Slashdot Mirror


Craigslist to Start Charging for Some Listings

rufey writes "In the coming months, Craigslist will begin charging fees for some of its listings. New York City real estate listings will be the first to get the fees. Starting on March 1st, it will cost $10 to list real estate on Craigslist for New York City. The fees may not be limited to New York real estate however. Job postings may see fees imposed for various parts of the country. The fees have been proposed as a way to combat the problem of people posting the same thing several times a day to keep their listing near the top of the list."

131 comments

  1. good by joe+155 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    sounds like a good idea, it'll make the site better and reduce dupes etc. $10 is such a small amount that it won't put off anyone who wants to use it seriously but will make some dupers reconsider posting the same thing loads... although it might be so small that you could still pay $40 and think it was a good deal for 4 listings... I guess it depends on how much money you think you might make.

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    1. Re:good by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      On the contrary- I've listed things on the for sale only because it was free. If they charge, I may as well use the traditional paper- higher readership for my money.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:good by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Informative
      Hopefully the money will be put back into the programming of the site. The abusive behaviour could easily be handled with the right programming.

      Still, money's usually enough of a deterrent to stop the majority of the abuse.

    3. Re:good by jcr · · Score: 1

      higher readership for my money.

      That's quite unlikely, as it happens.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:good by jcr · · Score: 1

      Hopefully the money will be put back into the programming of the site.

      Yeah, it is rather primitive. I'd sure like to be able to search RE ads by more criteria than price.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  2. craigSlist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    make sure you do not omit the "s" in craigslist.

    otherwise it takes you to a page with porn ads.

    1. Re:craigSlist by joe+155 · · Score: 2, Funny

      yes... forgot the "S"... i didn't mean to see the porn... of course not... *looks shifty*

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:craigSlist by daveb · · Score: 0

      and how many links did you shift-click on before you noticed you shouldn't be doing that mmmmm???

    3. Re:craigSlist by cnettel · · Score: 1

      Now, it's only a matter of time before craiglist (without the s) is slashdotted. A +5 mod about a porn URL in the top comments of a posting. Oh, my... how will the server be able to bear the, ahem, load?

    4. Re:craigSlist by JoaoPinheiro · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the information, I'm sure that half of the slashdot population is now heading over to craiglist.com (without the s).

    5. Re:craigSlist by TellarHK · · Score: 1

      And for that matter, never add a /m4m /m4w /w4m to the end of the URL either, or you'll get porn ads.

  3. This is not a new thing by licamell · · Score: 4, Informative

    Craigslist has been charging for some things, specifically full time job postings in certain areas, for the past couple of years. I think it is a good thing to keep down the number of spam messages that are being posted in certain sections (Specifically jobs and real estate).

    1. Re:This is not a new thing by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah I was going to say the same thing.

      I don't understand why this is news. I think until now it was mostly just job postings, but there were definitely listings that cost money on Craigslist, at least in certain markets. I thought NYC was one of them, but perhaps not.

      I've found a few apartments and rooms for rent through Craigslist ... I wonder if roommates wanted and rooms for rent fall under the $10 "real estate" category.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:This is not a new thing by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      Craigslist has been charging for some things, specifically full time job postings in certain areas, for the past couple of years.

      I actually got my last job in Portland (portland.craigslist.com), thanks to Craigslist. The recruiter (who I ended up working closely with on my contract) noted that the money she paid for that posting was considerably cheaper than using Monster or Dice, and that she got lots of good leads on it.

      Thanks Craig! Drinks on me for helping me find work when I was just starting to despair...

  4. So we're on the internet, right by karmaflux · · Score: 3, Informative

    The summary links to a Washington Post article with no links in it.

    Craigslist can be found at www.craigslist.org.

    See? That wasn't so hard.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

  5. Meta-Moderation? by bigwang · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love craigslist.
    But wouldn't it be effective if people could flag the types of posts that these measures are trying to curb?
    "Flag this message 'dickwad'"

    1. Re:Meta-Moderation? by fupeg · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can flag items just as you suggest. Some of the options are "miscategorized", "spam", "prohibited", and "best of." If enough people do it, then it gets removed.

    2. Re:Meta-Moderation? by MustardMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      IMHO the flag system on craigslist is severly flawed, though - the messages pretty much vanish, and a user who saw a listing one day has no idea why it's gone the next day. Plus, there are entire communities of self-righteous jackasses who patrol craigslist and flag en masse any post that they don't like. I see this a LOT in the pets classifieds, where some have assigned themselves the pet police and go around removing any posts that offend their (usually quite extreme) sensitivities.

    3. Re:Meta-Moderation? by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But wouldn't it be effective if people could flag the types of posts that these measures are trying to curb?

      People either don't know what flags do, don't care, or not enough of them see it. I've seen blatant scams in all manner of sections that don't get removed for quite some time.

      On the same hand, I've posted stuff warning people about other posts which were blatant ripoffs or scams, and been flagged.

      The one major item I bought from CL was a used iBook that turned out to have a defective logic board; the previous owner had dumped it cheap because she knew it crashed regularly, and even though I spent 30 minutes with the machine before I bought it, I didn't come across the problem. She wouldn't return phonecalls or emails from me the next day.

      Every single person I've talked to about selling stuff says that they'll get 10 replies to an ad, and not a single person will actually show up. I've seen CL people price stuff ABOVE ebay prices (auctions are not market value, folks!) and found NO END of people trying to take advantage of each other.

      Example? Canon 20D's had a rebate for over $100. In one week there were 6-12 listings for them, all at or slightly below the best online prices. Initially they'd mention the UPC codes were removed, but wised up.

      Want another example? 750 xbox-360 postings on average right after they came out...with people asking prices anywhere from $750 to $2k. I repeatedly emailed abuse@craigslist.org asking them to just delete ANY ad with "xbox 360" in them, and never even got a reply.

      For Craig and other CL people to rant about community this and that, but refuse to shut down those clearly abusing "the community"...is rather hypocritical.

    4. Re:Meta-Moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some people just don't believe in cock fights, you've got to accept that.

    5. Re:Meta-Moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The one major item I bought from CL was a used iBook that turned out to have a defective logic board; the previous owner had dumped it cheap because she knew it crashed regularly, and even though I spent 30 minutes with the machine before I bought it, I didn't come across the problem.
      From another poster:
      People bitch about craigslist, but in truth it's an awesome display of market-clearing power. In the last two months, I have ... [s]old all the major parts of a broken iBook, including the broken logic board, for more than the total offered by a computer salvage company.
      Hmm . . .
  6. It was bound to happen by Laura_DilDio · · Score: 3, Interesting

    after all, doesn't ebay have a stake in Craigslist?

