Haha, that reminds me of the high end Tek scope that I noticed was a Win2k computer with some fast ADCs attached. Somehow I don't think it was ever upgraded. I think it did have Ethernet.
That banks and large corporations have too much political power has nothing to do with Keynesianism. If they had less power, less money would be allocated to support them. A couple more Elisabeth Warrens in Senate and Congress would do this easily. But of course you have to convince a few more people to vote for these evil commies.
How does this contradict what I wrote? Keynesianism has worked every time from the US before WWII to Germany (Sweden, Finland) right now. Conversely, check Ireland, Greece or Spain for how well Austerity works. The only alternative to Keynesianism is default a la Iceland or Cyprus.
I think the central problem is that right now there's more money to be made by gambling and speculating than by investing in the real economy. As long as this imbalance isn't fixed nothing is going to change.
The problem is that Americans have a tendency to elect the candidate who promises the most, not who runs the best economic policies. If you elect a spendy government as soon as the previous one has fixed the economy and started to run a little surplus you'll never get sustained Keynesianism.
There's also significant flooding so it's mostly the distribution of precipitation that's changed. Sea level rise is part ice melt and part thermal expansion of the warming water.
That's exactly what they do. Drill deeper and pump harder. Or even desalinate, oil-powered of course. Which will make the Middle East all that more interesting over the next 20 years. Saudi Arabia is projected to use all its remaining oil production to support its booming population some time during the 2020s, by 2030 the latest.
Slashdot Mirror
Haha, that reminds me of the high end Tek scope that I noticed was a Win2k computer with some fast ADCs attached.
Somehow I don't think it was ever upgraded.
I think it did have Ethernet.
But for the record, Intel has been amongst the most FOSS friendly as well
That's because they own most of the IP. Where they don't... see PowerVR/GMA.
I switched from Nvidia to AMD and bought a 7850 a few months ago after seeing that their open source code is making progress.
Where's the factor for football field length?
I think it represents the anti-science crowd rather well.
If you considered this a "flimsy strawman argument" then your sarcasmometer needs a tune-up.
Germany.
Now if we get that on any platform including ARM I'll agree with you.
Ah so you say let them starve, they don't deserve any money?
That is complete BS. Keynesianism is about the economy as a whole and unemployment, not helping big corporations.
That banks and large corporations have too much political power has nothing to do with Keynesianism.
If they had less power, less money would be allocated to support them. A couple more Elisabeth Warrens in Senate and Congress would do this easily. But of course you have to convince a few more people to vote for these evil commies.
How does this contradict what I wrote?
Keynesianism has worked every time from the US before WWII to Germany (Sweden, Finland) right now.
Conversely, check Ireland, Greece or Spain for how well Austerity works.
The only alternative to Keynesianism is default a la Iceland or Cyprus.
Agree, if you refer to the US. Other governments can do it.
Who cares about the theory as long as it works? Macro economics is not based on good theory anyway.
I think the central problem is that right now there's more money to be made by gambling and speculating than by investing in the real economy. As long as this imbalance isn't fixed nothing is going to change.
The last one was Clinton.
The problem is that Americans have a tendency to elect the candidate who promises the most, not who runs the best economic policies. If you elect a spendy government as soon as the previous one has fixed the economy and started to run a little surplus you'll never get sustained Keynesianism.
Keynesianism is proven to work and austerity is proven not to work, so what's the point here?
That combination should be unbeatable in job security.
I thought you run it through a horse.
I have a feeling you meant English.
There's also significant flooding so it's mostly the distribution of precipitation that's changed.
Sea level rise is part ice melt and part thermal expansion of the warming water.
That's exactly what they do. Drill deeper and pump harder. Or even desalinate, oil-powered of course.
Which will make the Middle East all that more interesting over the next 20 years. Saudi Arabia is projected to use all its remaining oil production to support its booming population some time during the 2020s, by 2030 the latest.
Yup.
What about anybody living within 100 miles of space? That's a border too.
Even the far Northeast has way higher insolation than Germany. It's still completely idiotic.