so because some people cant afford XX, you want to take XX away from everyone. You clearly do not understand how things are supposed to work in america
so does that mean we shouldnt vote on it? the only reason to say yes to that question is to protect the president from saying he actually did something
oh I understand how it works. We do have one branch of congress who at least claim to want to cut spending, We have another branch who controls the vote in the senate who refuses to even bring the bills up for a vote. We have a president who runs around doing whatever he wants. I do in fact blame congress, both branches for not holding the president accountable. But when we have a president who says we need to raise the ceiling, instead of saying we need to learn to budget and cut spending, hes just as much if not more of the problem
I dont remember any libertarians wanting the cable to be considered anything other than dumb pipes to begin with. I love how people on slashdot love to tell others what they believe before they get a chance to say anything about it....
Actually the "teabaggers" as you put it were not happy with bush either. You need to remember that the tea party happened not as a an anti obama group but as an anti establishment group. They were just a smuch again the mccains and romneys and bushes as they are the democrats. So as the democrats like to remind me when I mention they were the ones who were pro slavery and pro jim crow, things change. The current republicans (IE anyone elected since 2006 or so) are NOT the same people that supported bush
How much money was spent the year before XXX IF the money spent this year is XXX +.001 = THAN more spending is happening. Simple as that.
Or we can look at it the other way. We keep needing to increase the debt celing, something obama called unamerican...every other year, as such spending is going up.
the only people who think spending is going down are the types you decribe using fuzzy math
We have NO proof AT ALL that racism has anything to do with anything... but we also dont have any proof that racism is not a factor... therefore OMG RACISM!!!!
Im sorry but if you cannot bring me hardcore proof that members of the senate or congress are opposing obama simply because of race, people need to stop with the bullshit accusations. the last openly racist person in congress was a democrat (robert byrd from the KKK)
Im actually interested as im looking into starting a campaign where i hope to get similar numbers. You been here long enough, dont let the trolls get to you. it seems right now everyone is skeptical about everything
I keep hearing about this assumed racism but I hardly ever see it, not for how often it is thrown out there, and not by anyone who actually matters. Everytime I turn on MSNBC we have al sharpton telling us we are all racists if we dont agree with obama.
Please show me one shred of legislation that has been blocked "because hes black" and not because the policy was bad to begin with, I honestly have not seen that one time yet
oh, so you were saying that they should have stuck with base 10? I dont feel like doing the math but I would wager the address would have to be more than just 123.123.123.123.123 to match the numbers available with the numbers as they are with hex. I just dont see the address space but im not trying to do the math right now. Yes base 10 would be much easier for the majority of people to deal with but not if its something like 123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123
true, but the problem comes with the boy who cried wolf. I remember when I was getting my CCNA back in 2001, They told us that IP4 was doomed in the next 3-5 everything would be IP 6
you do understand that the housing collapse was exactly because fannie and freddie got involved, and the laws about sub prime lending correct? There is no reason someone who makes 20 grand a year should be given a 500K loan for a McMansion, yet it happened for quite a number of years.
I'm in a neighborhood that is very smart, but very poor. As an example, we voted for Obama by more than 80% in the last election
Smart is not the word I would use for that....
so because some people cant afford XX, you want to take XX away from everyone. You clearly do not understand how things are supposed to work in america
so does that mean we shouldnt vote on it? the only reason to say yes to that question is to protect the president from saying he actually did something
oh I understand how it works. We do have one branch of congress who at least claim to want to cut spending, We have another branch who controls the vote in the senate who refuses to even bring the bills up for a vote. We have a president who runs around doing whatever he wants. I do in fact blame congress, both branches for not holding the president accountable. But when we have a president who says we need to raise the ceiling, instead of saying we need to learn to budget and cut spending, hes just as much if not more of the problem
wow, how well thought out and reasoned. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter with such insightful comments like that!
While I do agree with what you are saying, I was mainly just pointing out the fact that he is once again full of shit
I dont remember any libertarians wanting the cable to be considered anything other than dumb pipes to begin with. I love how people on slashdot love to tell others what they believe before they get a chance to say anything about it....
rand paul would be a better president than hillary any day of the week so no, its not better than anything the republicans have
Actually the "teabaggers" as you put it were not happy with bush either. You need to remember that the tea party happened not as a an anti obama group but as an anti establishment group. They were just a smuch again the mccains and romneys and bushes as they are the democrats. So as the democrats like to remind me when I mention they were the ones who were pro slavery and pro jim crow, things change. The current republicans (IE anyone elected since 2006 or so) are NOT the same people that supported bush
just the other day he said no plain english "if congress doesnt act, I will do everything I can to go around it"
YET when it comes to doing things we actually want him to do he gives us BS speak
I do use real reason, its very simple to me
.001 = THAN more spending is happening. Simple as that.
How much money was spent the year before XXX IF the money spent this year is XXX +
Or we can look at it the other way. We keep needing to increase the debt celing, something obama called unamerican...every other year, as such spending is going up.
the only people who think spending is going down are the types you decribe using fuzzy math
Except for congress has passed 1 budget in the past 5 years.
so to put it into simple terms
We have NO proof AT ALL that racism has anything to do with anything... but we also dont have any proof that racism is not a factor... therefore OMG RACISM!!!!
Im sorry but if you cannot bring me hardcore proof that members of the senate or congress are opposing obama simply because of race, people need to stop with the bullshit accusations. the last openly racist person in congress was a democrat (robert byrd from the KKK)
name one country today that was not taken over by other people in the past... why does everyone seem to only focus on america doing so?
Im actually interested as im looking into starting a campaign where i hope to get similar numbers. You been here long enough, dont let the trolls get to you. it seems right now everyone is skeptical about everything
so... its geocities?
and my point was that if the people cant focus on a small issue with a known solution, why should we focus on the unknown, with no known solutions?*
* If we all do just the small things, it adds up to the big things i guess is what I am trying to say
solutions that dont involve everyone living in huts.
I keep hearing about this assumed racism but I hardly ever see it, not for how often it is thrown out there, and not by anyone who actually matters. Everytime I turn on MSNBC we have al sharpton telling us we are all racists if we dont agree with obama.
Please show me one shred of legislation that has been blocked "because hes black" and not because the policy was bad to begin with, I honestly have not seen that one time yet
oh, so you were saying that they should have stuck with base 10? I dont feel like doing the math but I would wager the address would have to be more than just 123.123.123.123.123 to match the numbers available with the numbers as they are with hex. I just dont see the address space but im not trying to do the math right now. Yes base 10 would be much easier for the majority of people to deal with but not if its something like 123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123
OR, samsung simple added tablet parts to their existing digital photo frame? the photo frame was out prior to the ipad
true, but the problem comes with the boy who cried wolf. I remember when I was getting my CCNA back in 2001, They told us that IP4 was doomed in the next 3-5 everything would be IP 6
13 years laters, barely anything is IP 6
IP 6 is done in hex, not base 10, thats why it is not as user readable
ok , I will admit I was not alive in the 70s, Maybe I should have done a little more reading before making the statement I did
please dont do that apple, I really like Tesla. I dont want apple to be able to remote kill my car if i dont accept their EULA
you do understand that the housing collapse was exactly because fannie and freddie got involved, and the laws about sub prime lending correct? There is no reason someone who makes 20 grand a year should be given a 500K loan for a McMansion, yet it happened for quite a number of years.