additionally, he's not a boy or a kid, he's a man - he's old enough to be married, go to war, fly a plane, father a child. He has adult rights and responsibilities.

      Lusers like this is why September 1993 has still not ended. He is no better than a spammer or a skript kiddie. I hope he is punished to the extent the law allows for his actions.

      Why are people supporting this idiot?

    173. Re:must be more zero tolerance by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Except nobody called anybody, and your analogy has no relation.

      I was making no analogy. I was explaining how the legality of an action can vary with the results. If you've got an issue with somebody else's post, maybe you should talk to them instead.

    174. Re:must be more zero tolerance by ckedge · · Score: 1

      If I hook up a 1MW power supply to a 1MW capable speaker and blast it at the school, yeah, I might be guilty of something. If I encourage 10,000 other people to meet me outside the school and all yell at the top of our lungs, we're guilty of FUCK ALL.

      This is insane. Hopefully the kid gets a good lawyer and a competent judge. Even a half competent judge should do. Hopefully the judge doesn't get confused by the claim of "cybervandalism" and have his eyes glaze over - which clearly happened to the prosecutor.

      BTW: Do they elect their prosecutors down there? That's just idiotic too. It should be based on competence. Not public popularity.

    175. Re:must be more zero tolerance by richlv · · Score: 1

      if i was living there, i just might call and express my opinion...

      --
      Rich
    176. Re:must be more zero tolerance by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Still, those 30 friends should bear most (possibly all) of the responsibility, since they're the ones actually calling me.

      I don't see it that way. The friends may or may not have any intent to harrass. But the person orchestrating them sure does.

      The analogy's especially clear with more dramatic crimes. A drug kingpin may never actually touch the drugs; in fact, drug gangs often use throwaway people at the low levels to insulate themselves. Low-level soliders are generally not the ones held responsible for war crimes. And more mundanely, the people who did the actual changing of the numbers at Enron aren't the ones the government is after. Indeed, they may have been innocent of criminal liability, acting in good faith based on what their corrupt bosses told them. But in all of these, the bosses are rightly seen as the most serious criminals.

      Either way, taking you (or them) to court isn't going to resolve any personal differences between us. We'd both be better off if I found out why you had all your friends try to annoy me, and fixed that instead. If it can't be fixed (which is quite rare), I can always stop answering the phone. Jumping straight to coercion (e.g. lawsuits) is how wars get started...

      That's ridiculous.

      I agree that calling the law should be a matter of last resort, and I think the prosecutor and the school here are acting like idiots. But people have a right to be free of harrassment, and the reason we have a court system with powers to convict people of crimes and to issue restraining orders is to guard that freedom, and to give people an alternative to taking things into their own hands.

      Wars get started because people fail to use the legal system or don't have an effective one available. That's why violence is such a problem in illegal businesses like drugs. Liquor dealers used to shoot one another up just like drug dealers do now.

    177. Re:must be more zero tolerance by rjshields · · Score: 1

      So you never did anything mildly stupid when you were 18? At 18 he may be legally an adult, but emotionally still immature. Give the kid a break.

      What he did was wrong but it doesn't justify being thrown in jail. To call it a felony is just ridiculous.

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    178. Re:must be more zero tolerance by rjshields · · Score: 1
      With a dense population, you have more stupid people per square block.
      I see what you did there :-)
      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    179. Re:must be more zero tolerance by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      remove the word computer and replace it with phone, is it still wrong? Change it from going connecting to the server to coming into the office, still a DDoS?

      Encouraging action from a large number of people shouldn't be wrong. Or to put it differently, you think everyone who ever puts a link up on /. is a criminal?

      Do you word for the RIAA?

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    180. Re:must be more zero tolerance by GuyverDH · · Score: 1

      What's really funny, is that the cantonrep site that held the story, has actually caused a hellacious amount of damage way beyond anything the poor kid did.

      Whether intentional or not, their story, coupled with our outrage - probably caused the poor server to have a meltdown.

      Who's going to jail from the paper? Oh wait - freedom of the press right?

      Poor school district jerks. Who the hell do they think they are? They're acting like grade school bullies. "We'll show him how we deal with jokes." sheesh - what a bunch of dick-heads. I mean that literally. Here's a bunch of supposedly intelligent adults, trying to scare the crap out of a kid. Yeah the poor sob is 18, so he's legally no longer a kid, but neither are these dorks. I wonder how many illegal, or immoral actions we can pin on the school representatives, as well as the local constabulary.
            Let's see, reckless actions, nearly causing a virtual riot. Intimidation, threats, unwarranted arrest. I'd say the poor prosecuting attorney in this matter has just ended any hope of a political career.

      Anyone want to e-mail Leno or Letterman and let them take pot-shots at these idiots?

      --
      Who is general failure, and why is he reading my hard drive?
    181. Re:must be more zero tolerance by floamy · · Score: 1

      Give me a break. My city has a dense population. My city was declared most literate city in the United States this year. And I didn't make any comments on intelligence, only that they are indeed rednecks. Rednecks can be rich, rednecks can be smart. They can even have power, look at our administration!

    182. Re:must be more zero tolerance by MntlChaos · · Score: 1

      Your argument is still hard for me to swallow. He was not telling people to commit a crime. He was asking them to do something which did indeed cause harm to someone else, true. However that harm was not severe, and could be easily mitigated. I just don't see how telling people to do something which is not a crime is a crime.

    183. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Caiwyn · · Score: 1

      I just don't see how telling people to do something which is not a crime is a crime.

      Then you are amazingly short-sighted. Intentionally instructing people to perform small tasks that add up to a crime still amounts to orchestrating that crime, no matter how insignificant those tasks may seem on their own.

      Of course, that's not what this kid did. He told people to do something that WAS a crime -- i.e., to crash the school's webserver. There was no hiding it. He didn't just say "hey, refresh this page a bunch of times and see what happens." He said, "Let's try to crash the school's webserver." As such, the people who helped him do it are accessories to the crime, and could reasonably be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, as well.

      You're trying to interpret the law by defining certain actions as legal or illegal. The problem is that the law makes it clear that the legality of an action is also defined by the intent. If you have a gun, you can shoot someone by accident, or in the heat of passion, or as part of a premeditated plan, or in self-defense, and every one of those instances will be treated differently by the law. The end result is the same -- you shot somebody. But how you got to that point is as important in determining the proper punishment (if any).

      This kid orchestrated a denial-of-service attack on his school's website. He did it intentionally and he recruited others to help him. Slashdot likes to play scare-tactics by making you think, "*GASP*, all he did was refresh a webpage, that means refreshing a webpage is ILLEGAL!" But obviously it took a lot more than that to satisfy the legal requirements to charge him. He *didn't* just refresh a webpage. He did it with the expressed intention of causing damage to the school's computer equipment, and that makes all the difference in the world.

    184. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Caiwyn · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this. A felony charge is indeed harsh in context. Technically the kid committed a felony, but that just demonstrates the need for more granular computer crime laws. This sort of thing is more deserving of a misdemeanor. But your analogy is a good one, and you'd think there would be a less officious way for the school to deal with this.

      On the other hand, we're not exactly given the full extent of the damage, and we don't know how the kid responded to the initial accusations. If he was as defiant as the grandparent poster is about whether what he did was wrong, then yeah, I can see how the school officials' only response would be to charge him under the law.

    185. Re:must be more zero tolerance by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      Any lawyer worth his salt will easily put to rest the argument that
      this school system operations were interfered with even slightly.
          The big mistake here is, they charged the kid under the wrong law.
      It should be: A law that speaks to intent,
                            City of Canton
                            Codified Ordinances
                    541.04 CRIMINAL MISCHIEF.
              (a) No person shall:
      6) Without privilege to do so, and with intent to impair the
              functioning of any computer, computer system, computer
              network, computer software, or computer program, all as
              defined in Ohio R.C. 2909.01, knowingly do any of the
              following:
          A. In any manner or by any means, including, but not
                  limited to, computer hacking, alter, damage, destroy,
                  or modify a computer, computer system, computer
                  network, computer software, or computer program or
                  data contained in a computer, computer system, computer
                  network, computer software, or computer program;
          B. Introduce a computer contaminant into a computer,
                  computer system, computer network, computer software
                  or computer program.
      The Ohio state law he is charged with has no intent provisions
      so the disruption must have actually have happened, which it didn't.
                        OHIO 2909.04. Disrupting public services
      (B) No person shall knowingly use any computer, computer system,
      computer network, telecommunications device, or other electronic
      device or system or the internet so as to disrupt, interrupt, or impair
      the functions of any police, fire, educational, commercial, or
      governmental operations.
                Even reading that, and assuming when he introduced the F5 virus into the
      computer system, that he had no privilege to do so, you know it is a public box.
      Frequent reloads are so much a part of the net that refresh timers are built into
      some browsers.
      After the jury hears from one or two hundred of the staff who don't
      even know yet that anything happened and they say under oath it was
      a normal day, This disruption of service will not be shown.
      The contention that attempting to break the law and failing to do so
      is against the law is ridiculous. Although being stupid should be illegal.

      Yes officer, I have been driving the speed limit all day, I wanted to
      go faster, but this is the car's top speed. As the stereo plays "I can't
      drive 55" Here is your ticket son, for wanting to speed and not doing it.

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    186. Re:must be more zero tolerance by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      I think you are incorrect.
      "The problem is that the law makes it clear that the legality of an action
      is also defined by the intent"

      The law this guy is charged with has no intent porvision.
      If intent is not written as part of the Law, then intent may only be used at sentencing
      for more on this see: http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=173217&cid =14423765

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    187. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And just exactly what *damage* was caused? The system may have at best responded slower but there was no lasting, identifiable or quantifiable damage. Inconvenience maybe, admins brused ego maybe but no damage. When any other web server slows down, does the admin automatically call the police. If the admin knew who it was, why didn't he just pick up the phone or send an email and say 'knock it off we know who you are"? Then it would have been all over long before the first police car arrived. And a follow up from the principle would have sealed the deal.

      The part of this that seems to offend everyones seneibilities is not that this kid shouldn't be reprimanded and educated as to why what he was doing is a bad idea, But that they want to put him in jail and make him a felon over it.

    188. Re:must be more zero tolerance by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a fun patch except I think GTA is more into the hetro stuff. Might be sort of funny to merge GTA and The Sims and make everyone gay. Sort of a Queer Eye for the Straight Guy thing with a violent twist.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    189. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Oh, I did stupid thigns alright.

      But none of them included vandalism which is essentially what this is. You may understand this better if half your day involved beating off internet lusers from your servers.

    190. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Random832 · · Score: 1

      I think there's a certain threshold of automation for a DOS attack. Repeatedly hitting F5, no matter how many people are doing it on how many keyboards, falls rather below that threshold

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    191. Re:must be more zero tolerance by rjshields · · Score: 1
      You may understand this better if half your day involved beating off internet lusers from your servers.
      OK I can see why you might take strong offence at this guy's actions ;) Let's hope he learns from his mistake.
      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    192. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      Fair enough. He encouraged others to do something which would harm the school district. So is organizing a massive write-in or phone-in campaign.

      Hmmm. That depends on the INTENT of the campaign, doesn't it? His clearly stated intent was to deny everyone the use of the webserver. Most "write in" campaigns don't have that as the default intent.

      He has the right to ask people to join in his campaign.

      Not when his intent is to cause damage. You have the right to ask people to join you in "peacable assembly", but you don't have the right to organize a riot.

    193. Re:must be more zero tolerance by geekbastard · · Score: 1
      Offer him SUPPORT?

      This luser was trying to set up a DDOS attack (even if it was a feeble one). Additionally, he's not a boy or a kid, he's a man - he's old enough to be married, go to war, fly a plane, father a child. He has adult rights and responsibilities.

      Lusers like this is why September 1993 has still not ended. He is no better than a spammer or a skript kiddie. I hope he is punished to the extent the law allows for his actions.

      Why are people supporting this idiot?




      you however are obviously still a child and possibly a "sKript kiddie." i have never seen a mature adult use the word luser . . . . . . . . .

      the kid/man/child/adult/teen whatever you wish to refer to him as should have been suspended at the most. i hardly feel that this warranted leagal action and i feel, as many others do here, that the school system has over-reacted and is looking to seriously make a fool of its whole administration.

      how is throwing a student in jail going to be a proactive step in educating him/her which is what the schools main concern should be, not to mention what they receive all of that state funding for. schools are far to quick to make an example of one student when they should be looking at why he/she felt compelled to do what they did in the first place and trying to help address that with the student and parents.
    194. Re:must be more zero tolerance by catahoula10 · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      What ever happened to common sense in this country?

      This is a child, and what he suggested was a prank. 20 years ago a prank got you a 3 day suspension and your parents were called.

      --
      This has been another valuable and informative opinion from:
      Catahoula!
    195. Re:must be more zero tolerance by Alioth · · Score: 1

      you however are obviously still a child and possibly a "sKript kiddie." i have never seen a mature adult use the word luser .


      At least I know how to capitalize when writing in the English language, though (seeing as we are resorting to ad-hominen attacks).

      You obviously are pretty new to the Internet. The term 'luser' was coined in the mid 1970s on ITS (incompatible Timesharing System), and has been in common usage (particularly amongst system administrators who have to deal with idiots such as the one the article refers to) ever since.

      The guy is a vandal, and if you ran servers exposed to the internet, you'd be extremely tired of their continuous attacks by now. He deserves the book to be thrown at him for his vandalism.

    196. Re:must be more zero tolerance by MntlChaos · · Score: 1

      doesn't a protest still block the street even if it's peaceful? a DOS doesn't cause permanent damage.

  2. Oh Crap! by rodgster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fark!

    I just commited 7 felonies waiting for this story to appear.

    --
    Who will guard the guards?
    1. Re:Oh Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's my new home page. How many years will they put me away for that?

      -AC

    2. Re:Oh Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Islam is the root of all terroism. Plain and simple.

    3. Re:Oh Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posted in English for clarity's sake.

      Yes My Fuhrer!

      We shall prepare the Islamic Final Solution!

      Give the command and it shall commence.

      Sieg Heil!

      You have just demonstrated that you are not only stupid, but also a racist.

  3. Must Have A Pretty Bad Webserver by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This school must have a pretty bad webserver if simply clicking on refresh brings the server to its knees. I mean, it's not like they were generating millions of hits.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Must Have A Pretty Bad Webserver by reverend_rodger · · Score: 0

      http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/hs/ They sure as hell are now.

    2. Re:Must Have A Pretty Bad Webserver by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

      This school must have a pretty bad webserver if simply clicking on refresh brings the server to its knees.

      *cough* Windows 98 *cough*

    3. Re:Must Have A Pretty Bad Webserver by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      That should be all the defense he needs.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    4. Re:Must Have A Pretty Bad Webserver by shish · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    5. Re:Must Have A Pretty Bad Webserver by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      This school must have a pretty bad webserver if simply clicking on refresh brings the server to its knees.
      *cough* Windows 98 *cough*

      I was thinking the exact same thing, but I get flamed and modded to death every time I say anything these days. Anyway, I thought of Neal Stephenson's anecdote about a room full of servers crashing, and they tracked it down to users were holding the mouse button down too long when selecting from a menu. Single tasking systems...

    6. Re:Must Have A Pretty Bad Webserver by WinterpegCanuck · · Score: 1
      Hey, Windows 98 made a great server. I had my workstation running apache back in the day, and when my desktop was locked up to the point that my mouse would not move, I could still access webpages from it. Combine that with I had 98 holding a dhcp and a static IP on the same nic and doing Nat. I only had one hub and the net was safer back then. Now personal web server. . . .

      P.S. Yes, I laughed at the joke ;-)

  4. Article slashdoted... by Eyah....TIMMY · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... after all the /. readers held down F5 to see if it really worked

    --

    It is not enough to have a good mind. The main thing is to use it well. - Rene Descartes (1637)
    1. Re:Article slashdoted... by foolish_to_be_here · · Score: 1

      Wow man. Cool! Dude, really does work!

      --
      Please mod me 1 or troll. It's where the truth is these days, even on Slashdot. Beware the power of moderators everywh
    2. Re:Article slashdoted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not quite. The Digg effect has been in place for some time now.

    3. Re:Article slashdoted... by EuphoricaL · · Score: 1

      you insensitive clod... give me Apple-R anyday. After all, whats the point in just increasing the volume on my ibook???

    4. Re:Article slashdoted... by blixel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Since the high school succumbed to the digg effect like 6 or 7 hours ago, does that mean digg wins and Slashdot is trying desperately to get sloppy seconds?

    5. Re:Article slashdoted... by Eravau · · Score: 1

      That button is no "F5"...it's the up volume. If you want "F5" you need to press "fn" and that button. Then it will work (the same as command-r) in Firefox and MSIE at least. Unfortunately, it doesn't work in Safari. But unless you're on a desktop system, or have a full keyboard hooked up to your laptop, it's no easier than pressing command-r anyway.

    6. Re:Article slashdoted... by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 0

      To see if they could slashdot Slashdot?

  5. Low-tech DDoS? by Kelson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds like a distributed denial of service attack. He just left out the automation.

    Logically, the only thing that distinguishes a DoS from the Slashdot Effect is intent. If your intent is to spread awareness of the material that appears on a server, and the server can't handle it, well, that's tough for the server, but that's how the Internet works. If your intent is to take the server down, that's illegal.

    Up until now, most deliberate attacks were automated, making it easy to separate overwhelming legit traffic from attacks -- but that's only really as accurate as trying to separate legitimate city traffic from criminals by assuming that anyone on foot is a burglar.

    Of course, when you get down to the level of intent, you get to his contention that "Help me crash my school's server" was a joke, and that he wasn't actually trying to get people to follow through. And things get murky.

    1. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The fact that they all were doing it doesn't land the blame soley on his shoulders either.

      If it is bad enough to be considered a felony then why aren't the rest of them being charged with at least something?
      If I get a group of people together and tell them to all drive out there and pass stopped school busses then do I go to jail for commiting a felony?? Yes, I do. The people who passed the bus? Its not like they are getting out of it for pointing and saying well he told me so!!! May sound kind of stupid but I am a product of the Ohio schools and I know the kind of BS administrators there will try and pull...

      --
      We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
    2. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Skye16 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since his intent was to crash the school server, even as a joke, then his intent was to crash the school server. It doesn't look very good for him.

      Of course, they would have been better off letting him slide than making a few hundred thousand / million geeks curious all at once. That server probably unhooked its own ethernet cable, packed up its keyboard and mouse, and walked out the front door by now. Or it melted and dripped all over the carpet.

    3. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well I clicked the link to the schools homepage, KNOWING that I would help bring it down.

      Whatcha gonna do, punk!

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    4. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by thx1138_az · · Score: 0

      I think the guy who posted the link as "anonymous coward" intended for the /. effect to happen. There's your intent is it not?

    5. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by AxemRed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree that what he did amounts to a DDoS attack. That's what it was, but on a small scale. But I feel like, the punishment should fit the crime.

      When someone steals $50000, they get charged with a felony and go to jail.
      When someone steals $10, the get charged with a misdemeanor and get community service.
      When someone steals $10 at high school, they get suspended.

      When someone speeds 50mph over the speed limit, they get their license suspended.
      When someone speeds 15mph over the speed limit, they get a $100 ticket.
      When someone speeds in the high school parking lot, they get detention.

      Now lets try this...
      When someone mounts a large-scale DDoS against a major portal, they get arrested and charged with a felony
      When someone mounts a tiny DDoS against their high school, they get... arrested and charged with a felony?

      //You get my point. He deserved a week suspension. Why can't schools handle things in-house anymore?

    6. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Of course, when you get down to the level of intent, you get to his contention that "Help me crash my school's server" was a joke, and that he wasn't actually trying to get people to follow through. And things get murky.

      No matter what his intent, given the severity of the possible outcome the appropriate punishment was likely detention, not felony prosecution.

    7. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by raoul666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Logically, the only thing that distinguishes a DoS from the Slashdot Effect is intent. If your intent is to spread awareness of the material that appears on a server, and the server can't handle it, well, that's tough for the server, but that's how the Internet works. If your intent is to take the server down, that's illegal.

      I agree, but it begs the question: what if someone submitted a story to /. with the intent to crash the server of his enemy? Is that illegal? If so, was it his wrongdoing, /.'s, ours, etc. What if the owner of said page sent an email to Taco begging his site be taken down? Is that now Taco's felony? And what if a group of people, such as on /., got together specifically to do this to all their enemies, but under the guise of it being a serious website?

      Just being devil's advocate. I think it's generally pretty clear what's malicious and what's not. And they clearly overreacted to this kid.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    8. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by ebyrob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but that's only really as accurate as trying to separate legitimate city traffic from criminals by assuming that anyone on foot is a burglar.

      Note: If you assumed foot-traffic was criminals you'd also instantly make things like public demonstration illegal...

      Which is interesting, because having lots of people manually refresh a page is a lot more akin to asking a whole crowd of street people to come hang out in your school parking lot and make it impossible to park versus say throwing down caltrops.

      Which one is illegal, and what constitutes a felony is something that needs some consideration. It seems quite clear that a DDoS using hijacked systems is far worse than what this kid did.

      If your intent is to take the server down, that's illegal.

      So, if I post a story to slashdot with the intent of taking out a server that makes it illegal? Quite a bold and interesting statement of law there. I'd sure like to hear your precedent.

    9. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by HardCase · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The typical /. reaction:

      Guy incites a bunch of his buddies to crash school's web server and gets arrested for it. "What kind of police state is this? He didn't hurt anybody! He has free speech!"

      Kid incites a bunch of his buddies to crash Joe Geek's web server in his bedroom. "Joe Geek ought to sue him! He should be arrested for (pick the latest /. obscure legal term of the month). He has free speech? What about my right to host a web server!"

      On the other hand he got busted with a felony, while the kids who changed their grades were arrested with misdemeanors. Now that seems a little out of whack.

      -h-

    10. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

      Because the parents won't allow them to?

    11. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps, but the intent was to do marginal harm. Crashing a school's server is really quite harmless. Even any unintended consequences are going to be fairly small. Some people are mildly inconvenienced in a small way. That's all. He hasn't damaged the computer. He hasn't stolen anything. He hasn't prevented them from making money. Prosecuting him for a felony seems disproportionate. Punishing him with detention should be all that's needed.

    12. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Da_Weasel · · Score: 1

      I think the applies to every link posted on /.

      You know that 99% of the time the page that the link refers to and the first 10 mirrors posted will go down.

      --
      If you must!
    13. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      I don't think he meant he intended to crash the server as a joke, but the telling his friends to do it was a joke.

      Like a kid saying "Hey you should spray paint the entire school at midnight tonight!", and people actually doing it.

    14. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Then again, even when they are allowed to, there is no question of judgement. You bring a butter knife to school to spread your jelly on your sandwich, you get expelled.

      Letting schools use their own system of justice has as much appeal as letting monkeys do it. Or Canton's local justice system.

      Really, I don't see any good solution aside from killing the lot of them.

    15. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

      So, what about the First Poster? Could he get nailed? Seems like his was not to share info, but rather to actually crash the system.

      Don't remember if he was A/C, but it's a pretty trivial matter to get the record of who he is (if the Sysadm of where he is located is worth a grain of salt.)

    16. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Aurisor · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, and that time I pounded my desk with my fist of annoyance? That was a low-tech earthquake. I just left out the automation!

      If you go through all of high school without at least one token subversive act or outburst, there's something WRONG with you. Kids are going to turn the phones upside down. They are going to put the chalk in the erasers. They're going to putz with the computers. Get over it.

      The lab monitor should have given him a talking to and let the damn thing rest.

    17. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Metrol · · Score: 3, Funny

      He deserved a week suspension.

      Yeah, a week of sitting at home hitting F5!

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    18. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes when driving 110mph over through a construction zone (I was driving conservatively due to construction) when the highway isn't busy and you pull over for the officer you saw sitting over in the median, you get let off with a verbal warning.

      True story.

    19. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Kid incites a bunch of his buddies to crash Joe Geek's web server in his bedroom. "Joe Geek ought to sue him! He should be arrested for (pick the latest /. obscure legal term of the month). He has free speech? What about my right to host a web server!

      When has this happened? Please find a story where this occurred.

    20. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Ben+Newman · · Score: 1

      If a few dozen kids hitting refresh for a few hours brought down my webserver I'd take it as a sign I need a better set-up. I'm surpised it was even detectable, the school's site must be hosted on an Apple 2.

    21. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Automated earthquakes! Now there's an idea whose time has come!

    22. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      Remember the "flash mob" fad? Sounds sorta like the same thing. If I organized a flash mob at my competitor's store and it effectively disabled their store (and didn't merely bring them a bunch of customers) would they have a case against me?

    23. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      IIRC, he was anonymous, and claimed to live in Europe. The last, if true, could make the prosecution a bit interesting.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    24. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      Still, the punishment should match the severity of the crime. Pushing F5 is not going to take a server offline for more than a few minutes, as people will get bored fast. If it stays offline longer, then the server is so flakey that anything putting a sudden load will cause it to crash.

      It's like with trespassing. If you walk onto somebody's lawn and there are no signs and you aren't told you're trespassing, the punishment will usually be nothing or a warning (if it's not, there's generally some racism or ageism involved). If you trespass into Fort Knox, the consequences will usually be much harsher.

      The real ones getting the grilling should be the tech staff for having such a lousy server running. My home server can survive a bunch of F5 happy students, so why should a school server fare any worse? It also falls under the category of 'mostly harmless', and as such the school should take it very lightly, particularly considering that the kid most likely did it as a joke.

    25. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      I would figure that if you did this more than once (remember the quote that says 3 times is enemy action) i would not be supprised if you suddenly found your self "downtown" discussing this matter. (some stores have cameras that are linked to corp offices and yes they do see EVERYTHING)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    26. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1
      Well I clicked the link to the schools homepage, KNOWING that I would help bring it down.

      I clicked the link too. Just as with the 2004 election, I already knew what was going to happen, so why delay the inevitable? ;)

    27. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Hey, I only clicked the link to see if we'd been successful yet.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    28. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by sploxx · · Score: 1

      ... then his intent was to crash the school server.

      What about 's/crash/make temporarily unavailable/'?

    29. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      Well if his intent was to crash the school's server, the easiest way is to post a story about the school's server on slashdot and watch it melt under the pressure. So effectively he's done it twice now.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    30. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a girl in LA expelled from school last year for having two aspirin in her purse. The school had a zero tolerance policy on drugs. She probably needed the aspirin because talking to the idiots who run the school gave her a headache. The incompetents who come up with these zero tolerance policies are the reason that my children will never see the inside of a government school. Yes, I know that there are some good government schools, but the fact is that all of the bad schools are government schools.

      Karl Marx wrote that the first thing needed for his revolution to occur is to have government control indoctrination/education.

    31. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by empvirus · · Score: 1

      This doesn't look good for him, but it doesn't make much sense for me. This should have only been just the web server. Maybe I'm an idiot but last I checked, no one put anything crucially important on a web server. That is unless they WANTED to lose that information.

      --
      Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
    32. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      If it is bad enough to be considered a felony then why aren't the rest of them being charged with at least something?

      The ringleader of a crime is often prosecuted more severely than other participants. That's supposed to help cut down on people who goad others into doing something illegal whilst they try to keep their hands clean.

      In this case, the rest aren't being charged for the same reason that /. people who acted with the intent to crash the server won't be. It's too hard to find them all. It's still an unethical act -- trying to crash someone's server because you don't like how he acted is wrong, even if you know you won't be caught.

    33. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      If I organized a flash mob at my competitor's store and it effectively disabled their store (and didn't merely bring them a bunch of customers) would they have a case against me?

      I'm not sure, especially if you did your best to pretend the disruption was an "accident". Sure is an interesting thought though!

    34. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      Well, flash-mobbing certainly could be considered a hostile act at times, but I don't think any of it is clear cut legally.

      I'd dearly love to watch comfortably from the sidelines with my popcorn and see how a case like this turned out...

    35. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by frostfreek · · Score: 1

      I am afraid their server did not melt and drip all over the carpet.

      In fact, Here's a picture of it!

    36. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Why can't schools handle things in-house anymore?

      Exactly - even if he did wrong, this was entirely an internal issue between the school and a student.

      There often seem to be "Student arrested for such and such" stories - I wonder, is this some general difference between the US and UK, or just that people think that computer related offences are more serious and need to be dealt with by the police?

      I mean, back in my day, if you graffitied on the blackboard, the teacher would tell you off. Now it seems, they call the cops.

    37. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Fortyseven · · Score: 1
      Because it's The Computers, man! People can get killed with these viruses and illegal H.T.T.T. requests. The Online AOL Cyberspaced is where people get stalked and raped in the chat rooms and people load up their trucks with dozens of movies that are still in the theaters. AND THE TERRORISTS COLLABORATE WITH THE COMPUTERS AND STUFF.

      My god man, people freakin' DIE in The Online Cyberworld. It's Serious Business and we must be zero tolerant and slice off the hands of anyone who could possibly look at a byte and go "YOU, BYTE, WILL BLOW UP THE FEDERAL WILDLIFE RESERVE WEBSITE!! GO FORTH!!!!"
      ... what I mean to say is ...

      People seem to greatly overreact when it comes to technology. Not a surprise when you consider we've got the computer illiterate so friggin' paranoid about artificial or overblown concepts of supposed criminal activity that we're minutes away from making them fear moving a mouse at the wrong angle.

      Reminds me of Alice's Restaurant in some ways where all the baby-killing, father-raping guys on the bench hear he was arrested for littering and they all move down the bench away from him. ;D
    38. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Virginia (and most other states) if you steal $200 or more, it's a felony, you go to jail. Yes, that's two hundred dollars or more for a felony charge. Ergo, you do $200 or more in damage (physical, human time, etc.) you are committing a felony. So, if the 'technician' was paid $20/hr and worked on the problem for ten or more hours, that would constitute $200 (or more) in damages and result in a felony charge. Not to mention the disruption in service, and all the other people who were affected.

    39. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Of course, when you get down to the level of intent, you get to his contention that "Help me crash my school's server" was a joke, and that he wasn't actually trying to get people to follow through. And things get murky.

      Even assuming he truly intended the school's server to crash, is that really worthy of a felony charge? It's not as if the school will lose students or have operations significantly disrupted because their server was down. This is about as 'serious' as trying to flood the bathroom by repeated flushing. Detention (not in jail!) would be about right.

    40. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by yoden · · Score: 1

      its the computers. technology is scary, you know. // aparently, slashdot thinks my input is not valuable if it takes less than 15 seconds to type up :x

      --
      Computers can make otherwise intelligent people stupid, much like slashdot.
    41. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Nazadus · · Score: 1

      Ok, let's make a reality check.
      How many web browsers *really* re-download everything when you hit F5?
      Most will pull the heavy stuff (read: pictures) from your cache -- so you amount of bandwidth lost is negligable. If, for example, I say I'm going to go kill LOTS of people.. but all I can find is a 9mm, and I take out one person -- the conquences will be much less than had I actually taken out lots. They are not letting the punishment fit the crime.

      In any case, I hope the prosecutor ruins his career from this... making a fool of himself and attempting to ruin a kids life. Of course, think of the children... except when it involves us looking good and making money.

      By the way, what is the *absolute* worst he could have done had he actually accomploshed what he wanted? If I say, man, I'm going to go steal all the candy's in America... would you really punish me as badly compared to if I said I'm going to go steal all dairy dairy products?

      So, in conclusion, I'm sick and fucking tired of this "Zero Tolerance" bullshit. NO ONE LEADS A PERFECT LIFE. PERIOD. Awfully christian of them, let he who has no sin cast the first stone. Not that I'm christian, but I'm just saying.. Let the punishment fit the crime my ass... Zero Tolerence is only so schools don't have to do their job anymore (read: be 'responsible'; high school is a babysitting job, these kids aren't adults; or are they? then why can't they drink or smoke?)

      --
      "Do or do not. There is no try." -- Master Yoda (Half man, half muppet)
    42. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by blechx · · Score: 1

      So, if i just visit microsoft.com once with the intention of bringing their webserver to a halt, I have commited a felony? Or do i have to refresh once, ..twice?

    43. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by MonkWB · · Score: 1

      I want people to die, so I buy a gun. In fact, I want so many people to die that i encourage everyone else to buy guns. Then, I practice my aim on coke cans outside. Apparently I have commited a felony.

    44. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by MonkWB · · Score: 1

      I want people to die, so I buy a gun. In fact, I want so many people to die that i encourage everyone else to buy guns. Then, I practice my aim on coke cans outside. Apparently I have commited a felony. Actually, it was a joke.

    45. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      In the UK there was this Policeman (quite high up) who was driving to talk about zero-tolerance. On his way there some of his officers clocked him at 2 mph over the limit (which is kinda legal - technically illegal but due to slight inacuracies in the speedo and the speed check machine they give you 10%. Most speed cameras are 10% + 2 I seem to recall).

      He stood up and gave his speech and the two police that clocked him pointed out that HE should therefore be arrested under zero-tolerance. Don't remember it being mentioned much afterwards ;)

    46. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      To take that to a logical extreme -- what about advertising? Ads are designed to increase your business, which generally decreases someone else's business. In a truly loony system, honestly offering low prices could be prosectuted as "deleterious to other businesses".

      Actually, this is no joke -- it's essentially what happened to a local vertical manufacturer who sold both to businesses and to the public. A bunch of competitors (who are sales outlets only, not actual manufacturers) took them to court because their prices were "too low", and the upshot is that they are no longer allowed to sell to the public.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    47. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they will retroactively pass a city ordinance re: inciting virual DOS attacks. I'd love to see the ACLU get involved with this.

    48. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      What is interesting, if true, is that some smuck did something stupid and vendictive to a kid geek in Ohio, USA, and the response is almost immediate from literally around the world. Rally 'round and protect our younger bretheren! Wow!

    49. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, you appear to be arguing that there is a contradiction between:
      1. Decrying the use of state resources to bring a criminal prosecution for a minor offence and
      2. Advocating the use of the civil courts to resolve a dispute.
      I would have no problem with the school bringing a civil suit against the 'kid' and his accomplices and attempting to prove that they had suffered real financial harm as a result of his actions, and expecting them to pay. I seriously doubt they would win, however, and since the school is a state institution I would expect whoever instigated the suit to lose their job for negligent misuse of state resources.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    50. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by pla · · Score: 1

      If your intent is to take the server down, that's illegal.

      IANAL, obviously.

      But in all the DDOSing cases I've heard about so far, the actual charges had nothing to do with "taking down the server". Instead, the charges involve interfering with interstate commerce.

      Since this doesn't involve commerce, has no monetary value (though I suppose you could argue that hosting the site in-house saved the school $15 per month), and didn't cross state lines (until it made Slashdot), I fail to see how any of the normal "crimes" involved in a DDOS apply.

      Then again, since when do the tech-incomepetent legal systems of the world deal with spooooooky "compluter" crime analogously to "real" crimes? Lend a CD to a friend or tape a song off the radio, it would get laughed out of court if not for the 0% chance of getting caught in the first place; give a friend the password to your home audio server FTP site, and you can expect the RIAA to show up at your door with their illegal warrantless extralegal powers to violate the bill of rights in the name of profit.

    51. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by HardCase · · Score: 1

      Nope, just pointing out the typical modern-day /. hypocrisy. Funny thing, it didn't used to be like that - back in the day, /. wasn't nearly as polarized as it is today.

      Truth be told, I think that the whole thing with the kid and his school should have been handled as a school disciplinary matter.

      -h-

    52. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by Kuros_overkill · · Score: 1

      that we're minutes away from making them fear moving a mouse at the wrong angle. We are acctually several years past that point. I was requested to asist an individual on a HS computer, win 95 system. (this was 7 years ago) asked the individual what they whanted to do, which was to use a book search application. I moved the mouse over to click on it, and she freaked out. I mean full on fit. "OMFG YOU BROKE IT WHAT ARE YOU DOING???!!!???????*** HAXOR!!!!" At this point the 'helpfull' teacher walkes over, I get in shit, and the teacher then attempts to assist the user. I listened in out of curiosity, and was dismayed to find that the teacher knew less about computers than the individual they where helping... I just walked away.

