Ummm what? I use VS 2010 fairly regularly for C++ development and intellisense is very much working. 64 bit versions of the compiler and linker do exist, they just can't target 32 bit.
The tool chain for VC++ 2005 (and even 2008 and 2010) is 32 bit that can cross compile to 64 bit. I think there are 64 bit versions of the tool chain but they don't cross compile to 32 bit. So if you want to target 32 bit platforms, you are stuck with using the 32 bit tools.
Probably not, the price of most of these devices seems to target nice roundable numbers. Like $299.99 or $199.99 or something like that. You don't typically see devices sold for $204.99.
In any case it's irrelevant to the claim that Microsoft was suing Android users, which is obvious FUD.
You forgot 2 steps:
Convince the user to install your certificate (admin privileges needed).
Convince the user to change a setting in group policy or hack the registry (more admin privileges needed).
They have said that the only way to get metro style apps is through the store, but I don't think a developer unlock will be required to run apps that you have the source for. It would kill the point of visual studio express.
Slashdot Mirror
Witnessed someone have a seizure and cross the interstate to plow into someone else.
To be fair, that's not really something that can be controlled.
I did a quick bit of googling and it seems IE9 handles it as defined by the W3C standard, it's the other browsers that are broken. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd573303(v=vs.85).aspx
Granted I'm not a web dev so I could be way off on this.
Not yet, but it's coming in version 12. http://www.tomshardware.com/news/mozilla-firefox-silent-update-browser,14217.html
Link for the opt-out tool: http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&id=179
Damn kids and their PGO giving double digit perf increases! Get off my lawn!
Ummm what? I use VS 2010 fairly regularly for C++ development and intellisense is very much working. 64 bit versions of the compiler and linker do exist, they just can't target 32 bit.
The tool chain for VC++ 2005 (and even 2008 and 2010) is 32 bit that can cross compile to 64 bit. I think there are 64 bit versions of the tool chain but they don't cross compile to 32 bit. So if you want to target 32 bit platforms, you are stuck with using the 32 bit tools.
An individual 32 bit process (IE the visual studio linker) is limited to 4GB of addressable memory.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778(v=vs.85).aspx#memory_limits
Shit, now I'm going to be in a coma after reading your post. Hope you're happy.
Not anymore but it was originally developed as proprietary software.
Check again, the guy making the post isn't a Microsoft employee.
Probably not, the price of most of these devices seems to target nice roundable numbers. Like $299.99 or $199.99 or something like that. You don't typically see devices sold for $204.99.
In any case it's irrelevant to the claim that Microsoft was suing Android users, which is obvious FUD.
Except for where Microsoft themselves says no for 2008
Huh? Read the entire link including the answers. It's standard legalese saying you can't redistribute VSEE.
non-committal AFAIK
Nothing wrong with saying you are unsure and giving contact information for people who would know for sure.
The third link seems to be a forum index.
They are device manufacturers, not users.
Not complete (e.g., no ATL, MFC, some other core stuff).
None of those affect the metro style apps which use WinRT.
And binaries are not redistributable for pay
I couldn't find anything that agrees with this, in fact I found the exact opposite.
Tough to get cheaper then free.
patent lawsuits ... against Android users
Why yes I have missed these lawsuits. Can you please inform me?
Are you suggesting we should take all the 1000+ commands in word and condense them into ~10 keys? Good luck with that.
Except humble is listed first. Cool fail bro.
Urban dictionary says you're wrong.
You forgot 2 steps:
Convince the user to install your certificate (admin privileges needed).
Convince the user to change a setting in group policy or hack the registry (more admin privileges needed).
Everything you just said is wrong. Don't spread FUD.
First appearance of java: 1995.
First appearance of objective-c: 1983.
First appearance of c#: 2001.
I would have to say that the GP is correct.
They have said that the only way to get metro style apps is through the store, but I don't think a developer unlock will be required to run apps that you have the source for. It would kill the point of visual studio express.
You mean this? They "defeated" it by turning it off. Pretty serious exploit I think.