Who from Microsoft? Are you talking about the intern that graduated college 6 months ago and got assigned the project, or are we talking about someone who actually knows what they are doing? You talk as if suddenly Microsoft turned the entire company and made making that project work their #1 priority, which isn't nearly the case.
I can have a team write a similar version on linux and (pick your language) that does the same thing, only worse with more bugs and slower, as well. It's really not that hard.
I guess it depends on your point of view. I see Anonymous as having proven that they are just a bunch of criminals. Unless you condone their behavior. In which case, I suppose you think it's right for anyoneto break into your house, search through your families stuff, and post pictures of your wife's underwear (and/or other personal items) and tweet/email it to all your friends/family -- all because you are supporting the "other side". Oh, and let's take your daughters diary and post that on her high school website for all to read.. In the name of openness, and freedom of information of course. Then come back here and score that as Burgler:5, Vryl: 0 and realize just what you posted.
Breaking into private property without consent, no matter the reason is still against the law. Anonymous has proven that they are not only criminal, but also malicious thieves that aren't doing things that are "right". They do them because they think they can, and still get away with it. Give a few of them a few years in jail with a "roommate" that shares the same philosophy of "because I can, and still get away with it", and perhaps they will change their tune as well.
A good security firm doesn't lock down everything super tight. It can be done of course, but doing so is a major inconvenience. A good security firm knows how to manage risk, and apply enough security to outweigh the risk. As if any of those things that got "pwned" are of any real consequence.
This is the equivalent of someone running up and spray painting the side of an armored truck and declaring victory in defeating their security. lol.
Or perhaps calling into question how safe a bank is because someone stole their mailbox.
While Yahoo! Auctions is a U.S.-based site, it is accessible from any country in the world. Therefore, it is not yet clear whether sellers are subject only to the laws of the country they are posting from, or whether they must abide by the laws of every country in which the site is accessible.
It was these lawsuits that caused ebay to create a separate ebay.fr.
Not everything revolves around Free Speech. It is however quite ridiculous how few people actually understand what Free Speech is and what is and is NOT protected.
Better transfer protocols don't lose any time for ACK packets or lost packets. The stream should not stop. You will of course get less useful data, however, the number of bytes transferred isn't impeded.
Actually, it is an open standard as defined by the EU. It passes all those tests. It isn't a royalty based fee, and less than $.10 per unit is a "nominal fee".
FYI - The North American GDP is $16.2 Trillion vs the EU at $14.2 Trillion. So it's isn't the largest by market by GDP.
no wonder why your company feels safe with keeping its corporate website on.com domains. you are all incompetents.
Our coders are competent enough to handle doing pixel perfect designs across all modern browsers. Sounds like you can even handle a simple two column layout without resorting to using tables which is for displaying tabular data sets as a hack for your lack of skills in doing presentation.
they dont shift the ir place because you change a single float attribute on some random div somewhere on a page that has a lot of visual elements, depending on browser and version and platform and so on.
Sounds like you are incompetent and unable to do things the right way.
I will drop you a tip: tables, don't work on older blackberries.
From: Trial Team Sent: Tue 4/20/2010 9:30 AM ------ Thank you for volunteering to participate in Comcast's IPv6 trials! We're ready to take the next step in preparing for our trials, as we have now activated a trial user portal. This new portal will be used to communicate with you concerning which trial you may be eligible for, directions related to the trial you may eventually participate in, surveys related to the trial, and more. The portal will also have a web forum for asking us questions and interacting with other users.
It's amazing you can put a single comprehensible thought together. Try learning how to write next.
I can say for a FACT that you are wrong as MY company will definitely be keeping it's domains in the.com, and.net domain roots. I'm happy they are doing this. Now if they can kick off all the hacking, scamming, virus infested domains off.COM,.NET,.ORG people will be less afraid to visit domains in those roots. You on the other hand, feel free to go visit 1underagedgirl2goatsand3midgets. and superpirateworldwithnotrojanswepromise.cn
PS. GiriGiriPHP's site is a great example of a 10 year old let loose on the internet, and how NOT to design a website. Perfect example of a 1980s style table design. Guess that's what happens when the dumbest 10% of the world gets let go and has extra free time on their hands to try and push their poor skills on the rest of the world.
