Not only do we need apps and programs that monitor bandwidth being provided to different websites by service providers, but we also need a website dedicated to registering and amalgamating all such statistics in an open forum that automatically ranks politicians with respect to what they are going to do about it to increase speeds. Only when one can make political contributions and votes dry up at the first hint of bad news, will anything really change for the better.
So that the 60% of the money to pay teachers can instead go to charter school administrators, whose salaries vault into the 7 figure range. Clearly, one of the advantages of being a not-for-profit charter, just like the NFL.
As everyone knows that most parents have a far better understanding of differential equations and other mathematics skills than do math teachers. Besides, parents always have Fox News to rely on if they are weak on subjects such as history, social studies, as well as how to prepare their children for a reverse mortgage and life in the unemployment line.
especially in a highly dynamic technological society, where all parents have an innately excellent grasp of differential equations and the advanced mathematics needed to be competitive in the marketplace.
In order to secure desires of the owner's of Walmart concerning how education is to be granted in the USA, everyone should accept higher prices at WalMart. Its not as if you have a choice in the matter anyway.
There is very little basic research in a rocket launching pad unless it likely to be used for space exploration, which evidently this boondoggle is not, which is why NASA has been trying to kill it for years now but MS politicians keep preventing US taxpayers from saving money. (and Yes, I live in MIssissippi).
"Translated, it essentially means that if there is no significant warming for 17 year periods we need to start searching for the real causes and not just sink money in to finding more human causes to blame. "
Translated your quote raises the need to answer the one question that those who deny that anthropomorphic global climate change is real refuse to ever address:
If the world has not been "significantly warming" in the past 17 years, why are all the world's glaciers and reservoirs of permanent ice continuing to melt simultaneously during this very same period at ever more rapid rates?
If the science behind the theory of "no global warming" is correct, why are those who support such a theory unable or unwilling to answer this question?
One of the reasons China has become the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases is that they produce a substantial proportion of products bought and sold in the US and the rest of the world. They are now coming to grips with the fact that that economic model comes with a very high environmental price tag that is injurious to their population. The world is actually a lot more complicated than you think and there is plenty of "guilt" to go around.
and the radical right wants air pollution in the US to return to the standards now seen in China or in the UK at the onset of the industrial revolution and for global mean temperatures to continue to rise to satisfy the greed of the most extreme capitalists in the 0.01%.
Human adaptability is over hyped. Fact is that most humans that ever lived are either now dead or soon will be. They hardly adapted. Fact is that in our short lifetimes, some people adapt to some degree, but most die not having adapted sufficiently. The capacity to adapt is not infinitely plastic. There are very distinct limits. This reality will be made readily apparent to all in the relatively near future as planet Earth continues to warm at an increasing rate and now faster than it has in more than in the past 40,000,000 years.
"in the mean time, the climate scientists studying the phenomena got trapped in ice?"
"The arctic disappears but the antarctic grows and the explanation is *global* warming?"
You suggest erroneously that the ice trapping a Russian vessel in the antarctic was caused by cooler conditions leading to more ice formation. In reality the trapping occurred because sea ice was blown by the wind trapping the vessel during the antarctic summer. There is abundant evidence that the antarctic, both East and West, is also melting, which is one of the reasons there is more sea ice, since when glaciers calve at greater rates there is more floating ice. Indeed the grounding line for the Pine Island glacier is rapidly advancing inland at rates not previously recorded in recent geological times.
"I would also like to see the models be more open and transparent."
The code for many models are openly available on the internet. Further the methods are readily available in the primary literature. The problem the general public faces is not that the code is being hidden or that somehow scientists have conspired to keep their methods secret, but rather that most people would find the abundant ordinary and partial differential equations too intimidating to fathom, much less the numerical methods employed to solve them.
However, all that aside there remains one important question that those denying anthropogenic global warming driven by the accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and oceans never want to answer and in fact, are unable to answer:
If the planet is not getting warmer, why are all the world's glaciers and reservoirs of permanent ice on the planet shrinking at ever increasing rates simultaneously?
Newton had his mind made up about gravity in the 1600's. Would anyone seriously argue that Newton had nothing to contribute concerning how we think about gravity?
Most science is evolutionary rather than revolutionary. The basic idea behind carbon dioxide being a greenhouse gas is now several hundred years old. Current science has refined that basic idea, but has not replaced it.
No. It makes cynics of everyone, not skeptics. It actually decreases the number of skeptics since people become convinced of their own preconceptions and stop questioning themselves.
"Californicators should desalinate sea water and stop pumping the interior of the country dry."
and be prepared to pay about 75 times more for their water than they do now because desalination is incredibly expensive and highly energy intensive. Perhaps a solution is solar powered desalination, but that will take a lot of solar cells in an environment where NIMBY is a significant impediment.
Speaking of science, perhaps since you profess knowledge you can provide an answer to the following question, which those who argue that the world is not getting warmer can not seem to ever answer.
If its not getting warmer in the past 16 years, why are all the world's glaciers continuing to recede simultaneously at what appear to be increasing rates of melting?
Forget drones. PETA should arm robotic animals and send them into the woods to return fire. Might as well make hunting a real sport. After all, only the wusses would complain, since this would finally bring a sense of real manliness to the "sport".
If this trend continues books printed on paper will become popular again as the only place one will be able to read without distraction of someone trying to coax you out of your money while you read.
Have investors sold their shares in Barnes and Noble too soon?
Slashdot Mirror
Not only do we need apps and programs that monitor bandwidth being provided to different websites by service providers, but we also need a website dedicated to registering and amalgamating all such statistics in an open forum that automatically ranks politicians with respect to what they are going to do about it to increase speeds. Only when one can make political contributions and votes dry up at the first hint of bad news, will anything really change for the better.
