No. If tests X, Y, and Z are similar to each other, but not to test A; then the probability of X triggering the same effect that Z does is greater than it triggering the same effect that A does.
Overall exercise is strongly correlated with markedly lower mortality rates
Nobody I know disputes that moderate exercise is better than no exercise.
Is there a point at which there is too much of a good thing? Sure, but most people will never get close.
Not necessarily. If your job or hobby is strenuous or excessive, it may trigger the down-sides of excess.
I agree that more data and study is needed to really settle it. But, there are multiple hints that the benefits may roughly resemble a bell-shaped curve per exercise level and benefits.
I'd personally like to see a risk ranking/scoring system, similar to the restaurant health & safety inspection grades that CA also has. If coffee is a low risk, it will be graded as such. (Heavy cooking does introduce carcinogens into food in general. The real question whether it's significant or not.)
A labeling law was passed by CA voters, and then the technology got better at detecting potential problems. The law probably needs tuning, like everything else subject to scientific and technological progress. Adjust and move on instead of make it into a red-vs-blue troll-war.
In the short term one often loses weight on a diet simply because changing the pattern your body is used to puts it into minor shock. But in the longer run it adjusts and things go back to "normal" (overweight). Longer-term studies almost always confirm this. For one, if your food intake decreases, your metabolism also slows down to match, making it an uphill battle.
Exercise is a better route, but is time-consuming. Countries that rely heavily on walking too and from public transportation instead of cars often have notably healthier populations. One would have to exercise roughly an hour a day to match that, and split it into roughly 2 sessions. That's a lot of time to sacrifice. You may live 5 years longer, but lose that total difference exercising.
Slashdot Mirror
Orange into orange? Can't be good.
No. If tests X, Y, and Z are similar to each other, but not to test A; then the probability of X triggering the same effect that Z does is greater than it triggering the same effect that A does.
We slashdot virgins get nervous when volcanos open up.
But that's already tested: I've made hundreds of bad/trolly posts before, without ending Earth.
Fine, you can put my poor documentation event on my permanent record.
Kind of hard to fit a couch into a casket.
Nobody I know disputes that moderate exercise is better than no exercise.
Not necessarily. If your job or hobby is strenuous or excessive, it may trigger the down-sides of excess.
I agree that more data and study is needed to really settle it. But, there are multiple hints that the benefits may roughly resemble a bell-shaped curve per exercise level and benefits.
What if this triggers some run-away process or black hole that destroys our planet?
Slim chance, I agree, but not zero.
https://globalnews.ca/news/381...
That's fine; let democracy do what it will.
I'd personally like to see a risk ranking/scoring system, similar to the restaurant health & safety inspection grades that CA also has. If coffee is a low risk, it will be graded as such. (Heavy cooking does introduce carcinogens into food in general. The real question whether it's significant or not.)
A labeling law was passed by CA voters, and then the technology got better at detecting potential problems. The law probably needs tuning, like everything else subject to scientific and technological progress. Adjust and move on instead of make it into a red-vs-blue troll-war.
Those who exercise heavily, such as lots of running and weight lifting, even as just a hobby, also tend to die early.
There's a sweet spot in the middle that is the ideal.
It says, "Null; Delete all tables, no-confirm;"
"Lose Privacy & Rights"
At least that's the end result.
Classify this!
So they know about my turtle porn all the way down?
Professional hackers have been hacked, and their recursive hacking algorithm, known as GrndH0gDai, was recursively hacked and stolen.
Oops, it's singular, ain't it? I usually use Slashcoin.
For 300 bitcoins I'll tell you how much.
I plan to fuck a supermodel. Doesn't mean I'll succeed.
Beware of billionaires bearing "free" gifts.
Using logic and math on Trump is like buying Nike gift certificates for fish.
In the short term one often loses weight on a diet simply because changing the pattern your body is used to puts it into minor shock. But in the longer run it adjusts and things go back to "normal" (overweight). Longer-term studies almost always confirm this. For one, if your food intake decreases, your metabolism also slows down to match, making it an uphill battle.
Exercise is a better route, but is time-consuming. Countries that rely heavily on walking too and from public transportation instead of cars often have notably healthier populations. One would have to exercise roughly an hour a day to match that, and split it into roughly 2 sessions. That's a lot of time to sacrifice. You may live 5 years longer, but lose that total difference exercising.
The potential fail-level on both security and UI/UX is grand enough to put this in the top running for Worst Tech Idea of the Year.
I bet the PHB's patted themselves on the back as a way to "make our wonderful ads stand out from the crowd", and gave each other raises. Sick.
Yes, it runs malware perfectly.