I don't think the majority of people care that a few sites that deal with questionable material have to go and try and hide in some obscure domain. Perhaps they should just start the.illegal root domain so you can save your crying for more important matters.
They are still there. The article just fails to mention them. Microsoft has contributed a LOT to the HTML 5 specification process. A very large number of test cases were submitted by them, and they contribute during the discussions as well. It's just the author obviously has a very anti-microsoft bias. And for the purposes of the article, the lack of any one company doesn't really matter the principle remains the same.
DSL isn't really better. DSL is constrained to sharing the CO's link to their backbone just as cable connections are constrained to sharing a cable node's link to their backbone, the only difference is where it's located.
In addition to that, both are constrained to the interconnects their backbones have to the other parts of the internet, which is quite often a bigger issue than the last mile bandwidth constraints.
What you are saying is that it's "impossible" for it to cost more than $60 per month for 1/20th or 1/40th of a dedicated line.
Quick math. DS3's (45Mbps) cost around $3500 per month. Order 1 DS3 for every 9 people (9 people at 5Mbs = 45Mbs) = $388.89 per month per person. Feel free to get you and your closest 8 neighbors to cough up $388.89 per person (not including router, and cables to each house beyond the first), and you can get yourself a 5Mbps connection that you can do whatever you want with, and the bandwidth will always be there for you.
Or you can do 3 people @ 15Mbs for a mere $1166.67 per month, with GUARANTEED bandwidth 24x7.
Personally, I think the $45 I pay for 16Mbps down, burstable to 45Mbps for the first 10 seconds or so is quite a good deal in comparison, but you might not agree, and you are welcome to the alternative.
Slashdot Mirror
Who from Microsoft? Are you talking about the intern that graduated college 6 months ago and got assigned the project, or are we talking about someone who actually knows what they are doing? You talk as if suddenly Microsoft turned the entire company and made making that project work their #1 priority, which isn't nearly the case.
I can have a team write a similar version on linux and (pick your language) that does the same thing, only worse with more bugs and slower, as well. It's really not that hard.
Some of us actually wrote the BBS software ;-)
<script type="text/c#"> ...
?
Comcast has native dual-stack trials currently running. It's much more than just 1 person.
I guess it depends on your point of view. I see Anonymous as having proven that they are just a bunch of criminals. Unless you condone their behavior. In which case, I suppose you think it's right for anyoneto break into your house, search through your families stuff, and post pictures of your wife's underwear (and/or other personal items) and tweet/email it to all your friends/family -- all because you are supporting the "other side". Oh, and let's take your daughters diary and post that on her high school website for all to read.. In the name of openness, and freedom of information of course. Then come back here and score that as Burgler:5, Vryl: 0 and realize just what you posted.
Breaking into private property without consent, no matter the reason is still against the law. Anonymous has proven that they are not only criminal, but also malicious thieves that aren't doing things that are "right". They do them because they think they can, and still get away with it. Give a few of them a few years in jail with a "roommate" that shares the same philosophy of "because I can, and still get away with it", and perhaps they will change their tune as well.
Ok, it's the equivalent of stealing the spare tire that is bolted underneath the armored truck. Oh noes.
That's because you are a script kiddie wannabe. Not of that is of any "real consequence".
A good security firm doesn't lock down everything super tight. It can be done of course, but doing so is a major inconvenience. A good security firm knows how to manage risk, and apply enough security to outweigh the risk. As if any of those things that got "pwned" are of any real consequence.
This is the equivalent of someone running up and spray painting the side of an armored truck and declaring victory in defeating their security. lol.
Or perhaps calling into question how safe a bank is because someone stole their mailbox.
Wrong.
While Yahoo! Auctions is a U.S.-based site, it is accessible from any country in the world. Therefore, it is not yet clear whether sellers are subject only to the laws of the country they are posting from, or whether they must abide by the laws of every country in which the site is accessible.
It was these lawsuits that caused ebay to create a separate ebay.fr.
Not everything revolves around Free Speech. It is however quite ridiculous how few people actually understand what Free Speech is and what is and is NOT protected.
It would have been hilarious if eBay and other stores *accessible* from France and Germany weren't sued for listing Nazi memorabilia already.
That ship sailed years ago.
