Slashdot Mirror


Super-Strong Synthetic Muscles Developed

Too Hot! wrote to mention a BBC article about extremely powerful synthetic muscles. From the article: "The most powerful type, 'shorted fuel cell muscles' convert chemical energy into heat, causing a special shape-memory metal alloy to contract. Turning down the heat allows the muscle to relax. Lab tests showed that these devices had a lifting strength more than 100 times that of normal skeletal muscle. Another kind of muscle being developed by the team converted chemical energy into electrical energy which caused a material made from carbon nanotube electrodes to bend."

191 comments

  1. Bye bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bye bye heavy and clumsy robots?

    1. Re:Bye bye by 3.14159265 · · Score: 1

      eh! Bye bye having to go to the gym :)

    2. Re:Bye bye by Davey+McDave · · Score: 0

      Actually, that raises some interesting questions.

      If things did get way over the top here, surely then becoming stronger would need not investment of time, but investment of money? Suddenly, how strong you are depends on personal wealth, not upon personal dedication!

      A vaguely scary thought. Though it might cut down on muggings quite significantly.

      --
      I've got the spirit, lose the feeling.
    3. Re:Bye bye by 3.14159265 · · Score: 1

      Well, I've always heard that time is money... :)
      Anyway, how healthy (or how "curable") you are depends on your personal wealth too, so it would be only a natural step forward, really... I find this last fact even more scary, because that's what's happening today.

    4. Re:Bye bye by Davey+McDave · · Score: 0

      Maybe moreso in the US, I happen to live in the UK where healthcare is more evenly distributed amongst the population, because of the NHS.

      This said, we still have private healthcare, though it's obviously more expensive. More expensive than free!

      --
      I've got the spirit, lose the feeling.
    5. Re:Bye bye by Rei · · Score: 1

      Remember that the human body isn't designed to be infinitely strong. If you get too much tug on your bones, you're just asking for them to be broken.

      Also, this is hardly an implantable product in its current state ;) Perhaps in the future, but not yet.

      --
      Democratic Party needs food badly.
    6. Re:Bye bye by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

      Good point. The bones that these synthetic muscles are attached to should be replaced with new ones made out of something interesting like carbon fiber or titanium. I'd think the skeletal replacement problem would be much easier to solve than figuring out how to splice the fake muscles into the nervous system in a useful manner.

  2. Meh get back to me when Battlemechs are completed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Myomer bundles are nice but until KF drives are developed meh.

  3. Geek progress by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Sure, the synthetic muscles could be used for helping the disabled and equiping special forces, but the bigger picture is the development of the first real Terminator. Now that's geeky progress!

    __
    Funy PORN videos @ Laugh DAILY.

    1. Re:Geek progress by cskrat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm actually looking forward to the day that functional implants are good enough to be a desirable elective procedure.

      Just imagine.. "Yeah, that's a nice tattoo. Wanna see what my synthetic muscles and reinforced skeletal structure can do?"

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    2. Re:Geek progress by Andrzej+Sawicki · · Score: 1

      Dude, you have to think big. You have to think mechs. ;)

    3. Re:Geek progress by TwentyQuestions · · Score: 1

      converted chemical energy into electrical energy which caused a material made from carbon nanotube electrodes to bend

      Call me crazy but wouldnt it be easier just to apply electrical energy to begin with?

    4. Re:Geek progress by dynamo52 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Call me crazy but wouldnt it be easier just to apply electrical energy to begin with?

      It is referring to the chemical energy of the fuel cells. All electrical energy derived from batteries is converted chemical energy

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    5. Re:Geek progress by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      Sorry to bother you Mattygfunk, but you could please use your signature for advertising, not paste it into the article. Thanks.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    6. Re:Geek progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget Terminators. We can finally make the Starship Troopers' powersuits. Yo Bugs, yo Skinnies, here we come!

    7. Re:Geek progress by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and when can be buy a kit to grow this stuff on Thinkgeek! It's the perfect geek accessory!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    8. Re:Geek progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you get teased alot huh?

    9. Re:Geek progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boomers.

    10. Re:Geek progress by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Seems like an unreasonable request. Why should he do that?

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    11. Re:Geek progress by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1
      So you get teased alot too huh?

      There, I fixed that for you.

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    12. Re:Geek progress by qeveren · · Score: 1

      You think too small. Try Unicron. :)

      --
      Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
    13. Re:Geek progress by qeveren · · Score: 1

      Probably because you can turn off viewing of signatures?

      --
      Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
    14. Re:Geek progress by Heembo · · Score: 1

      but the bigger picture is the development of the first real Terminator.

      Awesome! How about the Battletech universe? If you want to know what advanced strong metallic muscles can really do, consider piloting a 50 foot weapon-clad BattleMaster!

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    15. Re:Geek progress by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1
      So you get teased a lot too huh?

      There, I fixed that for you.

      Mod me down if you like, but that was too tempting to resist.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    16. Re:Geek progress by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that they're just trying to make it sound more complicated than it really is?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    17. Re:Geek progress by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      If you want to know what advanced strong metallic muscles can really do, consider piloting a 50 foot weapon-clad BattleMaster!

      Count me out. Big bots make big targets. Better to be the guy you don't even see until your head comes off.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    18. Re:Geek progress by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Count me out. Big bots make big targets. Better to be the guy you don't even see until your head comes off. Sorry man, I work with a full squad of aerospace fighters, I have crack support troops, and I make sure to artillery the hell out of any city before I charge! There is nothing like having a 100 ton heavily armed monster robot at your command!

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    19. Re:Geek progress by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      There is nothing like having a 100 ton heavily armed monster robot at your command!

      100 lb of armor-eating nanotech goo. Pwnz0red.

    20. Re:Geek progress by Heembo · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I spray at least 50 lbs of NANO-B-GONE(tm) enhanced-edition clear polymer combat-ready spray on all of my Mechs before battle like any good Mechwarrior!

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    21. Re:Geek progress by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      That explains why is your unit known as "Slimeys".

    22. Re:Geek progress by Heembo · · Score: 1

      My unit is actually named, RAGE = Rapid Assault Ground Enforcement

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    23. Re:Geek progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, good luck with getting your nanobots to eat through reactive ferro-fibrous armour and endosteel.

  4. Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new mechwarrior overlords.

    1. Re:Obligatory... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Mechwarrior? These things are fueled by ethanol.

      Think more on the Futurama side of things.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  5. End of the blue pill by k1980pc · · Score: 1

    Good news for grand dad...viagra was putting a big strain on the budget last 4-5 years

    1. Re:End of the blue pill by pimpimpim · · Score: 4, Informative

      The corpora cavernosa is not a muscle!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    2. Re:End of the blue pill by Impeesa · · Score: 1

      No, but the thing that keeps it full of blood is. When that muscle starts to weaken, then you have a tough time keeping it up.