Is that the same Kentucky charter school that teaches intelligent design and creationism in biology class?
So that the 60% of the money to pay teachers can instead go to charter school administrators, whose salaries vault into the 7 figure range. Clearly, one of the advantages of being a not-for-profit charter, just like the NFL.
Is that the one that teaches intelligent design and creationism in biology class?
As everyone knows that most parents have a far better understanding of differential equations and other mathematics skills than do math teachers. Besides, parents always have Fox News to rely on if they are weak on subjects such as history, social studies, as well as how to prepare their children for a reverse mortgage and life in the unemployment line.
If they just increased the default font size a little and if one could more clearly mod-up posts which are actually on topic.
Who needs usenet, when we can still send smoke signals. Global warming is just a lie anyway, right?
especially in a highly dynamic technological society, where all parents have an innately excellent grasp of differential equations and the advanced mathematics needed to be competitive in the marketplace.
In order to secure desires of the owner's of Walmart concerning how education is to be granted in the USA, everyone should accept higher prices at WalMart. Its not as if you have a choice in the matter anyway.
Only if its spent on something useful and worthwhile. Its not as if had Bush and Cheney not invaded Iraq, the private sector would have.
There is very little basic research in a rocket launching pad unless it likely to be used for space exploration, which evidently this boondoggle is not, which is why NASA has been trying to kill it for years now but MS politicians keep preventing US taxpayers from saving money. (and Yes, I live in MIssissippi).
"I see nothing but deflation right now."
Evidently, this guy doesn't get a cable bill.
"Translated, it essentially means that if there is no significant warming for 17 year periods we need to start searching for the real causes and not just sink money in to finding more human causes to blame. "
Translated your quote raises the need to answer the one question that those who deny that anthropomorphic global climate change is real refuse to ever address:
If the world has not been "significantly warming" in the past 17 years, why are all the world's glaciers and reservoirs of permanent ice continuing to melt simultaneously during this very same period at ever more rapid rates?
If the science behind the theory of "no global warming" is correct, why are those who support such a theory unable or unwilling to answer this question?
One of the reasons China has become the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases is that they produce a substantial proportion of products bought and sold in the US and the rest of the world. They are now coming to grips with the fact that that economic model comes with a very high environmental price tag that is injurious to their population. The world is actually a lot more complicated than you think and there is plenty of "guilt" to go around.
and the radical right wants air pollution in the US to return to the standards now seen in China or in the UK at the onset of the industrial revolution and for global mean temperatures to continue to rise to satisfy the greed of the most extreme capitalists in the 0.01%.
Human adaptability is over hyped. Fact is that most humans that ever lived are either now dead or soon will be. They hardly adapted. Fact is that in our short lifetimes, some people adapt to some degree, but most die not having adapted sufficiently. The capacity to adapt is not infinitely plastic. There are very distinct limits. This reality will be made readily apparent to all in the relatively near future as planet Earth continues to warm at an increasing rate and now faster than it has in more than in the past 40,000,000 years.
"in the mean time, the climate scientists studying the phenomena got trapped in ice?"
"The arctic disappears but the antarctic grows and the explanation is *global* warming?"
You suggest erroneously that the ice trapping a Russian vessel in the antarctic was caused by cooler conditions leading to more ice formation. In reality the trapping occurred because sea ice was blown by the wind trapping the vessel during the antarctic summer. There is abundant evidence that the antarctic, both East and West, is also melting, which is one of the reasons there is more sea ice, since when glaciers calve at greater rates there is more floating ice. Indeed the grounding line for the Pine Island glacier is rapidly advancing inland at rates not previously recorded in recent geological times.
"I would also like to see the models be more open and transparent."
The code for many models are openly available on the internet. Further the methods are readily available in the primary literature. The problem the general public faces is not that the code is being hidden or that somehow scientists have conspired to keep their methods secret, but rather that most people would find the abundant ordinary and partial differential equations too intimidating to fathom, much less the numerical methods employed to solve them.
However, all that aside there remains one important question that those denying anthropogenic global warming driven by the accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and oceans never want to answer and in fact, are unable to answer:
If the planet is not getting warmer, why are all the world's glaciers and reservoirs of permanent ice on the planet shrinking at ever increasing rates simultaneously?
Newton had his mind made up about gravity in the 1600's. Would anyone seriously argue that Newton had nothing to contribute concerning how we think about gravity?
Most science is evolutionary rather than revolutionary. The basic idea behind carbon dioxide being a greenhouse gas is now several hundred years old. Current science has refined that basic idea, but has not replaced it.
"Politics. Makes skeptics of everyone."
No. It makes cynics of everyone, not skeptics. It actually decreases the number of skeptics since people become convinced of their own preconceptions and stop questioning themselves.
"Californicators should desalinate sea water and stop pumping the interior of the country dry."
and be prepared to pay about 75 times more for their water than they do now because desalination is incredibly expensive and highly energy intensive. Perhaps a solution is solar powered desalination, but that will take a lot of solar cells in an environment where NIMBY is a significant impediment.
Speaking of science, perhaps since you profess knowledge you can provide an answer to the following question, which those who argue that the world is not getting warmer can not seem to ever answer.
If its not getting warmer in the past 16 years, why are all the world's glaciers continuing to recede simultaneously at what appear to be increasing rates of melting?
Forget drones. PETA should arm robotic animals and send them into the woods to return fire. Might as well make hunting a real sport. After all, only the wusses would complain, since this would finally bring a sense of real manliness to the "sport".
If this trend continues books printed on paper will become popular again as the only place one will be able to read without distraction of someone trying to coax you out of your money while you read.
Have investors sold their shares in Barnes and Noble too soon?
At the present rate of planetary warming, no one will remember humans in a few hundred years anyway.