Yeah? And if you're suspected of orchestrating an anthrax attack, your browser history probably will (and should) be used as evidence of your guilt.
I disagree "anthrax" on its own is just a simple word he could have been looking for symptoms or effects theres no proof of intent anywhere there
also how can they justify useing search history as evidence when they cant even prove who was sitting at the computer at the time?
How awful is it that detectives were able to discover that her husband searched for information on the exact thing that killed her shortly before her death, along with other methods of killing someone. On top of that he attempted to delete traces of it. This is an invasion of piracy.
Normally in murder cases the significant other of the victim is the primary suspect. As such I would assume (Didn't RTFA so not sure if there is more detail) that it was pretty easy to get a warrant for his house, computer, bank statements, etc. etc.
he consented to letting them look so a warrant was unnessicary
hi i am a 16 year old kid who learnt to play at the age of 8.... i learnt by my dad teaching me the basic rules then playing against real people (useing an internet chess program) i found that i learnt more off the net than i did off a computerised program. so after you have taught your kid the basic rules you might want to set up something like yahoo or something:-)
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah? And if you're suspected of orchestrating an anthrax attack, your browser history probably will (and should) be used as evidence of your guilt.
I disagree "anthrax" on its own is just a simple word he could have been looking for symptoms or effects theres no proof of intent anywhere there also how can they justify useing search history as evidence when they cant even prove who was sitting at the computer at the time?
How awful is it that detectives were able to discover that her husband searched for information on the exact thing that killed her shortly before her death, along with other methods of killing someone. On top of that he attempted to delete traces of it. This is an invasion of piracy.
Normally in murder cases the significant other of the victim is the primary suspect. As such I would assume (Didn't RTFA so not sure if there is more detail) that it was pretty easy to get a warrant for his house, computer, bank statements, etc. etc.
he consented to letting them look so a warrant was unnessicary
there is a linux chess game (cant rember name of it ..) witch lets you play real people but it does not have a chat function
hi i am a 16 year old kid who learnt to play at the age of 8 .... i learnt by my dad teaching me the basic rules then playing against real people (useing an internet chess program) i found that i learnt more off the net than i did off a computerised program. so after you have taught your kid the basic rules you might want to set up something like yahoo or something :-)