There's nothing unlawful about it dumbass. Twits like you use the "I paid for the room so now it's my home" logic to justify your insane behaviour. Well in the case of the guy who was assigned an already occupied room, he also paid for that room. So now what? It's both his home and yours? If he walks in and finds the room already occupied, he can shoot you for being in his room? You two can have yourselves a nice little shootout to figure out who gets to keep the room?
Use your fucking head. I'm no fan of overly restrictive gun laws but when I hear maniacs like you talk about these things I start to think that the gun-control side might have some decent points.
There is not convincing evidence of carcinogenic effects in animals. They're simply wrong about that, and, as such, have obviously misclassified it.
That said, group 2a also involves "shift work" as a possible carcinogen. I would love to see what kind of shift work their laboratory animals were doing.
"Safe" is relative. Water is safe to spray on your kids, but that doesn't mean that water can't kill you. Salt and vinegar are both potentially harmful, but you feed them to your children.
The research on DDT suggest some possible risk but there's no conclusive evidence of harm at normal exposure levels, and the benefits generally far outweigh the risks. Like with nay other substance it's best to use it only when needed, and take proper safety precautions, but I would have no qualms about spraying it on children when needed.
That "citation" is a crappy article about some idiots who - when they couldn't prove that glyphosate itself was dangerous - instead tested one of the additives. That additive is essentially soap.
That's right, these utter morons put soap on a bunch of cells in a Petri dish and then yelled "OMG this shit kills cells in a Petri dish!"
Yes, we know that soap kills cells in a Petri dish. We've known that for a long, long time. It tells us absolutely nothing about the safety of glyphosate, or of roundup.
It is. DDT was banned because it was linked to a decline in bird populations, not because of harm to humans.
Ditto agent orange
Why would you spray agent orange on children? It's an herbicide. Unless your kids name is Herb, you're just wasting money.
Anyway, agent orange on it's own isn't harmful to humans. The issue with the batches used was that they were contaminated with TCDD. And it was those eeeeevil scientists who discovered and pointed out the contamination issue.
Ditto morning sickness pills
Again, not sure why you're giving these to kids. Additionally, I'm not sure what you think the problem here is.
Ditto burning people at stake since they knew the Earth is flat
If you think that scientists were burning people at the stake, or claiming that the world is flat, you are one seriously deluded individual.
Scientists are good/useful but they operate best at theoretical level and need to be super super super careful before proceeding to anything beyond that, and that is not happening all the time
Whereas you operate at the "I'm just gonna make shit up" level, and think that this somehow makes you better than scientists.
The link is the same link you find between water and cancer: some people who use it also happen to get cancer. Idiots think that this is somehow significant.
I'm sure Monsanto has lots of money to fund a study aiming to prove that glyphosate doesn't cause cancer.
You can never prove that something doesn't cause cancer. That's not how science works. All you can do is try to prove that it DOES cause cancer, and repeatedly fail. Which is what has happened every time anyone has tested it.
Ah, I see. I misunderstood your objection due to the weird phrasing of the second bit (couldn't figure out wtf an "all n gangster" was supposed to be).
Yep, you're right, you probably wouldn't be allowed to record the actual drop. You could still do it (you can get tiny cameras disguised as pens if you really want to be sneaky) but it would be more difficult than filming the actual filling out of the ballot. May as well save yourself the hassle and sell your vote by mail.
The ruler form factor is supposed to be 0.33 inches thick. That's 8.3mm.
A 2.5" drive varies in thickness. Laptop drives are typically 9.5mm, however drives are made in thicknesses up to 15mm. Either way the new form factor is definitely thinner.
To make it a ruler, all I have to do is cut it with a bandsaw into three strips and glue them all together. That shouldn't change the surface area so I don't see how it affects cooling.
.... not sure if clueless or trolling...
If you're actually serious, go cut a block of wood into three pieces instead. Measure the total surface area before you cut, then measure the total surface area of the three pieces laid end to end. Then marvel at the magic of geometry.
Right, they're going to search you before you step into the voting booth.
OK, OK, you live in some weird place that does strip searches before elections. No problem. Most places allow voting by mail. Get the special ballot, sit down with your gangster pall, fill it out, and have him mail it out for you. Problem solved.
It's odd that you don't see that it would still be the same study. Men survive more than women if the doctor is male, and women survive more than men if the doctor is female.