    3. Re:End of the blue pill by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      You're just saying that cause yours is all floppy and small.

    4. Re:End of the blue pill by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      Err, not exactly. It's smooth muscle works like a valve, when it's contracted it closes the blood flow, when it's relaxed it opens the blood flow to the penis. The "pump" doing the work is actually the pump doing blood flow everywhere: your heart. And, training your heart does not readily help you with your erection, although it might be good to have some condition for all the other things you need to do during sex. I'll leave that as an exercise to the reader ;)

      A very good website on this stuff: http://health.howstuffworks.com/viagra.htm

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    5. Re:End of the blue pill by melstav · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be fun if it was, though?

      Haven't you always wanted a prehensile penis?

    6. Re:End of the blue pill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Know your anatomy. The corpus cavernosus and corpus spongiosus are erectile bodies that fill with blood. However, the bulbospongiosus and the isciocavernosus *are* muscles which cover these erectile bodies and facilitate erection.

      Sincerely,
      Anonymous medical student

    7. Re:End of the blue pill by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

      You've bben reading too much of this. Or did you just see a rerun of Babylon 5, when Londo is caught cheating? (At cards.)

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  6. Get ready to kiss some shiny metal ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists have developed artificial, super-strength muscles which are powered by alcohol and hydrogen.

    I for one welcome our new Bender overlords.

    1. Re:Get ready to kiss some shiny metal ass by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Dr Madden said pressures needed to be generated so that waste gases could be produced, and the artificial muscles could truly be described as "breathing".

      Breathing my ass, or rather, out my ass.
      Yep, this has Bender written all over it. =P

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:Get ready to kiss some shiny metal ass by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Of course this raises the question: Will those robots in the US be allowed to drink, err ... refuel in the public? :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  7. BALCO? by OffTheLip · · Score: 3, Funny

    For some reason Barry Bonds comes to mind when I read the article subject. AS skewed as the sports playing field is now I shudder to think what things might be like once the 'designers' get a hold of something like this. The Tour de France in one day?

    1. Re:BALCO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, this brings me back to the days before Steroids in sports were manditory...

    2. Re:BALCO? by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1

      This stuff is already being used by NFL kickers.

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    3. Re:BALCO? by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      AS skewed as the sports playing field is now I shudder to think what things might be like once the 'designers' get a hold of something like this.

      If it means that the professional sport will be finally good for something useful, in this case for betatesting new enhancement technologies, I for one don't see anything wrong there.

    4. Re:BALCO? by rabiddeity · · Score: 1

      The Tour de France in one day?

      It's called a motorcycle. But they don't allow those in the official Tour, and I doubt they'll allow synthetic muscles either.

    5. Re:BALCO? by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      I doubt the Tour De france would be able to make use of these, it's more of an endurance race carring synthetic muscles as well as fuel for the syn muscles would probably be less efficient than no synthic muscles.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  8. Yes, but... by coffeechica · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm still trying to make up my mind to decide whether this is awesome or frightening. Both, I guess. Because there are so obviously enormous benefits. But on the other hand, when you've grown up on Marvel comics, then any mention of superhuman strength makes me wonder about the potential problems.

    Fancy imagining that kind of technology in the hands of some warlord in a third world country somewhere? Or even in a normal army? I'm not sure it's something I really want to envision.

    1. Re:Yes, but... by Hanthus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Bush is way more frightening than any third world warlord.

    2. Re:Yes, but... by coffeechica · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Point. And it would mean another war somewhere because, after all, you've got to try out your new toys under combat conditions.

      I was thinking of situations like Darfur when I was posting. Given what the militia manages to do there with nothing more than horses and guns (and bows and arrows), then turning them into what amounts superhumans wouldn't paint a pretty picture at all. Bush at least has to care a little bit about the bad PR he gets when the US troops randomly kill civilians. At least, I imagine he gets that bad PR not just here in Europe.

    3. Re:Yes, but... by agent+provocateur · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      For gods sake get a grip... they use guns and horses in Darfor because thats all they can afford and they work plenty well enough.

      --
      Siggy Sig Sig? Where is the sig?
    4. Re:Yes, but... by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      Actually, no, not in major media, they pretty much gloss over the mass deaths of iraqui civilians in US military manuvering, explaining them away as casualities from the rival groups within iraq and a tiny number of actual unfortunate but unavoidable incidents that are part of the reason we're fighting for a democratic iraq.

    5. Re:Yes, but... by The+Mgt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bush is way more frightening than any third world warlord.

      Just wait, he'll be a third world warlord soon enough.

    6. Re:Yes, but... by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Funny

      when you've grown up on Marvel comics, then any mention of superhuman strength makes me wonder about the potential problems.

      Yeah, but if we pay any attention to Marvel comics then everyone would be exposing themselves to radiation in order to get super powers.

    7. Re:Yes, but... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      No problem at all, chummer. Artificial muscles have a maximum level of 4, cost one point of essence per level and don't count against your reaction; the deal's not that good. Once boosted reflexes or move-by-wire come out, though...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    8. Re:Yes, but... by Wyrmy · · Score: 1

      Why? Stronger muscles is hardly equivilent to increased political power and those that have the resources to afford this tech harm with the pen not the sword.

      --
      Every act of conscious learning requires the willingness to suffer an injury to one's self-esteem.-Thomas Szasz
    9. Re:Yes, but... by Gryle · · Score: 1

      "Kids who get bitten by radioactive insects or dunked in a vat of toxic waste, well, they'll have their superpowers the next day. Or they'll be dead." - Sky High

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    10. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't Adam West try that? And fail.

    11. Re:Yes, but... by turnipsatemybaby · · Score: 1

      Sounds like something we should be encouraging. That's the best way for evolution to take it's natural course. :)

    12. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cyber sams and their mechanical bits.
      All that horrible essence.
      I gotta ask chummer, why bother when being a mage is so much more fun.

  9. Should help the disabled by Cybert14 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Meaning all of us. I hope we start abandoning our evolved bodies soon. What we'll become will make what we are now seem quite disabled.

    1. Re:Should help the disabled by lurch_mojoff · · Score: 1
      I hope we start abandoning our evolved bodies soon.

      In case you haven't noticed, we are still arguing whether ours are evolved bodies or intelligently designed bodies. >_> The quick and dirty fix? We can stuff our brains in a jar, bolt it on some kind of robot made up of synthetic muscles and we'll have arguably intelligently, but definitely designed bodies. Case closed.
    2. Re:Should help the disabled by Mr.+Mikey · · Score: 1

      "In case you haven't noticed, we are still arguing whether ours are evolved bodies or intelligently designed bodies."

