Slashdot Mirror


User: kkiller

kkiller's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
86
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 86

  1. You couldn't do what now? on Can Ordinary PC Users Ditch Windows for Linux? · · Score: 1
    What's more, I couldn't transfer, via email or a disk, some complicated word-processor and spreadsheet files between my Linux system at home and Microsoft Windows on my work PC.

    Eh? I do this on a day to day basis. USB drives work wonderfully in Ubuntu Linux, as I suspect they now do in other distributions. There is nothing there that would not work normally - how hard is it to add an attachment in Evolution? Or to a webmail message in Firefox? It sounds like he downloaded or saved his file and couldn't find it again - something which could be resolved with spending a little more time understanding how the system's file structure works.

    As for multimedia support, that is Microsoft and Apple's fault, not Linux.

  2. Re:heh... don't trust Gmail on Gmail vs Pine · · Score: 1

    I don't run my own web server but I have the next best thing - a good friend who is. You have a good friend who is a web server?

  3. Re:Is this a real number? on Ubuntu, Macintosh and Windows XP · · Score: 1
    Your're not wrong. Notice how GScreensaver, the replacement for the developmentally-dead XScreensaver in Dapper, has no RSS and no-per hack options. When asked about the options in a bug report, one of the key developers said rather patronisingly that "any screensaver theme that requires configuration is inherently broken," despite consternation in the forums.

    Now there are some aspects of Gnome's simplicity I like, but Gnome-Screensaver's attitude towards its users is a little worrying. Configuring a screensaver isn't hard - you could do it Windows 9x for heavens sake. This seems a little retrograde, and I hope this kind of attitude doesn't begin to colour the whole project.

  4. Re:Official spokesman Pacman stated on Gamers Gain Political Voice · · Score: 1

    But seriously, Super Mario has already spoken out about the inhumane act of placing randomly swinging blades in videogames.

  5. Re:Ehh on Root Password Readable in Clear Text with Ubuntu · · Score: 1

    Mod parent down for conspiracy theory, or a poor joke

  6. Re:Outgoogling Google on Microsoft To Offer Free Wireless VoIP · · Score: 1

    You sure? Microsoft have offered products for free before where doing so would offer market leverage. I.e. Internet Explorer.

  7. Faulty crystal ball on Shuttleworth on Open Source Development · · Score: 1
    Creating a neat C++ framework when what the world really needs a non-Microsoft browser is nothing but a deriliction of duty: a piece of vanity code. What we Brits call pointless "willy waving".

    ...

    So it's more than a mere accident that Opera, with its relentless focus on the Human Interface - and looking after the needs of users like your grandmother - stands set to reap the rewards. Instead of investigating the nerd-options, Opera invested in smartphones and embedded appliances.

    Now I wonder which company has the largest browser market share? Maybe that willy waving paid off.

  8. Re:It'll grow into itself. on PlayStation 3 May Play Too Much · · Score: 1
    Exactly. One word: N-Gage.

    That did side-talking well.

  9. Re:Quite a good idea... on Google Adds Chat To Gmail · · Score: 1
    To quote Yahoo...

    Linux: Yahoo! Messenger runs on the Intel chipset and has been tested on RedHat 6.2, 7.2 and 8 and 9; Debian Woody

    I wonder if it even works now..

  10. Re:i hear a sucking sound... on Craigslist to Start Charging for Some Listings · · Score: 1

    Funny Craigslist has yet failed to take off in Britain. The Free Ads papers are still as vibrant as ever. Either there is a generation of people who refuse to use the internet to sell items, or someone has yet to exploit the niche in this country.

  11. Re:Fair use? on Tension Between Record Labels And Digital Radio · · Score: 1

    Nearly. They are using the aacPlus codec, which sounds alright in 64kbps, but certainly is not CD quality.

    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XM_Satellite_Ra dio#Technology">Quote</a>: "Audio channels on XM are digitally compressed using the aacPlus codec from Coding Technologies for most channels, and the AMBE codec from Digital Voice Systems for some voice channels. Due to lack of bandwidth and too many channels, the maximum bitrate XM broadcast from its satellite per music channel is limited to 64kbs."