A) ditto ; everyone who voted bush in did because they felt the statisfaction of knowing they have nothing to hide.. or need to hide
b)that was the whole point behind the framers creating the constitution... if there is a disturbance in equilibrium it
can be accounted for.. as it has been for 200 years.. or should that be only when the democrats are in power..
i guess republicans face the bull by the horns and the democrats are ready to convey that that equilibrium is the
problem only when republicans are in power... a balance of power is a balance of power not a negotiation or
reason to digress.
c)who's hiding from the government...?
let me go over some.
great books of our time
1984
brave new world
farenheight 451
animal farm
if you're telling me there is a reason to hide from the government today.... either you flunked 11 and didn't read
any of these books... or your telling simply>>> you do have something to hide.. its called rhetoric..
i have nothing to hide! bit i don't want to hide....
if you ever read these books you'd know the authors of these books wrote these early 20th century to send a
message to the future that living under any government power would be the same means to an end.. according
to them all governments would eventually go bad whether democrtic, republican, facsist or kingdom. the point
they made though is that only the people who believed in this type of opppression would be affected. what
happened? reality! checks and balances and a way to keep an equilibrium in the government..who doesn't agree?
you! why? cuase the systems unfair! if you read in between the lines youd see that is exactly what brought
around such governments... mistrust in the people who run the country, corruption and people who don't have
faith in the consititution as a way of amending itself.. democracy today..
if the laws have to made to constitute for another law the thats what has to be done.. its not about whos corrupting who and whos doing what behind our back... if you had any real notion of how the government works youd know : the bill didn't pass because it has to go through a series of votes by each committee and that sooner or later it will be reintroduced in a more contextual version of the exact same measures not because it
doesn't work... we don't have idiots running the country..
democrats have been to used to way too much freedom and liberalism starting in the sixties and now they regret.. face it! this isn't about hiding its regret.!
sound like the documentary they made on bush "illuminati" dude if bush is as evil as they make him out to be on
there, i am 110% behind him and the republican party.. i guess no one knows that most of the master minds behind
9/11 were rich saudi vamps in the 80's drinking, partying and living it up like real boozers... exporting russian and
american whoars and getting their hands dirty in every american material conspiracy... guess who got smart.. yeah
they did... they could'nt get what they really wanted from the US (POWER) so they conspired and created a high
level terrorist nation to fight back against the US GOV.... and you know what if Bush is dark and evil I am in, and
if he skipped out I am still in.. get real dude. these are terrrorists who were boozing yesterday, are muslim today and are cutting off the heads of journalsts on video.. GOOGle them each one of them you'll find IBN whats his name
in a 3piece tux his hair greased back and looking ready to party with the BIllions he was worth at the time...!
is this about bush or terrorists! figures!
in the us thats drunk drivers not cars guess that makes all europeans drunk drivers...
yet another action on the part of the government that is republican based, biased and led...
funny why so many liberalists think were cracking down on drunk driving too hard, yet president bush should do
something about it....
i guess he got it from the same place you got your credentials:
scott long is your name AND
youre a south asian ?????
the side corner pocket you named before you left him a comment...
and the same cliche you left about SElinux not being open source because its government based and developed.
>>> basically your stating the same issue again in a different context... which is really that open source has
nothing to do with government and if it does it is bad! and worst if it is republican it no good at all... after all
it all goes back to open source... [slashdot.org]. in reality unix and government go way back... and the real
cliche you want to know about is "which governemnt", the same government you put down ten threads ago
as being a threat to open source policy (SElinux) and definitely the one you've attempted to summarize as a threat to its own country...
when the framers put together the consititution they had intended for a balance of power in all areas of
government.... and this includes democrats and republicans. the fact that republicans are in power and the
democrats aren't is not what is constituted as important.. its what the people want.. that what you want to
talk about.. because theres a shift in power going on in favor of the republicans its because a) the people
choose so : not the media, not the rich or the corrupt... b) because they manage to do a better job of handling
homeland and international affairs with a little more dignity and gaunt.