    1. Re:It was bound to happen by crazygamer · · Score: 1

      Nope, craigslist isn't a public company meaning they have no stock. It's not possible for eBay to have a stake in them.

    2. Re:It was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after all, doesn't ebay have a stake in Craigslist?

      eBay paid money and has no control or say over anything at CL. People at CL don't like the fact that 25% is owned by eBay, and the truth is that at this moment it has zero effect on the business decisions of CL

    3. Re:It was bound to happen by Azreal · · Score: 1

      Wrong, as of 2004, ebay owns 25% of craiglist.

      --
      $sys$droids
    4. Re:It was bound to happen by ericspinder · · Score: 1

      Your question may have been rhetorical, but yes they do have a stake. However, the article also mentions that Craigslist was charging for ads then as well... So is the next Slashdot article titled "Wendy's is going to start charging for burgers!"?

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    5. Re:It was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an absolutely uninformed point. I'm glad you didn't feel constrained by your lack of knowledge and subsequent incorrectness before you posted it.

  7. Craigslist has become Spam Central by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Craiglist has really gone downhill over the last few years. The personals are 80-90% spam, and the other listings have a high spam content as well.

    Anonymous ads without moderation just don't work any more.

    1. Re:Craigslist has become Spam Central by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
      Craigslist personals ... shudder

      I haven't trolled those since I kicked a stimulant habit.

  8. Do not forget the S by YOystick · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's craigSlist.org. If you try going to craiglist.com you get something else.

  9. The submitter is an idiot by multipartmixed · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How can you spell "Craigslist" wrong three times in an article summary...about Craigslist????

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:The submitter is an idiot by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      How can you spell "Craigslist" wrong three times in an article summary...about Craigslist????

      ScuttleMonkey: Are you saying I can dodge spell checks?

      * *B-B: No ScuttleMonkey. I'm saying when the time comes, you won't have to.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  10. Expanded Search by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The biggest problem with craigslist, they dont allow extended searchs for more than 1 area. While they have always bitched about global searchs would run the "small town" feeling, its global NOW.. Jobs in point, would be nice if you could search nation wide, people move for work now, get with the times.

    While making some people pay will get rid of multiple posts, thats annoying on high traffic sites.

    I just wish craigslist would actually ask what people want, without the freaking attitude...

    1. Re:Expanded Search by mthreat · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can do all this on these "vertical" search engines:

      For jobs, indeed.com
      For real estate, trulia.com

    2. Re:Expanded Search by rolfwind · · Score: 0

      You're correct.

      The search is extremely retarded - as you can search globally but just have to keep switching cities. In other words - they're unloading work the computer should be doing is dumped onto you.

      Ebay (owner of craigslist) can limit searches by radius to zip code, I don't see why craigslist won't implement that.

      People who want to deal locally will still be able to do that (and by default if decided), but especially in the trade of small items - location doesn't matter. Otherwise one of the internet's biggest benefits is ignored by the site.

  11. Editors? by Catskul · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can we charge Slashdot editors to post stories... It might have the same benefitial effects !

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    1. Re:Editors? by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1
      It might have the same benefitial effects !

      You must be new here.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    2. Re:Editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You must be new here"
      Says user number 856852 to 323619 :)

    3. Re:Editors? by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1

      They represent penis size. And you were saying? :)

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

  12. i hear a sucking sound... by d723 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tim Redmond of the San Francisco Bay Guardian has an interesting perspective on Craigslist:

    A little background. Mr. Newmark, whom everyone calls "Craig," has created a system of online advertising that has pretty much wiped out traditional daily newspaper classified ads in many of the 115 US markets where he now operates. He's also hurt the alternative press, although the damage to the dailies is deeper. Some say Craig has single-handedly destroyed thousands of newspaper jobs.

    He calls Craigslist the Walmart of classified ads because it siphons money out of the local economy since Craigslist doesn't employ people locally in the markets in which it operates.

    It also seems that one of the reasons Craigslist became the definitive source for online classifieds is because it's FREE for everything except job postings, and job postings is an area where they are not the definitive source. Their product is not incredibly complex. If/when they start to charge, it would be a relatively easy task for someone to build a better free alternative.
    1. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      A "better free alternative" would have a problem with name recognition.

    2. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      It's just the redistrabution of information, which some people can't seem to accept is now very easy to the point of being almost free. Ya'know like music distrabution. Don't like the fact that your job got taken over by a machine? Tell it to someone in the UAW.

      --
      We are all just people.
    3. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He compares Craigslist to Wal*Mart because he writes for a third-rate free weekly newspaper which depends on small advertisers for revenue. Competition with Craigslist is killing the Guardian because the Guardian provides terrible value to advertisers. They charge a large fee, run your ad only once per week, and on the same page with incoherent political screeds, strange editorials, factually incorrect news pieces, and artistic criticism of the latest pornographic dvds.

      Craigslist is killing the Guardian because the Guardian is a bad product. And for the Guardian, Craigslist *is* local competition, and they *do* employ San Francisco workers (4, I think).

    4. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by c0dedude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "He calls Craigslist the Walmart of classified ads because it siphons money out of the local economy since Craigslist doesn't employ people locally in the markets in which it operates." -- Are you fucking kidding? Craigslist is fair competition -- if you can offer a product for cheaper and better, then you get the business. It's called efficiency, it's the key to economic growth, and this stupid logic of preserving outdated jobs is killing American productivity. Not only that, walmart is a product of the global supply chain, Craigslist is domestically owned and operated.

      --
      Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    5. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by AaronLawrence · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Isn't technology terrible? Doing with a few programmers what previously employed thousands of people. Someone should stop this!! What about the children of those poor out-of-work newspaper employees? Won't someone think of the children? WEB SITES MUST BE STOPPED!!!

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    6. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that economic growth does not automatically equal lower and middle class growth. It is possible for economic growth to benefit the rich while harming the middle and lower classes. IE, the new wealth goes to the rich, and the not-rich either stay the same, or lose wealth.

    7. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by cyberformer · · Score: 1

      Local newspapers already have name recognition, so they could do something like Craigslist to save their classified ad business. It's too late for the SF Bay Area, but not for the other areas that Craigslist hasn't opened in yet.