    53. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      While I think you could argue that if you can get enough people of their own free will to do something like this often enough, you could argue that there is a compelling public interest. To me this seems to be a very comparable form of civil, cyber disobedience. However it seems to me that argument addresses only a small part of the point.

      He is being charged with a felony. A FELONY.

      That means that, if convicted, in many states he would lose the right to vote, as well as effecting for the rest of his life in many way. Because of an action he advocated that causes no harm now does it endanger any people, that causes no harm to any property, he would lose what many consider our most sacred right as a democracy.

      I don't think you advocating that it makes sense, i am just addressing the issue of balance for the crime.

      Also, just sitting here thinking a bit more about it, I think that any time someone can get into trouble for speech, for example inciting someone to do some certain act, the people committing the act are ALSO accountable for what they have done. I mean,the act being committed has to be illegal for the incitement to be illegal. Are all the member of the flash mob prosecutable?

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    54. Re:Low-tech DDoS? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I agree, but it begs the question: what if someone submitted a story to /. with the intent to crash the server of his enemy? Is that illegal?

      Sure, it's just concealing a crime. Will you get caught? Probably not unless you publicly boast about your actions, and even then... But concealing a crime does not make it legal.

  6. Seems like a waste of time and money by dada21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This problem can be solved through software already -- the school didn't take necessary means to avoid such a simple "DoS" style attack.

    Even so, it seems crazy to me to waste taxpayer dollars chasing down this citizen and even more dollars prosecuting him. While the law is supposed to be around to protect property, I don't see how this is a felony. He didn't do the refreshing, did he? He used his right to speak freely.

    I'm sure I'll hear the standard arguments about how speech can be regulated and I repudiate all of them. Crying fire in a theatre is private property -- the Constitution protects nothing on private property and the theatre owner is responsible for setting the standards of speech. Telling someone how to make a bomb is also free expression/speech -- you're not making the bomb. In this case, if clicking excessively is a crime (I can't believe it would be), the people who did the act should be indicted.

    I'd love to see what real crimes are happening right now in Canton City -- murders, rapes, thefts. Speeding tickets and telling people to refresh a website repeatedly are nothing compared to real property crime. The last quote about trying to solve them reads more to me like they're "trying to find ways to exploit them."

    For the school -- they can now expect this to happen more often. The publicity in charging this guy is going to be mostly negative in the minds of the students. All we need now is to get the link visible on slashdot, right?

    1. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by m3j00 · · Score: 1

      So if I tell someone to shoot the principal that would be exercising my free speech?

    2. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by User+956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This problem can be solved through software already -- the school didn't take necessary means to avoid such a simple "DoS" style attack.

      Judging by this quote, it sounds like they don't even really have a grasp on what kind of "attack" it was.

      "It's a crime and it is important we take this seriously ... especially for school officials ... it could have done a tremendous amount of damage," said Canton City Prosecutor Frank Fronchione.

      Causing a tremendous amount of damage? WTF? He's not DDoSing Air Traffic Control. What a total load. This kid should sue these jackasses for libel, false arrest, and harassment.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    3. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by User+956 · · Score: 1, Funny

      So if I tell someone to shoot the principal that would be exercising my free speech?

      Straw man? Is that you?

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    4. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by m3j00 · · Score: 1

      libel, false arrest, and harassment all for a little hyperbole by an obviously not-so-computer-savvy prosecutor? the kid committed a crime, albeit fairly benign, it's a crime nonetheless

    5. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by cavemanf16 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not "Canton City", it's just Canton. And, after having visited there recently, I can tell you it's a midwest town - NOT a city - where life moves just a bit slower than the rest of the country. You can tell by Mr. Fanchione's comments on the article that the police are "trying to teach this youngin' a lesson!" and think they're just so smart for arresting this kid. I agree with your sentiments about how important this really is in the face of actually dangerous stuff. There were all kinds of buildings in that town that probably need to be condemned because they're a fire and health hazard, but no, the 'authorities' are busy arresting kids smarter than they are.

    6. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by undeadly · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Even so, it seems crazy to me to waste taxpayer dollars chasing down this citizen and even more dollars prosecuting him. While the law is supposed to be around to protect property, I don't see how this is a felony. He didn't do the refreshing, did he? He used his right to speak freely.

      What's crazy is the legal system allowing this. It favors those with deep pockets to bully and force their will upon others since just the hint of legal action is enough to deter most in USA. RIAA actions are public examples of this type of behavior, along with US style patent practices/laws.

    7. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by JWW · · Score: 4, Funny

      Causing a tremendous amount of damage?

      I'm sure the kid didn't cause a tremendous amount of damage. Not so sure about what the slashdotting will do....

    8. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by User+956 · · Score: 1, Troll

      the kid committed a crime, albeit fairly benign, it's a crime nonetheless

      Ok, Matlock, what's his "crime"? Show me the law. Seriously.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    9. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though I live about 10 miles from that school, it's across county lines, so I can't vote that idiot prosecutor out of office

    10. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      He didn't do the refreshing, did he? He used his right to speak freely.

      It is specifically illegal to incite others to commit a crime.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Kelson · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I'll hear the standard arguments about how speech can be regulated and I repudiate all of them. Crying fire in a theatre is private property -- the Constitution protects nothing on private property and the theatre owner is responsible for setting the standards of speech. Telling someone how to make a bomb is also free expression/speech -- you're not making the bomb.

      Just curious: how do you take "Inciting to riot?" Assuming it's applied properly (i.e. to someone who really is whipping a crowd into a frenzy with the intent of starting a riot, not just as an excuse to punish the protesters), is this justifiable as a criminal charge, or is the guy just exercising his right to free speech?

    12. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Crying fire in a theatre is private property -- the Constitution protects nothing on private property and the theatre owner is responsible for setting the standards of speech.

      You don't make any sense.

      Under your interpretation of free speech, it would be perfectly fine to cry "fire" in a public place (say, the Capitol building) and you would bear no responsibility for the resulting chaos that ensued, even if people were trampled to death during the panic.

      That's ridiculous.

    13. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Telling someone how to make a bomb is also free expression/speech -- you're not making the bomb."

      The gun analogy almost fits with this particular level hyperbole.

    14. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Population of 80,000 in 2000...that's not a town, that is a city. Not a big city, but it's sure bigger than a town.

      http://www.city-data.com/city/Canton-Ohio.html

    15. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by podperson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Crying fire in a theatre is private property -- the Constitution protects nothing on private property and the theatre owner is responsible for setting the standards of speech.

      Um ... no.

      You think murder is legal/constitutional on private property? Or wiretapping? Or cruel and unusual punishment?

      Crying fire in a crowded theatre -- as an example of the limits of free expression -- is the same regardless of whether the theatre is privately or publicly owned.

      All of that said, getting folks to click "refresh" is about as legal as suggesting that folks grab free brochures from a stand so as to exhaust the supply of brochures, except that printing more brochures and refreshing the stand are both more expensive to do than restarting a server.

    16. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Straw man? Is that you?

      Apparently it isn't, since they're both scenarios where encouraging another party to commit a felony is itself a felony.

      How are they different, from the perspective of criminal law?

    17. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by dada21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So if I tell someone to shoot the principal that would be exercising my free speech?

      In my anarchocapitalist belief system, yes.

      This country was founded on the idea that you can say what you want to say as long as you don't physically harm another person or their physical property. The initial revolt was no different than "We should defend our rights, and in doing so we will kill in defense."

      I think inciting a riot or inciting others to do violence is still free speech -- the person who riots or performs violence is the person who commits a crime.

      If the day comes for revolution, I don't want to see the government using speech to jail "traitors."

    18. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      Refreshing a web page is a crime?

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    19. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      It favors those with deep pockets to bully and force their will upon others since just the hint of legal action is enough to deter most in USA.

      Yes, those with "deep pockets" like... the public school system of Lake Township, Ohio.

    20. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by John3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Causing a tremendous amount of damage? WTF? He's not DDoSing Air Traffic Control.

      Yes, but what if there was a snow day announcement and nobody could access the web site to check if school was open. Oh, the inhumanity!

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    21. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by dada21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Under your interpretation of free speech, it would be perfectly fine to cry "fire" in a public place (say, the Capitol building) and you would bear no responsibility for the resulting chaos that ensued, even if people were trampled to death during the panic.

      Congress shall make NO LAW... who doesn't make any sense?

      If I scream fire in the Capitol building, and you trample another -- you committed the violent act. If I hear someone yell fire, I look, I smell, I consider.

      Oh, when I was younger my parents' house did burn down while I was in the house -- and I left calmly while still telling my mother-in-law that the house was on fire. My brother and his friend also ran out calmly.

      The one who does the trampling should be found guilty of murder, especially if they ran with no obvious signs of fire.

    22. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The same crime you would accuse me of if I organized a group to DDoS your website.

      Don't anyone click it!

    23. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Crime is often determined by intent. Refreshing a webpage is not a crime. Refreshing a webpage with the intent of taking it down is a Denial Of Service attack. Granted IANAL but intent is pretty significant (though not as significant as the quality of your lawyer. Or the size of your pocketbook.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      (standard) ME TO post. Prosecuters and police are always looking to make criminals out of people. I did stuff *FAR* worse to my high school computers (in the early 90's) and I got caught doing some of it. But guess what, they shrugged it off as mischevous youth... which is what it was.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    25. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Skye16 · · Score: 1
      Err... no it wasn't.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_and_Sedition_Ac ts

      I would contend that "being able to say whatever you want" is directly contradicted by an Act passed mere years after the ratification of the Constitution prohibiting publishing "scandalous" or "malicious" material about a government official.

      It was also illegal to "write, print, utter, or publish" anything critical of the president or Congress.
      Admittedly the veracity of Wikipedia may be in question, but if we can believe this entry, the Sedition Act, passed in 1798, was hardly the act pased by a country founded on "say[ing] whatever you want to say".
    26. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Violation of your ISP's TOS?

    27. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not my website. Just like the people with www.whitehouse.gov in their profile aren't the president. So, click away, asshat.

    28. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by sglane81 · · Score: 1

      Crime is all about intent. His intent was to bring down the web server. His crime, IMHO, is equivalent to stealing park benches and bringing them back in a few hours.

      I'm not saying I agree with the law or what happened, but I don't :)

      --
      This is the Internet. You can say "fuck" here. - AC
    29. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      This isn't wartime (maybe massacre time, but not war time) and this kid's principal is not the president.

      As for saying "Go kill Jim Schmuck" we already have legal precedent for deciding when the line of collusion is crossed in murder cases, and crashing a website isn't exactly murder.

    30. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Way back when I was in college in the 70's we had a lot of fun with the school mainframe systems (they had two ... IBM 370 and an HP2000): pranks and practical jokes that, today, would have gotten the entire computer science department arrested and/or deported, students and teachers alike. Really, the need for our elected leaders and their appointees to be seen "doing something" about computer crime is overpowering any sense of proportion or justice. Around 1978 or thereabouts my father (who was a physicist and electronics engineer) testified in front of my State's Legislature regarding a new computer crime bill they were about to sign in to law. Many of the activities that my fellow students and I had engaged in would have landed us squarely in prison ... it was that kind of law. My father pointed out to these "we need to appear tough on this" politicians that they were, in one swell foop, criminalizing some of the best and brightest minds in the State. Whacked 'em with a cluebat, he did. They had absolutely no idea what they were doing, so far as I'm concerned still do not, and that goes up to the Federal level because we still keep seeing stupid computer and Internet-related laws.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    31. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by sd_diamond · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I'll hear the standard arguments about how speech can be regulated and I repudiate all of them. Crying fire in a theatre is private property

      Crying "fire!" in a crowded public space (say, a city-run museum) has exactly the same effect, and the same potential legal consequences, as doing so in a privately-owned theater.

      the Constitution protects nothing on private property

      I don't know where you get this. I am still protected from unreasonable search and seizure while I'm on private property; I cannot be held against my will unless there is reasonable suspicion that I have committed a crime. For that matter, I have a legal right to free expression while I'm on private property. The owner of the property may choose to tell me to leave if he doesn't like what I have said, but that doesn't mean it was a crime for me to say it.

      and the theatre owner is responsible for setting the standards of speech.

      Not being allowed to yell "fire!" is about public safety, not standards of speech.

      Telling someone how to make a bomb is also free expression/speech -- you're not making the bomb.

      True (for the most part), but asking or telling someone to use that bomb is, in many cases, conspiracy to commit a crime and therefore not protected speech (is a Mafia boss committing a crime if he orders one of his underlings to kill a juror or witness?).

      I agree that this is a case of overzealous prosecution, but your analogies really are not applicable.

    32. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the kid didn't cause a tremendous amount of damage. Not so sure about what the slashdotting will do....

      Make a couple soccer moms not able to access the information on when to pick up little Suzie?

    33. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by pthisis · · Score: 1

      That's not a crime, it's a breach of contract (which is a civil and not criminal matter).

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    34. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      The one who does the trampling should be found guilty of murder, especially if they ran with no obvious signs of fire.

      Right. Hundreds of people who were overcome with panic as a consequence of your action should rot in jail, while you, the one who triggered the event, should remain free to practice your hobby of instigating deadly stampedes on public property.

    35. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      You think murder is legal/constitutional on private property? Or wiretapping? Or cruel and unusual punishment?

      Wow you really don't understand this at all do you?

      Property owners have the right to allow or limit certain rights on their property. FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS IN THE CONSTITUTION, WHILE FREEDOM TO MURDER IS NOT! Might want to read it again.

      Shouting "fire!" is not murder. Who did you kill? You caused some morons to believe you 100% and panic and trample over people. THEY killed those people, not you.

      Likewise, Rockstar is using their freedom of expression when they create games like GTA. They caused some morons to think it was real and kill some innocent people. THEY killed those people, not Rockstar.

      All of that said, getting folks to click "refresh" is about as legal as suggesting that folks grab free brochures from a stand so as to exhaust the supply of brochures, except that printing more brochures and refreshing the stand are both more expensive to do than restarting a server.

      If the brochures weren't free, they would have charged you for them. You aren't forcing them to print more brochures at all, they are "donating" them to you when they leave them out and you take one.

    36. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by KevinKnSC · · Score: 5, Interesting
      From Senate Bill Number 146 (enacted a few years ago):

      In Sec 2909.04, (B) No person shall knowingly use any computer, computer system, computer network, telecommunications device, or other electronic device or system or the internet so as to disrupt, interrupt, or impair the functions of any police, fire, educational, commercial, or governmental operations.

      (C) Whoever violates this section is guilty of disrupting public services, a felony of the fourth degree.

      So, there's the law. We now return you to the discussion of whether this is an overreaction or not.

    37. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      All of that said, getting folks to click "refresh" is about as legal as suggesting that folks grab free brochures from a stand so as to exhaust the supply of brochures,

      Good point. How illegal is that? (And would this kid be spending the night in jail if he stole all the "free" brochures from a counter in his school?)

    38. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by jeffy210 · · Score: 1

      "You think murder is legal/constitutional on private property?"
       
      Heh, you obviously have never been in Texas. Here, it's quite legal :) Though so is shooting your wife and lover if you catch them in bed together (gotta love that law)

      --
      ------
      "And may your days be long upon the earth."
    39. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1
      'm sure the kid didn't cause a tremendous amount of damage. Not so sure about what the slashdotting will do....

      I just wonder what the people running that server are thinking right now. It's got to be one hell of a good laugh. They probably assume the Slashdot effect is something left over from the F5 attack. They are probably logging it down on notebook paper now to add to the case against this boy.

    40. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      Ok, but I think the argument now is if the website is considered part of educational operations. Its not essential to the operation of a school at least.

    41. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Here, it's quite legal :) Though so is shooting your wife and lover if you catch them in bed together

      Wait... if you catch your wife and your lover in bed together, why would you want to shoot them? Or is this some sort of euphemism?

    42. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, the constitution protects us from the Federal Government. Not local city and state. F ucking morons.

    43. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by undeadly · · Score: 1
      It favors those with deep pockets to bully and force their will upon others since just the hint of legal action is enough to deter most in USA. Yes, those with "deep pockets" like... the public school system of Lake Township, Ohio.

      All they need is deeper pockets than you. I'm sure that the public school system of Lake Township, Ohio, could afford to loose 10 000$. Can you? Dare you risk it?

    44. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically speaking, there is no need for any of our rights to be listed in the constitution. The bill of rights was a bit controversial because of the fear that eventually people would think the only valid rights were the ones explicitly mentioned. Refer to ammendments 9 and 10.

      Most crimes are going to fall under the State constitutions, which are a bit longer and reserve more rights for themselves than the Constitution reserves for the federal government. If your state didn't give themselves the right to make murder illegal, then you'd have the right to commit murder as long as you weren't at sea (the US Constitution reserves the right to deal with felonies and piracy at sea). All of the state's likely have something to that effect in them, so you can't just go out and murder someone.

    45. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, trust me, born and raised Iowan here. 80,000 is a city, not a town.
      Those towns with the slower lifestyle that's way behind the times, they're under 8,000 people. This is a small city, probably quite conservative but still it's got plenty of modern life in it I'm sure.
      It likely even has 2-4 high schools.

    46. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how many times I've said that so and so deserves to be shot... not in jail yet.

    47. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by HiThere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it doesn't seem like hyperbole to me. I'd add abuse of power under cloak of authority (I'd need to look up the relevant Ohio statues, but I'm sure they exist)...only that's a felony, which means that the prosecutor needs to bring charges.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    48. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Not only is refreshing a web page not a felony, but telling someone to shoot someone else is not a felony, either, so your attempted point is almost entirely gibberish.

      It is illegal to pay someone to kill someone else, or even attempt to do so.

      But it is perfectly legal to seriously suggest someone go kill someone else for other reasons.

      Of course, any planning on your part could make you an accessory and part of a criminal conspiracy.

      Barring that, for it to be illegal, it has to be very obviously someone means to commit the crime at that exact moment, with you standing there and encouraging them. Anything else is legal.

      You can stand in town urge lynching all the (insert racial slur here) you want, but it's only illegal if you go along with the mob, encouraging them as they actually do it.

      However, in these circumstances, for this to even vaguely apply, you'd have to assert that repeatedly hitting F5 on a webpage is any sort of crime.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    49. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So hiring a "professional", then asking him to "take care of" a business rival is ok? :o)

      --
      Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
    50. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      If you can 'disrupt' service by using something repeatedly, by that logic I can have the person in front of me buying the last soda at the drink machine at the DMV arrested. Hey, look, the electronic device can no longer perform its intended function!

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    51. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Shouting "fire!" is not murder. Who did you kill? You caused some morons to believe you 100% and panic and trample over people. THEY killed those people, not you.

      I respect your point of view, but the law disagrees with you. So do I.

    52. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Copid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about fraud? Aren't there a lot of examples of fraud that are essentially just misleading speech designed to cheat people? Are you against those laws as well?

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    53. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by m3j00 · · Score: 1

      criminal mischief is the first thing that comes to mind. i'm not a prosecutor though.

    54. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by qtothemax · · Score: 3, Informative

      It may not be a big east coast city, but it certainly does have its crime and bad areas in the wake if the steel mills closing. Is Gary Indiana, ~100,000 people, a midwestern town where life moves a little slower? Gary has the highest crime rate in the country. Gary is an extension of Chicago, and Canton is an extension of Cleveland/Akron. Former steel towns are not nice places.

    55. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This country was founded on the idea that you can say what you want to say as long as you don't physically harm another person or their physical property...I think inciting a riot or inciting others to do violence is still free speech -- the person who riots or performs violence is the person who commits a crime
      So according to this logic Hitler didn't do anything wrong? Because thats what it amounts to the way you wrote it IMNSHO.

    56. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      No person shall knowingly use ...

      But he didn't use a computer or anything to disrupt anything. He may have called for others to commit a crime, but he didn't break that law. Is it a crime to stand up and say "Stop signs are stupid, everyone should just run them"? If it is, I think that about half the population has committed this crime at some time or another, which is a good litmus test of whether it is a lousy law.

    57. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      There is also a little know aspect to crime. Namely, the crime the person is charged with has to be possible the way you're trying to do it.

      In most cases, this doesn't matter, because usually a crime happens when something does happen.

      So a serious question here is: With the number of people in the channel, would it have been possible for him to disrupt or impair the website in any way?

      If the answer is no, he has not committed a crime. Anymore than someone caught attempting to walk through a wall is committing breaking and entering.

      Barring an explicit illegalization of the attempt, merely starting to do something illegal is illegal, but with a specific law, it's only illegal only if you actually could pull it off that way. If you can't, it's a 'mistake of fact'.(1)

      Some crimes, of course, are merely the intent to do X combined with actions you believe will result in X, like, I believe, attempted murder, and all other 'attempted' crimes. But I don't think there's any such thing as 'attempted DDoS'.

      Of course, some people are walking around claiming that any access of the website is impairment, which makes eveyone criminals. No. Impairment is not responding in 2 seconds instead of 1, anymore than it is impairing firefighters (another crime) if you have your shower running when they need water.

      1) Standard example of this: Trying to steal something you actually own. It's not illegal. (No, it's not not illegal because you don't 'press charges'. It's not illegal regardless.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    58. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      City of Canton Codified Ordinances
      541.04 CRIMINAL MISCHIEF.
              (a) No person shall:With purpose to interfere with the use or enjoyment of
                                                property of another employ a stink bomb

      http://www.cantonlaw.org/ordinance/

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    59. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      All of that said, getting folks to click "refresh" is about as legal as suggesting that folks grab free brochures from a stand so as to exhaust the supply of brochures, except that printing more brochures and refreshing the stand are both more expensive to do than restarting a server.

      Erm...so it's entirely legal?

      It is, in fact, so legal, that a few places that have had problems with it have actually passed laws saying that if a sign says something is free, it should be interpeted as meaning 'free for one per person per day', unless otherwise stated, because it is otherwise legal to walk up and take all of them.

      And as they couldn't charge the people actually running off with all of them under any existing law, they would rather obviously have problems trying to charge people who merely told others to do this.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    60. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Good God, where have you been the past 140 years?

      No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

      Second sentence of the 14th amendment, ratified in 1868.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    61. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No person shall knowingly use any computer, computer system, computer network, telecommunications device, or other electronic device or system or the internet so as to disrupt, interrupt, or impair the functions of any police, fire, educational, commercial, or governmental operations.

      Hey, porn can be very educational to a horny 12-year-old. Does that mean DOSing porn is illegal also?

    62. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, they could even bring him up on conspiracy charges - or perhaps even bring in some of the recent terror laws and toss this guy in jail for life..?

    63. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      I don't care if the law (IE: Federal and/or State law) disagrees with me. The Constitution DOES agree with me, and that's all that matters:

      Amendment I - "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech"

      abridge
      tr.v. abridged, abridging, abridges

      1. To reduce the length of (a written text); condense.
      2. To cut short; curtail. See Synonyms at shorten.

      You are curtailing my freedom to speak how I wish by not letting me shout "fire!". The only way that shouting "fire!" could be construed as wrong is if you are on private property and said owner of private property doesn't want you to do such a thing. If you were to scream "fire!" in a court room (or any other public property) and some idiot causes a panic because of it, however, you are free to do so, and are not in the wrong.

    64. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So as long as the person driving the get away car does not do the actuall robbing, they should go free?

    65. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by dhasenan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a high school website. If it got twenty hits in an average day, that's more than I expect; and if any essential school functions were handled by that server, the IT people in charge should be shot.

      So, there's the law. How does it apply? The kid used speech to ask others to use a computer to disrupt non-essential functions undertaken by an educational system, but not for an educational purpose. It doesn't.

    66. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      impair the functions of any police, fire, educational, commercial, or governmental operations Unless slowing down the web site interferes with teaching in some way (gasp!), I don't see how it interfered with operations.

    67. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by JBHarris · · Score: 1
      In Sec 2909.04, (B) No person shall knowingly use any computer, computer system, computer network, telecommunications device, or other electronic device or system or the internet so as to disrupt, interrupt, or impair the functions of any police, fire, educational, commercial, or governmental operations.

      (C) Whoever violates this section is guilty of disrupting public services, a felony of the fourth degree.
      So, according to my understanding of that Law...

      If my ISP uses a console to de-activate my business' service, they have commited a 4th degree felony.

      Sounds like pretty dumb law to me.
      Brad
    68. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by rpdillon · · Score: 1

      Listen, there is this thing called "Free Speech".

      When the Constitution was written, it wasn't written so that speech was only free so long as those words didn't make anyone uncomfortable, or were only convenient to everyone in power. It was written so that people could say whatever they liked (so long as they weren't endangering others, i.e. "FIRE!" in a crowded theater) without fear of it being a crime. There are some well known cases were saying certain things can lead to injury, huge monetary losses and even death. These are the cases we should spend time examining to see if we might possibly want to look into restricting speech.

      But slowly, we are finding a way to to come up with clever excuses why "Free Speech" isn't such a good idea, and rationalize perfectly legal free speech into a felony (or some other crime).

      This kid (man, whatever - he's 18) didn't pay anyone to do his bidding, he didn't automate some script that installed itself on people's computers to DDoS the server, he merely posted a link and suggested that people refresh the link to "crash the school's server." This is in the noise level, people.

      I see a lot of analogies that argue that this should be wrong. But, for the most part, the analogies are simply not appropriate:

      1) A lot of analogies talk about paying someone or setting a process in motion where no further human intervention is required (sometimes using people's computers without their knowledge as in a DDoS attack using zombie Windows machines). These are not valid because paying and/or automating the process makes you the proximate cause of whatever the action was. He was not the proximate cause in this case: there were a number of other people (hundreds?) that had to make the decision to visit his site, read it, click the link, and keep refreshing. They all could have perfectly well decided not to, and he had no way to further influence their decision. The decision was made by those people, not by the kid in question.

      2) Another set of analogies talks about inciting behavior that is *illegal* - robbing a bank, killing someone, trespassing, etc. These are not valid because the action he suggested was perfectly legal - visit a link on the web and refresh the page mutliple times. Heck, I'd bet every Slashdotter does this multiple times a day with Slashdot itself.

      The point is that he didn't have final say in what action was taken, he was not paying anyone to execute the action or aurtomating the process using a script, he was not the final decision maker that determined the outcome of whether someone executed his idea, and the idea was perfectly legal in the first place. He wrote an idea on a website and provided a link.

      We need to be careful what we decide is a crime and not let the line slide too far. There are perfectly reasonable ways to deal with this: the actual posting of the blog is in no way a crime, and I certainly hope he gets a lawyer good enough to explain this to the judge. The school has the option to enforce their terms of use, as the blog post was posted from a school computer. As such, he violated that terms of use and can held accountable for that in terms of loss of computer priviledges and perhaps detention of other school-initiated internal action.

      To tie up *criminal* law enforcement with this kind of noise-level transgression is the real crime. We need to be careful where we draw the line between civil matters and criminal matters. This of course segues perfectly into the copyright-infringement issue because that is often merely a civil matter, even though there are tons of warnings about the FBI chasing your ass down for copying a movie for personal use (i.e. not for sale to others). But I won't go there right now.

      The point is that we need to handle these kinds of issues at the correct level, and with the correct resources. Using police resouces (nevermind the courts) to handle this really is a *crime*: those resources are better spent catching people who prey on other for their own gain (muggers, rapists, thieves). We will never totally eliminate those people, and every second we spend on this kid is a second farther we are from dealing with criminals that ruin people's lives.

    69. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Sure, maybe life does move "just a bit slower" in Canton because it is not like a big city...except for around the NUMEROUS crack houses, where life moves real freakin fast. You are right, it is not a big city: it is like the ghetto and surrounding areas of a big city without all the nice areas and economic centers. Canton has way more important problems than DoS "attacks" on crappy high school web pages with crappy servers.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    70. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      The Alien and Sedition Acts were a clearly illegal/unconstitutional political move. Claiming they are representative of the beliefs of the founding fathers is rediculous.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    71. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

      Crime is often determined by intent.

      No, whether something is a crime sometimes depends on intent, but that sort of dependency is best avoided--intent is difficult to establish reliably.

      Refreshing a webpage with the intent of taking it down is a Denial Of Service attack.

      Refreshing a web page manually should never be a denial of service attack; if you bring intent into such a trivial and common action, you open the doors to widespread abuse of power by the government.

    72. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by GeekyMike · · Score: 1

      In Sec 2909.04, (B) No person shall knowingly use any computer, computer system, computer network, telecommunications device, or other electronic device or system or the internet so as to disrupt, interrupt, or impair the functions of any police, fire, educational, commercial, or governmental operations.

      But he didn't do that, he made a website and asked other people to do it, THEY should be the ones up for a felony rap.

      This is just a freaking kid trying to have a bit of fun. The lawyers, cops, school admins, and a large portion of /. posters are blowing this out of proportion. It's just a kid, not a terrorist cell, communist plot, or any other crap like that. America has become a bunch of legal system enabled bullies. I don't like that guy, I will sue him. This kid decided to have a bit of fun, let's put him on medication and charge him with a class 4 felony, revoke his right to vote or bear arms. IMO Americans try to hard to "grow up". I am 26, act like I'm 17 and enjoy my life. When time is needed to be serious, I am serious. When I am not needed to be serious, I have fun with my life. When I die, I will have no regrets, and I hope I can pass that on to my kids.

      --
      Beware the fury of a patient man
      - John Dryden
    73. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      No way they can make these charges stick, asking someone to jump
      off a bridge is not a crime. Looks like the site is back up
      Got this from stdent hanbook, but could not get into the building to get the FAP
      LAKE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT HANDBOOK
      COMPUTER NETWORK ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY
      All students must take responsibility for appropriate and lawful use of internet
      and network access. Please be advised that Lake Local Schools provides network
      and internet access to students and staff for educational uses only. Misuse or
      abuse of network policy may result in disciplinary action as described in the
      Lake Local Schools Computer Network and Internet Acceptable Use Policy and
      Agreement. The School District may also take other disciplinary action. Please
      refer to the Lake Local Schools Computer Network and Internet Acceptable Use
      Policy and Agreement posted throughout the building. By signing for this handbook,
      you are acknowledging you have read, understand, and agree to abide by the terms of
      the Lake Local Schools Computer Network and Internet Acceptable Use Policy and Agreement.

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    74. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by infaustus · · Score: 1

      The Alien and Sedition Act was not renewed for exactly that reason. Congress realized what a blatant violation of free speech it was, This is a horrible example; the whole reason Adams had the acts passed was to silence Jefferson and other critics of his administration. Also, the act was passed in 1798. Five years before the Supreme Court asserted the power of judicial review.

      --
      Frosty piss posts are worthless, GNAA posts are worthless and hurtful, but they are the least of this site's neuroses.
    75. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Consider this... say you're some minority, and some well known leader in your nation starts holding rallies decrying your minority for all the problems you've caused the people of your nation just by being present. This leader proposes an "ultimate solution" to the problem, and the majority support him. Way more than 67% of the populace supports him, so changing the constitution to remove the rights of your minority becomes relatively easy. Your minority loses the right to vote, to hold public office, or to work in the government. You are forbidden from using certain public services which you've paid for in your taxes. You decide to leave the country, but it turns out that your citizenship has been revoked, including your passport documents, and you can't leave. You wait for the storm troopers to come by and pile you into trains and send you off to Aushwitz.

      But that could never happen in America because there's a constitution that guarantees you your rights. Right?

      It may be that the only thing that keeps lynch mobs in America from rounding up gay people (or muslims) and starting this same process with them is the fear of the law which restricts their ability to organize such a crime.

      While I agree with your principles of free speech, the laws regarding this exist because we don't want a holocaust to occur again. If you can come up with a way to protect the rights of minority groups in a country where a 67% majority can change the constitution and the bill of rights at any given time, I would certainly like to hear it.

      Of course, this law does no good if a majority can rescind the law anyway. :)

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    76. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by tapehands · · Score: 1

      Being an ex-resident of Canton, I do have some personal insight in to the area. Fortunately, I never went to Lake HS. ;D

      Generally, it's like that all the time there. Ignorant law enforcement with nothing better to do. Granted, the kid said he wanted to take down the server, but how much damage can a bunch of "1337 k1dd135" from IRC do when their idea of a DDoS is mashing F5? And for that matter, what kind of hardware is the school running to let an F5 rampage slow their site down?

      Also...a nice little tidbit for how much "crime" canton has to deal with... this story has Canton listed as #30 on a list of the "Most Dangerous Cities"

    77. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm so did he actually do any of those things?

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    78. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Aris+Katsaris · · Score: 1

      This country was founded on the idea that you can say what you want to say as long as you don't physically harm another person or their physical property.

      So, let's say that some mobster tells his goon "kill this man for me", that's just free speech because the mobster didn't himself pull the trigger, he just told another person to pull the trigger?

      How many people did Hitler or Stalin or Saddam or Osama *personally* kill? Signing an execution (or even genocide) order doesn't count in this context, because signing pieces of paper is again just free speech I suppose.

      The world's biggest mass-murderers wouldn't have nearly as many victims if they needed to personally murder every single one of their victims.

    79. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't disrupt it. He told others to.

    80. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This law doesn't talk about others doing the work for you - it is only a felony if you do it yourself.

    81. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Your rights end where my rights begin. The freedom of speach is not the paramount freedom. Life is. Your right to free speach ends when that speach destroys more paramount rights of others, such as life. And whether or not you like it, shouting fire in a crowded theatre *does* make you solely responsible for any injury or death that occurs. You're responsible not just for your actions themselves, but also for the consequences of your actions, both direct and indirect.

      Is it free speach to say "sic 'em boy?" What about when you've got a trained attack dog at your side? Is it freedom of expression to squeeze your finger? What about when it's pressed against the trigger of a gun pointed at my head? Is it freedom of speach to libel someone in the press? To grafiti the "nigger" on an afro-american's front door?

      Freedoms of speach and expression have limits even in the most liberal of civilized societies. Otherwise it's simply anarchy, because all crimes could otherwise be claimed as freedoms of expression or freedoms of speach.

    82. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      I think it is also illegal to incite a violent act. Inciting a riot is chargable for sure. Inciting murder would most likely be at least as chargable an offense.

    83. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can make the leap from actively putting packets down a wire, and requesting that the world at large put packets down a wire. Although he perhaps incited the actions of all those people, he didn't actually push those F5 keys. If I were on his jury, I'd make let him go.

    84. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Using a man as a weapon that's as fatal as a gun makes you a killer. You're clearly hurting someone through someone else and that's wrong. On the other hand singing "The proffesors a twat, I hope someone beats him to death with a cat" would be more a long the lines he's thinking I suspect.

      --
      I like muppets.
    85. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Not in the US. To incite something, you actually have to be there helping encourage it along at that exact time, and it has to be obvious as to what is about to happen.

      Otherwise it runs into 1st amendment issues. It is not 'incitement' to merely tell others what to do, you basically have to be directing their actions as they do them.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    86. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by losycompresion · · Score: 1

      Well according to the letter of the law, this law was not broken by this student. First of all it says "Person" well in order to actually make this happen serveral people would have to be involved. So this law does not apply, period. Well OK, you say it does, then they must arrest EVERY person that is using a compter to disrupt the server. Which with out reading the article, does not say that this one student actually did any refreshing, and if they can not prove he did, the law does not apply.

    87. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Dude, he's an Anarcho-capitalist. He's pretty much against ALL LAWS.

    88. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crying fire in a theatre is private property -- the Constitution protects nothing on private property and the theatre owner is responsible for setting the standards of speech.

      Oh, horsehockey. The Constitution is very much involved on private property as elsewhere. You simply do not understand the proper scope of freedom.