      Well, it's an argument in that there are some people who, due to a lack of understanding or a passionate need to believe their religious texts are literal truth (or both), are vehemently clinging to the idea that life didn't evolve.

      From a scientific perspective, there is no real argument... the evidence is inescapable.

      --
      wants to be the first monkey to touch the monolith
    3. Re:Should help the disabled by qeveren · · Score: 1

      In case you haven't noticed, we are still arguing whether ours are evolved bodies or intelligently designed bodies.

      Not 'we'. Only the stupid people are arguing about this. Everyone else already knows the answer, more or less. :)

      --
      Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
    4. Re:Should help the disabled by lurch_mojoff · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well, it's an argument in that there are some people who, due to a lack of understanding or a passionate need to believe their religious texts are literal truth (or both), are vehemently clinging to the idea that life didn't evolve. From a scientific perspective, there is no real argument... the evidence is inescapable.
      Yes, of course there is no real argument. Mine was an, obviously bad, attempt for a joke. (oops)

      If you look at it, man is able to create artificial muscles that are a hundred times stronger than his own. This alone is pretty strong evidence that there was not much intelligent engineering in the "creation" of the human body. Otherwise we would have been much less vulnerable to, well, practically everything.
    5. Re:Should help the disabled by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

      You're free to abandon your evolved body anytime you choose. I generally like mine and plan to hang on to it for a lot longer.

      When it really needs augmentation, there is a wide variety of devices to choose from. My personal favorites are motorcycles, cars, and skis, but there are a lot of others to choose from.

    6. Re:Should help the disabled by buswolley · · Score: 1

      Most likely untrue. If you are not a specialist into the theory of evolution, then you are acting on a faith in science coupled with a general yet imprecise knowledge of the process of evolution through natural selction. I am not saying that it is evolution untrue. What I am saying is that evolution is not truly as obvious as you'd like to make it out to be. Sure it is easy to understand that species that have a good genetic fit for their environement are likely to survive better and pass on their offspring. The parts that are not obvious are things like, group level selection,(why is it weak, and when is it strong?) How do complex systems maintain there organization across scale? There are whole departments working on the theory behind the theory of evolution. true? probably. simple no.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    7. Re:Should help the disabled by Grab · · Score: 1

      The *results* are not obvious. However the *process* (favoured survival of random mutations via increased reproduction) is very obvious. ID believers deny the existence of the *process*.

      If I drop a handful of marbles on the floor, it'll take some pretty sophisticated maths to calculate in advance where they're going to end up (in fact, IIRC solving the maths for a collision of 3 or more objects simultaneously is not actually possible). But it takes nothing more than stating the bleeding obvious to say "dude, they're going to fall on the floor, and they're going to go all over the place". And it'd be pretty dumb to say "they're going to go wherever God tells them to go"... ;-)

      Grab.

    8. Re:Should help the disabled by buswolley · · Score: 1

      Rather, I think the question is: Can such complexity arise from a single selection event per organism.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    9. Re:Should help the disabled by buswolley · · Score: 1
      Actully, youe just as dumb when you say, "And it'd be pretty dumb to say "they're going to go wherever God tells them to go" " since you are passing judgement on a thing that you cannot define if it were to exist. While there is no proof that God exists, there is no proof God does not exist. There is absolutely nothing wrong in saying that the marbles go where God wants them to go, because if an all powerful God exists, then for all you know God could change the laws of physics at any moment, to alter one chemical reaction, and put all the laws back into place, and who would be the wiser? As you have already told us, science and math are not good at prediction. Dynamical Instability(sensitivity to initial conditions), difficulties in solving non-linear equations etc.. all are showing us that although our Universe is pretty deterministic, prediction of future events is impossibly hard, or impossible. So there is no way we can know if God intervenes in some chemical reactions or not. Also note that ideas such as chaos, are showing us that the minutest change in one variable in a dynamic system can alter large macroscopic behavior of the system. For example, a little flutter in the right place and right time, unde some leaf can cause it to rain on my head two month from now. No human could know that particular flutter will cause that, but an all powerful God could.

      Look all I am trying to say is: I know Christians don't give scientists a fair chance, because of their narrow ideology. But I know that Scientists are too damn cock-sure about things that science can not test or describe.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    10. Re:Should help the disabled by Grab · · Score: 1

      That's a fair point. Proof or otherwise of God's existence isn't possible.

      Rephrase: "Your maths/physics can't solve the problem, therefore this proves that they're going to go wherever God tells them to go." Now *that* would be dumb, and that's the situation we're in...

  10. We -could- rebuild people, or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could make Mechagodzilla!!! Tokyo, here I come...

  11. DUPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, this article received quite a bit of attention then too...

  12. Powered by alcohol by Centurix · · Score: 3, Funny

    At least these muscles won't suffer from Brewers Droop...

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:Powered by alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I checked, erections were facilitated by blood flow to the penis, not muscle strength. Even super strong muscles won't help you when you have a floppy dick.

    2. Re:Powered by alcohol by hedleyroos · · Score: 1

      Oh please. This is nothing new. My muscles increase to 200 times their original strength after vast amounts of alcohol!

  13. Frightening? by Cybert14 · · Score: 1

    Why put emotion into it? It's pretty simple. People will use it. If you don't you'll get thrown into an airplane. Therefore, better get it implanted. Dead people don't mull over ethics.

  14. Powered by alcohol? by Sir+Pallas · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just like all of the robots in the future. I'm sure it's not coincidence.

  15. Heat problems? by Mathiasdm · · Score: 0

    So, what if things get too hot? Will the muscles stay contracted? Sounds almost too easy to sabotage.

    Or did I misunderstand?

    --
    Join the anonymous, help develop the network: http://www.i2p2.de
    1. Re:Heat problems? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Excessive heat disables biological muscles, too. Temporarily or permanently, depending on the amount and cricumstances.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  16. wtf by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 2, Interesting
    a lifting strength more than 100 times that of normal
    skeletal muscle


    Whoa. okay.

    Fact 1. You know, the human body is so efficient at converting Calorie input into work output that in the world of fitness and nutrition, we practically don't even need to differentiate between Calorie intake and Calorie output! Eating exactly 500 Calories less is almost the same as performing exactly 500 Calories of work! (I think that fairly exact Calorie output testing can be performed in the laboratory, although I don't know the technique.)

    Fact 2. Now let's all take a moment to read the Wipedia article on the human muscle, which includes:
    Muscle can produce 3.35 kW (4 1/2 horsepower) at full rate.
    Okay, so combined with 100 times that of normal skeletal muscle, these lab muscles can perform work at a rate of 335 kW or 450 horsepower per second at pretty much perfect efficiency! Holy shit.