      Their problem is that Craiglist doesn't make anything like as much money as the newspapers got from print ads. The fees from job (and now housing) ads are enough to make Craig and his colleagues rich, but not enough to support big companies with thousands of full-time employees.

    8. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Interesting


      This is excessively critical of the Bay Guardian - probably because the poster is a Republican idiot. He's relying on the probability that a lot of /. readers aren't local and don't read it.

      While the Guardian is definitely "left" or "progressive" or whatever bozo political term you prefer, the fact of the matter is the Guardian has been around a hell of a lot longer than Craigslist and has far better content.

      While I thought the criticism in the article was a bit heavy-handed on Craig, this current issue of charging for their ineffective ads (ineffective from the service sellers point of view, at least) tends to support the criticism that in the end, Craig is only interested in the money, and all the "community building" talk is so much bullshit (or perhaps I should say "Billshit" since he seems to have borrowed the propaganda from Gates.)

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    9. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      If you read the Guardian article, he recognizes that Craigslist is a marvel of capitalism. He says several times that while he isn't happy with that, it's definitely a legitimate way to go, and the local papers could have done this themselves at any time in the last few years. They screwed up, and Craig got the business.

      That said, his main problem is that Craig's notion of "community building" while riding on the backs of classified ads is mostly bullshit.

      It's hard to argue against his point.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    10. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by kkiller · · Score: 1

      Funny Craigslist has yet failed to take off in Britain. The Free Ads papers are still as vibrant as ever. Either there is a generation of people who refuse to use the internet to sell items, or someone has yet to exploit the niche in this country.

    11. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1

      Ah I see, Craig Newmark is only in it for the money, but Bruce Brugmann just wants to save puppies and help old ladies across the street? Please! Brugmann has lost his mind and the content of the Guardian has decline with him. I think it's swell that Brugmann fought for public power for 30 years (and lost), but you can't point to political fights as evidence that your newspaper is of any use.

      As for the rest of your post, shove it up your ass with a hydraulic ram, you fucking fascist cocksocket.

    12. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by rhizome · · Score: 2, Informative

      i don't know anything about fascist cocksockets, but the rest of what he says is pretty much true. additionally, with the recent redesign the paper has become harder to read (smaller typefaces and some kind of freaky chopped-block layout scheme) while making more room for more ads. i've liked the guardian for a long time but over the past few years it has really become untenable.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    13. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      I said nothing about the motivations of the Guardian owners. It isn't even relevant to the point.

      The point was that the OP didn't like the Guardian criticizing Craigslist because the Guardian was a leftist rag (in his - and perhaps many people's - opinion), thus ignoring the point of the Guardian article that Craig's stated purpose for building Craigslist was "community building", which doesn't seem to have been all that successful outside of the Bay Area and seems to have taken a backseat to the revenue.

      Also, I tend to read the Guardian mostly for the movie news while I'm doing my laundry - and the occasional muckracking article about the assholes running this country. Beyond that, I have no axe to grind for the Guardian or the SF Weekly. So yelling at me about the quality of the Guardian is not relevant. All I said was the Guardian has been around a lot longer than Craigslist and it has actual content rather than ads.

      In other words, it's not "my" newspaper.

      So fuck you very much for your comment.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    14. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      I agree, the new Guardian layout sucks.

      Not relevant to the point, however, which was about Craigslist, not the Guardian. Shooting the messenger is not relevant.

      I only read the thing during my laundry, anyway, and then mostly to find out what's going on in town and what movies are playing. Occasionally they do publish an interesting main article as well. OTOH, I only use Craiglist for posting ads for my tech support service and occasionally browsing the computer gigs, job ads, and things for sale. This is hardly comparable to an actual newspaper with actual written articles. If this is what Craig refers to as "community building", well, fine. It didn't impress the Guardian critic and it doesn't impress me.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    15. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1

      Actually, what you said is that I'm a moron and a Republican.

    16. Re:i hear a sucking sound... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Well, are you?

      You sounded like one.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  13. the real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    when they say it's not about the money, it's always about the money

    the real question i suppose is why so many feel such a need for greed

  14. Limits by pjh3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps one solution would be to allow one post per category per day. Anything extra would cost you.

    1. Re:Limits by mabu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I run several popular classified engines for various clients. You don't have to limit postings. You can easily create a blacklist that stops most of the abusers. Most of them are repeat offenders continually adding the same ads over and over. A keyword-based blacklist would stop at least 90% of this, and you use an IP-based blacklist for the rest, and then you deal with just a tiny amount of random spam that can be addressed by the user-reporting system.

      Another solution is to "deputize" more moderators and give them the ability to delete ads, or create a category where spam ads are moved into some "trash" area that is still publicly viewable.

    2. Re:Limits by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

      Perhaps one solution would be to allow one post per category per day. Anything extra would cost you.

      I actually had the exact same idea at first, but the implementation would be a bitch, if not impossible to do fairly. How would you identify who each poster is? Generating a ton of email addresses isn't tough. IP address might work, but between proxies and rich companies/people with large IP blocks, you could still get significant abuse. While it may hurt those with more resources some, it would hurt the casual person more.

    3. Re:Limits by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Use a valid credit card for the free posting, identify an account by a credit card. Bill subsequent postings (with authorization) to the card.

  15. Craigslist = spam/scam heavy and search is lacking by tokengeekgrrl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are so many scams and spam postings on craigslist now that I turn to my network of friends and an internal posting board at my work before bothering to use it.

    Don't get me wrong, I love craigslist and used it back when it was just a list-serv. But success has its price and that price is a ton of clutter.

    If craigslist had decent search capabilities that would help mitigate the problem but as it is, it's very frustrating. You can't search for anything in multiple neighborhoods in the same city, let alone search for something in multiple cities. Searching for housing is tedious since you can't filter it by number of bedrooms, bathrooms, whether it has off-street parking, etc.

    I have found some utilities online that will do craigslist filtering but they can't help but miss a bunch of postings since they're just parsing a bunch of text. There is nothing that they can key off of in order to filter accurately.

    I'll still use craigslist when I need to, of course, but I also use other things as well and don't solely rely on it.

    - tokengeekgrrl

  16. The first one's Free by Mateorabi · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I like that idea too. Let people post the first one free, which lets the casual user avoid fees. The realestate agents / brokers who post day in and day out (and are the one's abusing the system with same-day repeats to keep on top of the stack) will have a market force applied to curb the posting.