so if anyones making a cliche these days it is just who "all these whining democrats that can't handle any
real constitutional measures taken to effectively promote the US rather than promote liberalism and liberal
gibberish of a free world.. the only real way to achieve a free world is through hard work and face it the
democrats don't want to have to deal with half the third world up in arms and find a solution they'd rather
be pointing fingers (as stated) at who us! and talk about preserving the environment.. what environment are
they talking about when the koreans are back in the arms race, the iranians are trying to get in, and the
joke of 'em all saddam hussain who according to democrats and only democrats had no weapons of mass
destruction, but 20yrs ago did! according to iraqi intelligence they do! and according to every voter who voted bush they do! so what are we supposed to do with the environment?? since you, i and everyone knows including
the democrats that the environment and freedom is all that democrats want to talk about anyway...
get real!
likewise!!
bleeding hearts and big money (like bill i guess no pun intended)
no fair ! score five for fraud hunter! read it in the moderator faq.... whome ever moderated his thread as a -1
(for stating that too many democrats are whining about why there are reasons to defend and can't take one
moment to reflect on how much liberalism is really possible and why it is such an antogonist in many of the
problems globally... i guarantee you that half the countries that these liberals are willing to defend don't want to
be defended and are already engaging in war through no ones will but their own).... is Bias!
damn straight that right! after 9/11..... with all the innocent people that died in those towers, you're willing to tell
me that the measures that bush and the republicans have been willing to take to evade another attack of the
same sort is not correct... i think your minds tied up in booze,sex and money and not real life buddy...! (i do recall
something about too many overcharged credit cards by coward anonymous or something...)..
in reality if the government has to tap our phone lines and is in our computers (which they are) to protect and
defend us from another mistake like 9/11 ( which i blame on 8 years of democratic BS by the now more than
infamous MR.Clinton) my question is who of us here have anything to hide!? i don't.. like the rest of the hard
working MAJORITY that don't have their hands down their pants..
quick get to the point...!!!
are you defending, criticizing or simply making a statement that is obvious (as usuall)..
look at it this way if the US is all this then thats the way it is and that the way it will always be, since i don't
think the brits are smart or were smart enough to handle the current situation as it is and has always been, nor
the germans and the french are really (cowards too), when it come down to it a simple explanation of what is
really happening in the world today and maybe just maybe you'd have a point about the power and the extent of
that power the that USA posses and why it is legitimate means of controlling the whole infrastructure of the
world...
my question to you is: are you talking about the republican administration, globaliztion or taxes..
from my point of view you've got all three right and it still sounds like you are complaining..
so am I! i guess its too difficult to defend a government that defends its own country.. (as well as bush has!;-)
really! as far as I am concerned I couldn't have given two hoots about who was in power 10 years ago until
things really started smelling bad in the world... and as far as i can see a republican vote will always come through
for me and the thousands of other americans who republican... unless every one's trying to imply that a) clinton is
not guilty of a slight misdemeanor thats probably every democrats worst night mare.. and that jhon kerry is really
capable of handling a presidential race like a man!! let alone presidency..
don't spit into the wind, don't tug on supermans cape, don't pull the mask of the 'ol lone rager and don't mess around with jim/re:vamap slim>>> even if you do have a two piece cutom pool cue...
cute song from the sixties that sort of reminded me of your name and what your're trying to imply by using it........
and since you do apply a lot of non-sense in what you are saying most of the time, i kind of tried to size it
up as something.. a two piece custom pool cue...! too much ranting and raving by " coward anonymous" and really
too much swearing and flaming... no harm intended (really). but most of the time you just seem to go on a rant and
no quit till half the thread thinks otherwise... look at the moderator faq and tell me why coward anonymous has
no karma (its obvious?!) yeah its too damn obvious no pun intended..
basically the gnome desktop it uses is a simplified version of any other gnome desktop from my own experience..
but what i can say one thing for ubuntu..
it is a work of genius.. .
good for kids is right!
education! true!
the live cd in my own experience is extravagantly set up for simplicity and ease..
and the installation is an automated cd format
but what kills the whole meaning of any kind of any real "open source potential" is that is all it has to offer..
if open source is going to create software for education create a whole new project.. don't add something that
does't even effectively run unix unless your 10.. mentally challenged:-) or just not smart enough to use
an operating
systems that requires real posix composite programming.. such as a real shell and command line interaction..
the system comes equipped with a shell called dash..
