Re:From TFA (and other materials on the subject)
on
HAARP Amping It Up
·
· Score: 1
(big grin) We've worked for them as consultants. I've been to both "-works". We're a small defense contracting firm with pretty good clearances, our own SCIF and an eclectic set of abilities. The guys we work for the most in the military call us "hired gun trouble shooters" meaning we do a lot of "adversarial systems integration", which is what happens when the finger pointing stalls out and you have to bring in someone to sort it out. We do straight engineering contracts too. Hell, as far as that goes, we do commercial stuff to fill in when we don't have a big backlog. But mostly mil or mil related.
Laser energetics, eh? We got to do some minor stuff on THEL. I got to see them fire it. Ho-oly crap. They won't let me have one, I'm sort of disappointed.
Again, just a crapload of what they're doing isn't precisely classified, well in a sense that's not true. That they're doing it, or trying, is, but what it is they're doing isn't, exactly. If that makes sense. You can find a lot of data about it if you look in the right places. Enough that you see a press release with an interview by the Dark Prince of atmospheric plasma processes, with dates sort of spooged into the interview like "Well, if we had the ability to direct 2GW ERP, we think 2GW would do it, then we could do x and y, if we had that ability by [date] then we could complete the initial modeling and experimentation in doing [function] by [date]". And you say to yourself, self, I wonder when the upgrades will happen at Gakona, I bet they are going for 4GW just to have the usual 2x margin, and I bet it's going to happen to meet that timeline, and lo! there it is. Like clockwork.
Well, it's also true that when the satellite system specs and funding hit, it's sort of hard to hide what project group they're for. I mean, you can waffle all you'd like, but there's only one thing that set of specs is for, no matter what verbal crap you wrap around it as subterfuge. It's so much fun to tease the security guys too. "Oh, so they're going ahead with [project]? When are the array upgrades going to start?"
Anyways, you shouldn't have any problems finding the pubs where you're at. I did find a Helliwell that's open source and is actually one of the major papers on the subject. Here are a handful of cites:
Journal of Geophysical Research:
Abel and Thorne: Electron Scattering Loss in the Earth's Inner Magnetosphere: 1. Dominant Physical Processes: 103, 2385, 1998
Abel and Thorne: Electron Scattering Loss in the Earth's Inner Magnetosphere: Sensitivity to Model Parameters: 103, 2397, 1998
Inan, Bell, Bortnik and Albert: Controlled Precipitation of Radiation Belt Electrons: 108, 1186, 2003 (a good article)
Reviews of Geophysics: VLF Wave Stimulation Experiments in the Magnetosphere from Siple Station, Antartica: 26, 551, 1988
Re:From TFA (and other materials on the subject)
on
HAARP Amping It Up
·
· Score: 1
Urm, well, yeah.
I don't work on this project a lot, but we have, and have done a bit of... peripheral stuff related to it. We have the job specs for the two types of satellites related to it, for example, and that tells you a lot as well.
So while we're probably not privy to everything you CAN do with it, I suspect we are, at least to the bulk of it. There are lots of really interesting uses. None of them "mind control", btw, but a lot of interesting uses. Some I've heard mentioned, some not. Some is in 'plain sight'. Actually quite a lot of it is. You just have to understand what projects relate to what other projects, and who's running the show, and what their personal hot buttons are in terms of research, and you could pretty much have the whole thing.
Hell, there's so much data and noise on the net anymore if you make any attempt to obfuscate it at all it's tough for the 'unwashed' to reconnect it again. Not that they don't have a few shills injecting BS to make sure it stays that way too. And all this crap is so technical anymore that there's very few people with the specialized education to really understand what they're reading, either. So you get a lot of guys reading stuff they don't understand, distorting it a lot, mixing it up with their personal paranoia, and passing it on in a sort of "telephone" game.
Are you interested in the basic methodology? I have some open source cites, you will probably have to go to an engineering university library to find the journals though. It's tough reading but interesting.