    So how far away are we from organic power plants?
    Wait a minute, 459 horsepower? How far are we from starting the morning with a couple of gallons of nutritional shake for our organic car?
    1. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      100x more powerful than a normal skeletal muscle? Do they mean by mass? The article doesnt say. Otherwise saying that its 100x more powerful than X tells us nothing. The hydraulics on a backhoe are probably like 10000x more powerful than a normal skeletal muscle. Oh wait, maybe not if you're talking dinosaur muscles. Sheesh. What a stupid article.

    2. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the human body is not very efficient at converting chemical energy into motion. Okay, so combined with 100 times that of normal skeletal muscle, these lab muscles can perform work at a rate of 335 kW or 450 horsepower per second at pretty much perfect efficiency! Holy shit. you fail at thinking

    3. Re:wtf by Eivind · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'm hoping you're joking.

      First, the human body is indeed effective, but not anywhere *close* to what you claim. The thing is, when you calculate the calorie-need for a certain activity, you typically do so by looking at a table. Say swim a mile in half an hour requires about X calories.

      But those numbers are *already* calculated (or more likely measured) including the human inefficiencies.

      Ever noticed you get warm and start sweating if you do heavy work ? That's waste heat for you baby.

      If you pedal a bike, and generate 100W, you'll use significantly more than 25cal/s doing so (a calorie is about 4 Joule).

      Second, producing "450 horsepower pro second" is a completely nonsensical statement. Horsepower (or KW) are measures of *power*, A car migth have 100 horsepower, you can measure it over a second, an hour or a year, it'll still have 100 horsepower.

      It's a lot like saying you're 6 feet tall pro second, which makes no sense, unless perhaps you mean you *grow* at 6 feet pro second.

      The article is dumb. 100 times as strong as skeletal muscle is a statement with no meaning unless you specify what exactly you mean;

      • Is it 100 times as strong as a muscle of the same mass ?
      • Is it 100 times as strong as a muschle of the same volume ?
      • Do you mean it has 100 times the force ?
      • Or 100 times the movement ?
      • Or 100 times the power ? (i.e. force times movement)
    4. Re:wtf by Tx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The article is dumb. 100 times as strong as skeletal muscle is a statement with no meaning unless you specify what exactly you mean

      I agree with most of your post, but BBC aims their content at Joe Public, it's not a scientific journal. Joe public will read from that that if he replaced his muscles with these artificial muscles, he'd be able to bench-press a lot more than he can now. That's as much as he needs or wants to know, and more importantly, he'll absorb it before his short attention span is exhausted and he moves on to the celebrity gossip column.

      The scientifically minded like you and I must seek other sources for more technical details, we can't expect publications aimed at the average Joe to provide the kind of detail we'd like on these stories.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    5. Re:wtf by bookhappy · · Score: 1

      "No one at Microsoft has ever had anyone murdered."

      Unless you count the slow death they impose on people day-by-day.

    6. Re:wtf by Elemenope · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And it is articles like this, all of them, that assure us of the perpetuity of Joe being dumb. If there was perhaps an incentive for Joe being smarter...but, no, instant gratification is so much more marketable.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    7. Re:wtf by IainMH · · Score: 1

      That's as much as he needs or wants to know, and more importantly, he'll absorb it before his short attention span is exhausted and he moves on to the celebrity gossip column.

      I'll happily fall into that category. On a Sunday.

    8. Re:wtf by timeOday · · Score: 1
      The article is dumb. 100 times as strong as skeletal muscle is a statement with no meaning unless you specify what exactly you mean;
      A couple other issues: what's the response time of the metal muscle type? Heating up and cooling off strips of metal sounds very slow to me.

      Second, does it scale? Maybe one strand of this metal pulls 100x compared to one strand of muscle, but can a big bundle of metal fibers be heated and cooled that way?

    9. Re:wtf by cbc1920 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm assuming that they mean 100 times as much linear force per unit mass. Shape memory alloy (SMA) actuators have been around since the 60's, and they are incredibly powerful. An actuator made from 1mm diameter Nitenol wire can easily lift 10lbs. Their reaction time can be measured in ms if enough heat is applied quickly. So, the claim is not so farfetched.

      Of course, there are several caches to using a SMA actuator: First, its operating temperature range is less than 100C, and usually more like 40C, depending on the alloy. Second, the actuator needs to be biased with a spring to return it to its original shape. The spring will have to be pretty hefty- at least 1/3 of the maximum load. If the load is a dead-load, the spring is not needed. Finally, as another poster has mentioned, the initial response can be in the millisecond, but the recovery time can be much longer. This is because of the simple fact that dissipating heat is much more difficult than creating it. If these designers have figured out a way to pump out heat just as fast as they can dump it in, my hat is off to them.

      I cannot speak to their efficiency, since it is highly dependent on the design of the device. If *only* enough heat is added to actuate the device, they could be very efficient, but this is rarely the case.

    10. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or 100 times the power ? (i.e. force times movement)
      Force times movement is work. Power is work/time

    11. Re:wtf by russotto · · Score: 1

      The human body is nowhere near 100% efficient. Aerobic respiration is only about 40% efficient, anaerobic respiration a miserable 2%. I'm not sure about digestion. The muscles themselves are 80% efficient, but that's once you've gotten the ATP to them in the first place.

      I'm not sure about the input end, but I'm sure that's much less than 100% as well, unless you're taking in glucose.

      I think in the fitness world, the numbers are already adjusted for this. That is, if an activity is deemed to use some number of kcal, that includes the generation of waste heat as well as the muscular motion.

    12. Re:wtf by russotto · · Score: 1

      You could get rid of the return spring if you set up the actuators in opposing pairs, the way many human muscles are.

    13. Re:wtf by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

      The body is not 100% efficient. Like the other poster said, the calorie tables *take into account* the bodies inefficiencies in converting chemical caloric energy into mechanical work energy. The efficiency of the human body, defined as ratio of mechanical work output to chemical energy input through food, is about 10-12%. So as a rough estimate, multiply the mechanical work by 10 to get the calories you need for it.

      --
      Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    14. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. I was sure someone on slashdot would be smart enough to recognize the fallacies in this article & the previous post. The idea that 500 calories digested will produce 500 calories of useful work is laughable. Whoever's post you replied to needs to review the carnot cycle, & shame on the moderators for modding that post up. Are we trying to propagate science fiction or science fact?

    15. Re:wtf by EvanED · · Score: 1

      we can't expect publications aimed at the average Joe to provide the kind of detail we'd like on these stories.

      No, we DON'T expect them to. And thus they don't publish details like that. If people started writing in complaining about the imprecision in scientific articles, they'd improve them.

    16. Re:wtf by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that they mean 100 times as much linear force per unit mass.