and to install a c shell you have to go through every library on the cd.
a work of genius yes.. but a real operating system NO..
i use ubuntu just for the sake of exploring the OS itself.. other than what I have just heard about new linux for
education of youngsters. i see no real potential in this operating system.. it just basically a gnome application
desktop configured to look just that "ubuntu" and libraries added in there for upgrading or customizing all done
in a non-posix unix rhetoric.. basically you use a gui interface pick out the lib functions you want and it does
everything for you.. looks like a subtle linux version of windows policy integrated into a few fancy names and
utilitiies grinded togeher effectively enough to sell by making kde the other thing you can do.. take it from me
if you are already an effective unix user this operating system is a toy..
even though (and I stress even though) i myself gave a ubuntu hoary hedge hog distro package to my neighbors
son as incentive to try out some of the open source software since he had just recieved his first computer for
his eighteenth birthday (probably because it come packaged with a live cd).. but i also made sure to give him
something he can use a "fedora core 2 package". i think in the long run he would benefit from the fedora alot more
than the ubuntu.. linux for all maybe ?! "but i guess that depends on who all is!"
off topic?! but its really out of habit that I punctuate this way.. since I am blogger by nature (if that the
the right word) but i create dummy files for my database on daily basis and keep track of progress, notes, any new material i have learnt or acquired and so on.. (thousands of files and I am the only
one who reads them so:-) i guess in a humerous way I am the only person who could actually
decipher my own punctuation although it is valid.. ( i know this from british boarding school and
straight A's). like i said in my bio ( a little metally challenged:-))
go to unix.com see how many indians are on the moderator list and can't code worth a penny! no
racism intended but their just not educated or created for this type of credential... . i think bill is in on
something more than just code and internships : he's looking for political scandals to cover for any
mistakes he makes in the future.. where else to find it than in the third world..
i use windows.. i use dos... i use an open source unix emulator on a windows partition too... and I can say that a
study that claims test conditions as a medium for comparison between a unix architecture and a windows platform
as a way to bring meaning to MSsofts apparent denial of unix/linux expansion at this current time???? ask any real
programmer or technician endowed with real programming skills which operating system will do what... 10 to 1
windows will do the job... and unix\linux will effectively control a real programming environment with a command
line interface, system heirarchy and built in support for programming in virtually any language in the real world
thats 80% of all programmers with any credible ability to run, compile and administer an operating system without
replicating on a basic gui interface thats probably going to overheat where a linux\unix mchine just starts to
move... using all 139 patches in the test conditions and the 1001 more required for real life application. i think this
demonstration just undercut exactly how many patches would be required by windows (39 or something) by 1 too
many to even be credible... sorry dr.thompson sounds like a hustle to me!
from what i understood reading an article on SElinux last year: its origins go back quite far infact they seem to be
speculated as lost in some red tape... as to connections to AT&T labs. the intentions where to create a security
system specifically designed for intranet and networking specifics and where tested in university networks
and government based internet projects way back when.. according to sources who have taken interest in this
type of security and are spent on introducing it to the open source community, unix users globally and new
coorporate sectors who have migrated to unix.. its basic function at this current time is based on security in
networking environments that are too large for base unix security. as basic security for smaller systems it is still
not convincing and to tell the truth in situations where smaller systems are able to secure themselves unix based
security is probably still the answer.
it just sounds to gruesome to me that anything that has to do with the.gov analysis is "bad!" considering that
berkeley bsd, and really all unix before the introduction of the internet was government and university based
as its primary source of development and contingency to the IT world at the time... SElinux is basically a strategic
move to inspire and solidify the security of networking and internet services globally where the use of black art
hacking has become a problem in every nation that has any form internet communication and the developers who
developed it happen to have been open source experts in congruency with NAS developers... . !
figures!a GUI perfect application that requires a minimal
of 39 patches on a one year comparison between linux and
windows and the real rhetoric is in why it would take an
average of 139 patches in test conditions to keep a server
secure and the joke is "butt ugly!" how about the real number of patches that would be required to keep any server running and secure...! i guess in 2007 the new joke is its a kopykaT!
Slashdot Mirror
offtop! you sure did! because I left on the back burner for the dude with no glory!
just one question! who is sunnunu? and why is he saying this... as Elvis said ... nix nix!