    For things like home, or rent listings you could even limit it to once per week. I mean how often do you need to update those? And for that category, you could also require a (not publicaly disclosed) address to prevent someone from signing up as a 'new' user over and over.

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  17. greed.craigslist.org by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    That site is troll central.

    The only reason people even use that hideous site, is because it's free.

    There are many ways to combat abusive listings, without having to charge people who post ads.

    Charging is just more convenient, and using the 'preventative' excuse is a bunch of BS.

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  18. Slashdot to start charging for inaccurate stori by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a bold new move, Slashdot will charge each poster $10 for each story that has misspellings, misleading titles, inaccurate summaries and finally a double penalty for dupes.

    Slashdot has more than a dozen such posters, who select stories for readers throughout the day.

    One poster, who chose to remain anonymous, said "This is stupif. It takes several seconds to search for dupes and several seconds more to spelcheck. Can you imagine how long it would take to make sure the story is right?"

    Another poster, who goes by the name...

    1. Re:Slashdot to start charging for inaccurate stori by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Taco says you now owe him $125.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  19. OK By me by symbolic · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    I never understood what the big deal with Craigslist was- I've never seen it, and nothing I've heard about it has really inspired any interest.

    1. Re:OK By me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it isn't big in Podunkville, Oklahoma, but in the SF bay area, everybody finds a place to live off craigslist, then fills that place with furniture and secondhand gadgets bought off craigslist, and then looks for an SO on craigslist.

  20. Number of bathrooms?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why would you need to filter on that?


    Now, if they offered a way to filter out the condos in black neighborhoods...

  21. Here's a CraigList by cyranose · · Score: 2, Funny

    craig, AK Population (1990): 1260 (504 housing units)
    craig, CO Population (1990): 8091 (3559 housing units)
    craig, IA Population (1990): 116 (47 housing units)
    craig, MO Population (1990): 346 (166 housing units)
    craig, NE Population (1990): 228 (116 housing units)

    (from dictionary.reference.com)

    Anyway, so they'll charge. But $10 won't stop annoying/deceptive ads and if they go much higher, they'd better offer something for it, like better searching and better policing. How much does Ebay spend to fight fraud?

    And eventually, CraigsList will be just another brand site and we'll find a new cheapo service to use for free.

  22. The article is wrong!!! by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    Days of free Craigslist listings coming to a close
    Craigslist has been charging for job posts for a while. It is true that it has not charged for realestate listings before, but it is not a new thing for them to charge for ANY listing.
    1. Re:The article is wrong!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, job postings in most cities are free. They only charge in SF, LA, and NY.

      http://www.craigslist.org/about/help/job-cost.html

  23. How about "Casual Encounters"? by QuatermassX · · Score: 1

    I wonder when the dating / personals section will become a "profit centre" for the likes of Craigslist and the Gumtree.

  24. Didn't I read this in December? by AEton · · Score: 1

    I'll be darned if I can find the /. article, though. here's one blog post that mentioned it...

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
  25. Re:Craigslist = spam/scam heavy and search is lack by mabu · · Score: 1

    The spam and scam postings are easily dealt with if they ramped their filter/reporting system up a few notches. Why they don't is beyond me and that's mainly why there are problems. This is a classic case of them having a technological solution to the problem and choosing a different approach, or letting the problem fester as a means of justifying changing the business model.

  26. The fee is for brokers only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It should be noted the fee is for brokers (a who charge the tenant a hefty fee-- usually one month's rent or more-- to act as a go between between landlord and tenant), not for "no fee" landlords, roommates-wanted ads, shares or sublets.

  27. their plan all along by opencity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like the text ads and adsense on Google I would assume this was Craig's plan all along. Newspaper classifieds are going the way of the horse and buggy anyway. As soon as the routing, billing and favored content issues are sorted out we'll start to see the end of free email. A penny a message eliminates spam but doesn't slow me down.

    OT somewhat: To me, the internet has so far destroyed more 'wealth' than it created. What was once the music business is losing the 'business' part (probably going to improve the music). Corporations that were worth $ because of song ownership / publishing catalogs are now involved in a market driven con game to claim they're still worth anything at all. Magazines that used to employ writers, designers, editors, mail room clerks are watching their industry go away, and some covering their own demise. The writers end up blogging where Googles current ad-revenue illusion can make them a couple of $$ a day. When the fraudulent aspect of click throughs becomes more evident, that revenue stream will ride off into the sunset.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
    1. Re:their plan all along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how the hell is parent a troll? boring yes but a troll?

  28. The Flag System does Not Work! by microcars · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is particular to the Real Estate Section, maybe flagging works elsewhere, but the Real Estate Section is SATURATED with:

    Agents posting Services (and not listing actual Real Estate, there is a separate section for Services)
    Spam advertising cheap Housing, but its really Affiliate links to endless Popup Windows of ads.
    "Browse the MLS Free!" postings which you have to sign up for, but then they sell your name to Real Estate Agents "looking for leads" (there is a guy in my wife's office who pays for these.....)
    Ads for Florida Investments
    Ads for Vegas Investments

    I place ONE ad a week for my wife's Real Estate Listings there and I would be happy to pay if people did not have to wade through all the garbage just to get to her listing.

    The Flag System does not work for Real Estate, Nothing I have EVER flagged has been removed. NOTHING.
    And I am ONLY flagging the really spammy crap, not the actual listings.
    My time is worth way more than the $10 they will charge.

    --
    I like microcars
  29. Your anecdotal evidence by djdavetrouble · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is compelling: Every single person I've talked to about selling stuff says that they'll get 10 replies to an ad, and not a single person will actually show up. But the last two things that I sold on CL I only had to deal with one flake, the second guy came through and on time, as promised. The bad part is the people that flake out don't even call to say they are not coming. It is best to get a cell # or make them call 1 hour before the set time and place, and reconfirm. It is just good practice anyway. Matter of fact I sold a pair of huge speakers just last night to the second respondant to my ad. He got a good deal, and I got some Jacksons and more room in my apartment. It is good that they are doing something about the New York RE section, it is the worst in the entire world. Between the people that will sell you (ficticious) lists of landlords with no fee apartments to the fake (too good to be true) listings that are real estate agents trying to loop you in to their agency, the section is a far shot from what it used to be. It used to be the only place to find decent no-fee apartments in NYC. unfortunately the real estate industry has corrupted CL long ago just as they did the village voice before that. Thank god they are doing something about it. It is just to easy for the snakes to operate there right now. Buyer beware, as usual.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  30. great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where am I going to find my t4m casual encounter ads now?