      Private property does not "trump" freedom of speech, but is part and parcel of the same principle. When you get kicked out of someone's house for saying something offensive, it is the property owner's freedom of association which sanctions his action. You are free to say what you want, on his property -- but he is similarly free to decide he wants nothing to do with you, and kick you off his property.

      He cannot proceed, however, to forcibly confine you in the basement, or to kill you outright -- which would all be options for him if your idea were valid.

      Understood this way, shouting "Fire" in a crowded theater is not forbidden because it's private property -- it is forbidden because it is a kind of fraud -- a lie which results in direct loss of life and property. There is no such thing as the freedom to violate someone else's freedoms.

      That also refutes the common notion that the "shouting fire" prohibition is a legitimate "regulation" of free speech. Freedom is self-delimiting, and therefore does not require "regulation".

    89. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      "you basically have to be directing their actions"...like telling them to us F5? and telling them to hit it repeatedly? is that not "directing their actions"?

    90. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Yes, if repeated hitting F5 was illegal, sitting there encouraging people to hit F5 as they hit F5 could be illegal.

      OTOH, the courts have never attempted to apply that logic long distance, nor have they upheld it on a bunch of acts that aren't illegal by themselves, but together are illegal. (Again, assuming it actually is illegal in the first place.)

      For an example of how this hasn't stood up in the courts, calling someone's 1-800 repeatedly to harrass them is illegal. But posting someone's 1-800 number and asking people to call it isn't illegal, or, at least, no court has ever said it is. It can leave you liable to a civil suit, but it's not a crime.

      However, that wasn't anywhere my point. I was just taking issue with someone that said 'telling someone to murder someone else' is illegal. It's not.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    91. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      I think that is what the riaa is founded on.......

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    92. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 1

      "Using a man as a weapon" sounds like you use the poor guy as a club! ;)

      In any case, I agree that shouting insults and even silly threats like that is perfectly ok, though somewhat immature. I was just pointing out that you cannot claim not guilty by claiming that you have only exercised your free speech (to order another guy to kill someone, e.g.)

      Have fun

      --
      Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
    93. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      Your rights end where my rights begin. The freedom of speach is not the paramount freedom. Life is.

      I agree 100%.

      Your right to free speach ends when that speach destroys more paramount rights of others, such as life. And whether or not you like it, shouting fire in a crowded theatre *does* make you solely responsible for any injury or death that occurs. You're responsible not just for your actions themselves, but also for the consequences of your actions, both direct and indirect.

      Is it free speach to say "sic 'em boy?" What about when you've got a trained attack dog at your side? Is it freedom of expression to squeeze your finger? What about when it's pressed against the trigger of a gun pointed at my head? Is it freedom of speach to libel someone in the press? To grafiti the "nigger" on an afro-american's front door?


      As far as shouting fire in a crowded theater, the people who did the trampling are the ones who made the decision to run out histerically, they could just have easily left without panicking, or looked around, smelled and realized there was no fire.

      The dog issue is completely different! An attack dog isn't capable of rational thought, it can't decide, oh, he wants me to attack that guy, why? It just follows orders: it is a weapon.

      Same with the gun thing, I agree with you that killing someone with a gun should be a crime, the gun is following orders, it is a weapon.

      Is it freedom of speach to libel someone in the press?

      If you have the consent of the owner of that paper, then yes. People CHOOSE to buy that paper, people CHOOSE to read and believe unsubstatiated claims about someone. If they don't like the fact that they don't prove any information they give in that paper, they can just stop purchasing it. Likewise, they can disagree with their claims, and offer a completely rational counterpoint WITH proof, and be believed more.

      To grafiti the "nigger" on an afro-american's front door?

      If you "graffiti" "Joe is a nigger" on your door, I think it should be completely legal. But to do it on his door is violating his property rights, and should be against the law.

      Freedoms of speach and expression have limits even in the most liberal of civilized societies.

      Why does everyone bring politics to "liberal", "conservative", or "centrist" in this country? There are more dimensions to politics than rash generalizations of classification of what a set of beliefs are.

      Otherwise it's simply anarchy, because all crimes could otherwise be claimed as freedoms of expression or freedoms of speach.

      The "sic'em boy" is just a manner of communication to the weapon, much like pulling the trigger is telling the gun to fire at that direction. With "fire", unless you have people IN the crowd inciting the trampling, or you have hypnotized people to trample on "fire", you aren't communicating to a weapon, you are communicating to a rational being.

      As a side note, while I don't agree with anarchists, anarchy != chaos. An example of this is prison. Sure you are controlled by the guards, but it's been shown time and time again that prisoners can kill whomever they wish, without getting caught because they are careful. They don't kill random people, they kill people they don't like, such as child molesters.

    94. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      The dog issue is completely different! An attack dog isn't capable of rational thought, it can't decide, oh, he wants me to attack that guy, why? It just follows orders: it is a weapon.

      Ok, what about someone who orders a hit on their spouse? Are they not guilty of murder? They didn't kill their spouse, and the person who did was capable of rational decisions.

      If you "graffiti" "Joe is a nigger" on your door, I think it should be completely legal. But to do it on his door is violating his property rights, and should be against the law.

      This kid attacked (and incited others to attack) the school's server. This is their front door. He didn't say, "Hey, try to load test my home connection," which would be his own front door.

      Also, in a crowded theatre, there can be a fire, and you could be completely incapable of seeing that the fire was there. In a crowded night club that burned down a few years ago near here, there was a real fire on the stage, and the people in the front could tell that was the case, but the people in the back thought it was pyrotechnics (which were being used, and which had malfunctioned), and failed to move so that the people in the front didn't get burned alive. Something like 35 people died because the people by the exit weren't aware there was a problem. You have the same potential if everyone insists on locating the fire and verifying it for themselves before they're willing to leave the building. The people who are by the fire need to shout "Fire" so the people in the back who can't see it get out of the way. When someone shouts fire in a crowded theatre, even if you can't locate the fire, you should still try to leave. You don't have to panic and tromple people, but it's quite possible that you tromple someone who fell down, and never realize it.

      In crowds like that, the crowd is moving in a certain direction, and everyone is shoulder to shoulder. You can't see the floor, and it's probably all you can do to keep your own feet. If you bend over to try to help someone you saw fall, chances are you'll get trompled too, because someone else will be looking over their shoulder at the fire, or looking for their friend or child, and bump into you without realizing it, knocking you under the feet of someone else who can't tell anything but that *something* is under their feet, but they don't know what. There isn't opportunity for rationalizing with the crowd, because every person in that crowd is scared a little bit, and all together they make one very scared, very irrational organism.

      I've never seen a crowd which was capable of rational thought, so just like you're guilty if you tell an irrational attack dog to kill someone, you're guilty if you wrecklessly tell an irrational crowd to all move in the same direction (which is effectively what you're doing when you shout fire).

    95. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by podperson · · Score: 1

      No -- my point was that it's "about as legal" -- which is to say, not totally legal, but probably not a felony either :-)

    96. Re:Seems like a waste of time and money by argel · · Score: 1

      So why isn't someone at SONY facing felony charges???

      --

      -- Argel
  7. Apply this to eBay... by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 2, Funny

    and you've got a new way to fill the jails!

  8. Let the slashdotting begin by jkauzlar · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah. If it doesn't work at first, just hit F5 to try again. It'll work eventually...

    2. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by John3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh oh...did you just commit a felony?

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    3. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by rodgster · · Score: 1

      A quote from TFA fits quite well here:

      "School officials and Canton City Prosecutor Frank Forchione didn't think it was funny."

      --
      Who will guard the guards?
    4. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      Since its down.. does that mean we win?

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    5. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by CountZero117 · · Score: 2, Funny

      you have some major cahones man, posting it on your account and not AC ;)

    6. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by Kpt+Kill · · Score: 1

      Check out the video on WKYC news channel 3
      The website wont load the video in the browser for me, so heres a direct link.

      WEBSITE:
      http://www.wkyc.com/video/player.aspx?aid=18650&si d=45721&bw=
      VIDEO:
      http://wm.gannett.speedera.net/wm.gannett/wkyc/200 60105_lake_wkyc.wmv

    7. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by Anm · · Score: 1

      A quote from TFA fits quite well here:

      "School officials and Canton City Prosecutor Frank Forchione didn't think it was funny."


      Well obviously there need to earn more moderator points. Sheesh.

    8. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

      In case you feel like getting the exact location. You know, to help aim your packets so you get a faster ping time...

      Lake High School via google

      --
      No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    9. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by wuie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure! I've always wanted to win at a felony!

    10. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by bk4u · · Score: 1
      just hit F5 to try again. It'll work eventually...

      Sir you'll have to come with me, you're under arrest for telling people to refresh a web page.

      --
      Remember kids, with great power comes great opportunity to abuse that power
    11. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 1

      Hmm, this is the third site I've seen someone post in here. Does this make us serial slashdotters? I hope they don't have a three strikes your out law or we're all screwed.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    12. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Port is closed ... better find another (from ttcptrace):

      15 66.144.97.98 (66.144.97.98) [closed] 81.030 ms 70.043 ms 64.726 ms

    13. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by Schickie · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I'm a foreigner ... that was a joke, yes?

    14. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

      Here's the real site:
      http://www.lakelocal.k12.oh.us/lhshome.htm

    15. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      "Anything Goes" performs for the Lake Local School District staff during the
      Friday, April 15th inservice

      could hardly get it to load, had to refresh several times

      http://lakelocal.oh.schoolwebpages.com/education/c omponents/whatsnew/
      default.php?sectiondetailid=11&PHPSESSID=b35cd6d35 3097598d339ea439d208a09

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    16. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty troubled by the notion that some prosecutor's idea of what is or is not funny has anything to do with the law.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    17. Re:Let the slashdotting begin by iella · · Score: 1

      Or command+R for us mac users, you insensitive clod!

  9. That was a fast /.ing by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/ was offline before I could even find its url in Google.

    1. Re:That was a fast /.ing by John3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but their home page is still up.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    2. Re:That was a fast /.ing by WordODD · · Score: 1

      schoolwebpages.com is a hosting company that hosts a lot of educational sites. They sell a service that lets absolutly anyone make a decent looking website with a few clicks and some text. The other site mentioned (the k12.oh.us address) points to the school division's own web server(or it was before the slashdotting).

      --
      Please do not let scientific accuracy interfere with the intended humourous/interesting/insightful value of this comment
    3. Re:That was a fast /.ing by Honig+the+Apothecary · · Score: 1

      I recommend using the comment page here

  10. Denial of Service attack by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    But one that's rather easy to defend against with server side scripting- just deny the "from" source....

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Denial of Service attack by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Except for that it still takes a bit of processing power in order to determine who the source is and act accordingly. Given enough people hitting f5 you can still overload a server using such a method.

  11. the media by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love the complete bullshit way this article frames the situation. He didn't put a link, he "created a website, which connected to the school's system." ooo.. sinister.. yeah...

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:the media by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      It should have said:

      "He hacked into a web server (logged into blogspot) and modified the internal structure of it's files system (uploaded a web page) that created a "hyperlink" to the school's entire computer infrastructure (link to http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/hs). He then called upon his gang of evil cohourts to help him destroy their "servers" (asked people even more bored than him to visit that page and press F5 a few times until they realized it was as dumb as reading the blog). This caused a massive meltdown of "computer technology" which nearly destroyed the computer systems (they got more than 5 hits a day and wondered what was up).

      btw, the parts in parenthesis is (reality)

    2. Re:the media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a groovy video about it!

      http://www.wkyc.com/video/player.aspx?aid=18650&si d=45721&bw=

      "The website was discovered before any damage was done."

    3. Re:the media by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      It really shows the sad state most "news media" are in. I guess most of them have no real journalists any more. Why does no one asks what serious damage this could do or why the are overreacting so much?
      It's rare these days to see any asking questions instead of just running with the hysteria of a given event. sigh.
      Maybe it is just news for stupid people and I am looking at the wrong media.

    4. Re:the media by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because I actually watch WKYC some mornings. What you have to understand is that Cleveland is a tiny media market. I live about 30 miles away, just outside of Akron. The local news stations aren't really news stsations, they are entertainment shows. They sensationalize EVERYTHING. It is worth watching for comedic value. When I watch prime time on WKYC, they always have promos for the 11 o'clock news with promos like "Find out at 11 howinsert something you use everyday can insert words such as kill, make you violently sick etc. We expose it here!
      BTW- your webe got me introuble yesterday, when I had an uncontrollable laughing fit at work while reading it. You forgot one though: When Chuck Norris has sex with a man, it won't be because he is gay, it will be because he has run out of women...

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    5. Re:the media by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      The media is sad. I work at a local station and was shocked to find out that they look for stories to air that resemble the TV programs that air before and after the news. So for CBS, our station tries to find stories that are investigative, like CSI. Some famous news guy said something along the lines that journalism is a story that someone doesn't want you to tell, everything else is advertising.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    6. Re:the media by DotNM · · Score: 1

      I find it very funny that the reporter says "... where he told them to press F5, doing so overloads the server forcing it to crash." Hmmmm pressing F5 overloads a server and crashes it???

      --
      There's no place like localhost
    7. Re:the media by DotNM · · Score: 1

      I just tried this on my own webserver for www.coscore.com and for some reason, it didn't crash because the server is still up and running!

      --
      There's no place like localhost
    8. Re:the media by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      OMFG! Thank you so much! I would not have beleived that if I hadn't seen it. It remind me so much of the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
  12. Word of advice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stick to F5ing /. only.

  13. But wait, don't order yet!! by shystershep · · Score: 3, Funny

    New, only on Slashdot, the Outrage-O-Matic!!

    Simply take the bare facts of a story, throw in some out-of-context quotes and counter-factual insinuations, and that boring story about some punk's criminal mischief is suddenly about the Man's insane overreaction to a harmless prank!

    It's fun for the whole family! Get yours today!

    --
    The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:But wait, don't order yet!! by Radres · · Score: 1

      That's considered new on Slashdot? You must be new here.

  14. Felony? by evil+agent · · Score: 1

    I don't know about a felony, but it's definitely a crime. I't a DDoS attack. A little crude, but it does the job.

    --
    End transmission.
    1. Re:Felony? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      It's a DDoS attack on the lines of "Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet?"

      The response was probably some sort of bullshit "tough on crime" zero tolerance "policy" at the school. Tough on crime does not mean create fellons out of kids who happen to be dicks one day. It means making sure people who commit violent crimes get punished. This whole zero tolerance fad ends up hurting the kids more than it helps them. Kids are supposed to make mistakes because they don't know better. Branding a kid a fellon for something this petty is outrageous.

    2. Re:Felony? by Metzli · · Score: 1

      Um, he's 18. Under the law he's not longer a kid and can be treated as an adult. If this was an automated DDoS, then no one would care. This was a manual DDoS, but it's still a DDoS. If someone was to take out your server then claim, "Oh, it was just a joke" would you feel the same way? What if it crashed the server and you lost data?

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    3. Re:Felony? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      In my humble opinion, it sounds more like someone putting a straw in their mouth and blowing reallly hard as to create enough wind to blow down the school. No cop would arrest someone doing this because they'd realize it's a waste of time. But once you enter this computer world mumbo jumbo, everyone thinks people with a keyboard are terrorists. An automated DDoS is one thing, but this was just some idiot being an idiot.

    4. Re:Felony? by Metzli · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But this idiot did get other idiots to help whack the school's property. I think a felony is a bit harsh, but I can see charging him with a misdemeanor.

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    5. Re:Felony? by plantman-the-womb-st · · Score: 1

      Point is though, after I RTFA and a few other FAs about this, it is stated that the servers slowed a bit. He did not crash them. They did not go down. Yes, he may have tried, but he didn't succeed. It's like charging someone with defacing public property when they failed to spray paint a wall. If I say, "I'd like to see so&so dead," did I commit murder?

      --
      Say bad words about my book, in cold oatmeal, or I shall sue!
  15. Holy Crap by jandrese · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot is in a heap of trouble.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Holy Crap by tengu1sd · · Score: 1

      Don't you care that this is going on your permanent record!

  16. In other news... by Davak · · Score: 1

    In other news...

    The use of the F5 key has been banned.

    1. Re:In other news... by ehlertjd · · Score: 1

      Shft AND F5!? 'm runnng ot of keys.

    2. Re:In other news... by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      my-space-button-was-banned.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how will I ever increase the volume on my iBook now?? Glad I still have CMD-R.

    4. Re:In other news... by MntlChaos · · Score: 1

      MyHyphenButtonWasBannedTooSoISwitchedToCamelCase.I tsLegibleRight?

    5. Re:In other news... by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      my-space-button-was-banned.
       
      D0n't 3v3n j0k3. I c4n't b3g1n t0 3xpr3ss h0w m|_|ch h$rd3r c0d1ng g0t th3 d4y th3y b4ann3d 4ll 0f my v0w3ls...

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
  17. What joke? by va3atc · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The dude clearly was wanting to disrupt the schools website
    Asking folks in an Internet chat room to help crash his high school's computer

    My personal website gets charged strictly for bandwidth and storage. If someone had a grudge against me and did this it would COST rather then just slow it down.

    --
    Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    1. Re:What joke? by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      If it's the site you posted the link to you're talking about, wouldn't you be better off with a free hosting provider or running your own webserver at home? (provided you can run your connection 24/7 of course)
      I've got broadband at home and use my webserver for pretty much the same reason you do, keep notes on using FreeBSD and Windows, but it doesn't cost me anything specifically for storage and bandwidth.

      --
      home
    2. Re:What joke? by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 1

      BFD. Not everything that costs you money is a crime. I can legally do lots of things that cost people around me money. It's a joke. It's akin to asking all the students to the principal's office. It makes the office unusable, but I doubt anyone would be charged with a felony for doing it. Laws like disruption of public services were created to address serious problems of mischief. If you did something like this to a 911 service it would be an issue.

    3. Re:What joke? by va3atc · · Score: 1

      I used freeshell for ages but I needed an inexpensive mySQL server as I'm too lazy to change HTML files, upload, check, etc. Mediawiki is totally sweet, I can edit in my browser from anywhere, upload a picture if needed (again, from the browser). When school starts again collaboration of projects will be a lot easier.

      I will be moving back to freeshell though once they update their PHP server to 4.4.1

      --
      Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    4. Re:What joke? by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I'm still not convinced it should be illegal. You're offering anybody who wants to the chance to look at your website. It's like putting out a bowl of candy on your front step. The guy who takes as much as he can carry and calls his friends is a dick, but a criminal?

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    5. Re:What joke? by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but now I can't find out who we're playing in the big basketball game tonight. I have been stripped of my tax funded services. This is an outrage, it should be punishable by death.

      Seriously, do you know how important this game is to us? No you don't. Who are you guys to judge what is or isn't a critical service in our city. We voted this guy in and we trust him to make the best decisions regarding the well being of our community. I for one am glad that they are trying to take this punk out of the equation.

      What would you do if one day this kid, understanding the subtle nature of the intraweb, begins to refresh the shopping list on your internet enable refrigerator. You might run out of milk, or worse, beer. That would be a travesty.

      People like this should be put into special camps. My daughter is in tears because she can't find out if she is supposed to paint her face blue or yellow for tonight game.

    6. Re:What joke? by va3atc · · Score: 1

      The guy who takes as much as he can carry and calls his friends is a dick, but a criminal?

      I do agree with you on that. My original post was just pointing out that it wasn't overly funny on the kids part. But as others have posted, if a bunch of people visit said website because of interest thats great. But what I was refering to is if some ill-minded person decided to refresh my site a zillion times just out of meaness I'd be upset. Not so upset to ever consider the law, but upset enough to try and ban his IP :)

      --
      Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    7. Re:What joke? by LocalH · · Score: 1

      Good use of sarcasm there.

      --
      FC Closer
    8. Re:What joke? by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'm trying it on for size.

  18. Yes, it has by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'This new technology has created a whole wave of crimes, and we're just trying to find ways to solve them.'

    Yes, Canton City Prosecutor Frank Forchione,it has. The crime you are thinking of is prosecutorial misconduct.

    1. Re:Yes, it has by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who else wants to start a new sig campaign?

      --
      Whatever you do, don't click this link more than once! You might get arrested.

  19. If they would have just let this sleeping dog by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 1

    sleep, then they wouldnt have caused such an uproar. i forsee now thousands upon hundreds of thousands of new blogs about to be created so the webmaster can take down their favorite(or not so favorite) web site by having everyone hit F5.

  20. In other news ... by bushboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. Canton City just got their first set of traffic lights installed.

    Frank Forchione was quoted as saying :-

    "Hot Diggidy, this new fangled technology sure is mighty fine !, but it's created a whole wave of crimes, and we'll just have to find ways to solve them."

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:In other news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canton is pretty damn big.

      Uniontown, however, is a small town known for its Amish wares, popular flea market, and restaurant nearly the size of the high school itself.

    2. Re:In other news ... by bushboy · · Score: 1

      so are my balls, but I can still make a joke about them ...

      --
      A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    3. Re:In other news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean about your balls just now getting their first pube installed?

    4. Re:In other news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you at least make it a good joke? That sucked.

  21. Does this mean that it's also a felony by multiplexo · · Score: 4, Funny
    to press all of the buttons on an elevator at once?

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    1. Re:Does this mean that it's also a felony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just tried it.... you piece of crap, I was stuck in the elevetor for 30 mins.

    2. Re:Does this mean that it's also a felony by multiplexo · · Score: 2, Funny
      Just tried it.... you piece of crap, I was stuck in the elevetor for 30 mins.

      Good thing you posted as AC, otherwise Frank Forchione would be sending the cops after you and you'd probably wind up in one of those "pound me in the ass" penitentiaries.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    3. Re:Does this mean that it's also a felony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell does that have to do with Refreshing a Web Page? Why was this modded funny?

    4. Re:Does this mean that it's also a felony by 2e · · Score: 0

      No. Only F5.

    5. Re:Does this mean that it's also a felony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, if it's a Space Elevator.

    6. Re:Does this mean that it's also a felony by AnalystX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Only if it's an elevator in a police station, fire station, school, commercial building, or government building. My grandfather had an elevator in his building that was used for commercial purposes downstairs and for personal living space upstairs. The building was actually zoned that way. So, I guess it would have been illegal only if someone pressed all the buttons going up.

    7. Re:Does this mean that it's also a felony by Ambush · · Score: 2, Funny
      Does this mean that it's also a felony to press all of the buttons on an elevator at once?

      Nope, but if you send all the lifts to the same floor all at once, then it's a felony! ;-)

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people; those who know ternary, those who don't, and those now hunting for a dictionary.
  22. Good for them. by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    At 18, he should have known better. C'mon, he was actively telling others to actively disrupt his school's server. It might seem small, but in effect, he was asking people to participate in a distributed denial of service attack.

    If someone DDoS'd your site, wouldn't you get the police involved if you couldn't stop it?

    Not to mention that he was dumb enough to actually put it in writing on his own website. Why wouldn't he just tell people in person to do that?

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Good for them. by romeo_in_blk_jeans · · Score: 1

      ...and because they decided to treat pranking kids like hardened criminals *cough*FELONY CHARGE*cough*, they're getting /.ed

      Clearly, that's preferable to letting the short attention span of most high schoolers handle the first DoS.

    2. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you got on a bicycle and someone crashed into you because of your inability to ride wouldn't you have learned the hard way not to try to do something you don't understand?

  23. Video of Story by wike · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a link to a video newstory that provides some more details: http://www.wkyc.com/video/player.aspx?aid=18650&si d=45721&bw= This story has been up on Digg.com for a few hours, the school's website has been down most of the day

    1. Re:Video of Story by JWW · · Score: 1

      the school's website has been down most of the day

      Somehow I doubt the actions that got this kid charged even came anywhere close to the amount of disruption unleashed on them today.

      Ooops, their mistake.

    2. Re:Video of Story by conigs · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha....

      I like how they simplify the whole process on the new cast.... How many parents watching that are now going to think "Gee... I wonder if little Johnny/Jane are crashing websites? I better remove that F5 key before they get thrown in jail."

      *sigh*..... yay for local news. They're the reason I transfered from a communications program at one school to a film program at another school.

      --
      Slashdot: where repeating an article in a post is "+5 Insightful"
    3. Re:Video of Story by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      Their server is certainly feeling the combined wrath of /. & Digg. We may need a whole new phrase to describe THAT level of destruction. :-)

    4. Re:Video of Story by loraksus · · Score: 1

      HAHA, the reporter loaded up the website and refreshed it twice in the video. Maybe she's one of us?

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    5. Re:Video of Story by donaldgelman · · Score: 0

      Anyone notice how the reporter in the video hit F5 to demonstrate the attack, isn't that just as bad. All the kid did was ask people to go to a website, thats free speach as far as I know, if they are going to try and say it was just a mand DDoS, then the fact is that he didn't do anything, he just asked other to reload the page, they committed the crime . . .

    6. Re:Video of Story by JWW · · Score: 1

      We may need a whole new phrase to describe THAT level of destruction. :-)

      It been Slashdigged!!We may need a whole new phrase to describe THAT level of destruction. :-)

    7. Re:Video of Story by qzulla · · Score: 1

      From TFV: This is a growing trend.

      Really? Since when?

      Somthing else about learning lessons. It was directed at the kid but pot, kettle, black comes to mind.

      qz

  24. I can't wait until I graduate law school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are the types of cases I'd be all over. Disrupting a public service? Come on...that's for interfering with things like Police and Fire services. It'd be one thing if they charged him for what it is a DOS somehow...even then...it wasn't just him. If I get a thousand people to call the city hall all at once...is that a felony?

  25. everybody hold down F5 to help crash slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    it's not a "public service" so it's legal!

  26. 18 year old boy? by Wisgary · · Score: 0

    Huh.

  27. Ignorance is not a crime, but it should be by cybermint · · Score: 1

    And Frank Forchione should be prosecuted for his crimes against intelligence.

  28. A 'whole wave of crimes'? by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

    Maybe, but this sounds like the prosecutors are manufacturing a whole wave of criminals and trying to find crimes for them to be guilty of.

  29. "clearly, we must protect the children" by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 2, Funny

    i think we should bring a class action lawsuit against all companies that make keyboards, they are manufacturing unsafe products that encourage criminal behavior in america's youth by their continued inclusion of the button 'F5'

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
  30. Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since the school's site is already DDoS'd, here is the Canton Law Dept. Let's see how fast we can take the prosecutor down.

    1. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      set opera to auto reload every second

    2. Re:Canton Law Dept page by notsoanonymouscoward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder if inciting a DDOS will eventually be a crime...

      --
      I ate my sig.
    3. Re:Canton Law Dept page by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes! My city is getting owned.

      --
      -gjr
    4. Re:Canton Law Dept page by KenCrandall · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, a Manual Distributed Slashdotting Denial Of Service would be an MSDOS. :-) (Lame, but it made me giggle to think it up.)

    5. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Joseph Martuccio, Law Director
      218 Cleveland Ave SW
      Canton, OH 44702
      Phone: 330 - 489-3251
      Fax: 330 - 489-3374
      jmcarman@ci.canton.oh.us
      Think I might send the citys law director am email telling him to get real.

    6. Re:Canton Law Dept page by x69 · · Score: 2, Informative
    7. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope... looks like the law dept might have at least a passable apache config... btw... can I have kids as customers? that way when something breaks insead of working I can just have someone arrested?

    8. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in this case. We're all so concerned about this guy that we're refreshing to find out anything new as quickly as possible.

    9. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Well, it's slow but working - that joe marticcue has a face only a mother could love! :) heheheh

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    10. Re:Canton Law Dept page by cammoblammo · · Score: 5, Funny

      'Manual Slashdotting Denial of Service' works better. Of course, 'Slashdotting' implies 'Distributed.'

      Come to think of it, it implies 'Manual' too.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    11. Re:Canton Law Dept page by kfg · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If you read the blurb carefully you'll note that the "kid" is a man.

      KFG

    12. Re:Canton Law Dept page by KenCrandall · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, I meant to leave out the "Distributed". I guess it's Friday when I can't even spell my own acronyms. :-)

    13. Re:Canton Law Dept page by anti_analog · · Score: 1

      I think that one useful part of the site got slashdotted! Oh well...

      --
      you cannot dodge the quad laser. jumping is useless.
    14. Re:Canton Law Dept page by fitchmicah · · Score: 1, Informative

      Everyone refresh: http://www.cityofcanton.com/ I have a perfectly reasonable excuse for refreshing the page 100 000 000 000 000 000 times; I want some live updates from the city of Canton.

    15. Re:Canton Law Dept page by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      That's what he gets for not being a minor anymore.

      Not that being 17 would have saved him, they could have argued he knew what he was doing and tried him as an adult.

      But generally, juveniles get off much easier because they haven't turned 18.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    16. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could send him 1000 emails. This would probably work just as well. Oops, am I inciting you to do something baaad?

    17. Re:Canton Law Dept page by btsawyer · · Score: 1

      We not only have the addresses etc. of the police and city hall but the alleged miscreant's address and an aerial view of his house. And they think telling folks to press F5 is a felony?

      Logically, this one article has occasioned an informal DoS attack on a school and police station as well as a mass invasion of privacy (using public sources, of course) that is far beyond the alleged felony.

      Legally, we didn't do anything wrong. I sent a few dozen F5's to the site even though it's down but that isn't the crime so I'm clear. Telling someone to do it was the crime. Yes?

      Not as uplifting as the million dollar pixel site but not bad for starting off 2006.

    18. Re:Canton Law Dept page by pingus · · Score: 1

      kick open a shell for us and do:

      while /bin/true; do wget -O /dev/null http://www.cityofcanton.com/citygov/lawdept/index. html ; done

      kthnx.

    19. Re:Canton Law Dept page by nahdude812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they can demonstrate material damages, yes, for sure, even with out cyber laws. Encouraging any unusual and unnatural behavior which causes material damage is a felony.

      If they are on restricted bandwidth, and you encourage people in an unnatural action which causes them to exceed this bandwidth and so incur extra charges, you're responsible for those charges.

      Unnatural doesn't mean posting a link. Unnatural *does* mean encouraging people to repeatedly reload the link with the specific intention of taking down the server, as this kid did.

      It's not illegal for me to walk into a store. It's not illegal for me to encourage other people to walk into a store. It *is* illegal for me to encourage a thousand people to walk into a store and jump up and down until the floor collapses.

      Although this oppinion won't be popular here on the 'dot, the kid effectively incited people to vandalism of some nature, whether in his area this is a misdemeanor or a felony depends a lot on his local laws. Depending on how much damage (eg, man hours to bring the server back up plus bandwidth overage charges) he caused it's definately a felony. If he knowingly spoke to people outside his own state and encouraged them as well, then perhaps it counts as having crossed state borders, and then it's a federal crime.

      Let's not delude ourselves, according to the article his objective was vandalism; he deserves a visit from the cops for that.

    20. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Deviant+Q · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's a useful Firefox extension for this kind of stuff:

      http://reloadevery.mozdev.org/

      --
      "May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
    21. Re:Canton Law Dept page by overlordmead · · Score: 1

      he seems like a nice bad guy.... .... does anyone else think the site looks they are comparing this guy to justice?

      --
      Think Gnole-ish, not prole-ish
    22. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or simply put

      SLASHDOS!

      -G-

    23. Re:Canton Law Dept page by edbosanquet · · Score: 1

      Is it illegal for me to walk into a resturant that refuses to serve me with many of my friends and sit down until we are all served?

      On another note:
      Maybe what he did was wrong and maybe technically a felony but throwing the book at a student is hardly the right thing to do. There is room for the city officals to use the right laws at the right time and this is too much overkill. Suspend him for a couple of days and tell him not to do it again. Throwing him in jail is just a horrible miscarrage of justice.

    24. Re:Canton Law Dept page by chiok · · Score: 1

      That's horrible. I also think it would be horrible if we all added the picture of Joe Martuccio, Law Director of the Canton Law Dept, to our blogs and .sigs. http://www.cityofcanton.com/citygov/lawdept/images /martuccio2.jpg

    25. Re:Canton Law Dept page by HTL2001 · · Score: 1

      if "manual" was implied we wouldn't have those things that try to make sure you arn't a bot

      --
      By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
    26. Re:Canton Law Dept page by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      Aaah, he's AC.

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    27. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Magic5Ball · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it illegal for me to walk into a resturant that refuses to serve me with many of my friends and sit down until we are all served?

      Tresspass, if you've been told to leave and refuse to do so. Creating a public disturbance and assault are also possibilities depending on how you and your friends behave.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    28. Re:Canton Law Dept page by JBHarris · · Score: 1

      A Denial of Service attack, to me, implies that the requester's address has been spoofed, and the server attempts to handshake with the fake address. This is what makes a DoS what it is. A slashdotting is not a true DoS. It can cause a DoS, where no-one can get to the page they requested.....but then again so could pulling the server's power cord out of the wall.

    29. Re:Canton Law Dept page by ClamIAm · · Score: 1
      Come to think of it, it implies 'Manual' too.

      Well, it's a bunch of geeks, doing this by their computer...at home...alone... Yeah, "manual" is pretty accurate.

    30. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer Malicious Slashdot Denial Of Service attack.

    31. Re:Canton Law Dept page by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, a Manual Distributed Slashdotting Denial Of Service would be an MSDOS. :-) (Lame, but it made me giggle to think it up.)

      Wouldn't that be a MDSDOS though?

    32. Re:Canton Law Dept page by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      I think his mom is a member here. Now you're going to get it.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    33. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is where you can post an email anonymously.

    34. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it illegal for me to walk into a resturant that refuses to serve me with many of my friends and sit down until we are all served?

      It's probably not such a smart idea. You never know what you'll be eating.

    35. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst. Definition. Evar.

    36. Re:Canton Law Dept page by blackmagic1982 · · Score: 1

      Excelant point friend! Maybe this kid didnt have specific message (though anyone growing up smart and poor in the pathetic public schools we have in this country has every reason to want to stick it the system) but this is basically modern day civil disobendance. Of course its against the law, even more so of course it only crime is creating a material loss. That is kind of the point, the rediculousness of a system that so in love with the idea of privite property it ignores people.

      Besides, this kid is obviously smart and has time on his hands. We should be taking kids like this, find out what they wants to do in life and giving them everything they need to get it. These unfortunately are end up being the kids that end up dead, in the streets or in the military. Lest that how it was where I come from.

    37. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piped MSDOS.

    38. Re:Canton Law Dept page by WinterpegCanuck · · Score: 1

      It is like Winnipeg being mentioned in a Simpsons Episode. We don't care if we are getting dumped on, just glad to be mentioned. Go Jets Go!

    39. Re:Canton Law Dept page by hachete · · Score: 1

      Massive Slashdot Denial Of Service

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    40. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Null537 · · Score: 1

      I believe that's "Go Coyotes Go"!

    41. Re:Canton Law Dept page by serutan · · Score: 1

      Let's not delude ourselves, according to the article his objective was vandalism; he deserves a visit from the cops for that.

      Speaking of not deluding ourselves, how about if we stop lumping people's actions into the most convenient crime category (as in everything = "theft of...").

      "Vandalism" is defacing or destroying property. What this kid did was conspiracy to cause a minor inconvenience, at best. Even the prosecutor is groping for what exactly to call it. In another article he said the kid "could have done tremendous damage" or something like that. Making a school website unreachable for a few hours is tremendous damage?

      I say we should all move to Canton, since there's obviously not much crime there.

    42. Re:Canton Law Dept page by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Do you know no damage was caused? Do you know they weren't on a limited bandwidth account, and are now facing bandwidth overage charges? Do you know if that same server was used for the district to perform its day-to-day operations, and if employees were unable to perform their job functions as a result?

      There's many ways that affecting a denial of service attack can cause financial or material damages, and we don't know enough about the situation to know if those things happened or not. More to the point, this kid didn't know enough about the uses that server is put to, nor its billing approach to know if he would be causing damages by his actions.