A) ditto ; everyone who voted bush in did because they felt the statisfaction of knowing they have nothing to hide.. or need to hide b)that was the whole point behind the framers creating the constitution... if there is a disturbance in equilibrium it can be accounted for.. as it has been for 200 years.. or should that be only when the democrats are in power.. i guess republicans face the bull by the horns and the democrats are ready to convey that that equilibrium is the problem only when republicans are in power... a balance of power is a balance of power not a negotiation or reason to digress. c)who's hiding from the government...? let me go over some. great books of our time 1984 brave new world farenheight 451 animal farm if you're telling me there is a reason to hide from the government today.... either you flunked 11 and didn't read any of these books... or your telling simply>>> you do have something to hide.. its called rhetoric.. i have nothing to hide! bit i don't want to hide.... if you ever read these books you'd know the authors of these books wrote these early 20th century to send a message to the future that living under any government power would be the same means to an end.. according to them all governments would eventually go bad whether democrtic, republican, facsist or kingdom. the point they made though is that only the people who believed in this type of opppression would be affected. what happened? reality! checks and balances and a way to keep an equilibrium in the government..who doesn't agree? you! why? cuase the systems unfair! if you read in between the lines youd see that is exactly what brought around such governments... mistrust in the people who run the country, corruption and people who don't have faith in the consititution as a way of amending itself.. democracy today.. if the laws have to made to constitute for another law the thats what has to be done.. its not about whos corrupting who and whos doing what behind our back... if you had any real notion of how the government works youd know : the bill didn't pass because it has to go through a series of votes by each committee and that sooner or later it will be reintroduced in a more contextual version of the exact same measures not because it doesn't work... we don't have idiots running the country.. democrats have been to used to way too much freedom and liberalism starting in the sixties and now they regret.. face it! this isn't about hiding its regret.!
sound like the documentary they made on bush "illuminati" dude if bush is as evil as they make him out to be on there, i am 110% behind him and the republican party.. i guess no one knows that most of the master minds behind 9/11 were rich saudi vamps in the 80's drinking, partying and living it up like real boozers... exporting russian and american whoars and getting their hands dirty in every american material conspiracy... guess who got smart.. yeah they did... they could'nt get what they really wanted from the US (POWER) so they conspired and created a high level terrorist nation to fight back against the US GOV.... and you know what if Bush is dark and evil I am in, and if he skipped out I am still in.. get real dude. these are terrrorists who were boozing yesterday, are muslim today and are cutting off the heads of journalsts on video.. GOOGle them each one of them you'll find IBN whats his name in a 3piece tux his hair greased back and looking ready to party with the BIllions he was worth at the time...! is this about bush or terrorists! figures!
i think shes talking about the two piece custom pool cue... HMMMM!
in the us thats drunk drivers not cars guess that makes all europeans drunk drivers... yet another action on the part of the government that is republican based, biased and led... funny why so many liberalists think were cracking down on drunk driving too hard, yet president bush should do something about it....
i guess he got it from the same place you got your credentials: scott long is your name AND youre a south asian ????? the side corner pocket you named before you left him a comment... and the same cliche you left about SElinux not being open source because its government based and developed. >>> basically your stating the same issue again in a different context ... which is really that open source has
nothing to do with government and if it does it is bad! and worst if it is republican it no good at all... after all
it all goes back to open source... [slashdot.org]. in reality unix and government go way back... and the real
cliche you want to know about is "which governemnt", the same government you put down ten threads ago
as being a threat to open source policy (SElinux) and definitely the one you've attempted to summarize as a threat to its own country...
when the framers put together the consititution they had intended for a balance of power in all areas of
government.... and this includes democrats and republicans. the fact that republicans are in power and the
democrats aren't is not what is constituted as important.. its what the people want.. that what you want to
talk about.. because theres a shift in power going on in favor of the republicans its because a) the people
choose so : not the media, not the rich or the corrupt... b) because they manage to do a better job of handling
homeland and international affairs with a little more dignity and gaunt.