  31. How newspapers can fight back by gregwbrooks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Craigslist is a bitter pill for newspapers - most metro dailies make a third of their advertising revenue from classifieds. McKinsey (insert genuflect here) has a new analysis piece on how papers can fight back. Relevant reading for anyone who follows the industry.

    --


    "It was a summer's tale: Just a boy, his Linux, and a head full of dreams..."
    1. Re:How newspapers can fight back by qzulla · · Score: 1

      Too bad it is for premium members only:

      This article is available to Premium Members only. Subscribe now.

      $150 annually (with significant savings on two- and three-year terms)

      You forgot to mention that.

      qz

    2. Re:How newspapers can fight back by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Maybe that was the idea on how to fight back?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  32. Try combining your two statements by Gorimek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find your two statements interesting together.

    1. craigslist has wiped out much of the traditional classified ads industry
    2. If craigslist starts charging, someone will take their place

    It seems to me that 1 plus 2 equals that the traditional classified industry is dead, not because of craigslist specifically, but because the technology that made it possible.

  33. Agreed by Otto · · Score: 1

    I've heard of craigslist off and on for several years now, and while it's big in the bay area and NY and such, I don't live in those places. Even being in one of the main "markets" for it, I don't know *anybody* who actually uses it on any kind of regular basis. And I know lots and lots of people who use the internet for essentially everything.

    Never seen the big deal. It's a poorly designed site that has very little going for it. I looked around and can't find anything of interest on there at all. Where's the fire?

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Agreed by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Depends on your age, and the age and financial status of your friends.

      I know a lot of younger people who have used Craigslist extensively to find cheap apartments and sublets for rent. I think that's honestly the major use of it for most people. Also, I've checked it out a few times on the Free Stuff page, which is a good place to pick up furniture for refinishing.

      I think it mainly gets used by twentysomethings who are hurting for cash and looking for inexpensive places to live, in cities where there is a lot of demand for housing. Other sections of the site (personals, adult stuff) probably has it's own base of users. But I'm willing to bet that the apartment listings are a big portion of the site.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Never seen the big deal. It's a poorly designed site that has very little going for it. I looked around and can't find anything of interest on there at all. Where's the fire?

      Hippies. That's the market from all I can tell. Very liberal people with very little money living in some of the largest cities in the country like San Francisco or NYC. It's like a hippie version fo MySpace.com or something.

    3. Re:Agreed by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Plenty of people use it in Chicago. I found my apartment there, a friend found a cheap iPod there, etc. If you can't see past the "poor interface" (it sucks! it's not AJAX Web 2.0 buzzword compliant. there's content instead of fluff! the horror!), then you probably don't need it.

      --
      My other car is first.
    4. Re:Agreed by symbolic · · Score: 1

      I was going to mention MySpace as a comparison, but I figured it might not be fair. Kinda funny that someone else did. : )

    5. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The personals work pretty well, at least in my area. I've met quite a few decent women through craigslist.

    6. Re:Agreed by Otto · · Score: 1

      If you can't see past the "poor interface" (it sucks! it's not AJAX Web 2.0 buzzword compliant. there's content instead of fluff! the horror!), then you probably don't need it.

      That's the problem. The poor interface isn't hiding anything. This "content" you speak of... where is it? Because all the actual text I see is fluff. Hard to find, hard to read, mostly worthless, fluff.

      Maybe if I was a broke college student who needed second hand furniture or ther cheap used shit, then I'd be more interested. Or if I had the patience and time to wade through all the spam in what they call "discussion" areas. But I'm not poor, and there's millions of better forums out there.

      I agree that a way to bring local people together is a good idea, but craigslist is possibly the worst possible implementation of such a thing. It's like he took the worst part of classified ads and made a website out of it. Sorry, but if I need pre-owned materials, I'll check the local paper or hit a local Salvation Army/Goodwill store. It's faster and I don't have to wade through all manner of idiots to do it.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  34. good idea for real estate by Chimera512 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in my experience here in boston, realtors who are aware of craigslist will post properties on there and use that as a way to direct clients who like apartment X that they saw on craingslist, when in fact that property (at least here in the insane boston housing market) is probably already gone. one realtor seemed to be getting the vast majority of his clients through craigslist postings that had very little to do with the apartments he was going to show the clients.

  35. Thats fine so long as... by sweetnjguy29 · · Score: 1

    ...they don't start charging for the casual encounters section. Where else am I gonna find a transexual love monkey who is turned on my the thought of a 3sum with its girlfriend?

  36. Craig Interviewed Recently by camperslo · · Score: 1

    Craig Newmark, founder of Craigslist, was interviewed by Tavis Smiley of PBS station KCET in Los Angeles in January. One of the things he spoke of was spending much of his time with customer service. In particular he mentioned problems with New York City housing advertisers doing bait and switch. Perhaps charging for housing ads will also help fund dealing with these problems.

    1. Re:Craig Interviewed Recently by camperslo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Text of PBS KCET Tavis Smiley Interview with Craig Newmark:

      Tavis: Up next on this program, the creator of Craig's List, Craig Newmark. Stay with us.

      Tavis: Ten years ago, Craig Newmark started a small Website designed to help his friends and colleagues share information about things like jobs and apartments and events. He just happened to call the site Craig's List. Today, as you well know, (laugh) Craig's List is in 34 countries around the globe, used by some 10 million users a month. Craig Newmark, nice to have you on the program.
      Craig Newmark: Hey, it's my pleasure.

      Tavis: It's a pleasure to meet you. So, I'm sure you've been asked this a thousand times, but not by me. So you could not have had any idea, when you came up with this idea for your friends and coworkers, that Craig's List would be, like, all the rage.

      Newmark: You're giving the wrong guy credit. I had one simple idea about telling friends about arts and technology events. People in the community suggested everything else to us, and that's our theme. We're really run by the people who use the site. We just run the infrastructure, and help out with problems.

      Tavis: Tell me, you're very modest and I respect that, but tell me how the idea started, though. So you're in your apartment one day, or?

      Newmark: (laugh) Well, in '94, I was at Charles Schwab, the discount brokerage? And I was evangelizing the Net there, you know, to use in the business. I saw a lot of people helping each other out, I thought I should do some of that. So in early '95, I started emailing a few friends.