      I cannot shoot holes in your house, even if I suspect no one is home. Nor can I do so even if your windows are open and I cause no damage to your property. The point is that he was acting with the intent to cause enough harm to the server to knock it off the net, and there can be, and perhaps were real peripheral consequences.

    43. Re:Canton Law Dept page by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. Intent has nothing to do with the law.
      If he violated the law and they can prove it, then intent
      can come into the picture during sentencing.

      OHIO 2909.04. Disrupting public services
      (B) No person shall knowingly use any computer, computer system, computer network, telecommunications device, or other electronic device or system or the internet so as to disrupt, interrupt, or impair the functions of any police, fire, educational, commercial, or governmental operations.

      If they can prove he personally disrupted a computer system, then this law may apply.
      Now, if they are saying he formed a conspiracy to cause the disruption, that may be a
      completely different law than the one they charged him with.

      The key here is:
      Did he use a computer and cause a disruption?
      was there any disruption at all?
      Is there proof that the computer he was on caused the problem?
      What does the keylogger show?

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    44. Re:Canton Law Dept page by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Multiple people working together whose overall action is criminal, but with whom each individual performs no action that by itself is a crime still counts as a crime, and further counts as conspiracy to commit a crime.

      If he incited others to collectively commit a crime, even though their individual actions, in isolation, are not criminal, he's still guilty under U.S. law. If the others participating knew the objective (and from the sounds of it, they did, since he expressed his purpose in his plea for help with the act), then they are also guilty.

      This is how money laundering is illegal; each step in the laundering process looks innocent in isolation, but taken together represents a crime.

    45. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      breakcore DJ venetian snares is from winnipeg and hates it so much he dedicated an entire album to his hatred of it: Winnipeg Is a Frozen Sh!thole (2005, Sublight Records)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venetian_snares

    46. Re:Canton Law Dept page by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      The only thing is under the Ohio law they charged him with:

      OHIO 2909.04. Disrupting public services
      (B) No person shall knowingly use any computer, computer system, computer network, telecommunications device, or other electronic device or system or the internet so as to disrupt, interrupt, or impair the functions of any police, fire, educational, commercial, or governmental operations.

      They must show this guy/guys used a computer and disupted or interrupted, of impaired
      the function of an educational operation.

      You did/ I did'nt/ you did/I did'nt/ you did/ er Judge could the online viderconference
      that started at 2:45 running at 845kb/sec have anything to do with the slowdown ?

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    47. Re:Canton Law Dept page by Heembo · · Score: 1

      She was wacked with the ugly stick a few times to many herself!

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    48. Re:Canton Law Dept page by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      If the kid did infact cause the disruption, and they have proof that he incited others to do so, it wouldn't be hard to prove that the collective actions of the kid and his accomplices caused any disruptions that occurred.

      There's plenty of evidence you could show. For example, "According to our eyewitnesses who just testified, he incited the incident at 7:47 pm, and by 7:50 pm, 32 IP addresses which had not previously shown up in the school logs were each making an average of 30-40 requests per second."

      Further, they don't even really have to prove he actually caused any disruption. His intent was clearly to do so, and he engaged others to help him. Conspiracy to commit a crime is itself a crime that carries the same penalties as the crime itself, even if the crime never happened. They can arrest him now on the charge of committing the crime (since their initial evidence provides enough proof to issue a warrant), and if in their investigation they find out that it *was* the video conference, they can ammend the charges at a later date to just the conspiracy charge.

    49. Re:Canton Law Dept page by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but there is no conspiracy provision in the mentioned law. I tried to get in your door, the door was locked, there is no B+E, no attempted B+E. I just tried the knob. Yes I told my friends I was going in your door, but well it was locked. Nothing happened.

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    50. Re:Canton Law Dept page by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      All crimes can be conspired toward, laws do not need a special provision for conspiracy.

      He didn't just tell his friends he was going to try to bring down the server, he asked his friends to help him do it since he wasn't able to do so himself.

      If you want to try a front-door analogy, then you need to say you slammed your shoulder against my front door, but it held. So you got 100 of your buddies to all slam their shoulders against my front door at the same time (ignoring the mechanics of 100 people simultaneously slamming against a small door), and it broke in.

    51. Re:Canton Law Dept page by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      There we are, back to the theory that pushing F5, or for that matter,
      setting foxfire to refresh really often can ever be a crime.
      Crackers creed
      "The fact that a site can be broken is the reason it should be broken"

      The fault lies with us, the admins, to make the system robust.
      To involve the law only hurts us all by restricting our freedom. Yes/No/who cares

      Second of all, 100 of my friends only tried the door knob, we never pushed on the door.
      if Ping you = Ack /do again
      if no reply = quit

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    52. Re:Canton Law Dept page by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      The cracker's creed is not necessarily legal, moral, or ethical in all circumstances.

      They did more than try the doorknob. They wrenched on it as hard as they were able. When the kid by himself wasn't able to turn the knob by his own strength, he got a bunch of other people to put all their strength together and exert a lot more force until it gave. This wasn't a "refresh once a minute to see if the server is up" it was "refresh as fast as you can by as many people as you can get together." In other words, a classic DDoS.

      The only way to protect against DDoS is to have sufficient capacity to absorb the DDoS. In really extreme circumstances you build some crazy front-end networks to identify DDoS traffic from legitimate traffic and redirect the DDoS stuff somewhere less harmful. It requires a lot of infrastructure for that, and more importantly it requires a lot of bandwidth.

      If you're not expecting an attack, and still want to protect yourself, you have to had admins sitting there 24x7 watching network traffic with IDS systems so they can respond once the nature of a DDoS is identified.

      Not everyone should have infrastructure in place to protect against all types of attack. You'll never have perfect protection, but the closer you get to perfect protection, the more expensive it gets. Each organization needs to decide for itself what level of protection is economically feasible given the nature of the services it offers, the criticality of those services to its operation, and the likelihood of being on the receiving end of an attack.

      Also, saying, "They deserved to be DDoSed because they didn't protect themselves against it" is like saying, "They deserved to be robbed because they didn't lock the door." Yes, failing to lock your door may be stupid, but it doesn't make it any less of a crime to steal from you. The law establishes that there are understood borders.

      The kid *knew* he was doing something that was wrong, he did not have good intentions, it was his intent to bring down the server. He wasn't trying to do something innocuous, he was trying to cause harm. He didn't try the doorknob, he got a crowbar and cranked on it with all his and his friends collective strength.

    53. Re:Canton Law Dept page by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      I am sorry, what planet did you say you thought you lived on?
      To support the use of big guns for small fries you distort reality.
      Did somebody kick over your sandcastle at the beach, what makes you
      so mad. The place I live uses the law as a sort of guideline, no
      blood, no foul. You know the game.

      Freedom is not given by the law !
      Freedom is taken, if you want it, it's yours. You know what to do.

      I saw a phrase Sunday, it said.
      Don't hold on too tight, then it won't hurt so much when
      he pries it out of your hand.

      After all that, this on networking robustness.
      Reload rate per IP = 5 sec min
      no more F5 attack, not too hard eh.

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    54. Re:Canton Law Dept page by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      I am not mad actually. Personally, I've been enjoying a reasonable debate with someone who until this most recent posting had proposed insightful and well thought out commentary, but suddenly got a bit flamey.

      Reload rate per IP = 5 sec min

      Which IIS configuration option is this? Which Apache?

      Do you have keepalives on? If not, then your pages are going to load very very slowly since you have to wait 5 seconds between each image that loads. If you do, then you open yourself to a resource starvation where many clients keep their connections alive.

      Either way, a lot of big ISP's use a single proxy for all their users, and you'd limit those people from that ISP to a page load rate of 1/5s across all users. Maybe it'd work for a small website, but it definately wouldn't work for a big one. In short, it'd be a stop-gap, and nothing more.

      Also, it still doesn't matter. Leaving your door unlocked does not make it legal to steal from you. That is to say, failing to protect yourself against an action does not affect the status of that action as being illegal or not. Maybe a really good admin could protect them against all conceivable types of attack. Maybe a moderate admin could have protected them against this type of attack. Maybe they only have a former typing teacher running their servers who only knows how to get the thing running, and doesn't even know what DDoS stands for. It doesn't make it any less of a crime to attack them. Whether or not they could have protected themselves is immaterial, so long as they did not invite the crime (and failing to protect yourself doesn't qualify).

      I'll remind you again, the kid's objective was to perform an act (let's avoid pedantry and use the neutral term "act" to mean him taking down the server), and he did so. That act happens to be illegal, no matter how simple the act was. Further, he conspired with others to perform this act because there was sufficient protection to guard against him by himself. If the collective act is illegal, the individual actions are each illegal and carry an additional charge of conspiring to perform that act.

    55. Re:Canton Law Dept page by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      Sorry:
      I didn't intend to put fire in my words, I did mean to try to put
      perspective into this very questionable crime. If we build software
      systems that the user can break, then we will be doing what is
      sadly too common today.
        I tried every key on the keyboard and this text editor still works,
      guess its ok.

      Yes, systems are not designed to handle loads called worst case.
      Students at a Ivy League engineering school calculated the 25,000lb/in^2
      cast sewer pipes installed in the basement of a new 6 story dorm would
      not withstand a high load condition. They got all their friends to turn
      on every device in the building at the same time. After the basement
      wall blew out, there was hell to pay.

      Yes this type of thing should be avoided. It happens with the phone system,
      the highway system, and on the internetwork.

      I think my point is that we must make our sandcastles sturdier.
      I never complain when the wave comes in,
      I just go into emergency dike repair mode.

      On my brainless fix "Reload rate per IP = 5 sec min"
      I must admit to zero understanding and just a guess.
      My line is embedded and closed loop systems. In those systems one must
      always deal with nonsequitor inputs and out of range recovery. Should a
      modern power plant go into runaway, or back off into a safety condition ?

      To make the web servers more robust, tolerant, and self-recovering may
      be impossible with the present thinking, I wonder if a system like this
      could gain any market share? Are there any analogue circuit designers left?

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    56. Re:Canton Law Dept page by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      Attack of the F5 bot
      just another thing on proportionality, This From Canton:
      http://www.cantonrep.com/

      CANTON -- A roundup of "problem parents" whose children are habitually absent
      or late to school is under way. The crackdown on truancy -- an aggressive
      effort between Canton City Schools and City Prose...

      Story:
      LAKE TWP. -- Sheriff's investigators would like to find out how a man acquired nitric acid that they say he sprayed on his estranged wife's face, seriously burning her Saturday morning.

      Story:
      CANTON -- A crown adorning a statue of the Virgin Mary was stolen from Sancta Clara Monastery at 4200 Market Ave. N. The nuns who live and serve there want it returned, no questions asked. Mother Supe...

      Nice town, but don't want to live there.

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
    57. Re:Canton Law Dept page by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Decidedly well said, and I agree with the sentiment, as long as resources exist to implement them. Web development has been my gig for nearly the last 10 years, so I do feel I've got a decent grasp on typical web setups.

      In general, maybe 99% of web servers have no protection against a DDoS, and probably 90% of them have at best a software firewall running on the box itself. The enterprise systems (ecommerce) I work on have load balancing switches, multiple servers on the back end, redundancy on all levels (including Internet access, power supply, and all other back end systems). But even we don't have good DDoS protection. Our hardware and Internet connections are pretty high end, so it would take a *massive* DDoS to take us down, but I'm pretty confident that there are people out there with botnets who could manage it (never underestimate the power of 250,000 broadband-connected compromised computers).

      There is really *little* you can do to protect yourself from a DDoS, unless you have the infrastructure to absorb the DDoS. There was an article about how a central-american gambling site beat out a DDoS attack (the DDoSers were holding the site for ransome for like $50,000 or something). They ended up needing to proxy their website through a really huge ISP, set up advanced firewall rules to differentiate legitimate traffic from the DDoS traffic, and in the end it cost them $1 million to protect against a $50k extortion effort. (Just found the link: http://www.csoonline.com/read/050105/extortion.htm l )

      I had the unfortunate experience of having been on the receiving end of a DDoS (fortunately without any extortion attempt, though I wouldn't have been able to pay it anyhow) on my project site (lotgd.net). About 25,000 unique IP's were requesting random pages on my site, each every 4 minutes. I was pretty helpless to protect against it for the first couple of days, because it was a personal site on a server I rent, my ISP offered no DDoS protection at the time, and I hadn't been able to find any pattern other than that the requests came 4 minutes apart per IP address (plus or minus about 10 seconds). That's about a total of 100 requests per second [on top of my existing user traffic, which is generally about 25 requests per second], and my project is very database heavy.

      I couldn't really keep a database of how often each IP address accessed the site on average, because I was already under a heavy enough load, and 25,000 deny entries in my firewall at a time would also lend a heavy load (software based firewall on the web server [iptables]). Further, the IP's kept changing (either someone was only dedicating a small portion of their overall botnet to me at a time, or they mostly had computers that had dynamic IP's). Over the course of the ~2 weeks that the attack took place, there were a total of 1.7 million unique IP's (only ever almost exactly 25,000 at a time, plus or minus a few percent). Obviously I needed an adaptive solution, because a reactive one (where I identified IP's manually or with a script and added them to the firewall) would probably typically have missed the window where I was actually being attacked by any given IP.

      The *only* way I was able to beat it is by identifying a few IP's that were obviously attackers, and using a network sniffer to watch their traffic and noticing one thing that was wrong in their IP headers (which I could only do because I happen to know what IP headers should look like). It wasn't even technically wrong, it was just different from all the legit traffic. Then I was able to add a simple firewall rule that fixed the issue, but if the attackers had corrected this, I would have been screwed unless I invested in additional infrastructure. I paid a really hefty bandwidth bill that month (about 4x average usage overall), and I never found out who was attacking me (no one ever sent me an email, but because my site is a gaming site that has specific

  31. I hope the prosecutor is kidding... by phiber9 · · Score: 1

    If he's not, he should end up on everyone's shitlist. Punishing the kid for telling everybody to press F5, come on... Does the defence have anyone who knows what Internet is?

  32. Take gun, aim at feet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is their webpage.

    It's dead, predictably. Once again some morons in authority have demonstrated their complete lack of understanding of internet culture. Anyone with an ounce of knowledge of the way people like us think would have dealt with this as quietly as possible so as not to incur the wrath of the entire world. Instead, they thought they'd be smart and "show what they do about this kind of joke", or whatever it was they said.

    They shall pay the price for their lack of vision...

    1. Re:Take gun, aim at feet. by Metzli · · Score: 1

      So I take it you regularly DDoS the U.S. Congress too?

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    2. Re:Take gun, aim at feet. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      This is their webpage.

      It's dead, predictably. Once again some morons in authority have demonstrated their complete lack of understanding of internet culture.
      Ah, since they don't understand 'internet culture', it's OK to DDoS them? That my friend is called bigotry.
      Anyone with an ounce of knowledge of the way people like us think would have dealt with this as quietly as possible so as not to incur the wrath of the entire world.
      'People like us' are a vast minority, and have little right to impose 'our' culture and values on others, or to expose them to our 'wrath'. That my friend is called racism.
      Instead, they thought they'd be smart and "show what they do about this kind of joke", or whatever it was they said.

      They shall pay the price for their lack of vision...
      And that my friend is called Jihad in some parts of the world. In others it's known as 'stickin it to da man bro'. And it's wrong in both instances.
  33. Possible Precident by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Many human actions are only damaging if done en mass. It is a crime to incite individuals to violence, or to disrupt the peace. While this is surely not a violent crime, instructing individuals to perform a DDoS is an attack, whether performed in cyberspace (via browser refresh or other methods) or in real life (say, inciting a flash mob to take all the paper numbers in a waiting line, and leave).

    While I'm not certain felony charges are warranted in this instance, inciting detrimental group behavior is far from a new thing, and should be punished.

    1. Re:Possible Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what are these "other methods" you speak of? just curious i swear.

    2. Re:Possible Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      inciting detrimental group behavior is far from a new thing, and should be punished.

      So what you're saying is that politicians should be punished.

      You got my vote.

    3. Re:Possible Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Is it a crime to march lockstep across a bridge? Once they fish your mangled body from the water, I mean.

    4. Re:Possible Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...inciting detrimental group behavior is far from a new thing, and should be punished.

      No! Only those who actually perform the act should be punished. The listener is the criminal! NOT the speaker!

    5. Re:Possible Precident by bizard · · Score: 2, Informative
      I agree with the parent that instructing people to DDoS his schools computer is probably criminal. However, with the helpfully provided link to the City of Canton legal department I looked up the following definition of 'Criminal Mischief':
      (6) Without privilege to do so, and with intent to impair the functioning of any computer, computer system, computer network, computer software, or computer program, all as defined in Ohio R.C. 2909.01, knowingly do any of the following:

      A. In any manner or by any means, including, but not limited to, computer hacking, alter, damage, destroy, or modify a computer, computer system, computer network, computer software, or computer program or data contained in a computer, computer system, computer network, computer software, or computer program;

      B. Introduce a computer contaminant into a computer, computer system, computer network, computer software or computer program.

      And later it states that if the damage caused is more than $1000 that it is a felony. According to this definition though, no damage was caused...nothing was 'Altered', 'Damaged', or 'Destroyed'. How exactly did they prosecute him?

    6. Re:Possible Precident by LocalH · · Score: 1
      (6) Without privilege to do so, and with intent to impair the functioning of any computer, computer system, computer network, computer software, or computer program, all as defined in Ohio R.C. 2909.01, knowingly do any of the following:

      A. In any manner or by any means, including, but not limited to, computer hacking, alter, damage, destroy, or modify a computer, computer system, computer network, computer software, or computer program or data contained in a computer, computer system, computer network, computer software, or computer program;

      B. Introduce a computer contaminant into a computer, computer system, computer network, computer software or computer program.
      There's your answer.
      --
      FC Closer
    7. Re:Possible Precident by Schickie · · Score: 0
      >>According to this definition though, no damage was caused ...

      Read your own post: "with intent to impair the functioning of any computer, computer system, (etc) ... in any manner ... but not lmited to (etc)"...

      Or am I missing something?

    8. Re:Possible Precident by bizard · · Score: 1
      I read that, however, given the poor english, with commas, all, over, the place...I read it this way:

      In any manner or by any means alter, damage, destroy, or modify a computer, computer system,...

      the part that is 'including, but not limited to computer hacking' seems to be how you accomplish the crime, not what you actually do (alter, damage, destroy, modify) which is the crime.

    9. Re:Possible Precident by SnafuX · · Score: 1

      Based on your definition here and the information I have on this case so far, I see no precidence or crime. How do *we* know what his intentions were?
      Secondly, he didn't perform the act of disabling or harming the network or computers. How could he? All he *might* have done is persuaded people to do something. Since when was social engineering illegal? Even if he had refreshed his screen his refresh alone did not bring down the network. Furthermore, if the the network
      or server was misconfigured in any way then how could one not argue that it wasn't the refreshes of web clients (which is a perfectly normal function for web browsers) is what caused the server to purportefly go offline? Additionally, how many people were "incited" in performing this "act of heinousness", anyway? I can see him persuading a classroom of people
      or perhaps a small mass (50 people) to do this but a properly configured network and server should be able to handle any amount of traffic from this small of a group even if the refreshes happened many times and quickly.

      I don't buy it. This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

      --
      - J
    10. Re:Possible Precident by loraksus · · Score: 1

      *cough* Fax (330) 877-0853 *cough* black paper in a roll *cough*

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  34. If killing someone's web bandwidth is a crime by jaygatsby27 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Than Slashdot should have been in jail long ago. Isn't that exactly what this website is good for?

  35. In other news... by dapho · · Score: 1

    A local man was recently reported as attempting suicide when he was found gagging on the floor of a Burger King because he had drank his soda too fast...

  36. The cops always get their man by nih · · Score: 1

    This perpetrator thought he could evade the Canton City police department, but no one gets away from the law, not this time, not ever.

    --
    I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
  37. but what is the prosecuters site or email address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we could slashdot him just to let him experience some grief over this. I love our legal system.

  38. Canton City website by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    http://www.cityofcanton.com/

    This is the Canton City prosecutor Frank Forchione cyber digs. Nothing on the website about sending the stormtroopers after the kid yet.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    1. Re:Canton City website by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Funny
      Actually, they aren't sending stormtroopers... they decided to send in the Hero of Canton, the Man they call Jayne.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Canton City website by ATMosby · · Score: 1

      That's sort of a funny web site to poke around on! Lots of prostitution arrests!

    3. Re:Canton City website by Mordanliek · · Score: 1

      There's been a wave of crime there where young women have incited other women to charge for sexual favours! "Tom? He's so ugly you ought to charge him!"

    4. Re:Canton City website by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Best. Firefly. Reference. Ever.

  39. Number of hits by Silverlancer · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to the folks at Fark, who got to it before the slashdotting, it only had about 900 hits total. Come on, they crashed the server in NINE HUNDRED HITS?!

    1. Re:Number of hits by pdbogen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      According to TFA (I forgive you for not reading it.. this is slashdot, after all), they server admins noticed a slowdown and caught on.

      FWIW, for everyone lambasting assuming that "connected to" means "linked to," it's possible that the kid's web page loaded the school's in fifteen hundred IFRAMES (and if the school's website is set to no-cache, which is probably likely, this could be trouble), and also that their hit counter only registers unique IP addresses.

      /Devil's Advocate
      //Are these allowed on slashdot?

    2. Re:Number of hits by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      All good counters won't count multiple hits from the same IP within a limited time period... like half an hour.

      So if John Doe navigates to my page 5 times (he might be visiting sub pages and navigating back, and his browser isn't caching it properly), it will only record one hit as long as he doesn't take too long. Then I have an approximation of visitors. Otherwise it's a count of pages served to clients (which itself could be useful for other statistics).

    3. Re:Number of hits by raoul666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Jesus. I could handle 900 hits by tapping it out personally over the bloody phone line with one of those morse code thingys.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    4. Re:Number of hits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      google's cache [google.com] of the home page shows 580 hits as of Jan 1st 2006.
      Less than 400 hits to kill the server?! And they arrest the student?

    5. Re:Number of hits by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I think "fifteen hundred IFRAMES" would crash internet explorer (and your computer) long before it crashed anyone's website.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Number of hits by ROFLMAObot · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to consider the timefrime. 400 hits in several days.

  40. School by taskforce · · Score: 4, Funny
    The school in question is Lake High School in Uniontown Ohio.

    http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/

    The site is actually down, which is a shame; it would have been a nice oppurtunity to see if we could get Zonk thrown in jail for posting it on the Slashdot front page.

    --
    My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
    1. Re:School by cnettel · · Score: 1

      No, there is no malicious intent in posting a story once. The editor posting the first DUPE, though, that should clearly qualify.

    2. Re:School by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      The site is actually down, which is a shame; it would have been a nice oppurtunity to see if we could get Zonk thrown in jail for posting it on the Slashdot front page.

      No, because it comes down to plausible deniability. If Zonk claimed he didn't actually read his post before posting it who wouldn't believe him?

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    3. Re:School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if he doesn't I'm willing to chance it. I encourage everyone on slashdot to visit this site and slow down the web server. Let's see the Canton City prosecuter indict me on felony charges for that.

    4. Re:School by iphayd · · Score: 1

      "The site is actually down, which is a shame; it would have been a nice oppurtunity to see if we could get Zonk thrown in jail for posting it on the Slashdot front page."

      Too bad Roland Piquepaille didn't submit it, and JonKatz didn't post it.

      (I realize JonKatz hasn't posted in a really long time, but it still would have been better to throw him in jail, rather than Zonk.)

    5. Re:School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for the dupe due next week. I'm sure they have just recovered their server by then ;)

  41. I dare them to charge me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey kids, if you walk slowly in the halls, it will slow down traffic. If enough students stop and just stand in the hall, nobody will be able to move.

    1. Re:I dare them to charge me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and when I deal run into crap like that, (I am a teacher), I just toss them in detention hall. I don't need to deal with juvenile crap. And it's NOT an essential part of being a teen because many aren't like that. School is a place to learn, not a babysitting service. If you're disrupting the education of other students you deserve a good squashing. In the case of the website, there's a financial cost to the school associated with calling in a tech so there's a more serious penalty. Though personally I'd have just charged him the cost of the tech plus a hefty premium. Say 2X cost and tell the tech to charge his starbucks as an expense?

  42. Wow by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

    "18 year old man arrested for DDoSing his schools website by encouraging other students to quickly click refresh. In retaliation for his incarciration, he used his telephone call to call his freind Stevie, whom he told to post to /. and all the schools servers were /.ed."

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  43. This doesn't make any sense by Psionicist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This doesn't make any sense, at all.

    - If a boy tells his friend to reload a webpage, he gets thrown into jail and gets felony charges.
    - A lone spammer gets $11 billion in fines.
    - If joe sixpack downloads a movie he gets huge fines.

    Yet, if a medium to large corporation sell/delete customer records, infect consumers computers with spyware or the like, they only get a slap on the wrist?

    When did corporations get more freedoms than individuals?

    1. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did corporations get more freedoms than individuals?

      Long time ago ?

    2. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful


      When did corporations get more freedoms than individuals?


      When you gave corporations the right to be considered a person.

    3. Re:This doesn't make any sense by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Yet, if a medium to large corporation sell/delete customer records, infect consumers computers with spyware or the like, they only get a slap on the wrist?

      When did corporations get more freedoms than individuals?


      Who's the leader of the clubs
      thats bad for you and me
      L O B B Y G R O U P S

      Corporations have been steadily getting more rights than humans for years. They've been buying them.

      I'm sure a certain one will be trying to find me since I've clearly just infringed on their IP. :-P
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they got more money than individuals?

    5. Re:This doesn't make any sense by jfern · · Score: 5, Informative

      The activist conservative United States Supreme Court ruling Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad of 1886 claimed that the 14th amendment somehow gave rights to corporations. The idea of "corporate personage" was born. Of course, they have a lot more rights than persons.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v. _Southern_Pacific_Railroad

    6. Re:This doesn't make any sense by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the USA.

    7. Re:This doesn't make any sense by bogd · · Score: 1
      When did corporations get more freedoms than individuals?

      Probably around the time when they started making more money than individuals?

    8. Re:This doesn't make any sense by ClamIAm · · Score: 5, Insightful
      When did corporations get more freedoms than individuals?

      This happens when a populace starts caring more about iPods and celebrities than making sure their government isn't corrupt. If you live in America, you probably see what I'm talking about. And if you live here and don't see it, you've already fallen victim to it.

    9. Re:This doesn't make any sense by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      they only get a slap on the wrist?

      The last time I checked, they don't even get a slap, except in some very extraordinary circumstances.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    10. Re:This doesn't make any sense by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      - If a boy tells his friend to reload a webpage, he gets thrown into jail and gets felony charges.

      No, he told many friends, with the express purpose of causing disruption to the server.

      - A lone spammer gets $11 billion in fines.?

      If the penalty is $10 per spam...you do the math.

      - If joe sixpack downloads a movie he gets huge fines.

      No one has been fined for downloading. Uploading (distributing copyrighted material) to thousands or millions is a different story.

      However..I do think a felony is far too harsh for this kid. Misdemeanor, and community service at most.

    11. Re:This doesn't make any sense by TinheadNed · · Score: 1

      Buy two Senators today, and receive our handy get out of jail free card!

    12. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, corps have most of the rights of people, but none of the liability. Your corp is not culpable for murder, robbery, rape, whathaveyou. Those culpablilities lie with the person in the corp responsible. Your CEO can be arrested for ordering a murder, his secretary for commiting the act, but the corp as a whole is not liable. Even Kill People Inc. is not liable if its sole purpose is murder. All corp assets and whatnot are not liable. etc etc etc.

      Now, try to prove that CEO of Corp robbed people. He didnt rob them, the accounting firm did. The accounting firm didnt, they were just following orders. In short, you cant pin a systemic problem on a single cog in the system. Even if you can, the scapegoat gets sheared, and the corp lives on. The corp only fails if its investors and assets are not capable of dealing w/ the shitstorm.

    13. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order to protect my rights as a citizen I hereby incorporate myself Anonymous Coward Inc.

    14. Re:This doesn't make any sense by packeteer · · Score: 1

      The parent is correct. They used the 14th amendment which was designed to give liberties to all people after the civil war. The intention was for black people to use this amendment to fight racist state and local laws. The corporations asserted that they too were people and could not legally be denied the same rights as every human being.

      This transformed the idea of a corporation. They were not longer created for a certain business purpose. This is when corporations becuase their own self serving machine.

      The key difference however between a person and a corporation is that if a corporation does something illegal you cant throw it in jail. Technically The leaders of the corporation are liable if the corporation does something illegal but they protect themselves with layer upon layer of plausible denial. Everyone points the finger in every direction and you can never tell who is at fault.

      This is why corporations are so good for doing shady things. If a person did what a corporation did then they would be thrown in jail immediatly where as a corporation can really only be fined. So a corporation stole $10,000,000? Ok well lets fine them a good chunk of that, lets fine then $3,000,000 and that will really show them!

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    15. Re:This doesn't make any sense by oneeyedelf1 · · Score: 1

      I disagree, personally I see this as a similiar idea to that toolbar that was supposed to eat spammer's b/w. I see this as similar to what happens at my school (binghamton.edu) a bunch of students found a paper objectionable to them. The paper allows a student two coppies of the paper, and they all took 2 and threw them out. Dont like it but I feel it is justified. He was making a statement.

    16. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Kill People Inc" you just infringed my copyright, now prepare to die...

    17. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did corporations get more freedoms than individuals?

      1886. While technically they have less rights than a person, in effect, they end up with more due to the fact that corporations can't go to jail, die of old age, etc.

    18. Re:This doesn't make any sense by tiraid · · Score: 1

      As long as we are on the topic of not making sense, what other things can you ask someone else to do that will get you charged with a felony? Sure he had malicious intent, and I'm no lawyer, but come on! As far as the 'malicious browser refreshing', shouldn't he only be held liable for the refreshing he did himself?

      I feel less a man for even saying that last sentance. Can't you just see the court proceedings, "The defendant is charged with refreshing his browser, many, MANY, times! Many more times, in fact, than a good, honost citizen would think of doing.. The refreshing went on far beyond decency!

      For once I am glad there will be plenty of liberals in the court room to say, "WTF?"

    19. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as Paris Hilton mentions this issue on her podcast, I'll know how to respond to this allegation of yours. Until then, sit tight.

    20. Re:This doesn't make any sense by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Can't you just see the court proceedings, "The defendant is charged with refreshing his browser, many, MANY, times! Many more times, in fact, than a good, honost citizen would think of doing.. The refreshing went on far beyond decency!

      Best part is, with every followup story there will be another slashdot story and more expense/bandwith used for the school district and city. I think the city prosecuter should be charged for being irresponsible and reckless.

    21. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When did corporations get more freedoms than individuals?" 1776

    22. Re:This doesn't make any sense by HiThere · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From what I've heard it wasn't even the decision that caused the problems, but rather the law clerk's write-up of it.

      It hardly matters. What we need to do is institute corporate death penalties. If a corporation has committed a felony and cannot practically be imprisoned, then the only remaining option is to execute them. (I.e., revoke their charter and confiscate their assets. N.B.: This doesn't mean the assets of the individuals involved, merely the corporate assets. To attach the assets of individuals, you would need to prosecute them as individuals.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    23. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Lewis+Daggart · · Score: 1

      And this my friends, is what we call circular reasoning. We begin with the premise that he's right, and everyone who disagree's is wrong. We then postulate, 'but I disagree'. The answer to that, as outlined in the premise, is that you are now wrong by default. Instant +5 insightful.

    24. Re:This doesn't make any sense by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. What with their propaganda-styled approach, I just assumed The Corporation was making it up.

      Note to people who make films like The Corporation, End of Suburbia or The Money Masters: When you go overboard with your conspiracy theories, you lend discredit to everything you present!

    25. Re:This doesn't make any sense by t-twisted · · Score: 1

      This happens when a populace starts caring more about iPods and celebrities than making sure their government isn't corrupt.

      I know this is such a nitpick but can you please save your derision and resist picking the most popular pop culture items versus the more destructive ones, such as misbehaving celebrities, overpaid professional athletes and all of reality television? I'm no Mac fanboy but when you point to an iPod (works, useful, adds value) as an example of what is wrong with America today, it diminishes the return on the rest of your insightful comment.

    26. Re:This doesn't make any sense by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      When did corporations get more freedoms than individuals?
      In the USA they don't. Worldcom and Bernie Ebbers are an example.
      The USA does not have exclusive rights to toast big business, and their creators.
      In Russia, we have the YUKOS oil company item, somewhat similar to the Worldcom situation.
      I know, this is a boring comment, so for you older slashdotters wanting to see a story on a good-looking older woman who found herself in trouble with the law, and the resulting jail term tested the mettle of her Company, here you go.
      (not that one, this one)

    27. Re:This doesn't make any sense by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

      You are preaching to the choir my friend. That's all people care about, celebrity bullshit and the latest widget. People (WE THE PEOPLE) need to get our heads out of our collective asses!

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    28. Re:This doesn't make any sense by ClamIAm · · Score: 1
      The fact that I chose something you like for an example doesn't diminish my comment unless you let it. If a comedian had made a joke similar to my original comment, I bet you would laugh instead of getting pissy. Using examples allows one to make observasions easier. The equivalent generic comment would be longer, less interesting, and less memorable.

      You say I should focus on "more destructive" things, but I think that obsessive consumerism, worrying about people that have no real impact on anyone, and ignoring the government that you are supposed to be running are all pretty destructive.

    29. Re:This doesn't make any sense by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      And this my friends, is a classic comment that is critical of another comment. We begin with the premise that he's right, and since he doesn't reference what he's talking about, we can't prove it's wrong.

    30. Re:This doesn't make any sense by RembrandtX · · Score: 1

      I thought it was sweeping generalazations, stereo types, and boiling the facts that destroyed the country.
      Who knew it was a combination of Apple and Brad Pitt ?!

      Fuck politics, vote for your favorite sitcom next election.

      I would endevour to suggest that its possible a corrupt and bi-polar political system, the total disregard for seperation of church and state and centralized (and HUGE) government that is the cause of our woe's ..

      It's a wee bit more plausable than blaming it on consumer goods and actors no ?

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    31. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no Mac fanboy but when you point to an iPod (works, useful, adds value) as an example of what is wrong with America today

      He didn't. He was pointing to things like placing more importance on iPods etc as an example of what is wrong with America today.

      It's got fuck all to do with the exact item involved; he's saying the majority of Americans have completely fucked up priorities.

      Yes, iPods may be useful. But are they more important than politics? But is that importance is reflected in how the average American acts?

    32. Re:This doesn't make any sense by numbnut · · Score: 1

      That's essentially what happened to Anderson (sen?) consulting. They f*&^ed in majorly and were administered the corporate death penalty. Don't that work out okay?

    33. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Kanasta · · Score: 1

      and a damn lot more money/lawyers/politicians.

    34. Re:This doesn't make any sense by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      What we need to do is institute corporate death penalties.

      No, what we need to do is create tougher consumer protection laws, give them teeth and enforce them. "Killing" a corporation is a completely disproportionate response. Sure, it sends a clear message to others, and sure, it gets those responsible - but it also gets every single other employee, and affects their families, the corporation's suppliers, etc. The ones how are truly responsible - the ones at the top - will also likely just receive a huge payout and move on to the next top job. Meanwhile the ordinary employees - the ones who didn't really have a whole lot to do with anything - will likely (relatively) struggle to find alternative employment.

      I can't agree with a corporate death penalty, as it affects far too many innocent people.

    35. Re:This doesn't make any sense by ClamIAm · · Score: 1
      I would endevour to suggest that its possible a corrupt and bi-polar political system, the total disregard for seperation of church and state and centralized (and HUGE) government that is the cause of our woe's ..