If you had bothered to read all the way too the 4th sentence of the summary, you would have seen this:
It may also be that female doctors do a better job than their male counterparts. "In the new study everyone was more likely to survive if they saw a female physician, and a study published last year [...] indicated all patients of female physicians had lower mortality and hospital readmission rates," reports Scientific American
But why actually read what you're commenting on, right? Total waste of time.
There's plenty for both party's fanatics to be butt-hurt about, I guess you just decided to pick one.
Judging by the fact that I got modded "troll" while the jackass who couldn't even be bothered to read the fucking summary got modded "+5 insightful", I guess we know which fanatics managed to get their grubby little mitts on mod points today.
I'm aware of all this; the passwords I actually want/need to remember are all composed of at least 4 words, in at least two different languages. However the vast majority of my passwords (especially the ones I rarely have to type) are random alphanumeric strings stored in an encrypted container.
Why? Because I have upwards of 100 accounts I've signed up for over the years, and I do not reuse passwords. No matter how "easy to remember" I might make them there's no way I'm memorising more than a dozen passwords, let alone 100+.
This breaks WPA2-PSK by making attacks trivial to do
No, it doesn't; it merely makes it more vulnerable for users who aren't following good password guidelines (which, admittedly, is most of them).
WPA2 supports a maximum password length of 64 characters; if your target is using a password of sufficient complexity then the attack is going to be impossible rather than trivial.
Slashdot Mirror
There's nothing unlawful about it dumbass. Twits like you use the "I paid for the room so now it's my home" logic to justify your insane behaviour. Well in the case of the guy who was assigned an already occupied room, he also paid for that room. So now what? It's both his home and yours? If he walks in and finds the room already occupied, he can shoot you for being in his room? You two can have yourselves a nice little shootout to figure out who gets to keep the room?
Use your fucking head. I'm no fan of overly restrictive gun laws but when I hear maniacs like you talk about these things I start to think that the gun-control side might have some decent points.
There is not convincing evidence of carcinogenic effects in animals. They're simply wrong about that, and, as such, have obviously misclassified it.
That said, group 2a also involves "shift work" as a possible carcinogen. I would love to see what kind of shift work their laboratory animals were doing.
"Safe" is relative. Water is safe to spray on your kids, but that doesn't mean that water can't kill you. Salt and vinegar are both potentially harmful, but you feed them to your children.
The research on DDT suggest some possible risk but there's no conclusive evidence of harm at normal exposure levels, and the benefits generally far outweigh the risks. Like with nay other substance it's best to use it only when needed, and take proper safety precautions, but I would have no qualms about spraying it on children when needed.
According to that link, nothing whatsoever. We are not talking about dumping high-level waste here.
It would be valid, yes. But since no such link has been demonstrated, my comparison is entirely valid.
We should kill the guy who killed Ian!
Oh ... wait ...
It has been scientifically proven through Monsantos own documents which is how they lost in court.
No, it hasn't.
The EU has already banned it
No, it hasn't. Last november the EU renewed the glyphosate license for 5 more years. You're just making shit up.
and here is a citation: https://www.scientificamerican...
That "citation" is a crappy article about some idiots who - when they couldn't prove that glyphosate itself was dangerous - instead tested one of the additives. That additive is essentially soap.
That's right, these utter morons put soap on a bunch of cells in a Petri dish and then yelled "OMG this shit kills cells in a Petri dish!"
Yes, we know that soap kills cells in a Petri dish. We've known that for a long, long time. It tells us absolutely nothing about the safety of glyphosate, or of roundup.
The EU has not banned glyphosate. In fact they just relicensed it last November for another 5 years
Scientists claimed DDT is safe to spray on kids
It is. DDT was banned because it was linked to a decline in bird populations, not because of harm to humans.
Ditto agent orange
Why would you spray agent orange on children? It's an herbicide. Unless your kids name is Herb, you're just wasting money.
Anyway, agent orange on it's own isn't harmful to humans. The issue with the batches used was that they were contaminated with TCDD. And it was those eeeeevil scientists who discovered and pointed out the contamination issue.
Ditto morning sickness pills
Again, not sure why you're giving these to kids. Additionally, I'm not sure what you think the problem here is.
Ditto burning people at stake since they knew the Earth is flat
If you think that scientists were burning people at the stake, or claiming that the world is flat, you are one seriously deluded individual.
