Because the macbook pro is using a 2.16GHz and the others are using a 2.0GHz processor.
Why don't you guys read the fucking thing before asking AND answering questions?
Funny how *nix zealots always have an excuse for everything.
"If the user is smart enough to use unix" WTF? so if the user is smart enough to use something that is complicated, than this means the system is good? if the user is smart enough to use unix he will probably be smart enough to have windows just as secured!
I tried the link some user provided here ( and appears to be deleted ) and it locked my Firefox, its not a security vulnerability but it is sure stupid to lock the damn thing.
Slashdot Mirror
I don't know why, but in the body of this post my feed agregator shows this: http://rss.slashdot.org/~a/Slashdot/slashdot/to?i= HQvliE/
o.O
Because the macbook pro is using a 2.16GHz and the others are using a 2.0GHz processor. Why don't you guys read the fucking thing before asking AND answering questions?
Bush is way more frightening than any third world warlord.
Now thats just sad, Microsoft Wins at something, and the anti-microsoft-linux-zealots come with an excuse and/or alternative way of measuring it.
Depressive.
Windows won this time, just suck it.
I remember when computers had 1 megahert That's right, 1, as in uno. And now you want gigahertz?
Funny how *nix zealots always have an excuse for everything. "If the user is smart enough to use unix" WTF? so if the user is smart enough to use something that is complicated, than this means the system is good? if the user is smart enough to use unix he will probably be smart enough to have windows just as secured!
Beatles Beatles comes to mind
I tried the link some user provided here ( and appears to be deleted ) and it locked my Firefox, its not a security vulnerability but it is sure stupid to lock the damn thing.