"Nuclear Power will get us over for a while. but hydrogen is bullshit. It takes more energy to make H than what you get from burning it. Therefore it is an energy sink, esp. if you get it from cracking H2O. It's better to simply use the electricity you make to crack the water As Electricity to Do Work than to blow it on H."
Of course it takes more energy to make H then what you get from burning it, otherwise it'd be an energy generator. The thing is: How are you going to get this electricity to power your car? You could have an electric car that you'd have to charge for hours and get shit HP (at this point) or have instant refuel with some oomph. Nuclear power in combination with hydrogen for portable energy would be a very good system IMO.
I agree that nuclear power is great. In fact, in almost every aspect it's leaps and bounds better. Insane energy production. Rediculously low environmental issues, esp compared to coal. The waste with nuclear power is an advantage; would you rather be able to accumulate all your waste (much less of it) and bury it or just release it into the atmosphere? More people die mining coal every year than have ever been killed by nuclear power.
Developers know if their game sucks, the argument that the journalist could help them improve it is dumb. They're not gonna let anyone see an early build if it's getting trashed. I don't think we'd really get any previews if they turned into reviews, so I'd rather an early look than nothing.
The bashing on reviews is pretty pointless. What's so bad about being formulaic? They tell you what's good and they tell you what's bad. I believe that's the point of the review.
"Nuclear Power will get us over for a while. but hydrogen is bullshit. It takes more energy to make H than what you get from burning it. Therefore it is an energy sink, esp. if you get it from cracking H2O. It's better to simply use the electricity you make to crack the water As Electricity to Do Work than to blow it on H." Of course it takes more energy to make H then what you get from burning it, otherwise it'd be an energy generator. The thing is: How are you going to get this electricity to power your car? You could have an electric car that you'd have to charge for hours and get shit HP (at this point) or have instant refuel with some oomph. Nuclear power in combination with hydrogen for portable energy would be a very good system IMO. I agree that nuclear power is great. In fact, in almost every aspect it's leaps and bounds better. Insane energy production. Rediculously low environmental issues, esp compared to coal. The waste with nuclear power is an advantage; would you rather be able to accumulate all your waste (much less of it) and bury it or just release it into the atmosphere? More people die mining coal every year than have ever been killed by nuclear power.
Developers know if their game sucks, the argument that the journalist could help them improve it is dumb. They're not gonna let anyone see an early build if it's getting trashed. I don't think we'd really get any previews if they turned into reviews, so I'd rather an early look than nothing. The bashing on reviews is pretty pointless. What's so bad about being formulaic? They tell you what's good and they tell you what's bad. I believe that's the point of the review.