Slashdot Mirror


User: jmpareja

jmpareja's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
15
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 15

  1. Re:Still the cheaper option? on Spirit Stuck In Soft Soil On Mars · · Score: 0

    A new rover with the recently invented instruments I hope. And maybe new experiments. Finding life in Mars, $4million/rover/year. Introducing life on mars, priceless.

  2. Re:Palin? on Is Your IM Buddy Really a Computer? · · Score: 0

    Or it may be Sarah Palin herself...

  3. Re:One sided story on Are Quirky Developers Brilliant Or Dangerous? · · Score: 0

    Very true. And instead of finding faults of this 'Josh', management should look at themselves because they are part of the problem. I believe in small sub-groups and code ownership in software projects. Only then you can truly have a 'team' in software development.

  4. Re:Amazing on Are Quirky Developers Brilliant Or Dangerous? · · Score: 0

    I totally agree with you. That's the first thing that came to my mind that the poster is just plain jealous that he doesn't have the skills. As for me, when I meet people like 'Josh', I try to learn and better my self. Make this person my bar and realize that even after the many software you have written, I still can learn more.

  5. Re:I'd say most are less extreme on Are Quirky Developers Brilliant Or Dangerous? · · Score: 0

    Depends really on the type of software you write. Sometimes 'mediocre' just wouldn't do. :-) And also, I think these bad side is not the rule for really brilliant coders, but the exception. Most just ignore the noise and let their work do the talking.

  6. Re:I hate it when people venerate/elevate scumbags on Interview With an Adware Author · · Score: 0

    I think they call it a 'second chance'.. much like ex-convicts should have also, provided they have paid for those previous mistakes.

  7. Re:Apple is behind it! on Apple Believes Someone Is Behind Psystar · · Score: 0

    So you mean they will be suing themselves because they are looking for the people behind Psystar... doesn't make sense to me. :-)

  8. Re:Does anyone use this OS any more? on Microsoft's "Dead Cow" Patch Was 7 Years In the Making · · Score: 0

    It's not all about uptime. Have you heard about _SECURITY_?

  9. Re:lite on Why Mozilla Is Committed To Using Gecko · · Score: 0

    So are you saying that threads are not necessary? With the browser as probably one of the key applications in the internet, I think it should make use of parallel processing. Esp. because we are and will be using multi-core systems.

  10. Re:Huh? on Debian win32-loader Goes Official · · Score: 0

    Then how is it different from virtualization software like vmware, virtualbox, etc..?

  11. Re:Au contraire on How to Keep America Competitive · · Score: 0

    I think it is a problem for American companies to compete with Chinese/Indian/Philippine companies which pays very very less compared to American salaries for a job which can be done if not better, of the same quality as the American software. :-)

  12. Re:not likely on Congressman Calls for Arrest of Security Researcher · · Score: 0

    I agree. Because these people are not doing their jobs right. And what's worse, they hate the people who can expose these shortcomings. Much like the full-disclosure issue, it puts some pressure on responsible people to do their jobs right.

  13. Re:I havn't seen any Linux in China on IBM's Interest in Red Flag Linux · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Most red flags are probably used in Chinese football.

  14. Re:Coral Cache Link on A Look at GNOME 2.14 · · Score: 1

    that is so funny. :) i can't see their site. it's been /.ed.

  15. Re:His project needs an architect on Shuttleworth on Open Source Development · · Score: 1

    Or he may have hired not-so-experienced developers. Clearly with the direction of not re-using available code shows probably inexperience. Sotware development, either open-source or not should have a drafted schedules/release cycles to follow. The advantage of open-source is that there is little or no constraint with regards to marketing or shipping the product compared to proprietary.