      If I remember correclty, SMA force capabilities are often posted as "block force," which is the peak force (Newtons) that can be exterted by the SMA. There is typically no (very little) displacement of the ends of the SMA wire during this test (no strain of the SMA wire). Another parameter of interest is the maximum strain or throw of the SMA with no load (called the "free displacement"). I think a few percent of the total SMA length is typical, but I'd have to burn calories to check that....

      Obviously a huge block force exerted over a very small distance is not as useful as a skeletal muscle-like replacement (think piezo-ceramics). The SMA actuators have a much larger free strain, and typically smaller block force and MUCH lower bandwidth capability (order of about ~1-Hz with just passive convection cooling) than piezos (kHz). Heating them up is as simple as passing current through them. Cooling them down just as quickly, as you mentioned, is not possible by simple convection cooling to the ambient air.

      I suppose that there is always the possiblity of using a more active temperature regulation system. Or, as another poster suggested, using the actuators in opposing pairs would help stretch out the "relaxed" SMA.

    17. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a few percent of the total SMA length is typical.

      I think this comment deserves to be highlighted!

      You start with a spool of SMA wire, you get all excited and think you're one step away from a giant robot, hook it up in a circuit and you run current through it, and... nothing happens. Dumbfounded, you recheck your connections. All good. What could it be?

      Finally you notice that if you watch very closely, yes, the wire deforms ever so slightly. But it's a serious a letdown.

      (They sell the stuff in spirals too, like a long spring, since when it's can contract a greater distance, but that's more expensive.)

    18. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...450 horsepower per second...

      I'm too much of a geek to let this one go, dude.

      "Horsepower" already takes into account the "per second" part. Power is work per time. One horsepower is 525 ft-lbs/sec. It's just "450 horsepower".

    19. Re:wtf by Grab · · Score: 1

      I take your point about needing the energy to run these things - you'll be using a large amount of your 100x strength to lug the gas tank around! :-) But your assertion of 100% efficiency on the human body ain't quite right.

      The human body takes a large amount of energy simply to keep running - IIRC it's about 1500 calories a day (for a man) if you simply lay in bed and didn't move a muscle.

      For hard physical work, it doesn't get much tougher than Arctic expeditions or mountain climbing. They're typically using 6000-7000 calories a day. Let's say 7500 to make the maths easier. So of that 7500, only 6000 is actually doing work to move your body around - that's 80% efficiency. Actually it's less than that, bcos the body is also using some of that energy to produce heat so that you don't freeze. And this assumes the muscles themselves are 100% efficient at converting chemical energy (food) into kinetic energy (movement). If they're less than 100% efficient (which they will be), then it's going to drop still lower.

      Grab.

  17. We Have the Technology... by arakon · · Score: 2, Funny

    We can rebuild him, make him stronger, faster....

    Col Steve Austin is the "6 Million dollar Man."

    duhduh taduhhh

    --
    "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."
    1. Re:We Have the Technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can rebuild him, make him stronger, faster....

      But I don't want to spend a lot of money...

    2. Re:We Have the Technology... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I can imagine it now "The Six Dollar Man", he gets a wheelchair, that's it.

      Hey! They could get Steven Hawking to play the role of the Six Dollar Man.

    3. Re:We Have the Technology... by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think he got the Six Million Dollar Wheelchair.

      --
      Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
    4. Re:We Have the Technology... by spiro_glance · · Score: 1

      Reminds of a skit called the six millon rupee man. We have the technology: we don't have the exchange rate. Followed by all sorts of bionic action like trying to throw a paper ball in a bin and missing (with the sound fx)

  18. Yeah possibly but... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm quite sure you've never had sex.

    In the larger interests of mankind perhaps the government should fund sex therapy sessions for all potential mad scientists.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Yeah possibly but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The future...

      Her: I had my pelvic muscles replaced.
      Mad Scientist: What?
      Her: They're now 100 times stronger than they were before. I can crush a beer can doing my kegel exercises.
      Mad Scientist: Uh....
      Her: An unopened one.

  19. HEY Mattygfunk1, YOUR SIG LINK IS BROKEN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mods, can I get a +5, Informative for this?

  20. You don't kiss it... by dark_requiem · · Score: 2, Informative

    You BITE his shiny metal ass!

    1. Re:You don't kiss it... by turnipsatemybaby · · Score: 1

      In soviet Russia, shiny metal asses bite YOU! (Someone had to say it! ;) )

  21. Mechwarriors? Bah! by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    The SF world doesn't begin and end with anime or video games, which are old bad American pre-1930's sci-fi warmed over. And over. And over. And over. And over...

    If ya want to imagine coolness, picture Marvel Comic's Iron Man Armor. Now that's a fun toy. Closely related to Heinlein's Marine armor, which Lee probably never heard of. I used to dream of engineering a full suit of powered armor. (Sadly, it'll probably come into initial use intimidating protestors, as usual. We're kind of short on real enemies, so the weaponmeisters turn their gaze on dissenters within. If you don't have real enemies, make some up. If you doubt me, look at what our police wear facing down Quakers and similar madmen. They look like they are expecting rocket fire, with all that armor. Exactly why do they need military armor to face down college kids? Do they really think they're in some kind of danger, or is it just bullying?)

    The weapons labs were full of comics and classic SF fans; sadly, now they will probably be anime fans, who never got the pure stuff from the original SF sources. What the old timers could have dreamed up had they known then what we see everyday. They had style and imagination. They were original.

    1. Re:Mechwarriors? Bah! by Elemenope · · Score: 1

      With rubber bullet kisses! / baton courtesies! / service with a smile!

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    2. Re:Mechwarriors? Bah! by thedletterman · · Score: 1

      Like we need Captain America and the Fantastic Four to intimidate protestors when we can just chase them away with personal hygiene products.

      --
      Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
    3. Re:Mechwarriors? Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marvel? Derivative blah.

      People have dreamed of mechanically enhanced armour for a lot longer... since the invention of clockwork I think. And as for Superman, check out various Greek etc. mythology about flying, super strong gods who disguise themselves as people. I guess the Marvel version did add some pathos (and that rather amusing Clerks? bit about Clark Kent being a cariacature of humanity from a superhuman perspective), but not much more.

    4. Re:Mechwarriors? Bah! by afidel · · Score: 1

      If riot police aren't worried about the random rock or bottle damaging their fragile head or a random punch hitting them in the chest it is MUCH easier for them to use proportional and appropriate force. If you fear for your safety your fight or flight response will kick in and you will do what you have to to end the threat, however if you are a heavily armored warrior you can use the cerebral part of your brain to make sure that you use apropriate action.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Mechwarriors? Bah! by Rectal+Prolapse · · Score: 1

      This anime matches up with the article perfectly:

      Ghost in the Shell

      A great application for cyborg bodies...

  22. Not an adequate comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...these devices had a lifting strength more than 100 times that of normal skeletal...