      Tavis: And?

      Newmark: They suggested more stuff. I did it. They suggested more. When they told me I had to give it a name, they said hey, we already call it Craig's List. And they were right. And that's been pretty good, since when things go wrong, which is not often, but when they go wrong, I take it personally.

      Tavis: I would assume you would, given that your name is on it. I wanted to ask you, so I will, I guess, how it feels to have started something. It's one thing to have eBay, which I wanna get to in a second, 'cause they're now your partner in this project. But eBay or Amazon or Google. But yours bears your name. So is that a good thing or a bad thing?

      Newmark: It's a mixed blessing. I'm proud of what's happened. But when there's any kind of problem, not often, 'cause we have a really good culture of trust. But I take it all seriously. That's why I do full time customer service. I was doing it minutes ago; I'll be doing it minutes into the future.

      Tavis: So when you say customer service, what does Craig do every day?

      Newmark: (laugh) I handle specialized cases. Things like moderating our discussion boards. Lightly, very lightly. And also dealing with apartment brokers in New York. That's my biggest project. Because in that market, they've controlled, you know, apartments and rentals too long, and they haven't been very kind. That's changing.

      Tavis: Yeah, speaking of apartment rentals, if I got my numbers right here, $20 million, is it $20 million a month that you guys make just off the apartment listings here?

      Newmark: That's one estimate for the whole site over the course of a year. And frankly, first I don't know the answer. And secondly, I don't care. Jim Buckmaster cares. He's the guy who really runs things now. He's my CEO. My focus is just on getting customer service done every day. We've left behind a lot of money on the table, we continue to do so. How much does a guy need to earn?

      Tavis: Yeah. Why does money not matter to you? You got something that's big, and yet you seem like you don't care whether you make money or not.

      Newmark: Well, it does matter. I need to make an okay living. The people who work for us need to. But after you make a comfortable living, how much more do you need? It's like I make a joke about nerd values, 'cause I'm very much in the rich nerd tradition. And (laugh) you know, we say, like, hey, people pay us for this stuff, like program

  37. No great loss here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used CL for posting both personals, items for sale, and normal chatty banter in the appropriate sections. The result in all of these cases were the same: replies either on CL or sent to my email were 75% angry bitter people who think that just because its "online" its ok to insult, degrade, ridicule, and generally shit all over anyone the slightest bit different from themselves. And yes, this is a far higher angry bitter person rate than I've seen anywhere else, slashdot included.

  38. Re:Craigslist = spam/scam heavy and search is lack by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People bitch about craigslist, but in truth it's an awesome display of market-clearing power. In the last two months, I have:

    Sold my car on Craigslist, for more than car dealers offered, in cash, in under 4 hours.

    Sold a Playstation 2 in under a day.

    Sold all the major parts of a broken iBook, including the broken logic board, for more than the total offered by a computer salvage company.

    Bought a 6-year-old laptop computer with the exact specifications I wanted, in under two days, for less than the median selling price of the same item on eBay (and of course, no shipping).

    I will admit that I get frustrated with the people who call and say they are going to buy the item but then don't, and with the kids who want to buy your Playstation, but don't have any money or transportation and don't even know how to ride the bus, and with the African bank scams that automatically reply to every single listing. But in general it's a fantastic and free method for the buying and selling of anything.

  39. Free isn't always good... by sitarlo · · Score: 0

    Having just developed and launched my own free job post/search website (http://www.jobopoly.com/ I'm very uncertain about offering a free service, but I just don't feel that a job post is worth $399 (dice/monster) or even $29.99. I plan on charging for resume searches and that's it. Hopefully between that and the few ads I host I'll be able to pay the bills and keep the service up for people to use. Craigslist is no longer a grass-roots operation, it's a BIG operation trying to look grass-roots.

  40. no great loss here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used CL for posting both personals, items for sale, and normal chatty banter in the appropriate sections. The result in all of these cases were the same: replies either on CL or sent to my email were less than 25% nice people interested in the ad or wanting to chat, and greater than 75% angry bitter people who think that just because its "online" its ok to insult, degrade, ridicule, and generally shit all over anyone the slightest bit different from themselves. And yes, this is a far higher angry bitter person rate than I've seen anywhere else, slashdot included. Yes I posted this twice. Because I screwed up the first time :P

  41. Craigslist Meme has TOPPED OUT by broward · · Score: 1

    Craiglist gave a false inflection point signal last January, but I think the new one is accurate.

    http://www.realmeme.com:8080/roller/page/realmeme/ ?entry=craigslist_meme

    In the near future, you should see considerably less of Craig in the news, possibly some rising complaints, like we see here at Slashdot.

  42. Re: How much does Ebay spend to fight fraud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently not much. Have you ever tried to report fraud to Ebay? It is more frustrating than trying to deal with the DMV or the phone company. Ebay does not care about fraud. They will deny it is their responsibility. Once upon a time Ebay was useful, I don't expect that I will ever bother to use them again. It has turned into the online equivalent of buying car stereos from the back of a van. It's all legal really.

  43. Excellent move. by jcr · · Score: 1

    I hope that this also introduces a mechanism to prevent the spammers in the real estate sections. I've been seeing the same goddamned "foreclosure info" posts every single day for as long as I've been looking.

    If it's not an actual property for sale, it doesn't belong in the real estate for sale section. That includes everything from the "foreclosure seKrITS!!!!!!", to the "I'll offer sexual favors for a listing" ads from desperate brokers.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  44. Customers aren't property. by jcr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He calls Craigslist the Walmart of classified ads because it siphons money out of the local economy since Craigslist doesn't employ people locally in the markets in which it operates.

    Why should they?

    If you can't compete, too bad. The advertisers are entitled to choose a vendor, and if the Guardian isn't a good deal, they lose. If they'd been a bit smarter about offering their ads on the net sooner than their competitors, they might not be going down the tubes today.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  45. People can and will ruin anything worthwhile by FasterEddie · · Score: 1

    Isn't it amazing how we humans continue to ruin everything worthwhile!

  46. My brilliant commercial mind yields deep insight! by Alsee · · Score: 1

    The fees have been proposed as a way to combat the problem of people posting the same thing several times a day to keep their listing near the top of the list.

    Hmmm, wouldn't you also be making money off of it?

    Oh... we didn't think of that...