      Yes, but how did it get this way? My opinion is that people stopped caring about real issues, and instead focus more on shiny toys and reading gossip about people that will never have any impact on their lives.

    36. Re:This doesn't make any sense by wilec · · Score: 1

      "When did corporations get more freedoms than individuals?"

      It's been a gradual thing that started long ago in 1886(118 U.S. 394). But the short answer as far as recent history is concerned is: when Americans started voting in mass for the Republic-rats. Major events in the process 1968(elected a very smart and crooked leader of the fascist powers), 1972(damn they did it again), 1980(elected a likeable folksy puppet of fascist powers), 1984(damn they did it again), 1988(elected a key player in the ranks of the fascist powers), 1992(elected a self enfacing Republic-rat dressed as a Democrat), 1994(elected even more Republic-rats to sign the Contract on America), 1996(damn they did it again), 2000(quietly allowed an election to be stolen by yet another dingy bible thumping puppet of the fascist powers), 2004(damn they did again)....

      Will they ever learn? Probably not, it seems that a few too many in America today wish to live in a theologically supported police state. Too many more are simply too apathetic or too dingy to know the difference. The 10-20% or so who see the direction of our future have been marginalized as malcontented nut cases.
      This is because the logic of their arguments ignored, they often break into bitter rants like this or simply emit a low growl and gnashing of teeth as they listen to the programmed "talking points" babble from others. I am sorry that you seem to be one of them, I can tell you from experience it is not a nice way to live.

      Matthew

    37. Re:This doesn't make any sense by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I guess you haven't heard..

      "Corporation: n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility." Ambrose Bierce, 1842-1914.

  44. DoS not Refresh by garver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He arranged a Denial of Service attack. Think of his "fellow students" as zombies and him as a script kiddie, then pretend you're the admin or legit user of this site. Now tell me you wouldn't be a wee bit perturbed. This is akin to willfull destruction of property and saying he's only guilt of refreshing a browser is like saying a car thief is only guilt of moving your car.

    A felony is a bit harsh though. Perhaps there were significant damages involved. Or the cops are out of control.

    1. Re:DoS not Refresh by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      It would be awesomely funny if the admin was the one who blew the whistle on him... probably not tho. Still, it's fun to imagine his panic and "God I feel stupid" feelings right now,

    2. Re:DoS not Refresh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is akin to willfull destruction of property and saying he's only guilt of refreshing a browser is like saying a car thief is only guilt of moving your car.

      If you can't differentiate car theft from browser refresh, then we're all in a lot worse trouble than even this incidents suggests. Next thing we know you'll be mistaking IP for actual property!

    3. Re:DoS not Refresh by The+Man · · Score: 1
      He arranged a Denial of Service attack.

      Maybe. He certainly seems to have intended to do so.

      Think of his "fellow students" as zombies

      No. This is where your reasoning (and in fact the entire line of reasoning behind 'incitement' laws) collapses: humans are not zombies. Each person is free to exercise his or her own independent judgment at all times. That independent judgment should include considerations such as whether the suggested act constitutes a crime. If you tell me to kill my dog, and I do it, I am the dog-killing bastard, not you. That's because, unlike a "zombie [computer]," I have the ability to exercise independent judgment. That's one of the key characteristics of intelligent life.

      This is akin to willfull destruction of property

      How so? What property was destroyed? At worst perhaps a few people were unable to access a public resource; this would constitute being a nuisance, a minor misdemeanor. Destruction of property is permanent. Denial of access to a resource is temporary.

      saying he's only guilt of refreshing a browser is like saying a car thief is only guilt of moving your car.

      Not true. There are important differences. First, many car thieves' intent is to retain permanent control of your car. Second, cars are usually damaged by theft. Even those not damaged in the theft itself are worn out faster when being driven than when sitting idle. Computers are on all the time and are not physically damaged or consumed simply through greater use. Finally, stealing a car deprives its owner of an asset. A DoS attack against a web server denies some others of the use of that public resource, but does not deprive the owner of the computer of anything: he still has the computer and all its contents (both physical and virtual) and is free to use it as he sees fit.

      A felony is a bit harsh though.

      No kidding.

      Perhaps there were significant damages involved.

      No. This was a rarely-used, largely useless site with only static content. We're not talking about eBay here.

      Or the cops are out of control.

      Now you've got it. The right thing to do here is have him plead to a slight misdemeanor, pay a $200 fine, and tell him not to do it again. He's unquestionably guilty, but not of anything that would justify this kind of heavy assault.

    4. Re:DoS not Refresh by conJunk · · Score: 1
      He's unquestionably guilty, but not of anything that would justify this kind of heavy assault

      you are 100% right about everything in your comment. nothing this kid did justifies ruining his life with a felony on his record... HOWEVER, just to play devil's advocate...

      let's suppose hypothetically that he actually doesn't know his ass from his ear about technology, and it can be proven that he actually, really believed that getting 5 kids to hold down F5 would DOS the school's web server... then his intent is as bad as what he's getting charged with... what then?

      i'm nost saying that's likely at all, and really, i totally agree with you... i'm just sain' what if...

    5. Re:DoS not Refresh by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      "He arranged a Denial of Service attack"
      No. He merely passed out an information which exposes vulnerability of School's current shitty web service and gave suggestion on how to DDoS. That's far from planning it out with intention to do harm beyond reasonable doubt. Being a prick isn't yet a crime under our Constitution.

      Further more the article states;

      "The incident occurred Dec. 2. Using a school computer, Stone created a blog on a Web site that encouraged others to use a link to another site. Once at the second site, Stone told users to "hold down F5 to help crash my school server," according to police reports."

      I can post a blog that states "This is how you can clog up toilet. Flood bathroom with shit by clogging up my school's toilet." Am I making you follow my instruction? Am I suggesting that I will carry out the act and flood bathroom with shit? Exactly what criminal act has been committed here???? The crime of SUGGESTION? We suggest to nuke countries all the time, but does that make us MURDERERS?

      Since when did free thinking and expression become crime?

      "Think of his "fellow students" as zombies and him as a script kiddie, then pretend you're the admin or legit user of this site."

      You are mistaken, if not, you do not understand the concept of being a zombie. Zombiebots follow orders as author "MAKES" it to do. There is no one "making" these F5 key hitters to do anything. It's a fucking BLOG for god's sake!

      "This is akin to willfull destruction of property and saying he's only guilt of refreshing a browser is like saying a car thief is only guilt of moving your car."

      Again, you are not able to distinguish the difference here. Lets just say, I envy my neighbor's yard and I have ill will against his greener pasture and wish his grass to be burned, I am a prick and an asshole, BUT NOT A CRIMINAL. So I give a suggestion to my other friends around my neighborhood that I wish his yard be burned and suggest method to burn grass. Now, bunch of half baked neighbors carried out the act. Why the fuck am I being charged for instead of those who actually carried out the suggestion?

      "I wish, I can plant a road side bomb on a street of Bagdad. Someone do so as I wish."
      WOW, next time when I see the news of people dead in Iraq because of road side bomb, I will be charged with treason, murder, and terrorism. Is that your logic? Tell me it ain't so, because I don't want to go do jail!

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  45. Too much information given about the kid? by GhaleonStrife · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow. They even give you his street address, in case you wanna walk up and punch him in the face. He's no longer safe from the school bullies! ...Provided he ever gets out of jail.

  46. Sounds like the modern version of by ElementCDN · · Score: 1

    OK everyone pass it along at exacty 2:30 everyone start clapping!

  47. Thank the Lord that I hit Reload instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... because my Netscape Navigator Gold browser does not have a "Refresh" button, you insensitive clod!*

    * (Actually it is in the View menu since version 1, but it only refreshes the display.)

  48. 18 year old "Boy" by neoform · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to call an 18 year old a child "18 year-old boy".. cause we all know that 18 year olds are children.

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
    1. Re:18 year old "Boy" by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Dude if pro choice groups can call a 12 year-old a women then an 18-year old is a boy.

      Welcome to spin.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:18 year old "Boy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude if pro choice groups can call a 12 year-old a women then an 18-year old is a boy.
      Unless he isn't white. Then you're committing a felony abuse of his civil rights.
    3. Re:18 year old "Boy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unless he is white. Then you're committing a felony abuse of his civil rights.

      There, fixed that for you. After all, you know the proportion of minors tried as adults for similar crimes is much higher among non-whites, right? Right?

    4. Re:18 year old "Boy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey now, that's original thinking there son. Better watch that talk unless you want the black helicopters to swoop down out of the sky, scoop you up, and deposit you in a federal pound-you-in-the-ass prison.

  49. Canton, OH is not known for common sense by ChipMonk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Last year, an article on the WEWS Channel 5 website had this gem of a quote:

    "School officials are not sure they [know] what has caused so many pregnancies..."

    Someone needs to get these people a clue-bat.

    1. Re:Canton, OH is not known for common sense by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      I beleive the proper term is a Clue-by-four.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    2. Re:Canton, OH is not known for common sense by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Well? Are you going to tell us or just leave us all in suspense?

    3. Re:Canton, OH is not known for common sense by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

      You must be from Canton.

      I'm sorry.

  50. Wow.. by Jrabbit05 · · Score: 1

    Well that server is down now. Its fallen prey to Slashdotters around the world I guess. Or are just trying to not repair it to say; "It took us N hours to fix it" But who knows...

  51. intent matters by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if i break your arm because i didn't see you standing behind me while i was moving a heavy piece of furniture, then there should be mild repercussions

    if i break your arm by taking it, looking dead in your eye, and twisting it as hard as i can, then there should be severe repercussions

    the whole issue is one of intent

    intent matters in this world, and any opinion that ignores intent, about this kid, or a whole range of modern problems in this world, is not a useful or valid opinion

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:intent matters by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      What if I break your arm by inciting you to stand behind me while I'm moving a heavy piece of furniture by asking you for help?

      How do you know what my intent is, unless I tell you? How do you know I'm not lying?

      Yes, intent matters. But until we start putting psychics in the DA's office, appearances are the only things that are useful.

      / Still think the kid is getting over-punished
      // Worst case, a crappy attempt at a DDoS

    2. Re:intent matters by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 1
      How do you know what my intent is, unless I tell you? How do you know I'm not lying?

      That's what juries are for.

    3. Re:intent matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if I punch you playfully on the arm, I really don't expect the police force to swoop in and arrest me for attempted murder. How about a sense of perspective, too?

    4. Re:intent matters by drew · · Score: 1

      It's not just intent, it's also an issue of scale. If you break my arm by taking it, looking dead in my eye, and twisting it as hard as you can, then there should be severe repercussions, yes, but I wouldn't expect to get you thrown in prison for life. The kid tried to organize a small scale DoS against his high school web server. No money was lost and no damage was done. This is worthy of a felony conviction? Suspend him for a week and be done with it.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    5. Re:intent matters by wkrue1 · · Score: 1

      So, if he wanted everyone to holding down the f5 key to break my arm (his intent) then that would be grounds for an assult charge?

      His intent was to crash a server which apparently the f5 key couldn't do. So even though the intent was a crash, it didn't happen because I say it shouldn't happen with good code (no more that hitting the f10 key once can crash a server, which it could with bad server code but shouldn't).

      And btw, if I'm standing around heaving furniture being moved I can expect the slight possibility of an arm being broken. That makes me, the risk taker, more at fault for the broken arm than you, the furniture mover.

    6. Re:intent matters by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You say his intent was to crash the server.
      He says that his claim that that was his intent was a joke.

      If I consider the likelihood of a few kids refreshing their web page a few times crashing a server, then I conclude that he's telling the truth, and you have serious problems, nature undetermined.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    7. Re:intent matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares if he tried to crash the server? What crime did he commit?

    8. Re:intent matters by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      Intent matters? How about actually doing the deed?

      If you look me right in the eye and ask other people to break my arm. The schmuck that tries to do it committed the crime.

      You see, there is no inducement! I can spew stupidity, and link all over the web with impunity from the government. If I pay people, or offer to trade something for cooperating with illegal stupidity, then I have crossed the line in a big way.

      To me this is the same as yelling SCREW THE HEAD OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY! to everyone I meet. There is no crime until someone tries to get his pants on the floor. I wonder how many people will read this and see absurdity, and how many others will act scandalized?

  52. Vulnerability exists on Linux as well by Pakaran2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a concerned user of fully patched Gentoo, I have tested the "F5 causes excessive reloading" vulnerability. It works on Konqueror, Mozilla and Firefox, with all patches installed, including hardened kernel. Local access to the machine is NOT required; the F5 vulnerability can be triggered when opening a web browser through, e.g., SSH forwarded X connections.

    I hope there will be a patch soon!

    1. Re:Vulnerability exists on Linux as well by ndvaughan · · Score: 1
      The patch is out. Here's the code (java):
      Hand[] hands = your.hands;
      TableSaw tableSaw = new TableSaw();

      tableSaw.saw(hands[0]);
      tableSaw.s aw(hands[1]);
    2. Re:Vulnerability exists on Linux as well by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      He/She/it could still use toes or nose to poke that key.

      Better revise this, quick.

      Oh, and rewrite in Haskell, so there are no side effects.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    3. Re:Vulnerability exists on Linux as well by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      One time I held down F5 to see if the view counter for one of my posts increased. (It did). *.ezboard.com was blocked the next day.

  53. New technology by Jotii · · Score: 5, Funny

    This new technology has created a whole wave of crimes

    Behold the refresh button, the wonder of modern technology.

    --
    [sig]
  54. Whew! by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1

    Good thing he didn't tell them to hit the back button.

  55. The crime isn't hitting refresh by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

    Well, there's obviously only one punishment approrpriate for this sort of behavior: chemical castration.

    That said, come on, what kind of headline is that. "Felony For Refreshing a Web Page?" The crime wasn't refreshing the webpage, the crime was trying to DDoS the school's site. You might as well have written a headline that says "Death Penalty for Swinging a Baseball Bat?" for a story about a psycho who bashes in little old ladies' heads with a Louisville Slugger getting the chair. The crime wasn't swinging the bat, the crime was killing little old ladies.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    1. Re:The crime isn't hitting refresh by Schickie · · Score: 0

      You're thinking too much - get off \.

    2. Re:The crime isn't hitting refresh by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      the crime was killing little old ladies.

            Yes, I understand completely now. Of course DDOSing a website (900 hits is hardly a DDOS attack) is in the same category as killing a little old lady. Thank you for reminding me. By the way, what is that smell coming from your attic?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:The crime isn't hitting refresh by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Are you dense? Nowhere did I compare the magnitude of the crimes. I used an analogy about news headlines.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  56. That reminds me by easytoplease · · Score: 1

    We used to have a rule at school not to steal track balls out of mice. Apparently it was a big problem. Personally, I can't really think of a reason someone would want to steal a bunch of track balls. But I am not sure.

    1. Re:That reminds me by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they were trying to get a couple thousand to do an experiment on scaled-up liquid physics?

      I'm really in a devil's advocate mood today, it seems.

    2. Re:That reminds me by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Personally, I can't really think of a reason someone would want to steal a bunch of track balls.

      I can think of two reasons: (1) They aren't nailed down, and (2) At high velocity, a steel ball coated in rubber really hurts.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  57. You know, with this kind of logic... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cmdrtaco & Drew Curtis should be on death row!

  58. Canton has a new hero by ShinyHat · · Score: 1

    The man who refreshed!

    1. Re:Canton has a new hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the man they call Jane?

  59. Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Genius!!!

  60. Toilets are servers too by geophile · · Score: 1

    Kids used to do a DOS on toilets. They'd arrange for all of the
    toilets in a school to be flushed at once. Maybe they got suspended.
    But DOS-ing a school web site results in a felony charge? Jail?

  61. The Old Days... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Dropping an M-80 bomb into the trash can inside the restrooms was a decent way of getting into trouble back in the 1980s. If you do that today, the armed security guard would probably cap you before you strike the match. Future Terrorists of the World start young and die young these days.

  62. Must've been a popular blog by ottffssent · · Score: 1

    You don't need much hardware at all to handle hundreds of requests per second with apache (unless you're doing uncached database queries or other braindead things with scripts).

    If this kid can get that many strangers to load up the server that hard for enough hours that the school administrators took notice (in my experience, this can take days), call someone in to poke around, and for him/her to notice what's going on, the school's already out of its league.

    The article's a bit thin on details, but it looks like the message wasn't "going here and pressing F5 a lot will slow down my school's computer" (which is informative, and strictly legal) but rather an inducement to commit a crime (possibly - it'd be hard to prove intent to do harm on the part of the folks that actually helped DDOS the machine), which is itself illegal.

    So, we have a kid doing something dumb, amusing, actually sort of impressive, and possibly illegal. Yep, sounds like high school.

  63. Domestic Refreshers by NullProg · · Score: 1

    Sounds like homeland security needs to get handle on these pesky refreshers. They could damage the internet.

    Enjoy.

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  64. What if he did it with PAPER? by rdmiller3 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So they toss a kid into jail because he said, "Click here to crash my school's wussy server."

    Yes, it's a low-tech sort of DDoS attack but it's not automated. He didn't actually do it himself. It involved the willful cooperation of other individuals. That makes it more like a "grassroots movement".

    What if he had said, "Send an info request letter to my school, to swamp the mail-room," hmm?? That's the hardcopy version of what he did. Would he get thrown in jail for that?

    I can understand that people wouldn't be pleased by this kid inciting a bit of social disruption, but calling it a felony and throwing him in jail is far too extreme.

    1. Re:What if he did it with PAPER? by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... since their server seems to be unreachable, maybe we should all sent a snail mail with "Referrer: slashdot.org" on the back?

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    2. Re:What if he did it with PAPER? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I understand your alarm, but I'm sure they didn't really toss this kid in jail.

      They probably just led him in by the arm.

  65. NOW IT HAS: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    document.onkeydown = function() {
    if(window.event && window.event.keyCode == 116)
                    {
    if statement
            window.event.keyCode = 505;
                }
    if(window.event && window.event.keyCode == 505)
                    {
            alert('Please DO NOT DDOS US :(');
            return false;
            }
    }

    the school's easy fix...

  66. 5 to 1 by chigun · · Score: 1

    who wants to take bets the idiot prosecutor and the school beauracracy blame this poor kid for the slashdotting it receives that DID in fact shut down the server, when the kid's lame attempt probably NEVER had a chace to. I say the ADA should indict himself. I think he should indict a ham sandwich while he's at it.

    --
    swanker than you
  67. So typical of LHS by crumshot · · Score: 1

    Once upon a time, I actually attended Lake Highschool and let me say that this does not surprise me that they'd over-react like this. No one in that school knows their ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to technology; at least not when I was there some 7-8 years ago. Hell, 90% of the town is owned by the Amish and Mennonite and there's still horse and buggies going to church on Sunday mornings if that tells you anything.

    I can just imagine the principal (if it's still the same one), who talks like Elmer Fudd, coming over the PA:

    "XXXX, would you pwwweaaaase come to the office, you are in vewy vewy much trouble!"

    Back on topic, this is hardly a felony. Back in those highschool days, I had a few friends make fake IDs via scanners (not in school either). The cops were brought into school and talked to everyone and instead of going to court, they were told to do X hours of community service which none of them bothered to do. I wouldn't be surprised if this guy just got community service.

  68. You'd have to prosecute all the kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after all, they all participated in the refreshing.

  69. Ohio by rolypolyman · · Score: 1

    Holy cow... lately it seems that Ohio has been vying to unseat Florida for the capital of dubious distinctions. All we need is some OHP officers tasering some people's genitals and they'll probably take the crown.

  70. Second Thoughts About /. Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As ignorant as this prosecutor sounds, we may not be doing this kid any favors by slamming the site. They'll probably end up blaming him for the l33t DDoS attack he coordinated through online blogs & message boards.

  71. The Drinking Bird anyone? by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

    The new DDos Tool. I remember when Homer used it to do his automated work for him in one epsiode of the Simpsons.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  72. What can you expect, there other top story is abou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A parking meter scandal that could cost 18 people serious jail time (News at 11)
    http://wkyc.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=457 48

    Talk about wierd poo to get in a tiff over

  73. Too many under-employed cops !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Sunnyvale CA.

    We routinely see 10 copy cars at the scene of minor traffic accidents, plus 5 BIG fire trucks if there is any serious damage.

    At the same, people run traffic lights with impunity around here, and it takes the police 15 minutes to get to a major intersection if the traffic lights go out, if they even bother.

    There is near-zero crime in Sunnyvale, but it isn't because the police are on the ball. Definitely hard-asses, which they think is a means to effectiveness.

    This BS is nation-wide, mostly due to all the cops added by the various FedGov programs
    over the last 30 years.

    Lew

    1. Re:Too many under-employed cops !! by loraksus · · Score: 1

      You should see the amount of cops and fire fighters that show up when a hot chick is stuck in handcuffs or found bound in the trunk of a car as part of a kinky game ;)

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  74. Felony V. Misdemeanor by Irvu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There was a time when we made an important distinction between types of crimes. Misdemeanors were "minor crimes" annoyances that can be cleared up easily enough and are a) not worth making permanent and b) best forgotten once the problems is solved. A classic example is littering, or spraypainting something on a park bench. The former is solved by making the littebug pick up their garbage (and mabye some other peoples') and the latter by having the offendor repaint the bench brown. In both cases the offence can be "fixed" and the individual can learn form a simple dressing down. In most juristictions misdemeanors are not even recorded (or didn't used to be) and never ever became part of someone's permanent criminal record (especially a minor). Moreover misdemeanors aren't liable for jail time above and beyond "time served" (in the drunk tank).

    Felonies are major or "permanent" crimes such as theft, maim, and murder. They connotate crimes that cannot be simply "cleaned up", crimes that cannot be undone in any meaningful sense and crimes that may signal permanent problems for the individual in question. Felonies attatch much stiffer penalties (for both juveniles and adults) as well as "permanence". In some states felons lose the right to vote permanently. This is politely known as "Civil Disenfranchisement". In Midevil times it was associated with the term "Civil Death". Felons are also forbidden from obtaining some jobs (in government), and have to tell all other employers of their status. They are also often forbidden from obtaining some scholarships and grants. While not all of these attatch automatically to juvenile felons many of them do. Increasing numbers of states are making no distinction between juvenile felonies and adult felonies. Unlike midsdemeanor crimes felons are truly marked for life.

    The basic upshot of this is that this kid could be harmed for life for what is, in essence, a nothing crime. He encouraged people to visit a website and thereby caused a server to run slow, not stop, not crash, not burst into flames, just run slow. This is a temporary problem, a fixable problem, and one that doesn't even require two coats of paint.

    This is a dangerous, vicious overreaction on the part of the city prosecutor, and the school officials. They are abusing their power and risk punishing a kid for life for something that should be handled by a stern talking to and no dessert.

    Some ex convicts carry around a felony conviction that prevents them from re-entering society or impairs them in some way thus encouraging a return to crime. How much worse is that when the conviction is for something less-damaging than littering.

    On another note, I wonder when the prosecutor's up for reelection?

    1. Re:Felony V. Misdemeanor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On another note, I wonder when the prosecutor's up for reelection?

      Why don't you ask him yourself?

      Oh, and feel free to share your opinions on the case, too.

    2. Re:Felony V. Misdemeanor by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 1

      In some states felons lose the right to vote permanently. This is politely known as "Civil Disenfranchisement". In Midevil times it was associated with the term "Civil Death". Felons are also forbidden from obtaining some jobs (in government), and have to tell all other employers of their status. They are also often forbidden from obtaining some scholarships and grants.

      On the bright side, they will never get called for jury duty.

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    3. Re:Felony V. Misdemeanor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In some states felons lose the right to vote permanently."

      Do they lose the obligation to pay taxes too? No taxation without representation and all that.

      Or do the people who think up these ridiculous laws weasel out of it by saying that they're still represented, they just don't get to choose their representative?

    4. Re:Felony V. Misdemeanor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some ex convicts carry around a felony conviction that prevents them from re-entering society or impairs them in some way thus encouraging a return to crime.


      So on top of all grief, it's now even more likely this kid will tell people to hit F5?
    5. Re:Felony V. Misdemeanor by daigu · · Score: 1
      Felonies are major or "permanent" crimes such as theft, maim, and murder.

      You forgot jaywalking, unauthorized wi-fi access and other heinous crimes.

    6. Re:Felony V. Misdemeanor by justins · · Score: 1
      Moreover misdemeanors aren't liable for jail time above and beyond "time served"

      That hasn't been true in my lifetime, at least. The more traditional cutoff is a one year sentence, in some states it might be up to 2 years or as low as six months. It's a pretty rare misdemeanor that is actually sentenced at a full year; the prosecutor will in an extreme case like that probably just pursue felony charges.

      Some ex convicts carry around a felony conviction that prevents them from re-entering society or impairs them in some way thus encouraging a return to crime.

      This is another way in which the distinction between felonies and misdemeanors has decayed. Plenty of places won't hire someone with a misdemenaor conviction on their record.

      The operative word is "conviction." Plenty of states make it illegal to base a hiring decision on a non-conviction criminal record (if someone was found not guilty, the charges were dismissed, they were simply arrested and then released, etc.). Those sorts of rules aren't always followed, however.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  75. Well, the kid HAD to get arrested... by n6kuy · · Score: 1

    ...otherwise, he'd've never gotten an article about it on slashdot, thus the school's website wouldn't get slashdotted -- which is really what he wanted, right?!

    --
    If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  76. Welcome to the United States of America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be new here?

  77. huh? by tacokill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "inciting detrimental group behavior is far from a new thing, and should be punished."

    So I suppose you are for punishing Ghandi? Or Martin Luther King, Jr? Or any one of many other civil disobedians.

    I realize this isn't civil disobedience but my point is this: punishment is not always the best answer.

    1. Re:huh? by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

      "So I suppose you are for punishing Ghandi? Or Martin Luther King, Jr? Or any one of many other civil disobedians.

      This guy would have thrown Rosa Parks in jail just for telling her friends to get on the bus.

  78. This is how they pay for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.yesforlake.org/ I think just to show some people we need to find every related server to this system and inflict the slashdot effect.

  79. wrong by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you are looking for certainty where there never was certainty and and never will be any certainty: issues of trust in how humans present themselves

    in every interpersonal relationship that ever existed and ever will, all the way from the tiniest: how you relate to your girlfriend, all the way up to the largest: treaties countries establish with each other, is all based on best guesses and faith

    so welcome to reality, stop looking for certainty where there is none

    lack of certainty doesn't stop people from acting on establishing intent and trust on the most reasonable of judgments, nor should it stop people from establishing best guesses on intent and trust

    this world is not black and white, there are many greys

    you will never make it black and white and simple, nor should you try, unless you are a simpleminded fundamentalist dooming yourself to failure by trying (of which there are many kinds, not just religious)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  80. New Technology? by charlesnw · · Score: 1

    What new technology? Refreshing web pages? Wow..... talk about misinformed :) *goes into liberal mode* We need to look at why he was doing this. The web page must have harmed him at some time. He must be having a bad child hood. Perhaps he had a bad experience with computers. *wakes up from liberal mode* Wow. That was scary.

    --
    Charles Wyble System Engineer
  81. How is this any different.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Than organizing a DDoS attack with a small botnet and having the botnet simultaneously download the webpage to try to DoS the server?

    Kid doesn't need to be in jail but this is still obviously malicious behavior.

  82. Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that all slashdot readers should set their browser's homepage to the school's address so everytime you open the browser, you load their page. Which is worse, a few F5 keypresses or thousands and thousands of browsers opening all the time all day every day?

  83. Mod parent up by drownie · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Mod parent up

    --
    *an infinite number of monkeys wrote this sig
  84. Follow-Up by Irvu · · Score: 1
    According to this page Felons in Ohio are only barred from voting while in prison.

    From the article:
    It's not the first time local officials have investigated situations where students are misusing computers. Forchione noted a 2005 case in which four Jackson High School students were charged with misdemeanors after being caught accessing the school computer system. Some grades were changed.


    So violating other peoples' privacy and altering your grades is a misdemeanor but slowing down a webserver is a felony? Now that is stupid.
    1. Re:Follow-Up by Jayjay75 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you forget, the felony charge was to "send a message". It says they can do that in the Constitution. See, it's right there where the bit about cruel and unusual punishment used to be.

      What ever happened to sending messages via Western Union or something?

    2. Re:Follow-Up by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      According to this page Felons in Ohio are only barred from voting while in prison.
      You realize that he still has the felony record even if he moves to another state (e.g. one that has permanant disenfranchisement), don't you?
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  85. perspective, scale, context, intent by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    all wonderful, wonderful words and concepts that matter exactly as you say ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  86. When did corporations get more freedoms? by ntrfug · · Score: 1

    When they contributed big money to Senators and Congressmen to get their business models enshrined in dubious legislation.

  87. Re:huh? - YOU FAIL LOGIC by issachar · · Score: 1
    "inciting detrimental group behavior is far from a new thing, and should be punished."

    So I suppose you are for punishing Ghandi? Or Martin Luther King, Jr? Or any one of many other civil disobedians.
    You fail logic. Unless of course it was your intention to imply that Ghandi's and King's actions were "detrimental". I've always thought of them as positive actions. :P
    --
    . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
  88. The Only Person Who Should Be Indicted Here is by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

    the web site developer for ripping of the tax payers with such lousy software that 900 hits brought the thing down.

  89. Virtual Sit In by BaumSquad · · Score: 1
    This is the equivalent of a virtual sit in, and it has been used in the past. Is it a denial of service attack? Yes in some ways, but it's also an act of civil disobedience that in many ways should be protected. Would it be different if people decided to try and take down whitehouse.gov in a concerted effort to show the will of the people? I think it's incredibly important that this sort of act, online, be treated for what it is. Is it criminal trespass? Possibly, but that gets very murky when the "offenders" are students at the school, likely the target audience of the website itself. So then comes intent, but even if the intent was to cause some harm, that does not make it fair to compare to a regular denial of service attack using autonomous methods. Obviously one kid doing it won't cause much of a disruption, but tens or hundreds. That's the same power of a sit in. It shows the will (to sit and refresh - refresh - refresh or sit - sit - sit), the resolve (stay refreshing or sitting for a long period) and numbers (it takes a fair number of people to get either to work).

    What was the slashdot response? To continue the same DOS attack. And I think it's incredibly appropriate. Hopefully no script kiddies are automating it. That defeats the purpose. Show the will of the people by showing that this is a valid way to show defiance. We need this sort of free speech, so long as it is not automated, available online as an act of public defiance.

    1. Re:Virtual Sit In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sit ins are not protected behaviors. Neither is PETA/anti-war activists having "die ins" on the middle of interstates.

  90. America, you've got the government you voted for by cutecub · · Score: 4, Interesting

    America,

    For the last 25 years you have been voting for a Police State. And now that's exactly what you have. Congratulations, Democracy really works.
    Now shut up, bend over and take it like a man.

    -S

  91. VLAD FARTED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    christ lockwood...... you stink!!!!!!!!!

  92. Only possible answer by drownie · · Score: 1

    my email 5 sec ago: ---------- Dear Sirs, I am the evil mastermind behind an international crime organization... our name is .... "THE REFRESHERS". By looking at your webpage constantly we will slow it down until nobody will be able to load it. I hope you don't mind. If you want to sue me send me an email and I'll provide you with my correct adress in europe. yours, F.XXXX

    --
    *an infinite number of monkeys wrote this sig
  93. According to Maddox: by myth_of_sisyphus · · Score: 1

    "Civil disobedience is still disobedience"

  94. Ironic? by Wedge1212 · · Score: 1

    Shouldnt we be arrested for Slashdotting the page? Along w/ fark, digg and the numerous other sites that have carried the story and links to the Schools page? Cause i sure as shit know i clicked on the link to their web page just to be evil.

    --
    See Sig! See Sig Zig! Zig Sig Zig!!!!!
  95. I'm such a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey everyone go to www.slashdot.org and hit F5!!! hehehehe - I'm such a criminal!! I should really be stopped before someone gets uh uh uh uh hurt?

  96. Under this standard... by iconeternal · · Score: 1

    I could have got the death penalty for some of the things I did on the computers in highschool. ping!

  97. Can't believe no ones made a reference yet... by SeekerDarksteel · · Score: 1

    Stone..... The man they call Stone... He clicked refresh And his friends clicked it more Stood up to the school Gave their server what for Our love for him now Ain't hard to explain The Hero of Canton The man they call...err...Stone...

    --
    The laws of probability forbid it!
  98. Massive overreaction by Belseth · · Score: 1

    How times have changed. Pranks that would have gotten you a session with the principal are now felonies. Children of all ages do dumb things. It's why records are normally expunged at 18 so they don't carry the stimga of a childhood prank throughout their lives. Schools now have a zero tolerance to any misbehavior and expulsion seems to be the least of a kids worries. The stunt was a modern version of getting everyone to flush all the toliets at once. Fine, suspend him for a week to make a point but a felony? When I was growing up back in the 60s and 70s even in a small midwestern town there was several bomb threats called in. It was a dumb thing to do and would have gotten them expelled but in today's climate they would have been convicted of a felony and jailed for multiple years with the record possibly carrying over into their perminate record and ruining their lives. Is it really making us safer or is the intolerance ripping society apart? After the Columbine shootings it was found social outcasts that had been targeted by bullies were at fault. Who got targeted? The bullies that abused outcasts? No the outcast victims became targets in every school further victimizing them and possibly leading to school shootings that have occured in the years since. The iron fist approach tends to make things worst not better. Prison tends to make criminals. Is it serving society better to throw a kid in prison for a dumb prank and turn him into a career criminal or punish him for the prank by suspending him for a time then giving him a chance to redeem himself and his life?

  99. Hahaha.. I get it! by slashbob22 · · Score: 1

    The school is pulling a prank on them..

    Oh how classy.

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  100. "hold down F5 to help crash my school server" by Mark+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Hm. That's weird. I hold down F5, and all that happens is the little beveled, transparent "speaker volume" window appears and cranks to maximum.

    Well, if the kid's exploit doesn't work, I guess the prosecutor has no case.

    --

    Take care,
    Mark

    There is a solution...

  101. Sophistry. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    The one who does the trampling should be found guilty of murder, especially if they ran with no obvious signs of fire

    Well, now you're just being an ass.

    Out of curiosity, how does your take on the 1st amendment take into account other forms of fraud (beyond deceiving people in a public place into thinking that they're about to lose their lives)? So, if a doctor maliciously tells you you only have 24 hours to live... is he just having a little 1st amendment fun? How about if I call you on the phone and tell you that if you don't do [whatever] in the next 5 minutes, that I'll kill one of your family members - someone who is not in your sight at the moment. Ah, freedom of speech!

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  102. Re:huh? - YOU FAIL LOGIC by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Interesting


    You fail logic. Unless of course it was your intention to imply that Ghandi's and King's actions were "detrimental". I've always thought of them as positive actions.

    And you fail philosophy and politics. Did you think the people Ghandi and King were acting against thought their actions were positive? I'm pretty sure the British Government, and many US State governments (as well as many people of the time) didn't hold your view that these were positive actions. These are also the people with the power to prosecute. Get it?

    --
    AccountKiller
  103. I agree with the charge by Andrew+Tanenbaum · · Score: 1

    Consider that he had the intent, but not the skills, to take down the server. If he could, he would have done worse.

  104. I did it! I'm glad I did it! by AmazingRuss · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd do it again!

    (click)

    BAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!

  105. Yes, but we had a name for this in my day... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    ...we called it a prank.

    I mean, let's get serious. This guy crashed the Web server of a high school. Not a bank. Not a military research base. This is no threat to "homeland security." It's a kid goofing off. You want to slap him with a felony conviction for that?

    Sure it was the wrong thing to do. Sure he should be punished. But it seems to me that there was a time in this country where somebody who did something like this would get suspended from school for two weeks and the real punishment would come from Dad's belt.