Dr. Helliwell's work is really interesting research in itself, the stuff that's published in the open. You could get a real education in ionospheric modification by reading and working through his research.
Re:From TFA (and other materials on the subject)
on
HAARP Amping It Up
·
· Score: 1
This is certainly one of the main functions of HAARP. You don't have it exactly correct, but A for effort. Not only are the existing electrons heated by x-ray interaction (inverse Bremsstrahlung), but new electrons are injected by the Compton effect knocking electrons off stray gas atoms. The result, as you state, not only "livens up" the existing belts but also creates new temporary belts in the inner magnetosphere.
Where you go slightly astray is in stating that HAARP can radiate VLF. The article you quote is a trifle misleading. They don't directly radiate VLF, they cause the ionosphere to radiate it. This is done by patterned local heating of the ionosphere that "redirects" the auroral electrojet. In effect, they borrow the electrojet's flow and throttle the current up and down by a combination of pulse width modulation to vary the array HF power output and fast beam steering to pick where the power goes, think of it as sort of painting a VLF pattern that the electrojet has to flow through.
The VLF that is radiated then causes what is known as cyclotron-resonant wave particle interactions with belt electrons. The intent is to increase the electron pitch-angle scattering rate.
Minus the gobbledegook, it's a sort of multiple bank shot. The array "steals" the electrojet and causes it to convert some of its power to a very strong VLF emission with very specific characteristics. The emission interacts with trapped electrons looping around magnetic field lines. The electrons make bigger loops, the loops touch the atmosphere, and "precipitate", incidentally forming pretty lights. Presto, the HAND-induced electron belts are dissipated. Well, maybe not exactly that easy, but that's how it works.
For the interested, the original test work was done at Siple Station, Antarctica, by Dr. Helliwell. I'm pretty sure you can find some info on the work done, although you probably won't find all of it unclassified yet. They were using direct VLF. That's tough to do efficiently, and you can't aim it with any precision. If you want really good control over the wave you have to generate it in situ, if you will, so you can either induce it to happen like the Gakona array does, or you can do it from space using satellite assets.
Slashdot Mirror
(big grin) We've worked for them as consultants. I've been to both "-works". We're a small defense contracting firm with pretty good clearances, our own SCIF and an eclectic set of abilities. The guys we work for the most in the military call us "hired gun trouble shooters" meaning we do a lot of "adversarial systems integration", which is what happens when the finger pointing stalls out and you have to bring in someone to sort it out. We do straight engineering contracts too. Hell, as far as that goes, we do commercial stuff to fill in when we don't have a big backlog. But mostly mil or mil related.
Laser energetics, eh? We got to do some minor stuff on THEL. I got to see them fire it. Ho-oly crap. They won't let me have one, I'm sort of disappointed.
Again, just a crapload of what they're doing isn't precisely classified, well in a sense that's not true. That they're doing it, or trying, is, but what it is they're doing isn't, exactly. If that makes sense. You can find a lot of data about it if you look in the right places. Enough that you see a press release with an interview by the Dark Prince of atmospheric plasma processes, with dates sort of spooged into the interview like "Well, if we had the ability to direct 2GW ERP, we think 2GW would do it, then we could do x and y, if we had that ability by [date] then we could complete the initial modeling and experimentation in doing [function] by [date]". And you say to yourself, self, I wonder when the upgrades will happen at Gakona, I bet they are going for 4GW just to have the usual 2x margin, and I bet it's going to happen to meet that timeline, and lo! there it is. Like clockwork.
Well, it's also true that when the satellite system specs and funding hit, it's sort of hard to hide what project group they're for. I mean, you can waffle all you'd like, but there's only one thing that set of specs is for, no matter what verbal crap you wrap around it as subterfuge. It's so much fun to tease the security guys too. "Oh, so they're going ahead with [project]? When are the array upgrades going to start?"