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  47. re: brokers suck. by bluehalo · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's the brokers who ruined it for everyone and it is such a good thing that craigslist finally implemented this fee. You can avoid the brokers in other boroughs, even Brooklyn most of the time, but the way it works in Manhattan is that you HAVE to go through a broker to find a place and you always end up paying them a hefty fee (usually at least a month's rent). I had a friend who was hired part time to work for a broker in the summer (via a job posting on craigslist) and her job was to simply create listings on craigslist every day for apartments. All of these apartments were listed on the broker's company website - she would log on to the website and copy the pictures and text directly over to a craigslist ad, sometimes cleaning up the copy a bit but often just posting it as-is. She was paid $100 a week to post 20 ads a day and theoretically would get 10% of the broker fee (the broker would get let's say $3500 and she would get $300) if anyone rented one of the apartments that she listed online, which turned out to be not very often. (ie: never).

    After a while she realized that she was posting many of the same apartments multiple times and the broker didn't even care what apartment people called about or what the actual ads said, as long as 20 ads were posted with his contact information on it every day. The people who called about an ad would pretty much never see that actual apartment - the broker would ask what you wanted to pay and then proceed to show you whatever apartments were available that week that were $200-$500 over your price range. After a month or so, my friend quit because the broker was always late to pay the measly $100 per week and the whole operation seemed shady. There were several other people who worked for the same broker just posting ads, so this one broker probably had 100 ads posted per day on craigslist just for him. This guy worked at a company with around 20 other brokers, who probably all had their own minions doing the same thing. Just imagine multiple companies doing the same thing with all their brokers and you realize how useless it is to look for an apartment on craigslist in Manhattan.

    I personally have used craigslist to find some great apartments in cities like San Francisco, but in Manhattan it is primarily a form of free advertising that the brokers exploit. The system here is already crappy enough with the brokers, but even more so as long as they are free to render craigslist into a useless spam hole.

  48. Re:ALERT! Google Blog Censorship at BLOGGER? by koweja · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh, for the love of God. All of the blogs are back now. It was just a damn server problem. I'm sure if you looked around you would have found plenty of mundane blogs that were unavailable. But why miss an opportunity to jump to conclusions and scream "conspiracy!!!" all over the place.

  49. damn Commies..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    greedy? Hard to say when they're turning away a 1/2 billion in potential revenue Money mag

  50. Craigslist should cost a buck for anything. by xx_chris · · Score: 1

    Craigslist should charge a buck for anything and donate the money.
    It would cut down on the spam and it would raise money for a good cause.
    I like Craig, but Craig is not the good cause I'm thinking of.

  51. Re:ALERT! Google Blog Censorship at BLOGGER? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    rigorousintuition "403"s still.

    I could get "Cheese Sandwich" and "Windows Mobile" blogs - but about 12-15 poli blogs I frequent were all down...

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  52. Alternative by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    I saw the repost-a-day when I was searching for housing on Craigslist. I found it very annoying, and made up my mind that I wouldn't use services from that poster, even if it was useful (and it wasn't.)

    This got me thinking, though- why not just charge someone to auto-bump? "Pay us $5, and for the the length of your posting, we will automatically bump you to the top at the beginning of each day." It removes the repeats, takes care of those who are the problem, and everyone else goes on having free postings that tend to lack information.

    (And, yes, I did find my housing on Craigslist.)

  53. Fees - who needs em' by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    After the announcement that AOL and Yahoo are going to start charging a fee to send email in to their servers this announcement irks me. . Shees

    We get nickle and dimed to death. And instead of putting in place real solutions like requiring SMTP authorization, we get to pay and pay and pay.

    Then of course there are the fees tacked on to monthly phone bills. Fortunately this one doesn't bother me as much because I jumped to VoIP over a year ago. But already I'm hearing the drum beat of more taxes and fees even for VoIP providers.

    Not to mention that I can't get a tax break because in essence I'm single and don't have a mortgage from which I can take interest deductions. Bleah.

  54. I think $10 is a bit too high. by Skapare · · Score: 1

    I think $10 is a bit too high, especially for apartment management agencies that often have many apartments come available each month. Maybe $1 per listing would be better. I guess they need to find the sweet-spot where the price doesn't drive away listings altogether, but keeps down the repeats.

    I've never needed to look for an apartment on Craigslist anyway, so I don't know how this issue might be handled. It would be nice to be sure a listing goes away when the unit is rented. But you can't really be sure the person listing it will come back and remove it when it's rented. So, some kind of "yup, this is still available" action would be a good thing, while still a means to keep it from being up high, or even show at all, if I've seen it before. So maybe a $1 placement and $0.05 renewal to keep it active.

    What about a pay-for-placement approach? Let them pay whatever they want to pay and the listing shows up with highest payer first. Also provide an option for viewing listings to limit the range of what was paid ... such as few apartments for which no more than $15 nor no less than $0.50 was paid to list.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:I think $10 is a bit too high. by Scallawag · · Score: 1

      Apt Brokers in NY get 20% of one years worth of rent as a fee. People in NY are really into throwing money away, i guess.

      --
      Getting old fast, Shit!
  55. Devious by zymano · · Score: 1

    You got to laugh at their reasoning.

    Just say you want to make a few more bucks .

    You sold out didn't you.

  56. Craig has a "fee forum" and he reads and replies!! by cshay · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://forums.newyork.craigslist.org/?forumID=2004 0204

    It's amazing how involved (and accessible) Craig is!

  57. Re: How much does Ebay spend to fight fraud? by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

    I'm not an apologist or even attempting to defend Ebay, but they have NEVER attempted to deal with fraud. Hell in the early days of Ebay fraud was amazingly high. I got amazing deals back then, but I got defrauded a bit too (the scales tipped in my favor so I call it a win and learned from my losses). For the most part it's up to the end user to make sure they don't get screwed. Read the fucking listing over and over and then read it again, check feedback (if the # is not in the mid triple digits and positive feedback is below 98% don't bother), check that the seller normally sells what your buying (check feedback for other users who have bought "similar" from them and was happy), personally try to buy within neighboring states (I scared a scammer shitless and got my MO back because I had been in the area where he lives and could easily "reach out and touch him"), and when you pay please do make sure you pay the extra $2 for insurance and ask questions before impulsively clicking "buy it now."

    Its "buyer beware" and if the buyer can't be bothered to exercise good purchasing etiquette it's their own damn fault when things go to hell.