Better transfer protocols don't lose any time for ACK packets or lost packets. The stream should not stop. You will of course get less useful data, however, the number of bytes transferred isn't impeded.
Probably not. But if you really want to watch me reading slashdot by sniffing the network, go right ahead. All the important stuff is done over SSL.
Perhaps you don't understand English. Look up all those words in the dictionary, then come back.
THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF H.264 IS MADE AVAILABLE ON A ROYALTY-FREE BASIS. Does caps help?
Actually, it is an open standard as defined by the EU. It passes all those tests. It isn't a royalty based fee, and less than $.10 per unit is a "nominal fee".
FYI - The North American GDP is $16.2 Trillion vs the EU at $14.2 Trillion. So it's isn't the largest by market by GDP.
no wonder why your company feels safe with keeping its corporate website on .com domains. you are all incompetents.
Our coders are competent enough to handle doing pixel perfect designs across all modern browsers. Sounds like you can even handle a simple two column layout without resorting to using tables which is for displaying tabular data sets as a hack for your lack of skills in doing presentation.
they dont shift the ir place because you change a single float attribute on some random div somewhere on a page that has a lot of visual elements, depending on browser and version and platform and so on.
Sounds like you are incompetent and unable to do things the right way.
I will drop you a tip: tables, don't work on older blackberries.
From: Trial Team
Sent: Tue 4/20/2010 9:30 AM
------
Thank you for volunteering to participate in Comcast's IPv6 trials! We're ready to take the next step in preparing for our trials, as we have now activated a trial user portal. This new portal will be used to communicate with you concerning which trial you may be eligible for, directions related to the trial you may eventually participate in, surveys related to the trial, and more. The portal will also have a web forum for asking us questions and interacting with other users.
It's amazing you can put a single comprehensible thought together. Try learning how to write next.
I can say for a FACT that you are wrong as MY company will definitely be keeping it's domains in the .com, and .net domain roots. I'm happy they are doing this. Now if they can kick off all the hacking, scamming, virus infested domains off .COM, .NET, .ORG people will be less afraid to visit domains in those roots. You on the other hand, feel free to go visit 1underagedgirl2goatsand3midgets. and superpirateworldwithnotrojanswepromise.cn
PS. GiriGiriPHP's site is a great example of a 10 year old let loose on the internet, and how NOT to design a website. Perfect example of a 1980s style table design. Guess that's what happens when the dumbest 10% of the world gets let go and has extra free time on their hands to try and push their poor skills on the rest of the world.
We don't fix bugs for chrome. So our users actually do see it.
I would be thankful *IF* chrome actually fixed THEIR noncompliance bugs that they have been sitting on for years.
I don't think the majority of people care that a few sites that deal with questionable material have to go and try and hide in some obscure domain. Perhaps they should just start the .illegal root domain so you can save your crying for more important matters.
They are still there. The article just fails to mention them. Microsoft has contributed a LOT to the HTML 5 specification process. A very large number of test cases were submitted by them, and they contribute during the discussions as well. It's just the author obviously has a very anti-microsoft bias. And for the purposes of the article, the lack of any one company doesn't really matter the principle remains the same.
Lots.
DSL isn't really better. DSL is constrained to sharing the CO's link to their backbone just as cable connections are constrained to sharing a cable node's link to their backbone, the only difference is where it's located.
In addition to that, both are constrained to the interconnects their backbones have to the other parts of the internet, which is quite often a bigger issue than the last mile bandwidth constraints.
What you are saying is that it's "impossible" for it to cost more than $60 per month for 1/20th or 1/40th of a dedicated line.
Quick math. DS3's (45Mbps) cost around $3500 per month. Order 1 DS3 for every 9 people (9 people at 5Mbs = 45Mbs) = $388.89 per month per person. Feel free to get you and your closest 8 neighbors to cough up $388.89 per person (not including router, and cables to each house beyond the first), and you can get yourself a 5Mbps connection that you can do whatever you want with, and the bandwidth will always be there for you.
Or you can do 3 people @ 15Mbs for a mere $1166.67 per month, with GUARANTEED bandwidth 24x7.
Personally, I think the $45 I pay for 16Mbps down, burstable to 45Mbps for the first 10 seconds or so is quite a good deal in comparison, but you might not agree, and you are welcome to the alternative.