Anyways, you shouldn't have any problems finding the pubs where you're at. I did find a Helliwell that's open source and is actually one of the major papers on the subject. Here are a handful of cites:
Journal of Geophysical Research:
Abel and Thorne: Electron Scattering Loss in the Earth's Inner Magnetosphere: 1. Dominant Physical Processes: 103, 2385, 1998
Abel and Thorne: Electron Scattering Loss in the Earth's Inner Magnetosphere: Sensitivity to Model Parameters: 103, 2397, 1998
Inan, Bell, Bortnik and Albert: Controlled Precipitation of Radiation Belt Electrons: 108, 1186, 2003 (a good article)
Reviews of Geophysics:
VLF Wave Stimulation Experiments in the Magnetosphere from Siple Station, Antartica: 26, 551, 1988
Urm, well, yeah. I don't work on this project a lot, but we have, and have done a bit of ... peripheral stuff related to it. We have the job specs for the two types of satellites related to it, for example, and that tells you a lot as well.
So while we're probably not privy to everything you CAN do with it, I suspect we are, at least to the bulk of it. There are lots of really interesting uses. None of them "mind control", btw, but a lot of interesting uses. Some I've heard mentioned, some not. Some is in 'plain sight'. Actually quite a lot of it is. You just have to understand what projects relate to what other projects, and who's running the show, and what their personal hot buttons are in terms of research, and you could pretty much have the whole thing.
Hell, there's so much data and noise on the net anymore if you make any attempt to obfuscate it at all it's tough for the 'unwashed' to reconnect it again. Not that they don't have a few shills injecting BS to make sure it stays that way too. And all this crap is so technical anymore that there's very few people with the specialized education to really understand what they're reading, either. So you get a lot of guys reading stuff they don't understand, distorting it a lot, mixing it up with their personal paranoia, and passing it on in a sort of "telephone" game.
Are you interested in the basic methodology? I have some open source cites, you will probably have to go to an engineering university library to find the journals though. It's tough reading but interesting.
Dr. Helliwell's work is really interesting research in itself, the stuff that's published in the open. You could get a real education in ionospheric modification by reading and working through his research.
This is certainly one of the main functions of HAARP. You don't have it exactly correct, but A for effort. Not only are the existing electrons heated by x-ray interaction (inverse Bremsstrahlung), but new electrons are injected by the Compton effect knocking electrons off stray gas atoms. The result, as you state, not only "livens up" the existing belts but also creates new temporary belts in the inner magnetosphere. Where you go slightly astray is in stating that HAARP can radiate VLF. The article you quote is a trifle misleading. They don't directly radiate VLF, they cause the ionosphere to radiate it. This is done by patterned local heating of the ionosphere that "redirects" the auroral electrojet. In effect, they borrow the electrojet's flow and throttle the current up and down by a combination of pulse width modulation to vary the array HF power output and fast beam steering to pick where the power goes, think of it as sort of painting a VLF pattern that the electrojet has to flow through. The VLF that is radiated then causes what is known as cyclotron-resonant wave particle interactions with belt electrons. The intent is to increase the electron pitch-angle scattering rate. Minus the gobbledegook, it's a sort of multiple bank shot. The array "steals" the electrojet and causes it to convert some of its power to a very strong VLF emission with very specific characteristics. The emission interacts with trapped electrons looping around magnetic field lines. The electrons make bigger loops, the loops touch the atmosphere, and "precipitate", incidentally forming pretty lights. Presto, the HAND-induced electron belts are dissipated. Well, maybe not exactly that easy, but that's how it works. For the interested, the original test work was done at Siple Station, Antarctica, by Dr. Helliwell. I'm pretty sure you can find some info on the work done, although you probably won't find all of it unclassified yet. They were using direct VLF. That's tough to do efficiently, and you can't aim it with any precision. If you want really good control over the wave you have to generate it in situ, if you will, so you can either induce it to happen like the Gakona array does, or you can do it from space using satellite assets.