Scientists are good/useful but they operate best at theoretical level and need to be super super super careful before proceeding to anything beyond that, and that is not happening all the time
Whereas you operate at the "I'm just gonna make shit up" level, and think that this somehow makes you better than scientists.
The link is the same link you find between water and cancer: some people who use it also happen to get cancer. Idiots think that this is somehow significant.
I'm sure Monsanto has lots of money to fund a study aiming to prove that glyphosate doesn't cause cancer.
You can never prove that something doesn't cause cancer. That's not how science works. All you can do is try to prove that it DOES cause cancer, and repeatedly fail. Which is what has happened every time anyone has tested it.
Ah, I see. I misunderstood your objection due to the weird phrasing of the second bit (couldn't figure out wtf an "all n gangster" was supposed to be).
Yep, you're right, you probably wouldn't be allowed to record the actual drop. You could still do it (you can get tiny cameras disguised as pens if you really want to be sneaky) but it would be more difficult than filming the actual filling out of the ballot. May as well save yourself the hassle and sell your vote by mail.
Yes that idea would work. Glad I got you to think about it a bit, instead of the nonsense you wrote the first time.
I like how you keep insisting that stuff you don't understand is nonsense. It's adorable.
But what place allows you to secretly put a ballot into the ballot box without anyone looking.?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...
Oh, I see. Yes, it's honest confusion.
The ruler form factor is supposed to be 0.33 inches thick. That's 8.3mm.
A 2.5" drive varies in thickness. Laptop drives are typically 9.5mm, however drives are made in thicknesses up to 15mm. Either way the new form factor is definitely thinner.
To make it a ruler, all I have to do is cut it with a bandsaw into three strips and glue them all together. That shouldn't change the surface area so I don't see how it affects cooling.
.... not sure if clueless or trolling ...
If you're actually serious, go cut a block of wood into three pieces instead. Measure the total surface area before you cut, then measure the total surface area of the three pieces laid end to end. Then marvel at the magic of geometry.
Right, they're going to search you before you step into the voting booth.
OK, OK, you live in some weird place that does strip searches before elections. No problem. Most places allow voting by mail. Get the special ballot, sit down with your gangster pall, fill it out, and have him mail it out for you. Problem solved.
With the paper ballot system, I cannot sell my vote because the gangster has no way to know I actually vote the way he wants to pay for.
Sure you can. Everyone has a smartphone these days. You use it to record a short video of yourself filling out the ballot and putting it in the box.
It's odd that you don't see that it would still be the same study. Men survive more than women if the doctor is male, and women survive more than men if the doctor is female.
If you had bothered to read all the way too the 4th sentence of the summary, you would have seen this:
It may also be that female doctors do a better job than their male counterparts. "In the new study everyone was more likely to survive if they saw a female physician, and a study published last year [...] indicated all patients of female physicians had lower mortality and hospital readmission rates," reports Scientific American
But why actually read what you're commenting on, right? Total waste of time.
There's plenty for both party's fanatics to be butt-hurt about, I guess you just decided to pick one.
Judging by the fact that I got modded "troll" while the jackass who couldn't even be bothered to read the fucking summary got modded "+5 insightful", I guess we know which fanatics managed to get their grubby little mitts on mod points today.
I'm aware of all this; the passwords I actually want/need to remember are all composed of at least 4 words, in at least two different languages. However the vast majority of my passwords (especially the ones I rarely have to type) are random alphanumeric strings stored in an encrypted container.
Why? Because I have upwards of 100 accounts I've signed up for over the years, and I do not reuse passwords. No matter how "easy to remember" I might make them there's no way I'm memorising more than a dozen passwords, let alone 100+.
Yes.
It's no different than brute forcing any other 64 bit AES key. Hundreds of years using a single computer.
This breaks WPA2-PSK by making attacks trivial to do
No, it doesn't; it merely makes it more vulnerable for users who aren't following good password guidelines (which, admittedly, is most of them).
WPA2 supports a maximum password length of 64 characters; if your target is using a password of sufficient complexity then the attack is going to be impossible rather than trivial.
That's what a guest network is for. Enable it when they show up, disable it when they go away.
Just imagine the SJW outrage if the study had pointed in the opposite direction, with male doctors having better outcomes.
I see that THEY got to you ...