    Average heavyweight weightlifter has 100 times more lifting power than average nerd as well...

  23. What about our bones? by skam240 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    one of the problems with lifting weight of this kind is whether or not our skeletons can take it. the bones in your limbs can only support so much weight. it doesnt do you any good to have the strength to lift a car over your head if it will break the bones in your arms in the process.

    it strikes me that some sort of skeletal reinforcement will be needed before this can be used to its fullest extent.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:What about our bones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Luckily, now they're able to grow bone on Nanotubes.

    2. Re:What about our bones? by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Informative

      It definitely can't ; some people can already break their bones with their overdevelopped muscles.

      Artificial muscles would definitely require skeletal reinforcement. Although I don't know if anyone has ever worked on this.

      I'm not sure if those synthetic muscle can actually be implanted in a living organism either.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:What about our bones? by JohhnyTHM · · Score: 1

      Anyone know where I can buy some Adamantium?

    4. Re:What about our bones? by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      So we're ripping out perfectly healthy flesh, slapping a few rivets and i-bars over the bones, and hooking the whole thing up to some sort of alcohol tank. Why not just eschew all the messy surgery and permanent infrastructure needed to keep you rolling, and just put these muscles in an exoskeleton? Mind you, I don't know how effective these are as opposed to pneumatics, in terms of weight you can lift. Modifying any part of the body to give it superhuman strength however will always require a near total body replacement. Hey, when I'm 75, I'll definetely sign up for one, at least until the cloning and brain transplant technology catches up...

    5. Re:What about our bones? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      not only that. You will need stronger bones, to use these stronger muscles, but also you will need different type of skin, because if you start using these reinforced bones and these strong muscles in a normal human body, you will most likely hurt yourself every time you do something extreme, you will probably constantly rupture your blood vessels and skin.

    6. Re:What about our bones? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Artificial muscles would definitely require skeletal reinforcement."

      Bingo. If they were to be used on a human frame at least.

      The first thing that popped into my mind when I read this was "Sweet! They created Myomer bundles like they have in Battletech!" For any that are curious, here is the Wikipedia entry for Myomer bundles in Battletech.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    7. Re:What about our bones? by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      seen this myself, a friend of mine broke his arm whilst arm wrestling. though it was a good couple of seconds after the loud crack sound that someone said, "what was that noise?". then he said "ARRRRGGHHHHHH!". we bundled him in an ambulance and got another round in...

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  24. wow that's scary by moochfish · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists have developed artificial, super-strength muscles which are powered by alcohol and hydrogen.

    This could take bar fights to a whole new level.

  25. Wow by Godji · · Score: 1

    I just saw Ghost In The Shell, and now I get to read this?! This is getting creepy... BTW, will alcohol-powered muscles suffer from hangover the next morning? If not, I want my head replaced with one of these, please. And do it quietly, thank you!

  26. What they didn't say in the product announcement by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Of course, these new toys sound great. But, what they don't tell you is that they'll break five minutes after you get them home :)

  27. logical next step by name*censored* · · Score: 1
    We have computers fast enough to be able to cope with real world physics in realtime, and now muscles much more powerful than their human equivalents powered by a portable energy source..

    Surely this is all we need to make a decent mass market bipedal robot?

    --
    Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
  28. Muscular Dystrophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live with Muscular Dystrophy - A muscle degeneration disease that causes muscle to deterierate over time and I think this could possibly be a turning point. Now the cost and further exploration of this type of technology might take awhile but this proves that there might be something out there.

  29. BioEngineering by haakondahl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have for some time wanted to write a story including a "car" powered by a V-8 engine which is organic above the crankshaft. I have done my little engineering studies of nutrient bath and circulatory systems, exhaust issues (I mean this thing shits all over the road) and such... I have so far envisioned genetically tuned muscles, grown in a vat (or what-have-you), but the synthetic muscles are interesting.
    The problem is that I don't have a story there, just a neato idea. Not even characters. That doesn't stop many SF writers, unfortunately.

    --
    Don't trust anyone under thirty.
    1. Re:BioEngineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am haakondahl's staggering lack of imagination.

  30. yay! by irchs · · Score: 1

    Now I can re-create scenes from Mortal Kombat as Jax...

    My neighbours better watch the fuck out...

    --
    Jan
  31. Response times seems very slow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Shape memory alloys are already available to hobbiest in the form of nitinol wire. One of the problems is the very slow cycle times. The wire I have seen is only capable of about 3 contract/relax cycles per minute under ambient cooling. The main problem seems to be that once the wire is heated up in order for it to contract, it is hard to dissipate the heat out of the wire fast enough, to get the wire back to its original length or shape. Also, compared to just a normal RC servo, the nitinol wire was very energy inefficient.

    1. Re:Response times seems very slow.. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The wire I have seen is only capable of about 3 contract/relax cycles per minute under ambient cooling. The main problem seems to be that once the wire is heated up in order for it to contract, it is hard to dissipate the heat out of the wire fast enough, to get the wire back to its original length or shape.

      Have you thought about water cooling?
      wrap a lil' tube around the wire, and pump cold water in it when you want to cool down the thing? I don't know how reactive it would get, but I'm sure you could get better performance than by relying on room temperature to do your cooling.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Response times seems very slow.. by Danse · · Score: 1

      wrap a lil' tube around the wire, and pump cold water in it when you want to cool down the thing?

      Then you'd need a way to cool down the water/coolant, which means at least a fan and radiator, which would further degrade its energy efficiency.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    3. Re:Response times seems very slow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you thought about water cooling?
      wrap a lil' tube around the wire, and pump cold water in it when you want to cool down the thing? I don't know how reactive it would get, but I'm sure you could get better performance than by relying on room temperature to do your cooling.


      Yes that is one way to do it, there are many different methods to help cool the wire down a lot faster. But this adds bulk, complexity and further loss of energy efficiency(as another poster commented). Another real problem is modulating the movement between fully contracted and fully relaxed. It's easy enough to do PWM heating(just pulse current through the wire), but PWM cooling is a lot harder, and heating and cooling are a lot slower to react to PWM than say magnetic devices like solenoids or electric motors.

      The most common way to heat the shape memory allow is to simply pass a current through it. It is possible that the techniques suggested in the articule using fuel to heat the alloy(probably by burning it, or some chemical reaction), such as hydrogen, may turn out to be more energy efficient and pack more kinetically useable energy into a given weight or mass, than having a chemical battery convert a reaction into electricity. But I wouldn't hold my breath on that one.

      At the moment it seems SMA's are only useable in very specialized applications. For silent actuation, for very slow actuation, for very small size actuators, for actuators that can hav millions of cycles with no servicing and possibly for use in very dusty or other contaminant filled enironments since there are no parts to get clogged. Otherwise they are very slow, very inefficent, hard to modulate accurately and require hazardous levels of heat which must be designed around.

