Pirated copy is version 0.5 - it has half of the world.
So the full version will be 1.0 - it has the whole world.
When EA provides version 1.1 will I get 10% of world extra for free?
Wide vector processing with "800 stream processing units" (or "pipes" or "cores") - it is hard to put 800 cores in one chip and not to boil the silicon.
Every project funded as EU FP project (Framework Programme) must have an acronim. It is a requirement in the project proposal forms. I know that most of the acronyms are hard to read and understand. I can assure you it is much harder to create one that is new, creative, having any similarity to the project scope and matching letters with the full name of the project.
A "small" group of currently on-going projects can be found here.
LLC - logical link control (connecting to access points, handover, encryption,...)
MAC - an algorithm to share the same radio channel among many terminals (users)
PHY - physical transmission (modulation, coding, EM signal spreading, timer values,...)
Magic letters mark the extensions of the original standard. And a/b/g (and new 'n') extensions define only the PHY part that is done in hardware.
MAC implementation has very strict operating requirements (response delay to various events at level of 10 microseconds or lower) so it is also implemented in hardware (or FPGA, or any "chipset").
The part that you are concerned about is the LLC (partly done in hardware, partly done in OS). Linux must have a way to configure it to use available features (including WEP/WPA). And we are back to the problem of Linux drivers and chipset manufacturers that ignore Linux.
Solution: use cards with Linux-friendly chipsets (Ralink, Intel, Atheros) and you may have working WEP.
I use ingress shaping (via IMQ) and it seems to move the downstream bottleneck for TCP traffic to my WRT54. Of course I loose 5% of DL bandwidth, but every traffic control has a price.
And I agree that any TCP traffic control involving packet droping is useless (ingress policing, RED, etc).
I agree. Functional decomposition helps in developement scaling, but you need a genious to design an architecture and understand what "it as a whole" should do.
There is no flow routing in Anagran solution - it is just per (TCP) flow shaper/policer that you put at the ingres/egress of your network.
Anyway, in 99% of cases to achieve same thing you could use Linux with SFQ queueing.
I agree in 100% that meaning defines the content, but let's focus on math:)
Assume that there are two numbers X1 and X2.
When I store the X1 in file named X1.png I can see a picture of tree that I made and own (or picture of any other thing that won't sue me).
When I store the X2 in file named X2.mp3 I can hear a song.
Assume that I invent mathematical function f1() that can do: f1(X1)=X2
1) Am I allowed to distribute X1?
2) Am I allowed to distribute f1()?
3) Am I allowed to tell people to use f1() on X1?
4) Are people allowed to use any function f() on any number?
Slashdot Mirror
Hold your horses! High Treason cannot by applied as he does not come from the right Kingdom. That leaves us with boring hanging.
Entanglement
Clearly, the iMac was not mobile enough comparing to the bullets.
All hail Great C... and start preparing the questions (unless you are on a quest to paint Deus Irae).
FTFY:
Half of the geeks have inteligence below the median inteligence of the geek population.
And as any PHB will tell you "The customer ultimately pays the costs, one way or another."
Pirated copy is version 0.5 - it has half of the world. So the full version will be 1.0 - it has the whole world. When EA provides version 1.1 will I get 10% of world extra for free?
Wide vector processing with "800 stream processing units" (or "pipes" or "cores") - it is hard to put 800 cores in one chip and not to boil the silicon.
I am reading it in work now :) (work can wait, it won't run too far)
You forgot about "fast" before the date http://www.dilbert.com/fast/2009-01-24/
Don't forget correct sequence numbers and their acks!
Two new great features making it useable!
1) binary
2) not "human friendly"
Every project funded as EU FP project (Framework Programme) must have an acronim. It is a requirement in the project proposal forms. I know that most of the acronyms are hard to read and understand. I can assure you it is much harder to create one that is new, creative, having any similarity to the project scope and matching letters with the full name of the project.
A "small" group of currently on-going projects can be found here.
Magic letters mark the extensions of the original standard. And a/b/g (and new 'n') extensions define only the PHY part that is done in hardware.
MAC implementation has very strict operating requirements (response delay to various events at level of 10 microseconds or lower) so it is also implemented in hardware (or FPGA, or any "chipset").
The part that you are concerned about is the LLC (partly done in hardware, partly done in OS). Linux must have a way to configure it to use available features (including WEP/WPA). And we are back to the problem of Linux drivers and chipset manufacturers that ignore Linux.
Solution: use cards with Linux-friendly chipsets (Ralink, Intel, Atheros) and you may have working WEP.
The problem is how to use the same "free" radio frequency (2.4 GHz) both for "b/g" and "n" without interferencing each other.
... much more here
There is only one usable/scalable QoS tag - DSCP. And it seems that finally there may be agreement on common classes, see RFC 4594 and RFC 5127.
I use ingress shaping (via IMQ) and it seems to move the downstream bottleneck for TCP traffic to my WRT54. Of course I loose 5% of DL bandwidth, but every traffic control has a price.
And I agree that any TCP traffic control involving packet droping is useless (ingress policing, RED, etc).
I agree. Functional decomposition helps in developement scaling, but you need a genious to design an architecture and understand what "it as a whole" should do.
... tempting idea ... now we know why they give away those XOs for free.
... and with Gausian distribution you can have negative values of programming abilities!
In real life Pr{X<E[X]}=0.5 is quite rare.
In general "below average" should be "below median".
There is no flow routing in Anagran solution - it is just per (TCP) flow shaper/policer that you put at the ingres/egress of your network.
Anyway, in 99% of cases to achieve same thing you could use Linux with SFQ queueing.
I agree in 100% that meaning defines the content, but let's focus on math :)
Assume that there are two numbers X1 and X2.
When I store the X1 in file named X1.png I can see a picture of tree that I made and own (or picture of any other thing that won't sue me).
When I store the X2 in file named X2.mp3 I can hear a song.
Assume that I invent mathematical function f1() that can do: f1(X1)=X2
1) Am I allowed to distribute X1?
2) Am I allowed to distribute f1()?
3) Am I allowed to tell people to use f1() on X1? 4) Are people allowed to use any function f() on any number?