so if anyones making a cliche these days it is just who "all these whining democrats that can't handle any
real constitutional measures taken to effectively promote the US rather than promote liberalism and liberal
gibberish of a free world.. the only real way to achieve a free world is through hard work and face it the
democrats don't want to have to deal with half the third world up in arms and find a solution they'd rather
be pointing fingers (as stated) at who us! and talk about preserving the environment.. what environment are
they talking about when the koreans are back in the arms race, the iranians are trying to get in, and the
joke of 'em all saddam hussain who according to democrats and only democrats had no weapons of mass
destruction, but 20yrs ago did! according to iraqi intelligence they do! and according to every voter who voted bush they do! so what are we supposed to do with the environment?? since you, i and everyone knows including
the democrats that the environment and freedom is all that democrats want to talk about anyway...
get real!
likewise!!
bleeding hearts and big money (like bill i guess no pun intended) no fair ! score five for fraud hunter! read it in the moderator faq.... whome ever moderated his thread as a -1 (for stating that too many democrats are whining about why there are reasons to defend and can't take one moment to reflect on how much liberalism is really possible and why it is such an antogonist in many of the problems globally... i guarantee you that half the countries that these liberals are willing to defend don't want to be defended and are already engaging in war through no ones will but their own).... is Bias!
know why! bush will get things done and clinton was caught brown nosing.... i guess thats what they do there...
damn straight that right! after 9/11..... with all the innocent people that died in those towers, you're willing to tell me that the measures that bush and the republicans have been willing to take to evade another attack of the same sort is not correct... i think your minds tied up in booze,sex and money and not real life buddy...! (i do recall something about too many overcharged credit cards by coward anonymous or something...).. in reality if the government has to tap our phone lines and is in our computers (which they are) to protect and defend us from another mistake like 9/11 ( which i blame on 8 years of democratic BS by the now more than infamous MR.Clinton) my question is who of us here have anything to hide!? i don't.. like the rest of the hard working MAJORITY that don't have their hands down their pants..
quick get to the point...!!! are you defending, criticizing or simply making a statement that is obvious (as usuall).. look at it this way if the US is all this then thats the way it is and that the way it will always be, since i don't think the brits are smart or were smart enough to handle the current situation as it is and has always been, nor the germans and the french are really (cowards too), when it come down to it a simple explanation of what is really happening in the world today and maybe just maybe you'd have a point about the power and the extent of that power the that USA posses and why it is legitimate means of controlling the whole infrastructure of the world... my question to you is: are you talking about the republican administration, globaliztion or taxes.. from my point of view you've got all three right and it still sounds like you are complaining..
so am I! i guess its too difficult to defend a government that defends its own country.. (as well as bush has!;-) really! as far as I am concerned I couldn't have given two hoots about who was in power 10 years ago until things really started smelling bad in the world... and as far as i can see a republican vote will always come through for me and the thousands of other americans who republican... unless every one's trying to imply that a) clinton is not guilty of a slight misdemeanor thats probably every democrats worst night mare.. and that jhon kerry is really capable of handling a presidential race like a man!! let alone presidency..
don't spit into the wind, don't tug on supermans cape, don't pull the mask of the 'ol lone rager and don't mess around with jim/re:vamap slim>>> even if you do have a two piece cutom pool cue... cute song from the sixties that sort of reminded me of your name and what your're trying to imply by using it........ and since you do apply a lot of non-sense in what you are saying most of the time, i kind of tried to size it up as something .. a two piece custom pool cue...! too much ranting and raving by " coward anonymous" and really
too much swearing and flaming... no harm intended (really). but most of the time you just seem to go on a rant and
no quit till half the thread thinks otherwise... look at the moderator faq and tell me why coward anonymous has
no karma (its obvious?!) yeah its too damn obvious no pun intended..
sounds like a two piece custom pool cue... (niether here nor there)
BTW i don't even use the gnome desktop... the kde desktop has a few fancy features but i don't think i can misconstrue it with a real kde desktop.
basically the gnome desktop it uses is a simplified version of any other gnome desktop from my own experience.. but what i can say one thing for ubuntu.. it is a work of genius.. . good for kids is right! education! true! the live cd in my own experience is extravagantly set up for simplicity and ease.. and the installation is an automated cd format but what kills the whole meaning of any kind of any real "open source potential" is that is all it has to offer.. if open source is going to create software for education create a whole new project.. don't add something that does't even effectively run unix unless your 10.. mentally challenged :-) or just not smart enough to use
an operating
systems that requires real posix composite programming.. such as a real shell and command line interaction..