      Without some breakthroughs they are not going to be usuable as synthetic muscles, electric motors are far better. Cars can move faster and longer than any humans can, yet they use wheels and motors not legs and muslces. Just because SMA's work with contraction and relaxing and can be driven by oxygen and fuel, like muscles, doesn't mean they are more suited to the job than more "unnatural" devices like electric motors. It's probably largely irrational hype "Ooh look, that device has some similarities to human muscles, therefore it will revolutionize bionics!"

  32. Bitch Slap by PC-PHIX · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is a really cool creation and the scientists responsible will slap (100 times harder than you've ever been slapped) anyone who disagrees!

    --
    Optimist: The thumb drive is half empty! Pessimist: The thumb drive is half full...
  33. Other uses by Ztream · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is everyone here thinking "body augmentation"? I think this has very interesting implications for robotics and other forms of mechanical engineering; methinks the muscle is a pretty smart invention for certain types of movement and force application.

    1. Re:Other uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not me. I'm thinking: BattleMechs!

  34. *Puts on shades, and trenchcoat* by Ragnarrokk · · Score: 2, Funny

    My muscles are augmented.

    1. Re:*Puts on shades, and trenchcoat* by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      "Got the chips and enhancements
      Got the attitude right
      Got the metal 'neath my skin
      Moving faster than light"
      -Johnny Silverhand

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  35. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word: BattleMechs

  36. Obligatory one liner by MECC · · Score: 1

    I'll be back

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  37. this+realdoll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now, combine this with a Realdoll, and you have yourself the perfect android. Ltc. Data would be envious. :P

    1. Re:this+realdoll by kioopi · · Score: 1

      that would be a gyndroid. android comes from andras wich is greek for man. gyndroid comes from gyneka = woman.

  38. FINALLY we can say, without hesitation... by Illbay · · Score: 1

    ..."We have the technology..."

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  39. Myomer alloy from MechWarrior! by ronfar623 · · Score: 1

    Holy crap, was anyone else reminded of MechWarrior? That sounds an awful lot like Myomer.

    My dream of piloting a robotic exo-skeleton may be coming closer!

    1. Re:Myomer alloy from MechWarrior! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Just so long as they don't try to put a little clicky dial into its heel...

  40. Battletech Myomers by NilesDonegan · · Score: 1

    The discovery of myomers (artificial muscles) in the Battletech universe was a little less sanguine:

    Atlas: Is everything all set? Unauthorized personnel out?...Everyone behind the safety barriers?...All right. Good luck, everyone. O.K. Devers, charge the myomer bundle.
    Devers: Myomer bundle charge at 100 percent.
    Atlas: Trethers, measuring instruments ready?
    Trethers: Yes, sir.
    Atlas: Fine. Iona, turn on the cameras. Countdown from five, four, three, two, one, discharge.

    [Professor Atlas pushed the discharge switch. Immediately, all the potential energy stored in the myomer bundle became one swift and powerful contraction as the electric current traveled through it. The new myomer bundle composition of "Schwarzenegger's Bicep" contracted into a mass one-tenth its original size. It ripped the thick metal tubing of the test harness to shreds, causing ten-kilogram lead weights to be tossed into the air like confetti. Some of the scientists had to run for their lives to avoid the falling weights.]

    Atlas: My God. Am I hallucinating?
    Trethers: Professor, the contraction was off the scale of my instruments!
    Atlas: Which means what?
    Trethers: A pull of over one metric ton!
    Atlas: I think it's time to get rip-snorting drunk, don't you?

  41. Do the muscles by ghost. · · Score: 1

    ...look anything like this?

    --
    Bush is a cylon.
  42. Sci-Real by Markintosh · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Science Ficton looks like it might become Science Reality. Cool. Starship Troopers. Battlemechs. Now where the heck is my fusion powered flying car?

  43. Weight to usefullness ratio by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    What's really significant here is that these will be practical. Forget 100 times strength. Think 2x or 3x at a weight that the human skeleton can manage without requiring reinforcement in earth gravity. Current exoskeleton type enhancement or even prosthetics are limited by the amount of weight and bulk they bring along to the arrangement, we can only handle so much.

    This new tech would allow for very light weight and form fitting systems that could allow for normal range of movement and speed of movement while still providing enhamcement at the human scale... instead of requiring huge bulky robotic looking suits.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  44. Muscle Toner 3 by Jestrzcap · · Score: 1

    Excellent, now all I need is some cybereyes, a datajack, and some skillsofts and I start start doing runs on the 8+ diamond stores in town.

    --
    "I have great faith in fools: Self confidence my friends call it." ~Edgar Allan Poe
  45. You're thinking to small.... by Elfich47 · · Score: 1

    Where's my Battle Mech? I want my 100 tons of walking destruction!

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
  46. BattleMechs for Everyone!!! by cyranoVR · · Score: 1
    From ClassicBattletech.com:
    Two different systems are used to drive BattleMechs and control their movements. Small, electrically driven actuators move a 'Mech's light weapons and sensor arrays. Bundles of polyacetylene fibers called myomers control a 'Mech's limbs and main weapons. Myomers contract when exposed to electrical current, much like human muscles.
    Giant frickin' robots! Who's with me?
  47. What's with all the sci-fi crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who said this _has_ to be used for artificial limbs? The first thing I thought of was replacing all those hydraulic systems on construction machinery.

  48. Great! by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Now throw together some bones, ligaments and skin that can handle that kind of stress and I'll be in for a full body replacement.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. And order a full brain replacement while you're at it.

    2. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's not forget the big ol tank of alcohol(like a keg or two)that you will have to strap onto your back.

    3. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, mr. jaeger! got your ninja sword right here...

      (c'mon, somebody get this. you're nerds, for fuck's sake...)

  49. Artificial hearts? by Dave+Emami · · Score: 1

    Any chance this could be applicable for use in artificial hearts?

    --

    "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
    1. Re:Artificial hearts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yes!,i can just imagine it,every time your heart contracts ,your eyes are gonna pop out. :D

  50. not so good yet by Danse · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking that until we come up with a good way to reinforce our skeletons, super muscles won't live up to their potential. It's no good having muscles that can pick up an SUV if you snap your bones in the process. The muscles have to anchor to something after all.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  51. Old news.. on Digg days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot might as well turn into wired.

  52. As they used to say at the start of the auto era: by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I have for some time wanted to write a story including a "car" powered by a V-8 engine which is organic above the crankshaft. ...

    Get a horse!

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  53. Mmmmm beer by s31523 · · Score: 1

    Scientists have developed artificial, super-strength muscles which are powered by alcohol and hydrogen.

    Gives a whole new meaning to beer muscles!