    Have we as a people become so emasculated that we really need to have the government step in, call out the cops, and throw felony charges at a teenage kid for the digital equivalent of toilet papering a house?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Yes, but we had a name for this in my day... by Saint+V+Flux · · Score: 0

      A weeks worth of detentions would have been an apropriate punishment, not this bullshit lawsuit.

    2. Re:Yes, but we had a name for this in my day... by orcrist · · Score: 1

      Great post, but my favorite part was: ...for the digital equivalent of toilet papering a house? :-) Made me think of my own highschool days, and it's a perfect comparison.

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  106. Re:Canton Law Dept page PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  107. But, Officer! by modecx · · Score: 1

    But, Officer, it's just a flash motorcade?!

    Seriously, though, I've seen funeral processions that should have been crimes, and I was stuck behind one today, for almost 30 minutes! It's asinine. I think that sometimes the poor bastard who kicked the bucket wants to punish people who are just trying to get around... And that's why I'm going to offer free food and booze, and maybe a concert or something for any and every moocher who attends my service, which will last approximately one week. I will bring the city to its knees with my cold dead body! MUHAHAHAHAHA!

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  108. Likely a Macintosh, not a PC by syukton · · Score: 1

    Actually, thanks to subsidies from Apple, most public schools in the USA run on Macintoshes.

    I used to be a nighttime tech for a datacenter (www.forest.net) that was a largely Macintosh facility, and it was there that I learned about the perils of Mac-based web hosting. This was back in '02, when OSX was still "kinda new" and a lot of the machines in the DC still ran OS9 with Webstar as their web server software. Webstar had this "quirk" where, if it put a dialog on the screen, the machine stopped listening for incoming connection requests. It turns out though that this "quirk" isn't actually due to Webstar, but is actually the fault of MacOS 9.x and prior, because they're single-threaded operating systems and any time any application put a dialog onscreen, the entire system would halt pending the dismissal of the dialog box.

    So when you hit the connection limit and a dialog appeared onscreen notifying you of such, guess what happened if nobody was there to dismiss the dialog? Yes that's right, it appeared as if the machine had completely vanished from the internet. Kind of like that school district machine has done, on a friday, after school hours, with nobody around to dismiss the dialog.

    Hmmmm....

    If I were a bettin' man, my money would be on Macintosh in this instance.

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    1. Re:Likely a Macintosh, not a PC by Binary+Boy · · Score: 1

      First, it was quite possible for an app to throw up a dialog and not halt the whole system. So you're wrong on that count.

      Second, I think this very site proves almost daily that sites can be brought to their knees quite easily.

      This was a lame attempt, try again!

  109. www.thecorporation.com by mindaktiviti · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Corporation tries to answer this question. Pretty cool documentary. It's slightly left-leaning but it does show the opinions of both righties and lefties as well as ex and current CEO's from various huge multinational corporations. Very interesting.

    If you don't want to purchase or rent it, you can find a torrent on Sweden's favourite torrent site. :)

    1. Re:www.thecorporation.com by NoData · · Score: 1

      Aw man. thecorporation.com is now some promo site for a documentary?! Does anyone else remember when thecorporation were the purveyors of Humor Product(TM) and hosted such bits a Kitty Lick III: The Shedding (a hilarious FPS spoof?), and the Stop Kitty Porn campaign? Or the RGB Ribbon Campaign to eradicate free speech on the web? Good times, good times. Those were the olden days of the web. Man I'm old.

  110. The Effect by PacketScan · · Score: 1

    Feel the power, /.

  111. Problem Loading Page by bizitch · · Score: 1

    WTF? I mean what are they gonna do?

    arrest us all???

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  112. I can't get to the site! by kimvette · · Score: 1

    I can't load the web site ( http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/hs/ )! I keep hitting F5 to re-submit my request but I keep getting a browser error (not even an HTTP 500 error). I don't get it. I guess I'll just keep hitting F5 until the page loads. :D

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  113. Which ordinance? This one? by syukton · · Score: 2, Funny

    HTTP Status 500 -

    ----------

    type Exception report

    message

    description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request.

    exception

    java.lang.NullPointerException
            OrdinanceGet2.doGet(OrdinanceGet2.java:43)
            javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet .java:743)
            javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet .java:856)

    note The full stack trace of the root cause is available in the Tomcat logs.

    ----------

    Apache Tomcat/5.0.19


    Yeah, I hate it when I break that ordinance...

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  114. Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The truth hurts, doesn't it?

    Seriously, you wouldn't expect exactly that reaction?

  115. A Felony? by CaptMattman · · Score: 1

    This offense is put in the same level as aggravated assault, arson, burglary, murder, and rape. That seems like a clearly wrong classification since I would assume felonies carry a stronger sentence in court. The sentence will be disproportionate to the crime.

    --
    -Mattman
    http://OneBillion.blogspot.com
  116. Ok everybody, in 10 minutes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 10 minutes, want everyone to go flush their toilet.
    (my apologies to those of you on low ground)

  117. Digg too! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Digg reported this before /.. So three DDoS events. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  118. ooo my turn my turn. now that we've taken down by myfootsmells · · Score: 1

    the HS and Prosecutor's office why not the jail? http://www.sheriff.co.stark.oh.us/serv02.htm

    1. Re:ooo my turn my turn. now that we've taken down by DASCOM2000 · · Score: 1

      Stark County Sheriff's Office
      JAIL EFFICIENCY INDICATORS
      Cost per meal for food services
      This cost is based on competitive bidding every three years and presently our meal cost
      is $1.01 per meal and the state average is approximately $2.25 per meal

      Damn, these guys are really outdoing it with the watch your diet stuff

      http://www.sheriff.co.stark.oh.us/jail-facts.htm

      --
      If common sense were common everyone would have it.
  119. DDOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Burn! />

  120. The best quote by digitalgimpus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The best quote on this is:


    "It's a crime and it is important we take this seriously ... especially for school officials ... it could have done a tremendous amount of damage," said Canton City Prosecutor Frank Fronchione.


    HA! An overloaded server is damage? Tremendous?

    I think this guy is trying to turn an overloaded school website (like anyone visits that anyway) into a mini-9/11.

    Tremendous Damage is essentially reserved for 9/11, Oklahoma City, type damage.

    IMHO that's borderline slander since it's extremely unlike for any true damage, forget about "Tremendous".

    Those are just words to get in the paper, at the expense of someone else's reputation.

    If I were that kids parents, I'd consider a lawsuit. Then again, nobody ever wins a lawsuit against a prosecutor.
    1. Re:The best quote by robertjw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think this guy is trying to turn an overloaded school website (like anyone visits that anyway) into a mini-9/11.

      Better yet, his actions have actually resulted in the 'Tremendous amount of damage' he wanted to avoid.

    2. Re:The best quote by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1
      HA! An overloaded server is damage? Tremendous?

      Tremendous damage, maybe not. But how many public schools do you know of that can spare the money or manpower to un-constipate their network? IT attention costs money.

    3. Re:The best quote by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      But how many public schools do you know of that can spare the money or manpower to un-constipate their network? IT attention costs money.

      In a school here, the one student who bothered to hack the LAN became the admin's assistant, and later the admin. I know about two more schools where similar stories happened, and caused substantial IT-related savings for the schools involved. I attended one of them.

      However, it was not the Land of the Free, but a postcommunistic banana republic. What else to expect in such uncivilized place.

  121. pranking kids? by syukton · · Score: 1

    Pranking kids, you say?

    I thought that at 18 you became an adult in the eyes of the law. It's when you register for selective service and also when you become legally responsible for your actions (instead of your parents, who were responsible from 0 to 17).

    There were no kids involved here, just an adult who did something stupid.

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    1. Re:pranking kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though it's not in the press anymore, 18, 19, and 20 year-olds are not allowed the legal ability to enjoy alcohol. If you concur they aren't responsible enough to handle a bottle of beer, I'd like to hear your explanation for allowing (or even requiring, since you mention Selective Service) them to commit the next few years, or even their last breath, to Uncle Sam. Responsibility doesn't grow from birthday candles. And freedom IS free. Those who say otherwise want to sell it to you. Now I've got to prepare my uniform for drill/battle assembly, like I've been doing for 16 years. For the record, I much prefer tonight to the year of washing my uniform in a bucket in Iraq.

    2. Re:pranking kids? by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      It's 21 to drink in Texas, and I have to say, I was shocked it was that high when I went over there. It's 19 here in Ontario, which I consider a fair age (though 18 would be better). I think at 18, nobody's going to be able to stop you if you want to drink anyway (you'll get the alcohol through an older friend or something).

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    3. Re:pranking kids? by hunterx11 · · Score: 1
      Doing stupid, puerile, disruptive things is bad and often warrants punishment.

      The flagrant, egregious, unbridled abuse of justice in an attempt to abrogate a person's human rights for doing something this minor, however, is an outrage which should offend everyone everywhere.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    4. Re:pranking kids? by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      I think at 18, nobody's going to be able to stop you if you want to drink anyway (you'll get the alcohol through an older friend or something).

      In a way, that's sort of the point. If the drinking age were 18, then people who were younger say 15 would be able to easily get it through an older friend.

    5. Re:pranking kids? by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      IMHO that should be countered by a public service announcement-type campaign (if it did indeed become a problem, which here, it never really was) to teens of legal drinking age that their ability to buy alcohol came with responsibilities, one of which was not to purchase for a minor.

      I don't think the laws should be based on the assumption that people are going to break them.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    6. Re:pranking kids? by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      MHO that should be countered by a public service announcement-type campaign (if it did indeed become a problem, which here, it never really was) to teens of legal drinking age that their ability to buy alcohol came with responsibilities, one of which was not to purchase for a minor.

      That's great except that public announcements don't actually work. People still drink and drive all the time. People still don't wear seat belts or bike helmets. People still smoke, etc...

      Whether or not teenage drinking would be a problem I can't say, but I believe that is the main reason for the drinking age being 21. Making the drinking age 21 does a reasonable job of making alcohol more inaccessible to people under 18, which in my opinion is probably a good thing. A person who turns 18 is just too likely to know too many minors (i.e. people under 18).

      I don't think the laws should be based on the assumption that people are going to break them.

      Except that people do. That's kind of the point really. We wouldn't really need laws prohibiting things if people didn't do those things.

    7. Re:pranking kids? by romeo_in_blk_jeans · · Score: 1

      "Pranking kids, you say? I thought that at 18 you became an adult in the eyes of the law. It's when you register for selective service and also when you become legally responsible for your actions (instead of your parents, who were responsible from 0 to 17). There were no kids involved here, just an adult who did something stupid."

      Congratulation on successfully fixating on two words in my original post, thus completely missing the point all together.

      You see, my point was that the "adults" (they threw what amounts to a temper tantrum -- i'm not sure how "adult" that is) in charge completely over reacted to a childish prank. The kid didn't bring the local DMV's website to it's knees. It's not like people couldn't renew their license and were thusly in danger of getting arrested for driving on an expired license. He didn't cripple Chase Manhattan's website and cut people off from hundreds of millions of dollars of their collective money. He made his school's website slow down. "Slow" and "unresponsive" are not the same thing. Furthermore, the article did not even make it sound like the schools servers were unusable. They were simply slower than usual!

      Might I remind you that one of the formative principles of the USA was "let the punishment fit the crime" -- yet American's have a problem with over reacting. If something goes wrong, everyone gets sued. Arrest him! Sue her! How about informing the fella that you know what he's doing and threaten to take school-level disciplinary action before you send in the FBI to bust his door down like he's smuggling columbian crack to american children?

      This is a power play by people in charge. They're trying to assert dominance. This country isn't a land of dominants and submissives. It's a land of laws, freedoms, and rights.

      Annoying the school principle is not worth felony charges.

      I'm sorry if this is abrasive but it directly addresses the fallacy of each successive generation thinking that "the kids nowadays" are less respectful of their elders then they were as children. It's not true, you know. Kids don't become more and more disrespectful with each generation. Adults just get older and more crotchety. Hell, I've noticed myself heading toward this attitude and i'm only 30!

      Anyways, if "these kids" really are disrespectful at age 18, wouldn't it be the fault of the 40 to 50 year olds that gave birth to them for ineffectual parenting? Isn't that the age bracket that's in charge here?

      "Think about it." -- Nick, Falling Down

  122. his isn't the end by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

    It's all gonna kick off when they realise he masterminded this whole thing to get the site famous and have the entier population of the internet bring it to it's knees.

  123. Just one more step... by petrus4 · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...on the road to America becoming a repeat of Nazi Germany. The judicial system has been almost entirely dismantled already. Habeas corpus is gone, and Bush has been claiming that as Fuhrer in Chief he doesn't need to listen to either the courts or the representative bodies. That's why you get things like this happening...all the good Germans imitating Bush's attitude down the chain.

    The only thing he really needs to do now is implement Rex 87, and you're all officially fucked. Even if that poor kid does get locked up and sodomised and/or waterboarded for 20 years, just think of it as him going in early.

    It'll take a while, cos there are so many of you...but Bush'll get around to all of you, in time.

  124. Slashback by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for the Slashback on this story :o)

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  125. Shenanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems highly unlikely that this sort of attack would: (1) solicit enough agents to be of any consequence as the school only has 873 enrolled from which some proportion may read the blog in question, and (2) have the agents participate for a duration long enough to be of any consequence, even if a start time was agreed upon. (Netcraft doesn't have their server listed; Netcraft is unable to corroborate this story of dying.)

    Additionally, regarding (1), I doubt the intrest of outside partisans. Who else would care?

    Having been in a simlilar situation, I am inclined to assume that something else---general incompetence---was responsible for the sluggishness of the school district's website, and the student is being used as a scapegoat.

    Even if the district were to try to admit the server's referer logs as evidence, the ease by which one can forge the referer string makes doing so a laughable proposition.

  126. This is soooo wrong! by gone.fishing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Caution liberal/liberitarian/green content (rant) ahead!

    For some reason I feel like I should have seen something like this coming. Frankly the criminal justice system in the United States is absolutly ill-equiped to deal with technology crime. In general, it is a system that has morphed into a plea-bargain machine that charges people with the most henious crime they can make fit and then work on reaching a "equitable sentence" through a plea-bargain. Ultimately the student will be allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge (it this case, probably a misdemenor).

    There are a few things about this system that are GROSSLY UNJUST!

    First, there are no rules that allow both sides to play the game evenly. The prosicutor makes them up as he goes along and changes them when and if he wants.

    If you can't afford an attorney (and what eighteen year-old high school student can?) you will probably be appointed a public defender who is over-worked, under-paid and probably only a couple years out of law-school. He (or she) will consider it a victory if they can get the plea-bargain down to a misdemenor (even if no crime was committed).

    If the kid's parents can afford a (good) private-practice lawyer they will have to pay thousands if not tens of thousands for the defense. There are a couple of reasons for this, one is that the lawyer knows they can get that kind of money from those kinds of people. Another reason is that the lawyer will have to hire experts that can educate him about the technology just so he can get an idea of what the charges really are about. Finally, if it makes it to court, there will have to be money to pay the experts to come in to court and testify. Naturally, the lawyer will want all of this money up front.

    On the other side of the table, you may be facing a lawyer who wants to make a name for himself. He is aware of the failures of the system and knows how to exploit them to achieve his goals (personal or political). If the defendant gets a public defender he knows to prey on the over-worked defender and will offer a bad-deal that is just good enough to make the public defender sell it to the defendant. He also knows that the public defender has very little money for expert witnesses. If he faces a private practice lawyer, he will fight a delaying action, not offering much of a deal knowing that the cost-to-fight will soon bankrupt most people. He too can play the expert-game, only he has a county IS geek as a professional witness (so it costs him very little).

    Don't forget, the state's attorney is graded on his conviction rate (not on if justice was served). His raises and promotions depend on a good record with a high conviction rate.

    This is a system that is so broken it deserves to be tore completely down and rebuilt. You don't have to be an innocent man on death row to feel the injustice. Criminal Justice deserves two sides that are equally capable, equally funded, and fair for people of every income level. A CEO of a Fortune 500 company deserves the exact same treatment that a homeless windo deserves. Justice needs to be blind to status, race, gender, faith, orientation, or anything else (other than justice). It is the United States greatest failure as a country (although the health care system comes damned close).

    1. Re:This is soooo wrong! by RustyPelican · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From a guy that is more middle of the road, I feel quite comfortable saying that I believe you are absolutely right. Anyone who has had any real experience with the legal system ( civil or criminal ) has a gut understanding that it is not always justice that is on the table. The name of the game is to get a settlement that is good enough to clear the courts calendar and put a few brownie points in the city's column and then NEXT!

      It doesn't appear that the city officials in question have any real experience or interest in raising children to be good citizens. They have fired off a canon to kill a fly. What ever happened to progressive disipline in schools ( detention, parent teacher meeting, suspension, expulsion, or maybe just a good verbal reprimand?) Why should it be necessary to call in the criminal justice system to handle what is at best a school discipline issue ( if it is any issue at all). I hope the city fathers of Canton step back and rethink their position on this one.

      The point here is that a city official took this action because he could do it and cause this kid a lot of pain and suffering regardless of the outcome, not because it was just. If there is any justice here, the mayor, city council, citizens of canton and the judge will extract equil pain and suffering from the public officials that took this uninlightened course of action. Maybe an email from every reader of Slashdot to Mayor Creighton will help start the process in the motion ( I'd post the email address but the web site seems to be slooooow at the moment ).

  127. *giggle* by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    I mean, it's not like they were generating millions of hits.

    Well, maybe it wasn't earlier. . . ;)

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  128. Zombies!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He turned his friends into zombies.

  129. Boy? by leereyno · · Score: 1

    "An 18 year-old boy was recently arrested...."

    Am I the only one who finds this statement disturbing? What does it say about our society when an 18 year old can be described as a child and no one thinks it's strange?

    I'm sorry, but anyone old enough to join the military and kill our enemies overseas is NOT a child.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  130. Contact the city of canton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Don't know if anyone has posted this yet, but here are the contact details for the city of Canton officials. I hope you all voice your disgust by sending them an email. http://www.cityofcanton.com/reachus.html

  131. uh-huh-- and who broke the law by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    the kid at the center- or those who listened to his sermon?

    he's not believed to be personably responsible for the refreshing, only the reccomendation to others that they do so.

    kinda like printing the anarchists cookbook? no?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  132. Bzzzt wrong by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    The student encouraged others to refresh a web page. Not a felony, AFAIK.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  133. Forchione is an ass. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    This guys attitude helps nthing, stops nothing, and shows exactly how stupid someone can be when confronted with a 'computer problem'

    Felony? this is rediculous. Just stupid beyong belief.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  134. First off... by ShadowNetworks · · Score: 1

    Please people... this is just politics at it's worst. Apparently having more then 3 or 4 people now hitting F5 while on a website is now a felony? Maybe it should be a felony to charge students with technological knowlegde. If a server can be crashed that easily, it wasn't well maintain, didn't have enough bandwidth, and shouldn't have been running in the first place. As for this kid or adult, whatever he is, it'll be pitiful if he's convicted of a felony. I think the IT guy who maintains the server should be fired for not completing his duties. This kid didn't spread a virus, or a worm. He didn't hack anything. He just refreshed a freeking website. Perhaps Yahoo will come after me if I refresh their website too many times saying that I'm tying up bandwidth and trying to crash their server. Nothing malicious was done, just a vulnerabilty exposed in crappy hardware. Move on and drop the charges.

    --
    Give me a productive error over a boring, mundane and unproductive fact any day. ~Anon
  135. The felony is obviously for... by itior · · Score: 3, Funny

    Theft!

    He is making them steal MEGAHERTZ!

  136. Some particulars on the DA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The DA Frank Forchione seems to be an interesting character.

    Do check out more details and his picture on the following link: http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:oSdQ_jiXJUMJ: malone.edu/546+Canton+City+Prosecutor+Frank+Forchi one+&hl=en

    No wonder he put this poor kid in jail.

  137. FYI by jtorgers · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Lake Local School District is hosting a new web site this year. The new "official" district web site is http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/.

    When appropriate, visitors will be linked back to the former district site http://www.lakelocal.org/

    Or this site http://lakelocal.oh.schoolwebpages.com/

  138. Thwack! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    "School officials are not sure they [know] what has caused so many pregnancies..."

    Don't just give them a cluebat ... beat the hell out of them with it and then take it with you. That way, the police won't have the murder weapon and you'll be free to apply a free cluing-in to some other imbecile. Besides, if said officials are unaware of what causes pregancies then odds are they will not be reproducing, so hopefully the next generation will have fewer idiots in charge of their education.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Thwack! by Svartalf · · Score: 1
      Besides, if said officials are unaware of what causes pregancies then odds are they will not be reproducing, so hopefully the next generation will have fewer idiots in charge of their education.


      That'd be wishful thinking, I fear. Just because you don't know what is causing the pregnancies, doesn't mean you won't be doing the act- you just don't connect the two things out of ignorance or abject stupidity. In this case, stupid people seem to be breeding like rabbits (as is evidenced by all the extremely stupid people about including Jack Thompson and apparently Frank Forcione and all the Canton, OH police department...)- they're just going to get worse as time progresses.
      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    2. Re:Thwack! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      No doubt you're right but one can always hope. Actually, as the gene pool continues to degrade and as average intelligence continues to drop, at some point people won't even be able to figure out how to have sex. The question is whether that point will be reached before or after the fall of civilization.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  139. interesting that this Frank Forchione Fucker by geekoid · · Score: 1

    is more interested in solving crimes then preventing them.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:interesting that this Frank Forchione Fucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This editorial makes it sound like the kid's mistake was not being the Trustee of "a township he largely owns", in which case he might have been able to catch a break from this prosecutor.

      [excerpt]
      [Lake Township Trustee] Erb physically abused [Administrator Carolyn Casey] Casey. He eventually acknowledged it and apologized, but only after Casey complained and Canton Prosecutor Frank Forchione investigated and concluded Erb did, indeed, do the dirty deed. But rather than prosecute him as he would many first-timers, Forchione urged Erb to publicly apologize and Casey to accept it.
      http://www.cantonrep.com/index.php?Category=14&ID= 198547&r=0

  140. This is pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has Prosecutor Forchione never made similar stupid things in his youth, clogging up his school's toilets or placing bangers in mailboxes ? Has he be arrested and put in jail for those ?

    In any civilized country other than the US the kid would just have been dismissed from the school, at the very worst.

  141. Re:America, you've got the government you voted fo by robertjw · · Score: 1

    Problem is, we still got a heck of a lot of crime for a Police State. If we are going to live in a country where the police intimidate and harrass people, could they at least harrass the criminals too?

  142. Wussy DDOS by wetfeetl33t · · Score: 1

    It would take a helluva a lot of refreshing of a helluva lot of web pages to slow even a slow webserver down. Seems like refreshing pages is a drop in the bucket as far as web servers go.

    --
    Register the editry.
  143. Everything is a felony now by Wansu · · Score: 3, Insightful



    In the 60s, when I was growing up, only real bad offenses were deemed felonies. Murder, Rape, Arson, Armed Robbery and other stuff like that. Then along comes a new breed of careerist prosecutors and grandstanding politicians, all one-uping each other to see who could be toughest on crime. They're ratcheted damn near everything up to felony status. Are there any misdimeanors anymore?

    In my state and others, many drug offenses carry longer mandatory minimum sentences than violent crimes. I was buying ammo recently at a gun shop. There was a sticker beside the register which warned of a 10 year sentence for buying a firearm for someone who shouldn't have one. Well, there ought to be a serious penalty for that but Armed Bank Robbery carries a 7 year penalty. Either the illegal gun purchase should carry a shorter penalty or the violent robbery should carry more. It's nuts.

    These officials who slapped the HS kid with a felony say they're doing it to send a message. This is zero tolerance run amuk. All this felonizing of picayune offenses reminds me of something Deep Purple Ian Gilliam joked about on the Made In Japan album, "Make everything louder than everthing else."

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    1. Re:Everything is a felony now by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "In the 60s, when I was growing up, only real bad offenses were deemed felonies. Murder, Rape, Arson, Armed Robbery and other stuff like that."

      Posession of cigarettes that didn't have a tax stamp?

      Posession of a deck of playing cards in a tavern?

      Both felonies in my home state, and I know people who were arrested for each, in the 60s.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Everything is a felony now by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      I know someone who is study very hard for the LSAT. He says it shows mental abilities that are presumably required for being a lawyer.

      Seems more like the law is just about knowing arbitrary and specific things. If someone does well on the LSAT, it would be a shame to waste that brain on being a lawyer. I suppose that with enough knowledge of the law it would be legal to achieve almost any purpose as long as the method goes through all the loopholes. Anyone committing a felony is a person who didn't hire a lawyer to help with the planning.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  144. School URL might be wrong, try this-- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:School URL might be wrong, try this-- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ouch, wrong one. I actually go there, the one in Millbury, not the one in Canton. Kind of confusing, actually.

    2. Re:School URL might be wrong, try this-- by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Now go thru and view each of the teachers' pictures. That'll learn em. Oh shoot, now I'm probably committing a felony as well...

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
  145. Experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Lets see how my school district reacts.

    http://www.oasd.k12.wi.us/

  146. New Technology? by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1
    This new technology has created a whole wave of crimes, and we're just trying to find ways to solve them.
    Refreshing a web page is a new technology?
  147. Please show damages by jnaujok · · Score: 5, Funny

    Excuse me for pointing this out, but where exactly are the damages that relate to this felony. If this kid finds a lawyer with even an ounce of brains, the court case should last thirty seconds.

    Lawyer: Why do you have a web site?

    School: So the public can access it.

    Lawyer: So, is the same machine running it today?

    School: Yes.

    Lawyer: Does it run on the same connection?

    School: Yes.

    Lawyer: And it runs the same software, with the same data?

    School: Yes.

    Lawyer: So, in fact, nothing was erased or altered on the machine in any way? Correct?

    School: Yes.

    Lawyer: Did your service provider charge you with any extra fees?

    School: No.

    Lawyer: So, apart from a handful of extra traffic, which you admit slowed down but did not stop, damage, or destroy hardware, software, or data, and which did not cost you any extra money, you had not other damages?

    School: Uhm, well, I guess that's correct.

    Lawyer: Tell me, do you sue the driver in front of you if he slows down, or charge the slow walking grandmother holding up the line with a felony?

    School: Uhm, no.

    Lawyer: Tell me, if all the phone lines are in use at the school because people are calling them, is that a felony? Are prank calls a felony?

    School: Er, no.

    Lawyer: So, your basis for the "damage" in this case is that a student basically asked his friends to "call-up" the computer until you had a busy signal.

    School: Yes.

    Lawyer: In fact, your entire web site listed less than 900 hits before it was Slashdotted into oblivion. Tell me, have you started legal proceedings against the news agency that took the story national, or Zonk for posting it on Slashdot?

    School: Erm, no.

    Lawyer: So, you're only willing to harrass young children? To send a child to prison for what amounts to no more than a phone call where they hang up? Is that what you feel is acceptable? Is that, in fact, what you view as teaching our children?

    School: Er, do I have to answer that?

    Lawyer: Well, you are making me wait, keeping me busy, I might have to file a felony suit against you for that...

    --
    Life, the Universe, and Everything... in my image.
    1. Re:Please show damages by rfunches · · Score: 1

      Just thought I'd point out, defense would probably object on two of your latter points, the "sue the driver" question, and the "only willing to harass young children" question. Not that it would make any difference -- the point should've already been made by then -- but you'd never actually hear those questions get answered.

    2. Re:Please show damages by SysKoll · · Score: 1

      ROTFL! Brillant post! Absolutely hilarious! Man, you should be a lawyer. I hope this school is sued and that the morons who started it are sent back to the grocery shelving job they so richly deserve.

      --

      --
      Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    3. Re:Please show damages by lampiaio · · Score: 0

      Excellent post, especially the last line.

      --
      My other account has mod points.
    4. Re:Please show damages by denebian+devil · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the "Well, you are making me wait" comment.

    5. Re:Please show damages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is even worse... th eonly people delayed were this clowns friends and their high f5ing! -lol-

      was anyone else even on the website? if not, there WERE NO DAMAGES!

      what makes me think this prosecutor types up his reports with a type writer?

    6. Re:Please show damages by jnaujok · · Score: 1

      If I were the prosecuting lawyer (and I think you have the defense and the prosecution mixed up in your comment) by the time the defense lawyer got to those questions I'd be trying to please an insanity defense -- for the prosecution. If a judge doesn't throw this case out before it even sees a jury, there's a huge problem with our legal system.

      --
      Life, the Universe, and Everything... in my image.
  148. Blimey! by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

    I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition!

    1. Re:Blimey! by ClydeWJones · · Score: 1

      I spent at least five minutes resisting... but... No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!

    2. Re:Blimey! by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Heh, I was just surprised that nobody else thought of the whole thing first. This is Slashdot after all...

  149. Wrong Lake HS by mazarin5 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That Lake High School is just outside of Toledo, OH. The Lake High School in question is near Canton, in the East.

    --
    Fnord.
  150. Compare to Soviet Russia by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    This makes Lavrenty Beria's Soviet Russia look like Heaven. Just how do such dumb people get into these petty official positions, and then proceed to make the US the Number One laughing stock on the world's stage. Do please explain, because, looking in from another country, I'd be splitting my sides if it wasn't so tragic.

    1. Re:Compare to Soviet Russia by catmistake · · Score: 0, Redundant
  151. So many reasons why this is silly... by robertjw · · Score: 1
    This story is just wrong for so many reasons:
    1. Why would additional webserver load slow down the whole computer system?
    2. Why would additional reload requests even overload the webserver? Any webserver that's worth a crap should be able to server more traffic than it's bandwidth will allow. I know my servers would saturate the connection long before the machine would slow down.
    3. How difficult is it to just handle this from an admin side, either at the webserver or firewall level? Change your firewall configuration to slow down repeat requests from the same IP addresses. If the system was properly configured there would have to be hundreds or even thousands of users pressing F5 to seen any impact at all.


    This is beside all of the ethical/moral/constitutional issues everyone else is bringing up.

    BTW, if anyone from the Canton school district is reading this and needs an admin that can keep your webserver up, let me know. I'd be glad to do some remote consulting for you.
    1. Re:So many reasons why this is silly... by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Canton, Ohio. It is a HELL HOLE! I currently live about 20 miles North of this piece of shit city near Akron, Ohio (Copley Township). The city of Canton, Ohio is home to the NFL Football Hall of Fame, for which they are infinitely proud (LOL). The city used to be home to many manufacturers. Steel, Engines, etc. In the '70's, when the economy tanked, over 60% of the population was unemployed. People went CRAZY! I recall growing up being surrounded by drunks and druggies and people neglecting and abusing their children, wives, etc. This place is a complete an utter STINK PILE! If your ever think you want to go there, DON'T. It has got to be one of the worst places on the face of the earth. The people are all crap! The city is crap! The schools are crap! The police are crap! The city officials are crap! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!

      Personally, I think everyone on Slashdot should DDoS every website even remotely associated with Canton, Ohio government or industry. By the way, it is also the corporate home of Diebold Inc. Yep, THAT DIEBOLD! The one who is creating VOTE STEALING ELECTION FRAUD MACHINES to ensure that the piece of shit Republicans who cause all the damn problems in this country get to stay in power.

      Ralph Regula, a Republican, is (and has been for as long as I can remember) the congressional rep for Canton, Ohio.

      This is truly an EVIL CITY! Nothing about what this prosecutor has done surprises me in the least. Thest people ALL deserve to be shot, and have their testicles pulled out and shoved up their ass!

      I hate everything about that city and the government there can ALL GO TO HELL!!!!

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  152. Counterargument: by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    Anybody not old enough to buy a whiskey in a bar cannot be a man, so he has to be a boy.

    Nice country you have, where killing is ok for the young, but booze or boobs are a no-no.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Counterargument: by leereyno · · Score: 1

      Come to Louisianna. The legal drinking age there is 18.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    2. Re:Counterargument: by Winlin · · Score: 1

      Actually I think the legal drinking age is 21, but state law allows 18 and older to be in bars and other places that serve alcohol. from a legal FAQ page for Louisiana:
              What is the drinking age in Louisiana?

      The legal drinking age in Louisiana is 21, it is not 18.

      LSA R.S. 93:11 makes it illegal to sell alcoholic beverages to anyone under the age of twenty-one years.

      LSA R.S. 93:12 makes it illegal for anyone under the age of 21 to purchase or have public possession of an alcoholic beverage.

      LSA R.S. 93:13 makes it illegal for anyone to buy alcoholic beverages for anyone under the age of 21 years except for a parent, guardian or spouse of the person under 21.

      So, it would appear that someone under 21 years cannot buy or have in his possession (in public) any alcoholic beverage. It would also appear that it would not be illegal for someone under 21 to drink at home if a parent buys the booze.

    3. Re:Counterargument: by leereyno · · Score: 1

      "LSA R.S. 93:13 makes it illegal for anyone to buy alcoholic beverages for anyone under the age of 21 years except for a parent, guardian or spouse of the person under 21."

      What you don't realize is that a "guardian" there is interpreted to mean anyone over 21, including a bartender.

      The laws in Louisianna are structured to conform with the letter of the unconstitutional legislation passed by congress in the 1980's requiring states to raise their legal drinking age or lose their federal highway funding. MADD (Mother's against Drunk Driving) decided it would be a good idea to infringe on the rights of young adults. Just like the prohibition party before them, they worked to shove their tyranny down the throats of all americans simultaneously by enacting federal legislation. A constitutional amendment was beyond their grasp but that didn't matter anymore anyway since the federal governement had been slowly eroding the powers of the individual states for decades by that point. Their nominal reason for waging war on the rights of their fellow citizens was that it was supposed to lower the rate of drunk driving. Well guess what, it didn't. But then that is not surprising since that was never their real motivation anyway. If they had wanted to lower the drunk driving rate they would have lobbied for legislation that increases the penalties for drunk driving. There are all sort of ideas that one could come up with to lower the incidence of drunk driving that don't involve violating the rights of others. Their real motivation, so much like that of the "temperance" movement so long ago, was that they didn't like the idea of their 18 year old sons being able to go into a bar and order a drink. Since their sons were over 18, they no longer had the legal prerogative as a parent to prevent them from drinking. The answer they found was one with a long tradition throughout human history, lobby the government to abridge the rights and freedoms of those whose behavior or identity they dislike.

      The fact that their intentions flew in the face of the 9th amendment, and their approach the 10th, didn't bother them a bit. They were mothers and these were their sons and they demanded the right to control their son's behavior. Now had they been honest about their intentions they wouldn't have gotten very far. They were smart enough that they didn't try to convince people that adults don't have the right to drink. That had been tried before during prohibition and the country wasn't going to listen to that. Instead they coached their arguments in terms of drunk driving. They made teary eyed appeals to congress and the nation to stop the scourge of drunk driving that had robbed them of their sons and daughters, by infringing upon the rights of other people's sons and daughters. Thanks to their "For the Children!!!" nonsense and the gullibility of congress and the people, we're now living in a country where the police, at least in the college town where I've lived for the past 13 years, spend a fair ammount of their time violating the 9th amendment right of adults to self determination.

      Well that doesn't quite fly in Louisianna, especially among the cajuns for whom alcohol is a big part of the culture. There an 18 year old is a grown person, not a child. There the concept of someone being merely a "legal" adult just doesn't exist. In that part of the country most people get married between the ages of 18 and 21 and the idea that someone is old enough to make that sort of life-long committment, but not old enough to drink a beer, just doesn't wash. People there especially don't like the idea of a bunch of assholes in Washington telling them how to live. So, as a result, the drinking age laws in this state are designed to simultaneously comply with the letter of the federal legislation while undermining its purpose.