the system comes equipped with a shell called dash..
and to install a c shell you have to go through every library on the cd.
a work of genius yes.. but a real operating system NO..
i use ubuntu just for the sake of exploring the OS itself.. other than what I have just heard about new linux for education of youngsters. i see no real potential in this operating system.. it just basically a gnome application desktop configured to look just that "ubuntu" and libraries added in there for upgrading or customizing all done in a non-posix unix rhetoric.. basically you use a gui interface pick out the lib functions you want and it does everything for you.. looks like a subtle linux version of windows policy integrated into a few fancy names and utilitiies grinded togeher effectively enough to sell by making kde the other thing you can do.. take it from me if you are already an effective unix user this operating system is a toy.. even though (and I stress even though) i myself gave a ubuntu hoary hedge hog distro package to my neighbors son as incentive to try out some of the open source software since he had just recieved his first computer for his eighteenth birthday (probably because it come packaged with a live cd).. but i also made sure to give him something he can use a "fedora core 2 package". i think in the long run he would benefit from the fedora alot more than the ubuntu.. linux for all maybe ?! "but i guess that depends on who all is!"
off topic?! but its really out of habit that I punctuate this way.. since I am blogger by nature (if that the the right word) but i create dummy files for my database on daily basis and keep track of progress, notes, any new material i have learnt or acquired and so on.. (thousands of files and I am the only one who reads them so:-) i guess in a humerous way I am the only person who could actually decipher my own punctuation although it is valid.. ( i know this from british boarding school and straight A's). like i said in my bio ( a little metally challenged :-))
go to unix.com see how many indians are on the moderator list and can't code worth a penny! no racism intended but their just not educated or created for this type of credential... . i think bill is in on something more than just code and internships : he's looking for political scandals to cover for any mistakes he makes in the future.. where else to find it than in the third world..
i use windows.. i use dos... i use an open source unix emulator on a windows partition too... and I can say that a study that claims test conditions as a medium for comparison between a unix architecture and a windows platform as a way to bring meaning to MSsofts apparent denial of unix/linux expansion at this current time???? ask any real programmer or technician endowed with real programming skills which operating system will do what... 10 to 1 windows will do the job... and unix\linux will effectively control a real programming environment with a command line interface, system heirarchy and built in support for programming in virtually any language in the real world thats 80% of all programmers with any credible ability to run, compile and administer an operating system without replicating on a basic gui interface thats probably going to overheat where a linux\unix mchine just starts to move... using all 139 patches in the test conditions and the 1001 more required for real life application. i think this demonstration just undercut exactly how many patches would be required by windows (39 or something) by 1 too many to even be credible... sorry dr.thompson sounds like a hustle to me!
from what i understood reading an article on SElinux last year: its origins go back quite far infact they seem to be speculated as lost in some red tape... as to connections to AT&T labs. the intentions where to create a security system specifically designed for intranet and networking specifics and where tested in university networks and government based internet projects way back when.. according to sources who have taken interest in this type of security and are spent on introducing it to the open source community, unix users globally and new coorporate sectors who have migrated to unix.. its basic function at this current time is based on security in networking environments that are too large for base unix security. as basic security for smaller systems it is still not convincing and to tell the truth in situations where smaller systems are able to secure themselves unix based security is probably still the answer.
it just sounds to gruesome to me that anything that has to do with the .gov analysis is "bad!" considering that
berkeley bsd, and really all unix before the introduction of the internet was government and university based
as its primary source of development and contingency to the IT world at the time... SElinux is basically a strategic
move to inspire and solidify the security of networking and internet services globally where the use of black art
hacking has become a problem in every nation that has any form internet communication and the developers who
developed it happen to have been open source experts in congruency with NAS developers... . !
figures!a GUI perfect application that requires a minimal of 39 patches on a one year comparison between linux and windows and the real rhetoric is in why it would take an average of 139 patches in test conditions to keep a server secure and the joke is "butt ugly!" how about the real number of patches that would be required to keep any server running and secure...! i guess in 2007 the new joke is its a kopykaT!