isn't at least some form of modern linux usage a pre rec for posting here? (hint, it's farking terrible there too)
after you diaf, please open up your browser window with activity monitor.
if you think a postage sized video should make your cpu go even 40% your crack is better than mine.
a ipad, should not feel more responsive playing videos on a web page than a laptop. It is currently this way.
This post is utterly retarded.
They obviously should have come to/. and asked all the AC's what to get.
why is the iPad "annoying" to you? It's a farking tablet. Want a reason to not go android? how there are no apps that take advantage of the new screen sizes in android land, having no apps fill up that nice big screen is "annoying to me"
just like your post, which is anti apple for the sake of anti apple. Please go back to your geek den where you can look down at us while listening to music on your zune hd.
Probably the most wrong thing i've ever read on/. Please never post again Joce.
Android has no functioning app store on tablets, it's disabled because google doesn't think froyo is a tablet os. (used to be/.'ers knew this shit) There are also, no tablet apps there anyway, so you better lovvveeee the 3 or so apps put on your android tablet by the hardware manufacturer.
Lock in? You mean like how your locked into a carrier for a few thousand extra dollars, for 2 years? vs. the month to month $30 plans the ipad has? You know schools, dev's, they can install there own apps minus the app store. I'm always surprised when people don't know that you actually can do that.
Cheaper. the newest 7" samsung is over $700.
Failllllllllllllllllllllll
I run IT for an ad agency with about 50 of those dual 2ghz, os x boxes, and well... That's not true.
In my experience, somethings are faster on one, or the other. The GUI feels faster on XP sometimes, but there are always more steps involved. And, to be honest, only have ever felt the OS feel slightly more sluggish on PPC systems, on the Intel systems, it's pretty much speed wise and even match.
Personally not for work, i have a AMD x2 tower (running XP and OSX 10.4.8 (titan drivers, semmex 8.8.1 kernel full core audio/video;) And a MacBookPro. As far as speed goes, they are the same, and the Macbook just ended up being the main controller of my media, on the Mac side.
from my experience here with 50 G5's (in the course of about 3 years since we moved to the 12th floor) I've had 2 OS reinstalls, one bad hard drive, and on bad processor. Anyone who says stability is an issue of the mac platform, either a)doesn't use a mac or b) doesn't know how, in which case... there's this thing called web TV i gotta tell you about.
fyi, nerds: windows is for games.
not like this matters, everyone on slashdot is already a fan boy. but i honestly do triboot fedora, osx and xp on my macbook. so there.
no you didn't run those macros faster. You ran them under emulation, and office 98 for the mac wasn't the dog that office 2004 for the mac is. While softpc was the best of it's day, (killed virtual PC in terms of performance) they were still emulating an entire architecture, while crossover just redirects api's using wine's library.
rosetta is not that slow.
mod parent down, and kill the idiot that marked it insightful
1. You don't take into the account of the perspective of the buyer.
If you see a pair of jeans for $29 next to a $299 pair of jeans, you also assume that the $29 pair is cheap, or shitty.
2. and who's heads gonna roll when a flop song that a company invested millions of dollars in returning them 25 cents a track?
3. freeze the price? 90 seconds to make up your mind?
another point of ITMS is the interface, same as the ipod. Same as Mac OS X. if you don't think that sells, then u shouldn't be writing.
4. if your tracks are.25 each, won't that destroy your CD sales?
also, your funded by MS. Slate shouldn't be taken to seriously i guess.
but you were linked by slashdot. gay.
isn't at least some form of modern linux usage a pre rec for posting here? (hint, it's farking terrible there too) after you diaf, please open up your browser window with activity monitor. if you think a postage sized video should make your cpu go even 40% your crack is better than mine. a ipad, should not feel more responsive playing videos on a web page than a laptop. It is currently this way.
This post is utterly retarded. They obviously should have come to /. and asked all the AC's what to get.
why is the iPad "annoying" to you? It's a farking tablet. Want a reason to not go android? how there are no apps that take advantage of the new screen sizes in android land, having no apps fill up that nice big screen is "annoying to me"
just like your post, which is anti apple for the sake of anti apple. Please go back to your geek den where you can look down at us while listening to music on your zune hd.
I'd rather them have the best customer service in the world and not care about the press. oh wait... that's what happens.
Maybe he wanted a devices with a decent amount of software his machine can run?
Probably the most wrong thing i've ever read on /. Please never post again Joce.
Android has no functioning app store on tablets, it's disabled because google doesn't think froyo is a tablet os. (used to be /.'ers knew this shit) There are also, no tablet apps there anyway, so you better lovvveeee the 3 or so apps put on your android tablet by the hardware manufacturer.
Lock in? You mean like how your locked into a carrier for a few thousand extra dollars, for 2 years? vs. the month to month $30 plans the ipad has? You know schools, dev's, they can install there own apps minus the app store. I'm always surprised when people don't know that you actually can do that.
Cheaper. the newest 7" samsung is over $700.
Failllllllllllllllllllllll
karma from the macintosh?
I run IT for an ad agency with about 50 of those dual 2ghz, os x boxes, and well... That's not true.
In my experience, somethings are faster on one, or the other. The GUI feels faster on XP sometimes, but there are always more steps involved. And, to be honest, only have ever felt the OS feel slightly more sluggish on PPC systems, on the Intel systems, it's pretty much speed wise and even match.
Personally not for work, i have a AMD x2 tower (running XP and OSX 10.4.8 (titan drivers, semmex 8.8.1 kernel full core audio/video;) And a MacBookPro. As far as speed goes, they are the same, and the Macbook just ended up being the main controller of my media, on the Mac side.
from my experience here with 50 G5's (in the course of about 3 years since we moved to the 12th floor) I've had 2 OS reinstalls, one bad hard drive, and on bad processor. Anyone who says stability is an issue of the mac platform, either a)doesn't use a mac or b) doesn't know how, in which case... there's this thing called web TV i gotta tell you about.
fyi, nerds: windows is for games.
not like this matters, everyone on slashdot is already a fan boy.
but i honestly do triboot fedora, osx and xp on my macbook. so there.
to be frank, (or louis)
no you didn't run those macros faster. You ran them under emulation, and office 98 for the mac wasn't the dog that office 2004 for the mac is. While softpc was the best of it's day, (killed virtual PC in terms of performance) they were still emulating an entire architecture, while crossover just redirects api's using wine's library.
rosetta is not that slow.
mod parent down, and kill the idiot that marked it insightful
1. You don't take into the account of the perspective of the buyer. If you see a pair of jeans for $29 next to a $299 pair of jeans, you also assume that the $29 pair is cheap, or shitty. 2. and who's heads gonna roll when a flop song that a company invested millions of dollars in returning them 25 cents a track? 3. freeze the price? 90 seconds to make up your mind? another point of ITMS is the interface, same as the ipod. Same as Mac OS X. if you don't think that sells, then u shouldn't be writing. 4. if your tracks are .25 each, won't that destroy your CD sales?
also, your funded by MS. Slate shouldn't be taken to seriously i guess.
but you were linked by slashdot. gay.