      The government in Louisianna is notoriously corrupt, but one thing they don't do is put up with crap from Washington.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  153. I wouldn't usually post this but I read it today.. by TheSimkin · · Score: 1

    The Texas Duck Hunt A big city lawyer went duck hunting in rural Texas. He shot and dropped a bird, but it fell into a farmer's field on the other side of a fence. As the lawyer climbed over the fence, an elderly farmer drove up on his tractor and asked him what he was doing. The litigator responded, "I shot a duck and it fell in this field, and now I'm going to retrieve it." The old farmer replied, "This is my property, and you are not coming over here." The indignant lawyer said, "I am one of the best trial attorneys in the United States and, if you don't let me get that duck, I'll sue you and take everything you own. The old farmer smiled and said," Apparently, you don't know how we settle disputes in Texas. We settle small disagreements like this with the "Three Kick Rule." The lawyer asked, "What is the Three Kick Rule?" The Farmer replied, "Well, because the dispute occurs on my land, first I kick you three times and then you kick me three times and so on back and forth until someone gives up." The attorney quickly thought about the proposed contest and decided that he could easily take the old codger. He agreed to abide by the local custom. The old farmer slowly climbed down from the tractor and walked up to the attorney. His first kick planted the toe of his heavy steel toed work boot into the lawyer's groin and dropped him to his knees. His second kick to the midriff then made the lawyer loose his early morning breakfast. The lawyer was on all fours when the farmer's third kick to his rear end sent him face-first into a fresh cow pie. The lawyer summoned every bit of his will and managed to get to his feet. Wiping his face with the arm of his jacket, he said, "Okay, Now it's my turn." The old farmer smiled and said, "Naw, I give up. You can have the duck."

  154. Nice to know by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    According to Canton City Prosecutor Frank Forchione 'This new technology has created a whole wave of crimes, and we're just trying to find ways to solve them.'"

          It's because of dickheads like this that I choose NOT to live in North America... I don't know how the yanks can sing their national anthem with a straight face anymore.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  155. It's not the life in Canton that's slow, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the school administration that's slow !

    Craig

  156. Sorry, this is wrong HS--- don't click here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...sdfasdfasdfasdf

  157. A logical consequence of people having rights by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
    Corporations are nothing but collections of people. The individuals change, of course, but no people, no corporation (effectively speaking).

    So why does it surprise anyone that corporations are treated as people? Any rights the people that are part of the corporation have are effectively rights the corporation has.

    Take one trivial example: do corporations have freedom of speech? Let's assume the answer is no, and perform reductio ad absurdum: How would a corporation "speak" anyway? Well, it would have one of it's spokespersons (or webmasters, or advertising executives, or whatever) go out and say something on behalf of the corporation. That's an actual real, live, person we're talking about here. That person has the right to free speech. If they choose to exercise that right in exchange for renumeration from someone else, that doesn't strip them of their right to free speech. Hence, the corporation can "say" anything that any of its members can say. If corporations don't have freedom of speech, neither do the people that make them up.

    Q.E.D.

    The real tragedy (assuming there is one here) is that groups of people are inherently difficult to hold accountable for something, especially if they stand together. That's powerful and beneficial when it's a matter of civil disobedience, but it's a kind of power that single individuals don't have. It's not a right, though, just a power.

    1. Re:A logical consequence of people having rights by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      What about free speech in the use of collective resources (like money) that don't belong to an individual? Then the corporation's rights are independent of the rights of its members.

  158. Harmless prank by Thaelon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when do harmless pranks get you sent to jail?!

    And yes it was a harmless prank, the server didn't even come down. And even if it had it would have come back up at what, the end of the class period?

    I can remember getting in trouble for making various projectile devices ranging from spitwads to a pen crossbow (that would put a chopstick into a wall....ok that was kinda dangerous) and I never got freaking arrested.

    Schools are ridiculous these days. Let kids be kids.

    --

    Question everything

  159. like i said by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    So, if he wanted everyone to holding down the f5 key to break my arm (his intent) then that would be grounds for an assult charge?

    yes, if your arm broke

    His intent was to crash a server which apparently the f5 key couldn't do. So even though the intent was a crash, it didn't happen because I say it shouldn't happen with good code (no more that hitting the f10 key once can crash a server, which it could with bad server code but shouldn't)

    i said intent matters, i didn't say it overrules the actual effects. if you do something bad, your intent is evaluated in determining punishment. if you didn't do anything bad, i don't see how you can be punished. no one knows what you did, and no one was hurt, so it's like nothing happened. intent only comes into question for determining punishment for your action that actually resulted in damage

    And btw, if I'm standing around heaving furniture being moved I can expect the slight possibility of an arm being broken. That makes me, the risk taker, more at fault for the broken arm than you, the furniture mover.

    that's basically what i said

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  160. The Prosector has permanently killed that server by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Good going, you political hack. You think a couple dozen hits is a felony? You've just opened up that server to millions of hits. I might just take a few dozen shots at it myself. Thanks to that idiot, that school will never have an operational server again.

    And are WE felons now? Golly gosh.

    I'm thinking that Ohio is possibly the stupidest, most corrupt state in the U.S. Poor Ohio. Scandals and Diebold and creationism, oh my.

  161. 100% agreement by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    perspective, scale, context, intent

    all of them words and concepts that should be used together in determining punishment for a crime, minor or major

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  162. High school admins by AndreyF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From my experience, high school admins are usually the very bottom-of-the-barrel when it comes to computer ops. Mine was an english major turned high school english teacher turned highschool sysadmin. He suspended me for for three days just for running a network scan on the servers.

  163. Mac OS X 10.3 + Apache according to Netcraft by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    According to Netcraft, the site is running:

    Apache/1.3.33 (Darwin) mod_jk/1.2.6 DAV/1.0.3 mod_ssl/2.8.24 OpenSSL/0.9.7i PHP/4.3.11

    That exact version string seems to suggest Mac OS X 10.3. Who knows what hardware it's running on, especially in a high school. I've seen 10.3 running on an original tray-load 1998 CRT iMac G3 -- 233 MHz, 64 MB, it isn't pretty. Slow as XP on an original Pentium. You pretty much need a blue&white G3 minitower or a slot-load 2000 CRT iMac G3 (350+MHz) to run Mac OS X 10.3/10.4 with decent performance. Versions 10.0 - 10.2 were even slower.

    Why the server actually crashed is a good question for the Apache and Darwin/OSX gurus.

    BTW, I'm not aware of any Apple subsidies for schools. Sometimes Apple will make low bid, but nothing too different from what Dell does. I *wish* Apple subsidized their hardware, then maybe my high school and college would have had semi-modern machines rather than their 10-year-old Macs and 5-year-old PCs.

  164. Link w/ video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Video from a local news station on the arrest:

    http://www.wkyc.com/akron/akron_article.aspx?story id=45721

  165. Motive by umbrellasd · · Score: 1
    I bet the school district can establish a more insidious motive here because that young man probably knew that Slashdot would get a hold of it and DDOS the poor district as a result, so you see his crime is for more subtle and dangerous than we first thought. He corrupted his fellow students to attract media attention, knowing that this would result in Slashdot interest and a further more devastating attack.

    *Refresh*Refresh*Ref...oh, uh...*looks up and then hides his hand's behind his back and stares at the ceiling*

  166. translated quote ftfa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    '"This new technology has created a whole wave of crimes, and we're just trying to find ways to solve them, "Forchione said.'

    Roughly translated... yes from the fish. (Select "English" -> "Midwestern US Political System" translation.

    What we got here is one o' them newfangleed interweb connectors, yup. That thar thing is a whole slough of turrible thangs waiting to happen anna' we ain't gonna put up with no flim-flammin around from no smartypants yungins with a hankerin to start no trouble.

  167. brilliant! by calzones · · Score: 1

    This is a stupendous development. Now we have Digg to take down sites for us. So we no longer have to bother with TFA anymore.

    On with the comments!

    --
    Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    1. Re:brilliant! by Chmcginn · · Score: 1
      So we no longer have to bother with TFA anymore
      Come on, have we bothered with TFA since about 1998?
      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  168. PWNage by Watinko · · Score: 1

    This was on Fark Lastnight, and Digg this morning. FARK AND DIGG PWN /.

  169. Just wondering... by Aaton · · Score: 1
    If conficted of a felony in Ohio would he lose his right to vote? What a good way for a school to teach someone a leason...

    "THE ISSUE:
    Almost 4 million Americans, or 1 in 50 American adults, are not allowed to vote because they have been convicted of a felony, regardless of the nature or seriousness of the offense. Three fourths of these Americans are no longer in jail. 13% of African American males - 1.4 million - are prohibited from voting.

    Furthermore, state laws vary when it comes to defining a felony and in determining if people who are no longer incarcerated can vote. Thus it is possible that in some states, a person can lose their right to vote forever if he or she writes one bad check. Furthermore, the process to regain one's right to vote in any state is often difficult and cumbersome. Most states require specific gubernatorial action, and in 16 states federal ex-felons need a presidential pardon to regain their voting rights."

    Above quote was take from the following PDF the NAACP created April 13 2005.

    NAACP Supports Voter Renfranchisement For Rehabilitated Felony Offenders

  170. Mac servers not too bad by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    According to Netcraft the machine is running Apache 1.3.33 on what is probably Mac OS X 10.3.

    Regarding classic mac os and WebStar, I have used versions 1.0 thru 3.0 on Macs and Mac clones in my high school on Mac OS 7.6 thru 9.1. Prior to WebStar we used MacHTTPd and even NSCA HTTPd on a NeXTstation.

    What you said about a modal dialog box locking the system is somewhat true, however it generally is triggered by other applications. There were only a few very early versions of WebStar that would actually freeze themselves with their own dialog boxes. More common was a modal dialog box from another application that did the deed. On our servers (Mac IIci, Mac Quadra 605, PowerComputing Mac clone) we ran WebStar (WWW), Rumpus (FTP), Eudora Internet Mail Server (POP+SMTP), QuickDNSpro (DNS), FileMakerPro (DB), Lasso (FileMaker web CGi interface), Timbuktu (sort of like VNC), and a variety of scripts for log analysis and web searching. Over the first year we had a couple freeze-ups of the server, so we dove into the software to see what we could do. Turns out that simply updating the apps to their latest patch/bugfix release solved most of the problems. Also Mac OS 8.6 and newer were based on an updated kernel with updated threading support and solved even more issues. (Of course by the time 8.6 shipped we were already trying out FreeBSD and Mac OS X) For insurance we bought a watchdog dongle that plugged into the ADB (apple desktop bus -- keyboard/mouse) port and would force a restart if the software ever halted. In the 2 years after our overhaul I think we had one crash and the dongle successfully rebooted the server in a matter of minutes.

    Maybe we were lucky, or maybe we just took the time to read the manuals to avoid the gotchas. I have no regrets in using Classic Mac OS as a server. Today I like Mac OS X for the desktop, but it's Solaris and FreeBSD that I run on my servers.

  171. I wonder... by lucat · · Score: 1

    ...what kind of brainless idiot can charge a 18y/o boy for a felony for such a stupid thing. Probably someone that knows *nothing* about technology but just wants his/her name on the newspapers.

  172. Kill DaDa21? [was Re: Seems like a waste...] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >> So if I tell someone to shoot the principal that would be exercising my free speech?

    > In my anarchocapitalist belief system, yes.

    In your pin-headed, poorly thought through belief system.

    Asshat.

  173. This is pretty sad by smchris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Michael said it was a joke," Forchione said. "We showed him how we deal with this kind of joke."

    Being 18, they showed him, indeed, considering he will have a felony in the database tracking him for the rest of his life. In lieu of a job, I guess he can get a book from Loompanics on how to cook meth and be a drug dealer.

    But I suppose they had to balance the ethical issues to reach a wise decision. I mean, it's hard to imagine the horror of school web sites crashing around the country. That would send a signal that we're weak on terra.

    The more the idea takes hold in my mind, the easier it is to see examples of what cowardly bullies Americans are. Yup, the Canton police really showed this kid what happens when you mess with the school web site. "Take that computer-using high school kid!"

    Maybe Kevin Mitnick can get him gigs speaking at the high school circuit?

    1. Re:This is pretty sad by cooldev · · Score: 1

      Being 18, they showed him, indeed, considering he will have a felony in the database tracking him for the rest of his life. In lieu of a job

      Fortunately he won't be convicted, and hopefully the prosecutors will be made to look like fools at the same time.

      I'm not condoning illegal activity, just common sense.

    2. Re:This is pretty sad by exkate72 · · Score: 1
      "The more the idea takes hold in my mind, the easier it is to see examples of what cowardly bullies Americans are."

      That seems like a bit of a generality. I'm sure most American's would agree that a felony charge is way over the top. I could see him gettin some community service but this should not follow him the rest of his life.

    3. Re:This is pretty sad by Haertchen · · Score: 0

      "The more the idea takes hold in my mind, the easier it is to see examples of what cowardly bullies Americans are." The more of this I see, the easier it is to realize what bigoted morons slashdotters are. (And if you disagree with me, mod this dude down and prove me wrong! How many comments from here against this fiasco do you think are from Americans?)

  174. Forget That by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Lets ALL travel down there and mill about!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  175. Is it possible he did more? by psybertech · · Score: 1

    The news stated he blogged and pointed people to a link to a page he made on the school's server. Is it possible this page he made used a known Windows vulnerability (yeah, I hear there are a few of them) and in order to trigger the page's effect the user had to hit F5? (playing the odds at least one person would do it, if not more)

    If that's the case, its not a simple DoS attack. Its a malicious page that he created with the intent to take down the server.
    If that is true, then the story needs updating and the kid needs to go to jail.

    If its a simple "refresh the page thing" hoping that thousands of his loyal blog fans simulataneously hit F5 at the same time in order to create a mini-DoS, then he needs to wake up early and get to detention for the rest of the school year.
    To me that's kinda like winning the lottery (unless his blog is /. and I don't recall an article earlier on this).

    Funny that when I checked a few minutes after this story hit, the oh.us server was down. The whole server itself couldn't handle anything apparently. Must have been an old, unpatched NT server in a back corner of a Municipal building somewhere.
    Its any wonder it was up long enough for him to pull off anything on it.

  176. better get this one too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:BETUeXptEiwJ: lake.stark.k12.oh.us/hs/+&hl=en

    googles cache of the highschools webpage, better hit that up too...

  177. Still alive by levhita · · Score: 1

    I dont mean to be a bad boy, but they still alive

    http://www.lakelocal.k12.oh.us/lhshome.htm

    --
    -- "Freedom comes in small packages, usually TCP/IP"
  178. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up, valuable information contained in that post.

  179. I think of this as a form of protest by ClimbNorth · · Score: 1

    I always thought that this method could be used as a very legal form of protest. It doesn't do any damage to the server, only makes the intent of the party to be seen. He is simply an organizer of a public group- and they have every right to protest against whatever they like- and since loading a web page is not illegal- a group of individuals doing this can not be seen as any sort of criminal behavior, even if this was their form of protest.

  180. Just Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just Curious, What would people recommend using for a small type website like this to fend off DDOS's without breaking the bank? Obviously fixed bandwidth would do it, but the website would go off the air.

  181. This is the correct link by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

    http://www.lakelocal.k12.oh.us/lhshome.htm I know its a dupe post but this is the right link the other link it just a bad link.

    --
    OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    1. Re:This is the correct link by Terc · · Score: 1
      Google is our friend,

      Click for google search results of "Lake High School" 1025 "Lake Center Street" "Uniontown, Ohio"

      This returns lake.stark.k12.oh.us/hs/ as the first result. You're actually linking to a different school.... uh oh, hope that school doesnt try to sue you for "a felony criminal charge of disrupting public services" lol
  182. Simple Solution......... by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1
    --
    No Sigs!
  183. Loopholes 101 by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    No person shall knowingly use any computer, computer system, computer network, telecommunications device, or other electronic device or system or the internet so as to disrupt....

    Note that the kid only used his mouth, *not* a computer to do his "crime". Loophole City!

    That is unless the prosecuter argues that the mouth is a "telecommunications device".

    1. Re:Loopholes 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Note that the kid only used his mouth, *not* a computer to do his "crime". Loophole City!
      Until you realize that TFA says he setup a blog to tell people to do it...thus using a computer.
  184. Counter-sue by dstj · · Score: 1

    Isn't it illegal to incite mischief and crime?

    I'd say that owning a web server that crashes after 900 hits, and letting it be known, is endeavouring to incite mischief and crime. It could be argued that the kid is the victim here...

    If you can get a fine for leaving for car door unlocked, why wouldn't leaving a server badly protected not qualify?

  185. Taxation Without Representation. by Irvu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That has actually come up as one of the major arguments aginst such laws. As the page I referenced noted the practice of "Civil Death" goes back (at least) to the Romans. But it isn't practiced as much in the U.S. precisely because of that argument. Other arguments marshalled against it include the notion of Cruel and Unusual punishment (for a minor felony a life punishment is too much) and the notion of Double Joepardy. If the Jail Time is the punishment then what is the virtue of extending ti forever, etc.

    Ultimately it all comes down to the stigma of the crime.

  186. Re:The Prosector has permanently killed that serve by ENIGMAwastaken · · Score: 1, Funny

    Being from Ohio, I'd like to defend the state or whatever. But I really can't. Dumbasses abound. The entire government of the state is a joke. Top to bottom bullshit.

  187. Re:Canton Law Dept page PDF by el+americano · · Score: 5, Funny

    That *was* engrossing, but personally I found this 7.2MB pdf on Zone Change Procedures to be even more informative:

    http://www.cityofcanton.com/safetyservice/bldgcode s/zonechangesample.pdf

    --
    Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
  188. In the Old Day's we tried to time the flush... by xoip · · Score: 1

    Back in the days of the PET we tried a DoS on our School's plumbing System by running all the water and flushing all the toilets at the same time.
    Alas, it was all for not.
    Good thing they did not call the cops.

  189. More information from the county by br00k · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Stark county Sheriff's office had some outdated information in the previous post-- Sherriff W. Bruce Umpleby died several years ago-- here's the updated info: 4500 Atlantic Blvd. NE Canton, OH 44705 Phone: 330-430-3850 Fax: 330-430-3839 Sherriff Tim Swanson I was actually *referred* to the prosecutor to find details on how to donate for the kids' legal fees, though Frank didn't seem to know. The number I was forwarded for the county prosecutor (Frank Forchione) was 330-305-0084 if you wish to contact him for details on the case, and or find out what the heck he's thinking. As a director that deals with *real* security issues regularly, setting this kind of legal precedent is quite dangerous, and would be terrible for the internet community. If there's any EFF types reading this, please post information on how to open a donation fund for the defendant's legal costs, or how to contribute to an existing one.

    1. Re:More information from the county by theGoof · · Score: 1

      try writing him: the student's address at home is 13634 MOGADORE AVE NW UNIONTOWN OH 44685

  190. Personal Contact Info/Court Info/The Law by theGoof · · Score: 2, Informative

    Canton Muncipal Court -- Criminal Division

    2006 CRA 00060 MICHAEL WAYNE STONE
    Birth Date: 11-16-1987
    13634 MOGADORE AVE NW UNIONTOWN OH 44685
    Judge:
    2909.04 F4-DISRUPTING PUBLIC SERVICES


    Docket Entry
    01-06-2006 COPIES OF COMPLAINT SERVED ON DEFENDANT AND DEFENDANT APPEARRED AND ADVISED OF CHARGES PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 01-12-2006 @ 3:15 PM

    01-06-2006 ON THIS DAY THE DEFENDANT APPEARED WITH 20850-JOHN GIUA ATTORNEY OF RECORD

    01-05-2006 BOND POSTED $2,500.00 UNSECURED WITH SUPERVISION OF PTS DUE TO EMERGENCY RELEASE ON 01-04-2006

    01-05-2006 ARRAIGNMENT SET FOR 01-06-2006 @ 9:00 AM

    01-05-2006 DEFENDANT ARRESTED ON WARRANT 01-04-2006. TRANSFERRED TO STARK COUNTY JAIL IN LIEU BOND. FORM 8 FILED

    01-04-2006 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND. REFER TO BOND SCHEDULE FOR BOND INFORMATION BY JUDGE RICHARD J. KUBILUS

    01-04-2006 DEFENDANT'S PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FORM FILED AND ISSUED

    01-04-2006 WARRANT ISSUED ON 01/04/2006; (UNTWN)

    01-04-2006 2909.04 (F4) - DISRUPTING PUBLIC SERVICES COMPLAINT FILED

    Source: http://www.starkcountycjis.org/cjis2/docket/main.h tml

    -----

    2909.04. Disrupting public services.

    (A) No person, purposely by any means or knowingly by damaging or tampering with any property, shall do any of the following:

    (1) Interrupt or impair television, radio, telephone, telegraph, or other mass communications service; police, fire, or other public service communications; radar, loran, radio, or other electronic aids to air or marine navigation or communications; or amateur or citizens band radio communications being used for public service or emergency communications;

    (2) Interrupt or impair public transportation, including without limitation school bus transportation, or water supply, gas, power, or other utility service to the public;

    (3) Substantially impair the ability of law enforcement officers, firefighters, rescue personnel, emergency medical services personnel, or emergency facility personnel to respond to an emergency or to protect and preserve any person or property from serious physical harm.

    (B) No person shall knowingly use any computer, computer system, computer network, telecommunications device, or other electronic device or system or the internet so as to disrupt, interrupt, or impair the functions of any police, fire, educational, commercial, or governmental operations.

    (C) Whoever violates this section is guilty of disrupting public services, a felony of the fourth degree.

    (D) As used in this section:

    (1) "Emergency medical services personnel" has the same meaning as in section 2133.21 of the Revised Code.

    (2) "Emergency facility personnel" means any of the following:

    (a) Any of the following individuals who perform services in the ordinary course of their professions in an emergency facility:

    (i) Physicians authorized under Chapter 4731. of the Revised Code to practice medicine and surgery or osteopathic medicine and surgery;

    (ii) Registered nurses and licensed practical nurses licensed under Chapter 4723. of the Revised Code;

    (iii) Physician assistants authorized to practice under Chapter 4730. of the Revised Code;

    (iv) Health care workers;

    (v) Clerical staffs.

    (b) Any individual who is a security officer performing security services in an emergency facility;

    (c) Any individual who is present in an emergency facility, who was summoned to the facility by an individual identified in division (D)(2)(a) or (b) of this section.

    (3) "Emergency facility" means a hospital emergency department or any other facility that provides emergency medical services.

    (4) "Hospital" has the same meaning as in section 3727.01 of the Revised Code.

    (5) "Health care worker" means an i

  191. Give Forchione a Call at Home... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forchione, Frank & Sandramore
    1647 Shriver Ave NE
    Canton, OH 44705-1541
    (330) 455-6486

    1. Re:Give Forchione a Call at Home... by br00k · · Score: 1

      That's not him. I think that's his parents or something-- don't bug them.

    2. Re:Give Forchione a Call at Home... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      >That's not him. I think that's his parents or something-- don't bug them.

      Why not? Maybe they can get through to him. Knock some sense into his head. When they find out he's being abusive and endangering his (and his family's) reputation, maybe dad will do something like call in the loan he put down for Jr.'s boat.

  192. EFF by inKubus · · Score: 1

    That's why I'm a member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

    They only can work if people donate.

    Thanks.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  193. Microsoft advocates this behavior! by cbreaker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Call the FBI.
    From Internet Explorer:

    The page cannot be displayed
    The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings.

    ------

    Please try the following:

    Click the Refresh button, or try again later.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  194. Local information on Lake HS and area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure that Lake HS is in Hartville, Ohio (or at least a lot closer to Hartville than Uniontown). It's been several years since I was interested in HS goings on, so I _could_ be wrong. A little off subject, but Hartville was predominantly Amish some 30-40 years ago. There are still quite a few Menonite. (Let the Amish/technology jokes begin.) It's a relatively small town. It's pretty much due north of Canton, but in Stark County, so crimes committed there would be tried in the county seat (Canton, OH... Pro Football Hall of Fame...yada yada). Being a juvenile, he wouldn't be held in the Stark County Jail on Atlantic Blvd. That is where you would find the Sheriffs office and adult jail. He would be held in the Attention Center south of Canton (not sure of the address, but I know that it's on Faircrest in North Industry/Canton South). If he is still there, he probably would not be able to receive phone calls.

    Second... he technically promoted a DOS attack which the last I understood, was against the law. It may have been a little on the low tech side, but none-the-less... If you forget everything else in life, remember this: "It's not a good idea to poke the bear, especially if the bear might be able to get to you."

  195. There's a duty to minimize damages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any server that gets taken down if a page gets refreshed is junk. If I build a school and it collapses when a student leans on a wall, do I charge the student to rebuild the school?

    I've taught every grade from 3 to 12. I'm currently teaching at a community college. I would never penalize a student for pointing out that refreshing a web page kills the server. I'd get the server fixed.

    p.s. I was being sarcastic when I suggested blocking the halls.

    1. Re:There's a duty to minimize damages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdot... land of bad analogies. Kid didn't "point out" server crashed web site. Kid actively tried to get web site crashed and encouraged others to help him. Kid is an ass. Squash him. I hadn't assumed you were being sarcastic. I see teenagers actually pull similarly stupid ideas...

  196. Charged with != Convicted of by winkydink · · Score: 1

    In this case, he probably cops a plea to a misdemeanor creating a public nuisance, malicious mischief or somesuch and spend some time on probabation & community service.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  197. not only did it kill the HS' site... by potus98 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not only has this killed the High School's website, but it seems other schools (and stuff) were hosted on at the same place:

    Lake High School http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/hs/
    Lake Middle School http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/ms/
    Lake Elementary http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/le/
    Hartville Elementary http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/he/
    Uniontown Elementary http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/ue/
    Lake County District http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/
    Staff Login http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/login.php
    Athletics http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/athletics
    News http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/news/news.php
    Help Desk Login http://staff.lake.stark.k12.oh.us/helpdesk/login.p hp
    Mr. Wood's Homepage http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/~wooddave/compsciiii-o bjectives.php
    AP Calculus http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/~erbdave/Calculus/inde x.php
    Mr. Erb's Homepage http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/~erbdave/main.php
    Jester Labs http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/~wooddave/jesterlabs/i ndex.html

    BTW: According to Google's cached version of their site from Jan 1, 2006 03:32:05 GMT:

    "This page has been viewed 580 times! Powered by CMS Made Simple 0.10.4"

    Heh heh heh... IF it ever recovers from the /.ing it'll read "This page has been viewed 7.2*10^36. Please see Mr. Erb for conversion details."

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
    1. Re:not only did it kill the HS' site... by systemofadown · · Score: 0

      Slashdotted? potus98 hope you don't live the USA.

      --
      Science is but a perversion of itself unless it has as its ultimate goal the betterment of humanity. -Nikola Telsa
    2. Re:not only did it kill the HS' site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/hs is now responding with file not found.

      http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us is up and working with all the other home pages and services. But the /hs page has been removed. Sounds like their waving a white flag to me.

  198. i would just like to point out there websites is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  199. According to the wording of the law, yes. by gizmonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People modded you as funny, but if you read the actual law, then yes, pushing all the buttons in an elevator could, in fact, be a felony:

    SB 146, Sec 2909.04:
    (B) No person shall knowingly use any ... electronic device or system ... so as to disrupt, interrupt, or impair the functions of any ... commercial ... operations.
    (C) Whoever violates this section is guilty of disrupting public services, a felony of the fourth degree.
    (Law snippet borrowed from previous poster...)

    That's not really funny at all.

    --
    WWJD?
    JWRTFM!
    1. Re:According to the wording of the law, yes. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I like your style.

      That's...funny...

  200. ONLY IN OHIO!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With

    It's a no-brainer how a teen can be charged with a crime just for telling his friends to "refresh the page"...

    I think it's time for me to move...

  201. Please tell Frank how much you appreciate... by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    ...him making sure that criminals are properly punished!

    From a Google Search of "Frank Forchione, Canoton, Ohio"....

    Forchione Frank G Atty - 0.1 miles E - National City Bank B, Canton, 44702 - (330) 453-7676
    Forchione, Frank G Atty: Res - 3.5 miles N - 4601 Logan Ave NW, Canton, 44709 - (330) 305-0084

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  202. Cafe Press? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    Use f5, Go to Jail

    Someone has to make a shirt for these kids!

    -Peter

  203. Please let Frank know how much you... by gbutler69 · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...appreciate him ensuring that society is safe from criminals like this.

    From a Google Search for "Frank Forchione, Canton, Ohio"...

    Forchione Frank G Atty - 0.1 miles E - National City Bank B, Canton, 44702 - (330) 453-7676
    Forchione, Frank G Atty: Res - 3.5 miles N - 4601 Logan Ave NW, Canton, 44709 - (330) 305-0084

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  204. I have just one thing to say to that! by LnxAddct · · Score: 4, Informative

    while true; do wget http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/hs/ &> /dev/null; done;
    Regards,
    Steve

    1. Re:I have just one thing to say to that! by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      Ugh take out the bracketed content after the url, /. inserted it automagically, apparently it automatically links urls which I never knew.
      Regards,
      Steve

  205. Three Strikes Law by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And since it's a felony, if he does this twice more they'll sentence him to life in prison.

    --
    This space available.
  206. Surprised they didn't use the "T-Word" by matt_martin · · Score: 1

    Just a matter of time until this terroristic crime brings the CIA to each and every one of our homes. In fact, they're already watching and listening to us without court permission because we are SUSPECTED of PLANNING the heinous crime of refreshing a web page.

    --
    Lurking in the desert
  207. I wonder what would have happened... by buddyglass · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...if he'd told all his friends to mail a bunch of letters right around Dec. 25 in order to bog down the postal service! Denial of Service!

  208. facts and opinions. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Simply take the bare facts of a story, throw in some out-of-context quotes and counter-factual insinuations, and that boring story about some punk's criminal mischief is suddenly about the Man's insane overreaction to a harmless prank!

    Got some facts to back up your description of said "punk"? I did not find any useful information in the article other than these accusations (bare, but not quite facts):

    • Student encouraged chat room members to visit school site and press F5.
    • Student said this would crash school site
    • Student set up website with link to school and same encouragement.

    The reaction was for Canton City Prosecutor Frank Forchione to charge the student as a felon and throw him in jail saying, "Michael said it was a joke. We showed him how we deal with this kind of joke."

    If the accusations and reaction are correct, we have petty mischief and a serious over reaction. The article also has the same prosecuter talking about a more serious violation that was treated as a misdemeanor.

    I'm not sure what's out of context in the story summary either. How about some details, punk?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:facts and opinions. by shystershep · · Score: 1

      Post: "telling fellow students" Article: "created a blog on a Web site" Post: "refresh the schools web page in order to slow down the server" Article: "'hold down F5 to help crash my school server'" Post: "He is being charged with a felony and is currently being held in jail." Article: Huh? It says he is facing charges, not that he has been arrested -- very different things. Post: "According to Canton City Prosecutor Frank Forchione 'This new technology has created a whole wave of crimes, and we're just trying to find ways to solve them.'" Article: Gives the quote in the context of there having been several incidents where students attacked or otherwise misused the school computer, not specifically about this case. It's called spin. It's irritating when politicians do it, but to be expected. To have someone submit such a blatantly biased 'summary' to a 'news' site is even more irritating. If doesn't annoy you -- or your definition of a punk doesn't include someone trying to maliciously disrupt a computer system -- more power to you. I just happen to disagree.

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:facts and opinions. by gronofer · · Score: 1

      Your first two points seem valid, but the article says "Forchione filed a felony criminal charge of disrupting public services against Michael W. Stone", and near the end "Police took Stone to the Stark County Jail", which implies that he was arrested, although not necessarily "currently being held in jail".

  209. Re:The Prosector has permanently killed that serve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live a hundred yards from an Ohio politician who's doing his best to change that. There are plenty of good people in the government; it's just that the bad ones get all the attention.

  210. Re:America, you've got the government you voted fo by LarkaanSoban · · Score: 1

    The problem is, I haven't been around for 25 years to do the voting (nor have many people in this country), and the one time I have voted (the last presidential election) ended with the person I did not want to win in power. Try not to blame the direction this country is going on 'Americans' in general, but rather the misinformed peoples who have unfortunatly brought things like this, ID in classrooms, and a shrubbery for a President. (Bias warning: I am a firm supporter of evolution, and though I'm not a Democrat, I really don't like the current administration)

    So, I suppose, technically this kid has committed a crime. Fair enough. But I don't think he deserves something criminal. A short term suspension, at worst, would be the better route. It is sad to see resources going to waste on this sort of stuff when you know there are far bigger fish out there that need a good frying.

  211. Like Bush's reactions to 9-11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of this going around these days.

  212. there is a war on servers going on by ShineyMcShine · · Score: 1

    the war on servers in this country is appalling!!

  213. Hey the school server is down! by ademaskoo · · Score: 1

    Imagine that!

  214. DDOS plain and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, there's been quite a bit of quipping over this, but how is what he did any different (or less illegal) than a DDOS attack? I can't find a difference. If you've ever been on the receiving end of a DDOS attack (which I have) it ain't fun, and you sure as Hell want to fry the bastard doing it. I don't blame them for pressing charges. I would too! This turn the other cheek because it's a kid crap has to stop.

  215. Ctrl-F5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would holding F5 even do much? The page would have been served from the browser's cache after getting 304 Not Modified from the server. Ctrl-F5 would have had a bigger impact. Oops did I too just commit a felony?

  216. Non violent action? by Requiem18th · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, so If I invite 100,000 of my friends to sit in front of a restaurant, am I a felon? No, its called non violent protesting. Of course, the restaurant could argue that not being able to attend customers is a "damange", but if my friends don't start braking windows you can't jail me for instilling violent actions. Now there is another half of this story we aren't being told, and that is, why are students so willing to DDOS the school's site? This is the behavior of an unhappy alumnae. Now the funny thing is that physicaly invading the school's servers room is punished less harshly than doing so virtually. Welcome to the land of free shutting down public speech. The next step is getting the students to protest in front of the jail. Oops now I am a felon too...

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  217. No felony for refreshing a webpage by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    The felony is likely for inciting a DoS attack...

    Fucking slashdot editors....

    1. Re:No felony for refreshing a webpage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't fuck all that much. I swear.

  218. So is it the editor... by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    the submitter... or all of us who loaded that page who are responsible?

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  219. Apples & Oranges by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    Comparing a slashdotting to manual DOS by some high schoolers is like comparing... oh, I don't know... this one to this one.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  220. Don't know if this has been posted or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    but maybe we should give Frank a call?

    "Francis G. Forchione, City Prosecutor (330) 489-3395"

    http://www.cityofcanton.com/citygov/mayorsoffice/d epdir.html

  221. misdemeanors can be more damaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if you take 20$ from somebody who has 50$, and how much does it really hurt someone who loses a million - do they go hungry? No, they were hoarding anyways. Much better to have the money stolen and returned to the economy.

  222. Say it with me... by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    IRA

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  223. exercise in mediocrity by drivekiller · · Score: 1

    How is this different (in terms of bandwidth utilization) from having interesting or desirable content? Imagine if parents are involved in their kids' learning experience. Imagine if the teachers/administration/parents/students actually decide to use the available technology to build a community supporting quality education. The school should be grateful for the opportunity to learn just how lame their infrastructure is.

    1. Re:exercise in mediocrity by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      The school should be grateful for the opportunity to learn just how lame their infrastructure is.

      As someone who administered a high school network, sorry my friend, but this just isn't in their mindset. Anytime somebody finds a limitation with school technologies it's immediately their fault for mis-using school resources. When my school of some 400 workstations, all connected to the Internet via 10BaseTX, outstripped our 128Kb/s ISDN link it was decided that we should put tighter restrictions on the proxy because students were abusing the connection.

