thats not the point i was making, and i for one am very happy to see anything at all being done to preserve these ancient artifacts (id like to see more ISIS people being killed off but thats a different topic)
I just dont quite get why this is newsworthy , or at least the 3d printer and artist part. hes making replicas, which is awesome, but not really newsworthy, people have been doing so for centuries
what do you mean "when" didnt you see all the outrage over the draw a cartoon rally from last week??? the left was saying they deserved to die for drawing a cartoon.... i mean come on
does it bother you that libertarians (or people who believe in libertarian beliefs) like him eventhough he is not a "libertarian"? Or do you dislike him because no true scotsman?
thats only income tax. he didnt say income tax he said taxes. Now add in all other deductions from gross pay, add in a sales tax of 8.25% (in NY where I live anyway) and you are paying a LOT more than 210 a month
the first part of your idea, i cant stand behind. but this part
Another option is to just tax all money transactions. Anytime money changes hands just charge 0.1% or something like that. For the poor, they'll end up paying an unintended 0.2% tax on the money they make and spend. Something like the financial sector will pay a much higher effective rate, and that is something like a third of the economy.
I support fully. I even posted it on/. a few times before. If we taxed all transactions a nickel, we could raise as much money as we do now, while at the same time limiting the sting of the taxes. When you include bank transactions (think all those HFT bankers) its enormous
For example, start with a lump of iron ore.
Bob digs it out of the ground, sells to Pete. Pete pays the closest to a traditional sales tax, cause the value added is the value of going from nothing to something.
Pete smelts it into iron, and sells it to Bob. Bob pays tax for the value added to the lump by turning it from a lump of ore into a lump of metal. In addition to adding in the cost of the tax paid on the lump initially.
Bob works that iron into a shovel head, and sells it to Bob. Bob pays tax for the value added by turning it from a lump of metal into a shovel head, in addition to the cost to make the iron, and the price to dig it up. (which he then uses to dig up more ore).
Slashdot Mirror
because the government is SO good at managing the things it already does. like the health care website right???
some would make the argument that the 2 are not the same. (not me, but some)
one involves the ending of a (potential) human life, the other...is drawing a cartoon....
Not really the same
im not so sure its self serving though. he has been against the patriot act forever. now he actually has a chance to do something about it.
simple solution... dont attribute it to your real name, or any acct that can be linked to your real name!
thats not the point i was making, and i for one am very happy to see anything at all being done to preserve these ancient artifacts (id like to see more ISIS people being killed off but thats a different topic)
I just dont quite get why this is newsworthy , or at least the 3d printer and artist part. hes making replicas, which is awesome, but not really newsworthy, people have been doing so for centuries
if you dont want people to know what you are doing.... dont post it online for the world to see! is it really that hard???
My question is where is the money coming from to pay for this? i want my teachers teaching, not spying
the cake is a lie
what do you mean "when" didnt you see all the outrage over the draw a cartoon rally from last week??? the left was saying they deserved to die for drawing a cartoon.... i mean come on
whats so special about making replicas??? is it because of ...with a computer!?
or get the MVP vape and your vape becomes the external charger - http://www.innokin.com/index.p....
I love this thing
difference being obama said alot of things
rand is actually doing something
hes not, and he doesnt claim to be.
does it bother you that libertarians (or people who believe in libertarian beliefs) like him eventhough he is not a "libertarian"? Or do you dislike him because no true scotsman?
they do so because they are scared of him, and rightfully so
only took 6 years, and with no help of the president, who if i remember correctly ran on killing the patriot act in 08.....
if i remember correctly, killing it was one of the things he ran on in 08 (before he, renewed it that is)
and if that happens people like rand paul will have the upper hand with the people in 2016. not that i see a problem with that in the slightest
but he wasnt being charged with it. as such, it doesnt matter
well one - we dont know if they do/did or not
second, he wasnt charged with doing so, as such in the eyes of the law, that fact should not be used in determining the penalty
so does google get charged if someone looks up (using google) a hitman?? of course not
in essence, all ross did was the same thing google does
or lena dunham
so there were no roads in america prior to the 16th amendment establishing an income tax????
thats only income tax. he didnt say income tax he said taxes. Now add in all other deductions from gross pay, add in a sales tax of 8.25% (in NY where I live anyway) and you are paying a LOT more than 210 a month
Another option is to just tax all money transactions. Anytime money changes hands just charge 0.1% or something like that. For the poor, they'll end up paying an unintended 0.2% tax on the money they make and spend. Something like the financial sector will pay a much higher effective rate, and that is something like a third of the economy.
I support fully. I even posted it on /. a few times before. If we taxed all transactions a nickel, we could raise as much money as we do now, while at the same time limiting the sting of the taxes. When you include bank transactions (think all those HFT bankers) its enormous
if true, why not just print off 100 grand for each american at the start of each year, its only money right?
and heres how it really works
For example, start with a lump of iron ore.
Bob digs it out of the ground, sells to Pete. Pete pays the closest to a traditional sales tax, cause the value added is the value of going from nothing to something. Pete smelts it into iron, and sells it to Bob.
Bob pays tax for the value added to the lump by turning it from a lump of ore into a lump of metal. In addition to adding in the cost of the tax paid on the lump initially.
Bob works that iron into a shovel head, and sells it to Bob. Bob pays tax for the value added by turning it from a lump of metal into a shovel head, in addition to the cost to make the iron, and the price to dig it up. (which he then uses to dig up more ore).