funny, clinton seemed to do ok with a republican congress
but besides all of that, your blame the republicans tactic has nothing at all to do with him winning the award. Plain and simple he got the award when he did absolutely NOTHING to deserve it
If you really think the cost wont simply be shifted to the consumer you would have a valid argument. But the sad truth is that when corp taxes go up, prices go up.
How about instead of taxing the company you simply tax the finished goods???
business should collect taxes, not pay them (because they never do the costs get factored into price)
the thing is though MY solution would cover everyone now, and offend no one. it literally is a win win for all. instead of chipping away at it one step at a time, lets make it crumble, and make it equal for all
so the government can enforce a contract between consenting adults. why cap it with only 2? why not treat it more as an incorporation in the eyes of the law???
the health concerns are gone. as it is its not "wife" or "husband" its "family" when I was in the hospital i had no less than 30 people come visit me over a few days, friends, family etc. Yes I wasnt ICU but still.
This is one of those things that when you break it down you understand the government should not be involved in whether or not someone can visit you in the hospital. Thats some serious micro management.
Let the hospitals set the rules based on the risks involved in letting visitors in to see a sick patient.
ok.... so whats the issue here? why SHOULDNT the entire town be allowed to visit you in the hospital if you are sick and they want to? why should they have to be "married" to do that? why cant I, the sick person in the hospital simply grant those rights to ANYONE???
you are making a bigger problem out of it, for what reason I dont know
all the more reason to remove all restrictions and let it be what it is, a contract. one that can be entered by anyone, for any reason (in the eyes of the government) there is no reason to double down when the simple solution is to remove the barriers for everyone
so this state defined contract should be open to all, not just 1 man and 1 woman, or 1 woman and 1 woman, or 1 man and 1 man is all im getting it. if we want true equality that would be the right move
Slashdot Mirror
and you understand that government mandated loans drove the cost of those schools up right?
for now....
not to mention that he had the house and senate at the time he got the award, and still nothing worthy
and look at how well that turned out.....
funny, clinton seemed to do ok with a republican congress
but besides all of that, your blame the republicans tactic has nothing at all to do with him winning the award. Plain and simple he got the award when he did absolutely NOTHING to deserve it
you get the prize for accomplishments (should anyway) not wishes and dreams
the prize was sullied before then, but yeah that pretty much killed it
what is there to change? You are making things to complicated
The law could very simply state (all laws regarding marriage are null and void. from this day forward the laws are as follows....
things are only hard because people like you seem to keep them that way
smh
why is it long past due that america taxes delivered items??
If you really think the cost wont simply be shifted to the consumer you would have a valid argument. But the sad truth is that when corp taxes go up, prices go up.
How about instead of taxing the company you simply tax the finished goods???
business should collect taxes, not pay them (because they never do the costs get factored into price)
exactly. being married has nothing to do with the argument the other poster is trying to make
the thing is though MY solution would cover everyone now, and offend no one. it literally is a win win for all. instead of chipping away at it one step at a time, lets make it crumble, and make it equal for all
correct. Im not. but i dont see what that has anything to do with anything
so if the hospitals already set the rules.... how about we just keep it that way and let them set the rules for their business???
so... the simple answer is to change the law to enforce the living will above all, even the "marriage contract"
problem solved
why only 2 consenting adults though???
if the contract is written up in such a way, yes why not? it happens now (divorce)
so the government can enforce a contract between consenting adults. why cap it with only 2? why not treat it more as an incorporation in the eyes of the law???
how so?
only men and women - protected class
only single gay man and single gay man - protected class
only gay woman, and gay woman, - protected class
You are telling me that when you add 2 new classes to the equation that is it somehow fewer???
all the more reason to simply fix that problem with the law, rather then bringing in a new protected class
the health concerns are gone. as it is its not "wife" or "husband" its "family" when I was in the hospital i had no less than 30 people come visit me over a few days, friends, family etc. Yes I wasnt ICU but still.
This is one of those things that when you break it down you understand the government should not be involved in whether or not someone can visit you in the hospital. Thats some serious micro management.
Let the hospitals set the rules based on the risks involved in letting visitors in to see a sick patient.
ok.... so whats the issue here? why SHOULDNT the entire town be allowed to visit you in the hospital if you are sick and they want to? why should they have to be "married" to do that? why cant I, the sick person in the hospital simply grant those rights to ANYONE???
you are making a bigger problem out of it, for what reason I dont know
all the more reason to remove all restrictions and let it be what it is, a contract. one that can be entered by anyone, for any reason (in the eyes of the government) there is no reason to double down when the simple solution is to remove the barriers for everyone
so this state defined contract should be open to all, not just 1 man and 1 woman, or 1 woman and 1 woman, or 1 man and 1 man is all im getting it. if we want true equality that would be the right move