you hit the nail on the head. thats exactly what it is. its nothing but repetition, I would have a little before practice nightly (3 hours a night 5 days a week) and when i was breaking records (that have since been broken) i would before every race. Now they check for that but at the time it was one of those dont ask dont tell things. I had a clear 1/2 second to second advantage when on it vs not (when 10ths of a seconds mean 1st or 20th)
not just anecdotal, there is proof. which is why it is banned from use in a lot of extreme sports. people who do sports like snowboarding and swimming have been using it for an advantage for yesrs
source, 10 years of competitive swimming and holder of 2 state records.
people are addicted to all sorts of things. humans have addictive personalities. be it caffeine, or chocolate, or movies, or work. As long as people are not hurting others, who cares what one puts in their bodies??
if I leave an open website not protected, but i on the entrance page "no entry without previous written permission" but i dont put in any sort of protections. can I make everyone who accesses my site illegally face up to 35 years in prison for it? by your logic yes because they accessed my page without authorization. but when they get there, its a blank page.....
so, what was lost? what was gained? and why would that warrant 35 years behind bars???
he is the only one in the GOP i will be voting for, hes more serious about civil liberties, federal spending, military action than anyone else in the GOP, and hes even more anti war than the leading democrat!
I would assume they are not printing parts that have anything to do with the fuel yet. im assuming more along the lines of clips other such. I could be wrong but I highly doubt they will be using a new technology without testing it many many times before it goes into a rocket.
Lets also not forget the fact that they are not using makerbot or other commodity 3dprinters
ahh, I got you now. Still it has nothing to do with texas. a private company screwed cali (and a bunch of others) I wonder how many companies screwed millions of americans that are located in cali
Free markets would mean that they would get no water and they would have been stupid to create a agricultural business in the desert.
thisa sums it up nicely.
why should cali get to take water from other places because of their poor planning? I mean if they want to buy it AFTER the state that has the location of water has gotten all it needs/wants, and they sell it to cali, thats fine i suppose. but plain and simple. if you plant in a desert, dont complain when you run out of water
if you are worth 350K or more (that would include your car, your house) you are in the 1 percent.
cost of living changes things of course locally, having a million bucks in silicon valley for example probably only puts you in the top 25%, however if people want to keep talking about the "1%" perhaps they should know what they really mean are the ".001%"
the entire 1% thing has got to end. pretty much if you own your own house, you are in the 1 percent (at least in NY). while the numbers are dated, it cant be that much different in only a few years
That means a single filer who made $343,927 or more in 2009 is in the top 1 percentile. A married couple with two kids and combined earnings of $343,927 or more also was among the top earners in the country. The 2009 figures are the latest the IRS has tallied. Filing of returns for tax year 2010 didn't officially close until Oct. 17.
Read more: http://www.bankrate.com/financ...
Follow us: @Bankrate on Twitter | Bankrate on Facebook
you hit the nail on the head. thats exactly what it is. its nothing but repetition, I would have a little before practice nightly (3 hours a night 5 days a week) and when i was breaking records (that have since been broken) i would before every race. Now they check for that but at the time it was one of those dont ask dont tell things. I had a clear 1/2 second to second advantage when on it vs not (when 10ths of a seconds mean 1st or 20th)
sure, and humans are made of water, its the same!!!!
not just anecdotal, there is proof. which is why it is banned from use in a lot of extreme sports. people who do sports like snowboarding and swimming have been using it for an advantage for yesrs
source, 10 years of competitive swimming and holder of 2 state records.
people are addicted to all sorts of things. humans have addictive personalities. be it caffeine, or chocolate, or movies, or work. As long as people are not hurting others, who cares what one puts in their bodies??
been there, almost did that. I know what im talking about.
there are legit reasons, but 95% of the people who do it do not have legit reasons.
and think of how much better it would be if he were still here to fight for the belief
if I leave an open website not protected, but i on the entrance page "no entry without previous written permission" but i dont put in any sort of protections. can I make everyone who accesses my site illegally face up to 35 years in prison for it? by your logic yes because they accessed my page without authorization. but when they get there, its a blank page.....
so, what was lost? what was gained? and why would that warrant 35 years behind bars???
no, sorry but unless you are terminal, it is the weakest thing you can do
he is the only one in the GOP i will be voting for, hes more serious about civil liberties, federal spending, military action than anyone else in the GOP, and hes even more anti war than the leading democrat!
why solar? why not use the excess salt to build a salt reactor??? free fuel
im sorry are you proposing the government raise taxes on water??
I would assume they are not printing parts that have anything to do with the fuel yet. im assuming more along the lines of clips other such. I could be wrong but I highly doubt they will be using a new technology without testing it many many times before it goes into a rocket.
Lets also not forget the fact that they are not using makerbot or other commodity 3dprinters
sounds like orange lake in newburgh. simply beautiful, and affordable in comparison to other places
ahh, I got you now. Still it has nothing to do with texas. a private company screwed cali (and a bunch of others) I wonder how many companies screwed millions of americans that are located in cali
Free markets would mean that they would get no water and they would have been stupid to create a agricultural business in the desert.
thisa sums it up nicely.
why should cali get to take water from other places because of their poor planning? I mean if they want to buy it AFTER the state that has the location of water has gotten all it needs/wants, and they sell it to cali, thats fine i suppose. but plain and simple. if you plant in a desert, dont complain when you run out of water
whats wrong with thinking local first? Instead of trying to fix the entire state at once, take smaller areas and fix them
san fran is the capitol of left wing lunitics
NY is mostly apples and corn, at least in the hudson valley
free markets would mean ye who owns the land owns the water. not a bidding war after the government takes and distributes it
texas electric is fully within the borders of texas. not on the national grid. how can you blame texas for that?? http://www.texastribune.org/20...
the difference is existing homes that infrastructure is already there, he needs to fully develop 54 acres and 200+ homes, its no small task
were i live you can get a 4K sq ft home with garage on 5 acres of land (upstate NY)
if you are worth 350K or more (that would include your car, your house) you are in the 1 percent.
cost of living changes things of course locally, having a million bucks in silicon valley for example probably only puts you in the top 25%, however if people want to keep talking about the "1%" perhaps they should know what they really mean are the ".001%"
That means a single filer who made $343,927 or more in 2009 is in the top 1 percentile. A married couple with two kids and combined earnings of $343,927 or more also was among the top earners in the country. The 2009 figures are the latest the IRS has tallied. Filing of returns for tax year 2010 didn't officially close until Oct. 17. Read more: http://www.bankrate.com/financ... Follow us: @Bankrate on Twitter | Bankrate on Facebook
http://www.bankrate.com/financ...
or pretty awesome being able to watch that. you also forgot about shock, i highly doubt there would be time for pain to kick in