  58. This Is How You Fix Bad Site Design by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Charge for your mistakes.

    The problem with Craigslist, as everyone who posts there knows, is that your post rolls off the front page in a matter of a few hours, but you are supposed to only post once every seven days (not that anyone does this - everyone posts at least daily and many post multiple times a day.) You're also only supposed to post in your immediate neighborhood. Right - like the people within five or ten blocks of you are going to be enough to support your business - especially in a town like San Francisco where a "neighborhood" is barely ten blocks, if that.

    As everyone knows, very few people look beyond the first page or two of Google search results, and very few people look beyond the first page or two of Craigslist search results.

    The only calls I've ever gotten from my ads - and that has been a grand total of TWO - were within an hour of being posted while they were still on the first page. The rest of the time, my ads are completely worthless. This is the dirty little secret of Craigslist.

    So now they intend to charge for the dubious privilege of getting somebody to read your ad. Fat chance. This will be the end of Craigslist. Numerous people offering tech support services will no longer advertise simply because the return on the ad investment will be too small to justify paying for the ad. It's that simple. In the end, of the couple hundred tech support people advertising on Craigslist now, maybe a couple dozen will remain.

    Then the service ads page will be only one page and maybe it will work. Apparently the only way to generate any business is to be the only company able to afford to run an ad...

    Somehow I don't think this is what Craigslist was intended to be.

    It's also interesting that I read today in one of the SF weekly papers a criticism that Craig, despite his rhetoric about "building communities", basically has done nothing to do that in the over 100 cities his operation is in. Instead, Craigslist has basically wiped out the classified ad sections of newspapers in every community it operates in. While this is not a bad thing per se, the end result, as the paper points out, is that none of the revenue remains in the community. When asked about this, Craig's only response was "I only go where people want me."

    Craigslist has now made up my mind for me. It's worthless advertising there for the PC tech support business at least. Besides the saturation advertising of the two or three hundred people doing this work in the city, and the multiple posts, now they want to charge.

    Forget it. I'll do it the hard way - promote my Web site and resort to direct mail.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  59. You seem a bit confused by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Your post seems to be a bit confused to me. First you say that craigslist is worthless because of all the spamming, then you say that charging to cut down on the spamming is wrong - even while you admit that the charging may help:

    "Then the service ads page will be only one page and maybe it will work. Apparently the only way to generate any business is to be the only company able to afford to run an ad."

    Um, we're talking about $10 here. If you can't afford that, maybe you are in the wrong business. Also, I don't know that craig is charging people to advertise their tech-support business.

    "Instead, Craigslist has basically wiped out the classified ad sections of newspapers in every community it operates in."

    How has craig done this, if his service is worthless?

    1. Re:You seem a bit confused by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      You're confused, but perhaps I wasn't completely clear.

      Criagslist is obviously intending to charge for more types of ads than they're doing now.

      Their stated goal is to reduce the redundant posting of ads.

      This occurs in the computer services section, which is the only section I'm concerned about.

      The problem is the entire setup. People post multiple times because the setup forces your ad off the front page within hours, while at the same time you're not supposed to post multiple times or actually more than once a week.

      This renders the entire concept ineffective from the point of view of the advertiser, because most users will not browse several pages of ads to find what they want - unless they're like me and really determined.

      The other problem is that the result of this is that a Craigslist tech support ad is almost worthless if you're not on the first or second page of results - even if the reader selects only San Francisco ads. This means that no matter WHAT they charge for the ad OR what YOU charge for your service, the odds are the ad will not be cost-effective.

      So if Craigslist charges for tech support ads, the result will be that only a handful of people - or none, depending on whether ANYBODY perceives the ads as cost-effective - will run ads there. Some people presumably will be able to absorb even poorly performing advertising into their overall ad budget and will keep running their ads despite the low performance. Most will not.

      Among other things, this means that most of the startups like me won't be able to afford to put ads there. For me, this will probably be a wash since I'm getting so little response now anyway. I would be better off building up my Web site and posting references to it elsewhere on Craigslist and on other sites.

      It just seems to be that if the site were redesigned to allow ads to be displayed more easily for a longer period of time, there would less spamming, less multiple posting, and less frenzy. Charging for the ads just brings in a few more bucks for Craigslist and doesn't solve any of the problems for the ad posters.

      As for the effect on the classifieds, you have to distinguish between the services classifieds and the for sale classifieds. Craiglist is clearly a good place to go to find things for sale. It's there that it has wiped out the regular newspaper classifieds. It's just not as effective for a small business trying to advertise a service.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  60. I thought that was the gay hook-up website? by Scallawag · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am building a new, better craigslist. MUHAHAHAHA!!

    --
    Getting old fast, Shit!
  61. time for an alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe is time for services theadcloud, a free tag-based local classified to take off

  62. You can thank RENT CONTROL. & Zoning Regulatio by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1

    It's the brokers who ruined it for everyone and it is such a good thing that craigslist finally implemented this fee. You can avoid the brokers in other boroughs, even Brooklyn most of the time, but the way it works in Manhattan is that you HAVE to go through a broker to find a place and you always end up paying them a hefty fee (usually at least a month's rent).

    There is one and only one reason for the littany of nonsense you've catalogued in your post: RENT CONTROL. [You could throw in Rent Control's bastard half-brothers, zoning laws and zoning regulations, but they're all just slightly different incarnations of the same abomination.]

    Rent Control artificially restricts the supply of housing, hence endows unnatural potency to the landed gentry and their agents.

    I.e. socialism INVARIABLY benefits the Powers-That-Be at the expense of the serfs. Hence its [otherwise inexplicable] popularity with the high-IQ crowd that dominates our universities, non-profits, and "knowledge-based" industries.

    That's the way it's always been, and the way it will always be.

  63. Shift-click? Hell no! by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    and how many links did you shift-click on before you noticed you shouldn't be doing that mmmmm???
    Who shift-clicks these days? I control-click or middle-click all my links. Extra tabs are a heck of a lot easier on the desktop than extra windows. You aren't one of those poncey IE users, are you?

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Shift-click? Hell no! by daveb · · Score: 0

      [sigh] no - i always ctrl-click myself but I wanted to avoid the IE newbies wondering what the hell i was talking about

  64. Sarcasm works badly over the Internet by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    There should have been emoticons or something similar to indicate that I was joking. IRL, I'd have rendered that in a bad hick accent and I probably ought to have done something like that here. *wry grin* The cause of flamewars, that sort of thing is.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.