actually you dont want to use matt sheapard as your posterchild. do a little more research into him, and you will see he didnt die for the reasons the media portrayed.
i have deer that live in my yard, like i see 10 every single night. I in good conscience could not "hunt" them. now if i had no money or food, yeah thats different
to be fair, compaq had been garbage for a number of years prior to being bought out. in the late 90s to early 2000s, any store bought PC was pretty much abysmal at the time. Dell had good support and ease of ordering which gave them a little leverage, but by the time dell got big, hp and compaq were both considered, at least in the people i know to be inferior products to others available at the time
you are not grasping what I am saying. I will try and make it simple as possible for you
Yes, worry about both
when I say take out the government, im saying vote out the people getting bribed and stop voting incumbents in over 80% of the time. hard to bribe people when they change every few years
again, i apologize if it seemed like i was calling you out specifically or misrepresenting what you were saying
i disagree with you on a 90% top tax rate for the rich, if i were in that top rate, i would find ways to not make so much if i know the4 government is gonna take it from me anyway. therefore costing jobs to others
we can agree that hillary and most of the GOP would be a disaster though that is for sure
no the only moron here is you who cant seem to grasp the simple concept that im stating
who has the power to create the framework that the companies work in - the government
Vote out the people who are writing the rules for the big businesses, and vote in people who will follow the constitution, rather than bend to whatever some business wants
I in NO way, said dont ALSO go after the businesses who are breaking the law. they should pay as well.
My point was simple, if you only take out the people paying the bribes, and not those accepting them, someone else will step up and start bribing the people in government
objective- i dont think that word means what you think it means based on that worthless attempt at an insult based on your own misunderstanding of a simple idea.
thats when we went out and bought one, tied it into our home and now when we lose power if its out for more than a few hours, our home is 75 percent powered (we didnt bother wiring in EVERYTHING, as we simply put in a sub panel for the essentials
ahhh yes. thats logical alright. I mean no one who has ever been involved in a bad project has EVER come back from it to produce a good product right???
because if you take away the people being bribed, others are no longer bribing. If we punish those bribing, but not those taking the bribes, they will simply be bribed again.
well, nice to know we can still throw around insults unjustifiably and misrepresent my views on things....
Just as you were not justifying 100% taxes, I was simply wondering how if one were to do that, how they planned on getting money to continue to pay for the project when they have no one but poor people to go after in year 2 after taking all the money from the rich.
I can see how it looked like I was calling you out or something, but that wasnt the intent, it was just to further conversation.
allowing americans their right to protection is one thing, as for your other statement, its simply disgusting and Im not even going to dignify it with a response.
Slashdot Mirror
msnbc would be all over it if it happened
actually you dont want to use matt sheapard as your posterchild. do a little more research into him, and you will see he didnt die for the reasons the media portrayed.
protests... not riots... and not murder.... HUGE difference between voicing your complaint, and murder
i have deer that live in my yard, like i see 10 every single night. I in good conscience could not "hunt" them. now if i had no money or food, yeah thats different
sounds like you are the one full of hate.
by your own link, there was 1 in the past 16 years, and your link does not link religion to the acts of arson or violence.
Wiki, while good, is not your friend.
Would these same 'Christians' be outraged if someone staged a "burn the baby jeezus in effigy" rally?
You are asking the wrong question. the right question is would they go there to try and kill people over it? I am going to go with no, they would not
its not about being afraid, its about being prepared.
so...just like piss jesus, which no one shot anyone over....
the splc calls alot of non terrorist groups terrorist groups, and gives real terrorist groups a pass. I dont buy it just because they say so
yeah but no one was talking about them either, it was all about kanye. its always about kanye. I think it takes 2 trumps to make a kanye
no but she could have not thrown gas on it, which she did
as a resident of NY, i cant say she did anything at all for the better of our state. and as sec of state.... well what has she done there?
Its almost as if she took the jobs only so they could say she had those jobs when she runs of president....
to be fair, compaq had been garbage for a number of years prior to being bought out. in the late 90s to early 2000s, any store bought PC was pretty much abysmal at the time. Dell had good support and ease of ordering which gave them a little leverage, but by the time dell got big, hp and compaq were both considered, at least in the people i know to be inferior products to others available at the time
so shes the rights hillary clinton? in more ways than gender!
you are not grasping what I am saying. I will try and make it simple as possible for you
Yes, worry about both
when I say take out the government, im saying vote out the people getting bribed and stop voting incumbents in over 80% of the time. hard to bribe people when they change every few years
again, i apologize if it seemed like i was calling you out specifically or misrepresenting what you were saying
i disagree with you on a 90% top tax rate for the rich, if i were in that top rate, i would find ways to not make so much if i know the4 government is gonna take it from me anyway. therefore costing jobs to others
we can agree that hillary and most of the GOP would be a disaster though that is for sure
no the only moron here is you who cant seem to grasp the simple concept that im stating
who has the power to create the framework that the companies work in - the government
Vote out the people who are writing the rules for the big businesses, and vote in people who will follow the constitution, rather than bend to whatever some business wants
I in NO way, said dont ALSO go after the businesses who are breaking the law. they should pay as well.
My point was simple, if you only take out the people paying the bribes, and not those accepting them, someone else will step up and start bribing the people in government
objective- i dont think that word means what you think it means based on that worthless attempt at an insult based on your own misunderstanding of a simple idea.
thats when we went out and bought one, tied it into our home and now when we lose power if its out for more than a few hours, our home is 75 percent powered (we didnt bother wiring in EVERYTHING, as we simply put in a sub panel for the essentials
actually the price of the leaf and volt have pretty much gone down every year since they have been out. so it is in fact getting cheaper as discussed
ahhh yes. thats logical alright. I mean no one who has ever been involved in a bad project has EVER come back from it to produce a good product right???
I woulda had first post, but its dark out and I dont have a tesla battery yet to store my solar power :(
because if you take away the people being bribed, others are no longer bribing. If we punish those bribing, but not those taking the bribes, they will simply be bribed again.
well, nice to know we can still throw around insults unjustifiably and misrepresent my views on things....
Just as you were not justifying 100% taxes, I was simply wondering how if one were to do that, how they planned on getting money to continue to pay for the project when they have no one but poor people to go after in year 2 after taking all the money from the rich.
I can see how it looked like I was calling you out or something, but that wasnt the intent, it was just to further conversation.
allowing americans their right to protection is one thing, as for your other statement, its simply disgusting and Im not even going to dignify it with a response.
i get what you are saying however what I am saying is you cant fix that problem without fixing the underlying problem, being political corruption