  54. Muscle Power by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    How about reversing these muscle motors, like we do rotary ones, to make generators? Strapping them across hot parts absorbing the wasted energy from inefficient generation tech to capture more efficiency.

    Really any tech that can very efficiently capture heat and convert it to useable power, whether stored in chemical bonds, transmitted light or electric current will transform (pun intended ;) our power consumption problems. Especially if that tech's product lifecycle itself consumes very little energy compared to how much it conserves.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  55. Weight to usefullness ratio & Efficiency by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

    Well both of those have their place. There could be lightweight suits to assist in working in a warehouse or moving company, lifting boxes and stuff, a larger one for lifting dumpsters (FULLY replacing those noisy pneumatic garbage truck lifters! =) , and then a full sized one for cargo containers like you see on 18 Wheelers.

    Then there could be suits for athletics, bringing sports into a whole new dimension.

    There could be *silent* airplanes that flap their own wings.

    Sheesh. The invention is huge, depending on how efficient those muscles are. But I wouldn't narrow the repercussions down to small suits.

    --
    "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
    1. Re:Weight to usefullness ratio & Efficiency by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely correct. I just wanted to point out the importance of not looking at the technology as this extreme application. It could just as easily be used as a very effective micro-motor. The flexibility of something like this which has so much room for performance loss while still being useful.... now that is encouraging.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  56. The weak link is the Shape Memory Alloy by InakaBoyJoe · · Score: 1
    I've worked with Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs) before, and they are not like real muscles because, as the article says, they rely on heat to cause contraction. That means you have to wait for them to cool down before they expand again. For lots of applications, including stuff on the time-scale of human movement, cooling doesn't happen fast enough unless you have some kind of active cooling system. Maybe it's possible in the body as long as you don't boil the surrounding fluid (!).

    The novelty in this article is not the artificial muscle or the strength of the muscle itself, but the idea of powering (heating) an SMA with a chemical reaction instead of electricity. So the Slashdot headline is a bit misleading...

    By the way, yay, UBC got a plug in the article!

  57. This is not new. by neomajic · · Score: 1
  58. Actual efficiency is a bit lower. by Kodiak+Claw · · Score: 1

    The energy efficiency of the human body is about 20%. If these things are a 100 times as strong, then they should be using substantially more energy. (I think this is a strength to mass comparison). That being said, the fuel stores and cooling systems are going to take up a lot of mass on their own. But well, even a final product with a the mass/strength and fuel storage ability of organics qualifies as a major technilogical acheivment. The nanotube version, while not as powerful, might actually have more potential, should have a higher energy efficiency (electrical systems get the best), and a less powerful cooling system would be needed as a result. This also has some extrordinary potential when it comes to making things like robotic arms, since these will let us copy existing natural models, rather than trying to duplicate the same function with a different system.

  59. Bones by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now all we need are super-strong synthetic bones to prevent this sort of thing.

  60. Nothing Really New by Tellalian · · Score: 1

    The most powerful type, "shorted fuel cell muscles" convert chemical energy into heat, causing a special shape-memory metal alloy to contract.

    Shape-memory alloys or "muscle wire" have been around for decades, and are not particularly useful for large-scale robotic motion due to their immense power requirements, short stroke, slow actuation speed, and difficulty of control. This article is pretty lite on new information, but the only innovation seems to be delivering heat via chemical reactions directly on the muscle wires, instead of using electricity. However, I doubt this is much of an improvement, since most SMAs require temperatures of 150 degrees Fahrenheit and over before they'll actuate. Not good when you're making a "bionic muscle" for prosthetics as the article suggests.

  61. Skeletal Structure by TheCowardofAnonymous · · Score: 0

    The problems with using this to replace / enhance human strength already occurs with natural muscles. Our muscles are capable of far more than we actually get out of them, and in certain times of extreme stress or anguish they can be pushed far beyond "normal". The problem is that normally the muscles are restricted to what the less durable sections of the skeleton and ligament system can take. Human muscles on a sturdier frame with heavier-duty ligaments and bone attachments could achieve a lot more than they already do.

    The issue is muscle tearing and skeletal damage.

    You can read stories about this in the news every once and a while - a child gets hit by and forced under a car, and an average mother lifts the car off of her child. While it's horrible for your bones and all that, it's still possible.

  62. think of the pitcher's side by eamonman · · Score: 1

    Even though the obvious thing would be to look at the hitters, it'd be great if this one day could help pitchers. I want to see someone throw 105+ mph and be able pitch again the next day. That would pretty much defeat the probabably already boosted synth-muscle hitters (a hitter still needs to react to the ball in time, no matter how strong). That would be a wonderful achievement for synthetic muscles. Of coruse, we'd probably also need synthetic tendons to hold the synthetic muscluature on, but oh well. Maybe one day instead of Tommy John surgery, pitchers could get the Alex Murphy surgery.

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
  63. How about prosthetics? by x0 · · Score: 1

    So, everyone wants mech warriors and augmentation. Big deal...
    I'd like to be able to walk normally again.
    While my prosthetic is made of groovy materials (carbon-carbon, carbon fibre and titanium), it lacks even the most basic of control. Sure, there is a small amount of feedback as the carbon-carbon 'foot' flexes, but I have no true ankle control.
    I have been waiting for realistic 'active' prosthetics for over ten years now, and hopefully this technology will be available in a relatively reasonable time frame.
    Me? I'd be happy to be able to manipulate a gas pedal, or walk on sand without slipping backwards.

    --
    In the immortal words of Socrates, who said; 'I drank what?'
  64. Steam powered robots!!! by mlush · · Score: 1

    Hmm if the shape memory only needs heat to contract and cold expand it would be possible to build a steam powered mecha! House the muscle coils in ceramic and direct alternating steam and water to drive them dumping the excess heat via a radiator.

  65. Strong Bad meets Bender! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Do you take off your face and hands before you go to bed?
    And if so, are you some kind of robot?
    And if so, what kind of powers do you have?
    Do you use them for good, or for awesome?
    Would you like to join forces?
    I just happen to be the greatest criminal mind of our time."

  66. Sounds like Clan espionage to me by default+luser · · Score: 1

    Synthetic muscle that runs better when it's hot...

    Damn, looks like the Clans have caputured our Triple-Strength Myomer technlolgy!

    What's next, the C3 Computer?

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  67. Motorcycles, cars, and skis by Cybert14 · · Score: 1

    Head trauma, splattering on the dashboard, and flying into trees. Only by replacing our fragile structure will we have truly safe experiences with these add-ons.

  68. Well, only stupid people are religious. by Cybert14 · · Score: 1

    Because those answers are more obviously untrue.

  69. Soon... by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1

    I will be governor of California.

  70. arrant pedantry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There could be *silent* airplanes that flap their own wings.

    That would properly be called an ornithopter.