      When I implemented a local cacheing DNS server, I required a reverse PTR in the district's authoritative servers. I was given a 45 minute lecture over the phone as to why I couldn't use his private T1 for the school's routed traffic. It took an additional 45 minutes to explain that this would only be for school-board domain queries and that all other DNS queries would traverse the regular link and that all other routed traffic would, in fact, traverse our local ISDN link (duh) I then got the pleasure of a 30 minute discussion on how to implement the PTR.

      See, in a school board you have two primary motivating factors; unions and politics. These factors lend to ignorance and bliss. People with seniority get the cushy jobs because they want them. Qualifications be damned. There are countless schools that have business teachers administrating their school network. Keep in mind that these are people who teach Microsoft Office and Mavis Beacon Touch Typing programs - they couldn't tell you what TCP/IP stood for in a million years! They are, however, either the most qualified or the most vocal so they get the job.

      Now, get into their mindset; there's not enough [x]** to go around. Somebody took more than their fair share. That somebody must be punished. The concept of bandwidth being fluid, websites and other Internet resources requiring more bandwidth every year does not register with these people. In their mind, smarter people made the decision that for x number of students we require y amount of bandwidth. Any more than that is a deliberate misuse and should be punished .

      Thankfully I was merely a contractor, and thankfully my term ended and was not renewed.

      ** Where [x] is scissors, glue, paper, chalk, bandwidth, floppy discs, spekaers, etc.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:exercise in mediocrity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that the whole USA public education system is an exercise in mediocrity.

      Vote *NO* on all public scool budgets. Then get your kid into a decent private school. Or homeschool if you are up to it.

      By the time your kids are 10 years old they will be smarter and better educated than you ever had a chance to be.

  224. That doesn't make much more by abb3w · · Score: 1
    What we need to do is institute corporate death penalties. If a corporation has committed a felony and cannot practically be imprisoned, then the only remaining option is to execute them.

    To survive cruel-and-unusual scrutiny, you'd need to limit the corporate death penalty to crimes that normally get the death penalty.

    I suppose you could get something equivalent to corporate imprisonment by requiring that for the term of imprisonment: all liquid assets must be converted to cash for non-interest escrow with the government, and non-liquid assets may only be transferred by Takings or sale for escrow; escrow may be tapped only for payment of extant debts or taxes; and possibly the corporation is prohibited from entering new contracts for the term.

    NeverGonnaHappen.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  225. Support Mike Stone (Restart) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This website was put up in support for Mike Stone. http://restart.webdapper.com/ Check it out his music is pretty good. He has a myspace with his music on it.

  226. I remember a prank kinda like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some insane reason, all of the computers in my school's network used to run a program at startup that set the computers' network names to the model number of the particular motherboard inside.

    Now, since about half the school's computers have the same model number, a buddy of mine decided to do a remote shutdown ("shutdown.exe -m \\computername"). This caused half of the running computers to shutdown, and was rather hilarious!

    The point of this is that my friend disrupted the educational process way more than the Ohio kid did - at least a dozen students lost some work that they hadn't saved, i'd guess - yet he received ONE AFTER-SCHOOL DETENTION! That's it!

  227. High School Slashdotters will know... by ROFLMAObot · · Score: 0

    School webservers are only meant to be hit when a student loads the browser and see the site as the homepage. Actually navigating the site would of course cause "tremendous damage."

  228. Picture of Frank Forchione by Bodysurf · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here's a picture of the idiot.

    The guy looks real tough... :(

    From the original page (GOOGLE-CACHED):

    "Mr. Frank Forchione received his BA in Economics from Kent State University and the JD degree from the University of Akron. Mr. Forchione was appointed first assistant prosecutor for the city of Canton in 1989 and, in 1993, became the prosecutor for the City. Mr. Forchione's responsibilities as prosecutor include: overseeing all criminal cases in the Canton Municipal Court Jurisdiction, advising the police department in criminal matters, supervising the assistant prosecutors, and conducting criminal jury trials as well as felony preliminary hearings. In addition, he is the special prosecutor for Tuscarawas County, New Philadelphia, North Canton, Perry Township, Stark County Prosecutor's Office, and Massillon Municipal Court. Mr. Forchione is also a contributing writer for the editorial column of The Canton Repository. Mr. Forchione recently published an article in Ohio Lawyer entitled "Understanding the Domestic Violence Law."
    1. Re:Picture of Frank Forchione by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He looks like John Kerry...

    2. Re:Picture of Frank Forchione by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not much smarter either....

  229. *laugh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not often does Slashdot make me laugh out loud.

    Unfortunately I was unable to read the document you posted a link to. It seems the server was having trouble responding to my request.

  230. WTF? by Chmcginn · · Score: 1
    'People like us' are a vast minority, and have little right to impose 'our' culture and values on others, or to expose them to our 'wrath'. That my friend is called racism.
    You are kidding, right? I admit, it's been a long day, I'm kinda tired, so maybe I'm not seeing the sarcastic component of this... but, seriously, you are kidding, right? Racism? Racism? Prejudiced on the basis of race? Disliking a particular group, or multiple groups, because of their genetic makeup? So being aware of the conventions, customs & courtesies of the internet is now an ethnicity?

    Which brings me to my other point. Even if your entire post is serious... the internet has its own culture, and its own set of norms, customs, and courtesies. Which makes it kind of like a foreign country, to people who've never visited before. So, if you come visit... please take the time to learn the lingo, learn how to hail a cab, and avoid being a n00b. Thank you very much.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  231. school administrator contact info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeff Wendorf, Principal
    1025 Lake Center Street
    Uniontown, OH 44685
    330-877-4282

    John McAllister, Associate Principal
    1025 Lake Center Street
    Uniontown, OH 44685
    330-877-4282

    Joy Sama, Assistant Principal
    1025 Lake Center Street
    Uniontown, OH 44685
    330-877-4282

  232. hmm by provid · · Score: 0

    What can you expect from a gateway 2000?

    --
    Slashdot...home of the hackers
  233. dose this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that slashdotting can be classed as a war crime ?

  234. Govt. just gets worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How bizzare is our "society" and govt. getting? Yeah, it's a "whole new wave of crimes"- because you morons have legislated it as a crime! Laws don't protect, morons!!

    Imagine the wave of crimes when it becomes illegal to breath air!

    How about making it illegal to run an unprotected server? Or to run crappy software which overloads?

    Or how about just letting the admins of the overloaded server learn from the experience, and figure better ways to set up servers? Who cares? Most of civilization was successful- got us to where we are- without laws about overloaded servers and the stupid "cyber crimes". Waste of productivity. Find better things to make laws about.

  235. Re:uh-huh-- and who broke the law by cooldev · · Score: 1

    Or how about helping someone learn to print on an Apple II, and that someone later prints an insult about the teacher?

    I got suspended in middle school for that middle school (a LONG time ago). Really.

    It was slightly upsetting at the time, but in retrospect very funny.

  236. Rate the Lake High School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.ratemyteachers.com/schools/ohio/unionto wn/lake_high_school

    You may as well add Frank Forchione as a teacher of prosecution; and rate him

  237. Speak for yourself by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    Nothing else to say, eh?

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  238. Keep checking until the kid's out of jail.. by jaelle · · Score: 1

    Lessee..as of 1AM Saturday, eastern time, the school, the Law Office and the City Services pages are all down. I think I'll just keep checking until that boy is let out of jail.

    --
    You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
  239. Are they going to sue everyone ? by jonfr · · Score: 1

    Is this City Prosecutor going to sue everyone that does a "refresh" on webpages? Becose this is the most stupid thing i have ever heard and i am used to read about alot of stupid things. This just topped the list.

    I wonder if he is going to sue all the world. After all, we all did just click on the school webpage and did refresh or load a new webpage.

  240. Re:Canton Law Dept page PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Site's down.

    They should really have posted a torrent.

  241. accessory to a crime? by jahelton81 · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that if he told the other students to hit the school web page to slow the server down, then every student was a willing participant. So why not arrest every student involved as accessories to a felony crime? kidding btw

  242. Uhuh. by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    So if I called for people to bring kerosene and matches to the school's server room and set it on fire, and they did it, the entirity of the blame falls squarely on me.

    Stupid, stupid, stupid.

    --
    Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
  243. http://www.xanga.com/haxorest seems "owned" too NT by dextromulous · · Score: 1

    http://www.xanga.com/haxorest seems "owned" too

    "haxorest's site has been shut down by its owner..."

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: those who divide people into two types and those who don't.
  244. THATS funny.... by dartarrow · · Score: 2, Funny

    from google cache of the site

    : Lake High School
    1025 Lake Center Street
    Uniontown, Ohio 44685-9462
    Office (330) 877-4282
    Attendance (330) 877-4762
    Fax (330) 877-0853

    Office hours when school is in session: 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. All visitors must enter Door #1 and sign in at the main office.

    Lake High School is located in Stark County, Ohio. A total of 1220 students in grades nine through twelve make up the student body.

    Powered by CMS Made Simple 0.10.4
    Think you've found a bug? Report it.




    Think we should report a bug...?

    --
    I love humanity, it is people I hate
  245. creating a nuisance by Barbarian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In meat-space, there are laws that let people be charged with misdemeanors like "Creating a nuisance." You might get charged with this if you got 20 people to go into a department store and hold relay races in the isles. Isn't this guy's behavior more in line with this, than "computer crime?"

  246. MOD PARENT UP by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Mmm, the sweet smell of corruption.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  247. This just in! by SuperBug · · Score: 1

    Using your brake pedal on the highways can cause traffic congestion, and can be illegal too, but is hardly a felony. So the fact that I said that it could happen, must be close to a felony, right?

    --
    --SuperBug
  248. um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm riding in my DeLorean!

  249. Check out Mr. Boggs on the teachers page... by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
    That dude is so high it is not even funny...

    The other ones look plain creepy. The Fark should do a photoshop contest on some of those people.

  250. How many slashdot users are there? by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

    How many of us are there? How many people now think Canton is a crap hole place because of this? The mayor must be loving all this negative attention. http://www.cityofcanton.com/ loads ok. but links inside the site seem a big slow like this one doesn't seem to want to load http://www.cityofcanton.com/reachus.html Hey email the mayor and tell her what you think of her leadership.

    --
    OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
  251. Or otherwise called .... by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

    A slashjob. Abbreviated as /job

  252. jail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tell the admin to disregard repetitive ip querying. WTF...jail? Throw the admin in jail if he can't figure out a way around an auto-refresh.

    No way I'm giving that idiot 'root'.

  253. Before we get all carried away... by Restil · · Score: 1

    Should we extend the same sympathy to those who "encourage" zombied machines to "visit" various websites by flooding them with numerous requests with the intent of slowing them down? Packet flooders don't seem to rank very high on the food chain, but this kid gets our undying support. Yes, I realize he probably couldn't cause a great deal of damage this way, but this was one incident. What was his motive? What greater purpose did he hope to accomplish by abusing school resources in this way? This wasn't some case of innocent exploring that's getting blown out of proportion, this is a case of blatent intent to create a denial of service. And more importantly, should we let him take this to the next logical step, which would be packetflooding said servers, only doing so anonymously so we don't even know who's door to knock on to make it stop?

    Personally, I don't think he should be charged with anything, just discipline him within the school system and be done with it. As others have said, it would probably be considered a waste of public resources to prosecute him. Then again, it might be worth it in the long run to not let him off easy this time. Just a thought.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
    1. Re:Before we get all carried away... by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah because at 18 we mean everything we say. We are never just spouting random wouldn't it be funny if. Bet you never said I would liket o kill so and so. Did you mean it? Did he really think a few people could bring down the server? Do you really think he was even thinking it would do anything at all? Everyone press f5 hahahah oh well we failed. Was probably the extent of what he was thinking. Next logical step OMG, How is that the next logical step? You know this guy knows that much about networking at all?

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    2. Re:Before we get all carried away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think you hit the nail square on the head. If this kid had a clue about networks and intention to instigate a DOS he wouldn't have done it the way he did or openly involved his friends and would have made some attempt to hide his identity.

      Just a hunch, But my guess is this prosecutor has never had the experience of raising teenage kids. When you only have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. When you are an unenlightened prosecutor every rule infraction is a crime (or you manipulate the circumatances to fit a crime that you know). But, what really surprises me is that the judge allowed them to proceed. Apparently ignorance of technology is something that needs to be addressed in the criminal justice system. This probably would have happened differently if the judge and the prosecutor knew what they were talking about or if the school principle had the courage to handle the situation himself.

      Yep, now that I think about it, the real problem here is ignorance, passing the buck and a teenager doing the kind of stupid things they tend to do. Shure glad I don't live in Canton.

  254. Reload in Opera by saurabhdutta · · Score: 1

    Use opera browser. rightclick>reload after every 5 seconds....... bliss for the server. let the revolt be unchained.

  255. What crime? by DanZ23 · · Score: 1

    "Prosecutor Frank Forchione (said) "This new technology has created a whole wave of crimes, and we're just trying to find ways to solve them."

    I'm sorry, what crime?

  256. Bush == Hitler! by Karaman · · Score: 0, Troll

    I wonder if US is the fourth reich!

    --
    sex is better than war!
  257. Malicious intent makes all the difference by syukton · · Score: 1

    It isn't as if he just linked the website on slashdot; he told people to go there and press F5 in an attempt to slow down or halt the computer system. That's malicious, and a lesson that this guy needs to learn is that malicious intent is what defines the difference between a prank and a crime. If he had just linked the website and told people to refresh the page over and over because they're going to be posting some hot news item or something, that would be totally fine and wouldn't be getting him into trouble. But that isn't what he did, so he's in trouble.

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    1. Re:Malicious intent makes all the difference by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree that what he did was wrong. But he isn't being sued for damages, he isn't even being charged with a misdemeanor: he's being charged with a felony. Does this really warrant removing him from civilized society? Should we teach him how to commit truly harmful crimes while simultaneously radically circumscribing his ability to make an honest living? Yes, he needs to learn a lesson. But destroying his life will only teach him that the system is unfair and that the only proper attitude toward society is antagonism.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
  258. Teenagers do dumb stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the kid did was certainly worthy of some time in the detention hall. It wasn't worth a criminal record. If we all got punished to the maximum extent of the dumb things we did as teenagers, many/most of us would be crippled or dead. I probably wouldn't have made it past the age of four when I decided to get out of a moving car.

    Making mistakes is part of growing up. Trying to criminilize everything teenagers do is just wrong. God forgives us for a lot. We should do the same for our kids.

  259. Firefox = about:config by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    network.http.pipelining => TRUE
    network.http.pipelining.maxrequests => 65536

    F5 or Ctrl+R to your heart's content.

  260. do NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do NOT, I repeat do NOT, revolt immediately against the non-facism which is not choking us to life with never increasing non-speed!

  261. Hmmmm by Stikgawd · · Score: 1

    Guess the server is down... Wanted to check out this school for educational purposes :P Amazing the power of a slashdotting....

  262. CHILD ABUSE!!!! by Conor+Turton · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I've just looked at the school dinners menu. NO BLOODY WONDER AMERICAN KIDS ARE FAT. Jesus, you could get charged with Child Abuse in some countries for feeding that crap.

    It started to get that way in the UK but fortunately, we've seen the error of our ways and changed.

    --
    Conor "You're not married,you haven't got a girlfriend and you've never seen Star Trek? Good Lord!" - Patrick Stewart
  263. Re:must be more zero tolerance ..or is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do we know that grades were actually changed? We do not. Benjamin Franklin once said that there is no one better than an American to argue his fellow American into slavery! That said, it another possibility emerges from the limited information presented in the news article about the incident. That is the possibility that the changed grades were actually disciplinary punishments handed down to the alleged perpetrators of whatever by whoever. Yeah, close legal or engineering reading seems to make 'fools of us' for not 'knowing instantly' that a tired story out of American movies has reared its head yet once again; but everybody knows also how to spell 'assume', and that is that it makes an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me! This prosecutor and at least the local governmental administration he is part of appear to be mad dogs about to bite everybody and anybody in an unseeming thirst for blood and publicity. The proper venue for comment is not to him or any part of his government. That only invites retribution. If you are an international slashdotter out of the reach of American law or its military and/or secret police ministries/komissariats, then have
    at it but just watch out for black nondescript cars with Afghan plates full of large white men in black suits and dark sunglasses wearing antennas on thier ears.
        Others should write to Amnesty Internationale, the United Nations Human Rights Commission, and other American and foreign organizations including the American Civil Liberties Union to take up the case to free Mr Stone, prisoner number ___, political prisoner of Ohio.
          It is not surprising that this happened in Ohio. If one takes a close look at the election of 2004, the second presidential election in this century stolen by what appears to be organized republican criminals, they will find that criminal computer programmers on the other side of the law may have stolen this election by subverting the software used to record votes in key areas. Statements to this effect were made by various folks more in the know than most of us as to how the software for the electronic voting had been 'updated---we all know now what updates really are', in a tawdry series of hidden bribes of public officials and 'midnight visits' to key 'data centers'. How do we know that this place was one of those. Its the right state for it. There I go ......assume......ass ..of..u...and...me.......or are there really wolves under the bed here...you know, they ones wearing jack boots and coal bucket helmets?

  264. RE: Tresspass... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    There's actually modifiers to that, even.

    Say for example, the person in question that is told to leave has a Service Animal and is Handicapped
    and walks into a public place you run (And, this includes any business or governmental agency-
    technically, the USPS signs saying that only Seeing Eye Dogs are allowed in the building is in
    violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act...).

    1) Yes, you can make them leave, but you're in violation of the law if you're running anything other
    than something like a private club. If it's public, you're legally required to allow them in
    unless the animal or the person is actually disruptive to your operations or to the people present.
    And, better yet, if you call the cops, in most cases you will be the one receiving a ticket, etc.
    for a false call- if they did nothing else but bring the animal in, it's technically NOT trespass
    if you're a public business as the law is explicit; if you're handicapped and it's a service animal
    they HAVE to let you in unless the animal or yourself is in danger and you're not causing any issues
    otherwise (And this does NOT mean patrons being upset about a "pet" being in the place...)

    2) The very act in question opens you up to a Civil Rights suit in a Federal Court which can amount to a
    lot of money on your part in court costs and damages if it's proven that they did nothing other than walk
    into your establishment.

    Choose carefully what all you do- the law is NOT what most people actually think it is.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  265. judicial waste..try Albion Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For judicial waste, no one beats Albion, Indiana. They have charged over six people with felonies related to terrorism. The terrorists? Why they conspired to destroy
    a mailbox with a 'mmolottoff koktail' (word changed to delay the carnivore spying software) Now the twisted logic is that a mailbox is somehow 'federal property' and the instrument of its damage is called a 'destructive device', so the 'terrorism laws' are now engaged. Now the reality. A mailbox is really the property of a most likely rural resident and most likely quite far from anything expensive. It usually holds about 99 percent junkmail from huge government subsidized mail spammers like Chase Manhatten Bank and Capitol One, and usually cost the farmer/resident less than fifty dollars. Its present value is usually about jack nothing because it has probably over its average thirty year lifespan been hit by cars including mail delivery cars, school busses, and..did I mention hit and knocked into the next county by snowplows multiple times every year of its life. After about every incident, as long as the door still closes and the dents can be bumped out and it is'nt toooo rusty, it gets repaired superficially and put back up. Now this metal does not burn, which is good because grass fires clip it at an alarming pace....seeee...lets prosecute GOD for 'conspiracy' as well. Even lightning periodically zaps them. Now a 'mooolotofff drink' is really a small cup of gas that somehow is made to burn. A little cup of this is more threat to the Capitol One junk or the Chase bank crap than to the box it is in. The box being federal property is an obvious overextension of its jurisdiction. It that was so, I would demand that the Fed cough up a new mailbox and pay for its re-installation every time it gets plastered by the local contract snowplowers, not to mention throwing those dastardly evil conspiring plow drivers into the callaboose forever for cowardly driving their machines of destruction over my 'Federal Box'.
        To get back to the Albion six, one needs not know the tawdry details of the case beyond the fact that the target of this 'conspiracy' was really worth less than fifty dollars and the fact that the means to its 'destruction' would inevitably fail and the box would survive. A little sooty perhaps, and a few squirts with a garden hose and this halloween prank and its result would be history along with the ashes of the junkmail whose job of disposal with the rest of the scummy garbage was now already done. For this non-event, more than six people will now spend the next twenty years in a maximum security prison in Indiana! Now let's see:
                                        Cost of trial 100,000 dollars
                                          The first appeal 400,000 dollars this can go up...wayyy up
                                          do this six times and you get three million dollars.
        Now put them in prison in max security at 120,000 dollars per year per man for twenty years cost= $120,000.00 (20) x (6) = $14,400,000.00
        Now we have local taxpayer expense of $17,400,000.00 to be borne by local taxpayers in Albion Indiana for the crime of probably pouring less than a cupful of gas on a mailbox worth less than fifty dollars and accomplishing nothing.
          Which brings up the other fact in the news article...the perps had not done it ...yet! So nothing was done, the the poor long suffering county residents of this place will have to pay almost twenty million of thier hard earned money to pay for the ego of a crazed power mad law enforcer who should never had held a responsible public office. Indiana does have the power of recall of local officials. This is an excellent case for it.

  266. URL correct; 580 visits till 1st of January! by gentoo1337 · · Score: 2, Informative

    No! The URL is correct indeed. Watch the clip and check out the Google cache.

    As of January 1st this year, it proudly reads:
    "This page has been viewed 580 times!" :-D

  267. Re:http://www.xanga.com/haxorest seems "owned" too by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1

    unders_core is the new one.

    --
    -gjr
  268. google search on Frank Forchione by vaporland · · Score: 1

    reveals that this guy also is prosecuting parents whose kids are truant

    http://www.cantonrep.com/index.php?Category=15&ID= 209513&r=2

    sounds like a great guy to have for a neighbor . . .

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
    1. Re:google search on Frank Forchione by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm . . . Break the law (children are truant), get charged and convicted. Sounds reasonable to me. It may not be a sexy crime (drugs, murder, etc . . .), but it's still a crime.


      Do the crime . . . do the time.

    2. Re:google search on Frank Forchione by AgentAce · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it is a crime. Yet there are far better things the Prosecutor could be committing legal system resources to resolving other than a kid telling his friends to refresh a website and kids not attending school. I'm most certain the City of Canton will become a far better place to live once these cases are handled.

      I guess he's just too much of a pussy to deal with the actual criminals present in Canton.

    3. Re:google search on Frank Forchione by rhawk301 · · Score: 1

      What happens when parents want to home school kids? Do they get these mandatory school credits? How many hours are required so parents can make sure they comply? The bigger question, is shoudn't parents "want" to send kids to school? Why would the government send parents to jail for not doing that? This seems slightly draconian. I am a parent, and want the best for my kids, but I don't want the government mandating stuff like this. There should be other requirements, credits, or incentives to make sure kids get to school.

  269. Running on an Apple: by SillyWilly · · Score: 1
    root@felicia:~> nmap 66.144.97.98 -P0

    Starting Nmap 3.95 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-01-07 19:48 GMT
    Interesting ports on 66.144.97.98:
    (The 1668 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered)
    PORT STATE SERVICE
    80/tcp closed http
    110/tcp open pop3

    Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 55.155 seconds

    root@felicia:~> nc 66.144.97.98 110
    +OK lake.stark.k12.oh.us Cyrus POP3 v2.2.12-OS X 10.4.0 server ready <115861234.1136663434@lake.stark.k12.oh.us>
    quit
    +OK
    --
    Online & Feelin' Fine
  270. Site is Down, but Google isn't . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The site is down, but you know what? Google cache still holds it: http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:fibEIpY6TtgJ: lake.stark.k12.oh.us/+&hl=en

    And I never liked Google . . . let's bring it down.

  271. Response from Canton's Mayor by RustyPelican · · Score: 1

    I emailed my comments on this article to the mayor of Canton, Janet Creighton - email jwc@ci.canton.oh.us

    She promptly responded with the following reply:

    "Your comments should be directed to Law Director Joe Martuccio or Criminal Prosecutor Frank Forchione. This is a legal problem and not one that the Executive branch of city governments get involved with. The student, as I recall, is from a township. "

    I think that response illustrates how this series of events was allowed to play out as it has.

    1. Re:Response from Canton's Mayor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classic case of passing the buck. I emailed her as well, asking that she insist that the communities tax money be directed towards more meaningful matters.

  272. Re: WalMart too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And here's a great new film/DVD about WalMart:

    http://www.walmartmovie.com/

    Highly educational and recommended.

  273. Idiocy in todays government... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I have to say for Canton is GOATSE.CA!!!

  274. Petition for Michael W. Stone by Scratch+McGoo · · Score: 1
    There is now a petition being circulated to have the disgusting charges against Michael W. Stone dropped. You can add your name and post your comments by going to http://www.petitiononline.com/mwstone/petition.htm l.

    Along with the demand to drop the felony charges, the petition also calls for the resignation or termination of the prosecutor, Mr. Frank Forchione.

    People, charging an 18yo kid with a felony for posting a "call to action" on a blog is criminal in and of itself. Telling people to "hit F5" and refresh a site's content is by no means a DoS, or an attempted DoS. It's stupid, and at the absolute most harassment. Anyone who thinks that this kid's actions constitute an attempted DoS obviously doesn't have a clue what a DoS is or how it works. As usual, there are opinions on both sides. However in this case, the opinion that this was an attempted DoS is technically and factually incorrect.

    The bottom line is that Michael Stone is facing the possibility of wearing the badge of "Convicted Felon" for the rest of his life because he told readers of his blog to "hit F5" and reload the school's web page. And despite the ludicrous statements made by the prosecutor and the blatantly false "technical" information broadcast by the top-notch local news team, Michael didn't cause any damage to any hardware, software, or service. If a bunch of kids refreshing the web site was enough to slow it down, maybe the school should consider upgrading from their 56K dial-up connection. In the end, I think we all know that the intent of the prosecutor was to teach Michael a lesson and send a message to the vicious hacker underworld that has overrun the quaint lil' town of Canton. And if that's the case - that the prosecutor's plan was to give Mike a felony scare and accept a plea to a lesser charge, then that is nothing short of reckless and malicious prosecution which calls for the termination of Canton's tough-as-nails prosecutor.

    I ask that you all consider the lunacy and malice of the prosecution's case and add your name to the petition at http://www.petitiononline.com/mwstone/petition.htm l.

    1. Re:Petition for Michael W. Stone by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      I signed this petition but doubt it will have any effect at all.

      Reading the "rules of conduct" for the school it rather appears that the town must be on the point of sliding into Hell.

      The extreme overeaction to a minor prank that caused no damage falls in line with the draconian and endless lists of punishments in the schools code of conduct. It seems to me that at least 75% of normal intelligent, motivated and well behaved middle classed teenagers would leave this school with an endless list of bad marks for infringing those rules. Certainly anybody with an ounce of academic ability or self belief would soon have it smashed out of them.

      So the conclusion must be either that the place is "so full of drug addled gun toting broken family mentally deficient knife carrying gang member uncontrollable teenage thugs" that it has to be run like a North Korean prison - or that the people running it are suffering from many decades or possibly centuries of interbreeding. Possesion of "Electronic gadgets" is forbidden at school for example, and they are to be confiscated if found and can only be retrieved by the parents. Does this include or exclude mobile phones which these days contain video cameras, music players, internet browsers, FM radios and quite possibly GPS and mapping software for all I know. This place is truely in the dark ages.

      Clear guidlines for young people are needed of course but if this school is an example of what it means to live in the "Land of the Free" then I would rather live somewhere with a bit more confidence in and respect for its people. Somewhere in contact with the modern world. Canada or Mexico spring immediately to mind, or anywhere in the third world where the taps work and the power stays on for that matter.

      Ugh, what a ghastly place this bit of America seems to be.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  275. Re: Tresspass... by Buran · · Score: 1

    technically, the USPS signs saying that only Seeing Eye Dogs are allowed in the building is in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

    Only because it specifies dogs as the only animals allowed. It's perfectly legal to have signs allowing only service animals, but it's a little ignorant (by accident, I think, in this case) to say "dogs" because there are all kinds of other animals that help the disabled. I've even seen photos of a trained monkey assisting a wheelchair-bound person by pushing their foot back onto a footrest. I've also heard of ferrets used by the epileptic, since many animals are able to detect (somehow; we don't know how yet) impending seizures and signal the person to lie down and protect their head.

  276. Refreshing is worse than sex? by Urza9814 · · Score: 0

    What I find funny is that I'm 15, and last year I decided to have sex with this girl in a school bathroom...and I got 3 days suspension, no acedemic punishment, no mark on my record, nothing. And yet a kid refreshing a website gets arrested. Ah, the beauty of our legal system.

  277. F5F5F5 by JimXugle · · Score: 0

    "This new technology has created a whole wave of crimes, and we're just trying to find ways to solve them."

    Umm... I have some Legacy harware from the '70s in my basement... all of the keyboards have an F5 Key... hardly new technology.

    --
    -jX

    Don't you just love politics? It's like a comedy of errors.
  278. breaking the law by vaporland · · Score: 1

    the KIDS were truant, the PARENTS get busted

    as they say, why not go out and stop some REAL crime . . .

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
  279. Re:huh? - YOU FAIL LOGIC by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Equating a script kiddie to Ghandi and MLK Jr. is a stretch. The latter had visions of social, political, and economic reform. The former just wanted to "Ha ha" like that kid on the Simpsons.

  280. Me? Commie? Bad? by Sigg3.net · · Score: 0

    the defendant is accused of taking part in a Slashdotting of a high school web server in the United States

    Coming from Europe, that makes me a terrorizing communist!
    Man, I love the web. Group hug!

  281. Re: WalMart too! by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine worked at walmart. The way they're so rich is because of their logistics abilities. They run on a 24 clock for warehouse materials. If a truck is late 5 minutes or less, then it is sent back and not accepted.

    They also take their profits and instead of paying their suppliers first, they take that money and put it to short term investments. They're definitely bullying other corporations as well.

  282. Re:America, you've got the government you voted fo by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
    For the last 25 years you have been voting for a Police State. And now that's exactly what you have. Congratulations, Democracy really works. Now shut up, bend over and take it like a man.

    On the contrary, this is precisely where democracy fails. Two party systems and "package deals" (ala "platforms") force us to take the bad with the good. You pick the issue most important to you and swallow the rest of the bitterness.

    So, in my example, if the current administration manages to blow a hole in (and the sink) the assinine Social Security program and/or Medicare/Medicaid/Welfare while they're at it, I'll consider the restricted freedoms a decent trade for all my wasted money. Then I'll vote for a democrat to get the freedoms back, and pray they don't go gungho on Communistic programs again.

    Alas, such is life.

  283. No, it's about school bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and I don't mean the ones that take your lunch money on the playground at 3PM.

    I mean the monsterous bullies in school administrations that derive their sense of self worth out of how many _children_ they can threaten/abuse/terrorize/screw in any given day. While we should indeed feel bad for the millions of poor kids caught up in the mess (and do our best to prevent it from ocurring), maybe some pity should be reserved by the sub-human trolls running the gulags they're sentenced to 10 months a year for 13 years (longer if counting college). How awful it must be to wake up every day having no marketable skills, no accomplishments, no sense of humor, etc.

  284. What's wrong with these schools? by TheDracle · · Score: 1

    I remember hacking my professor's website, and replacing his personal image with a morph of him and a chimp... Sticking first person shooters on every one of the PCs, and figuring out how to hack them. Making a Java space-shooter applet, where I replaced every one of the stars with pictures of his head--- and it was all encouraged! This is, obviously, a rather remedial type of exploration and nusance--- but the basic childish need to annoy your elders can be a strong driving force to learn, and my CS teacher understood that, and had a sense of humor. What's happened?

  285. Why don't you hear more of this? by yanowhiz · · Score: 1

    I'm sure people have tried doing this to other sites. I'm just curious as to why we have to wait for a HS student to do this, and get slapped with a felony.

  286. WoW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forget that we do not have freedom of speech in US. Eminem you better stop rapping before you go to jail next time someone beats on their girl. Whether the kid really wanted people to do it or not, HE HAD NO CONTROL ON THE MATTER. Was he holding a gun to the others heads? This is just another fine example of kicking kids out of school for stuff like having a 2600 mag. LOL. Good Game. And to everyone else, you should make sure you never say you want someone to "break the law" cause they might just show you how they "deal with this kind of joke." What a moron.

  287. last news!!! he went to his hearing today by davygrvy · · Score: 1
    --
    -=[ place .sig here ]=-
    1. Re:last news!!! he went to his hearing today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not so, according to the Municipal Court Docket:

      01-06-2006 Copies of complaint served on defendent and defendent appeared and advised of charges preliminary hearing set for 01-12-2006 @ 3:15 PM

    2. Re:last news!!! he went to his hearing today by queenb**ch · · Score: 1

      Some twinkie-eating high school kid carried off the lowest tech "hack" ever. He's now being charged with a felony for asking for folks in a chat room to refresh his high school's home page to bring down the server.

      Item 1) If the server can't stand having the home page reloaded by a chat room's worth of people, it's obviously one lame-ass server.

      Item 2) What kind of morons charge a child (so he's 16- he's still a minor that makes him legally a child) with a FELONY for this.

      In light of the this stupidity, I would like to encourage everyone to go this link (to the same home page) and refresh it as often as possible.

      --
      HDGary secures my bank :/
  288. Found Guilty of Criminal Mischief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the court docket. What a shame the school principle didn't have the balls to deal with this kid. Now he has a record of a felony arrest and a conviction on criminal mischief, spent one day in jail and faces 60 days in jail if he isn't perfect for 2 years. Prosecutor Francis Forchione must think he made his mother proud today.

    01-12-2006 PROSECUTOR FRANCIS FORCHIONE
    01-12-2006 IT IS SO ORDERED BY JUDGE MARY FALVEY
    01-12-2006 COSTS ONLY.
    01-12-2006 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER FILED.
    01-12-2006 CASE TYPE CHANGED
    01-12-2006 PRECIPE RETURNED SERVED FOR SUBPOENA #1, WITNESS #2
    01-12-2006 PRECIPE RETURNED SERVED FOR SUBPOENA #1, WITNESS #1
    01-12-2006 ON COUNT #1 DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO COMPLETE 20.00 HOURS OF S.C.S. IN LIEU OF DAYS BY 03-01-2006
    01-12-2006 DEFENDANT IS CREDITED WITH 1 DAYS SERVED IN LIEU OF DAYS.
    01-12-2006 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL BUT 1 DAYS ARE SUSPENDED ON CONDITION OF DEFENDANT'S GOOD BEHAVIOR FOR TWO YEARS
    01-12-2006 IT IS THE SENTENCE OF THE COURT: COUNT #1 CRIMINAL MISCHIEF 60 DAYS IN JAIL AND COSTS.
    01-12-2006 THE COURT FINDS THE DEFENDANT GUILTY.
    01-12-2006 DEFENDANT ENTERED A PLEA OF NO CONTEST
    01-12-2006 ON THIS DAY THE DEFENDANT APPEARED WITH 20850-JOHN GIUA ATTORNEY OF RECORD
    01-12-2006 COUNT #1 DISRUPTING PUBLIC SERVICES (F4) AMENDED TO CRIMINAL MISCHIEF (M3)
    01-09-2006 PRECIPE FOR SUBPOENA FILED.
    01-06-2006 COPIES OF COMPLAINT SERVED ON DEFENDANT AND DEFENDANT APPEARRED AND ADVISED OF CHARGES PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 01-12-2006 @ 3:15 PM
  289. And they even have some games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they even have a couple of good old classic games (in flash, though) for everyone to play while hard at work during school hours too. Or to entertain the web, whichever. We all love flash games, right? http://alt.tnt.tv/movies/tntoriginals/pirates/html /arcade.html

  290. More by queenb**ch · · Score: 1

    This one - http://lakelocal.oh.schoolwebpages.com/education/s chool/school.php?sectiondetailid=10 which says that they're moving their site.

    ROFL!

    2 cents,

    Queen B

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/