while it can be used to make people "kinder" it can also be used for abuse. just look at all the companies that are being tricked into making statements, and being bombarded by the social mobs over it.
Its not making people be nicer, its helping lonely people harass others
consistently avoids any discussion of the hard medical facts about the dangers of marijuana, ignoring significant findings and reports.
While Ill agree with your claim on oz being a kook, can you please explain this? because it seems for every study that says it is bad, another one shows up that says the one claiming bad is all BS. Citations???
I get your point, and i dont disagree. but tell me this. do you have more power to vote out your mayor or your president? I believe the former is the correct answer there which is why keeping it local is the better option (in general)
I do NOT believe that to be the case with vital infrastructure. which I consider the internet to be.
id prefer local corruption, which is easier to remove and affects a handful of people comparatively speaking, over federal corruption, which affects 400 million people
well a limited government type would not want the GOVERNMENT to provide services that can be provided by the private sector so it actually does fit the mantra
i generally dont bother responding to ACs with comments like this but I will in this case
the other poster specifically said he wouldnt answer the question only because it was posed by an AC.
therefore I came in and asked him about it (not the AC he was responding to)
Give me proof of something that she has done that is worthy of praise, ill give it. im not blinded by partisanship like some others here.
As I said above, living in NY while she was our senator, having met the woman (believe it or not in 2004 I was a fan of hers) I simply dont see a single good thing she did for NY as senator, nor have I seen anything good from her time as SoS.
the difference being that they were not running their own servers, having access to wipe it without government oversight.
if you can show me any of them (or anyone else) who was running their own mail server, and keeping it away from government oversight, im keen to listen and change my opinion, but based on those links, there is a HUGE difference between them and hillary
did you even read those links???? Because there is a big difference legally between not wanting to release publicly, and hosting and scrubbing your emails. the one about jeb bush even points out that they know what they know because the emails were made public. having said that, not one of your links says that any of them broke any laws, while it is clear as day that clinton did in fact break the law
Slashdot Mirror
well, I dont care for "we" in that case. and you can keep to yourselves
actually verizon stopped rolling out fibre to the home a few years back. if you dont have it, you never will
its also helping those "victims" become bullies themselves.
while it can be used to make people "kinder" it can also be used for abuse. just look at all the companies that are being tricked into making statements, and being bombarded by the social mobs over it.
Its not making people be nicer, its helping lonely people harass others
yeah how DARE they release a FREE app! we should stone them for their audacity right away
I dont disagree with your theory, I agree as well in actuality. but oz doesnt help the situation as much as he thinks
consistently avoids any discussion of the hard medical facts about the dangers of marijuana, ignoring significant findings and reports.
While Ill agree with your claim on oz being a kook, can you please explain this? because it seems for every study that says it is bad, another one shows up that says the one claiming bad is all BS. Citations???
it didnt even have copy and paste... id say it was missing vital features....
apple hasnt done anything better for a long time now. other than marketing that is, they are the kings of marketing.
while I look forward to the probe making it there, at the current time the photo is simply too blurry to be useful (to the avg person)
lol personal attacks vs. evidence... theres a winner drywolf....
more accurate than media matters or MSNBC
you have NO idea what either of them went through to get where they are. and frankly it doesnt matter being that they are both equal
and whos fault is that? the people who live there that are complacent and dont run for office
I get your point, and i dont disagree. but tell me this. do you have more power to vote out your mayor or your president? I believe the former is the correct answer there which is why keeping it local is the better option (in general)
I do NOT believe that to be the case with vital infrastructure. which I consider the internet to be.
id prefer local corruption, which is easier to remove and affects a handful of people comparatively speaking, over federal corruption, which affects 400 million people
well a limited government type would not want the GOVERNMENT to provide services that can be provided by the private sector so it actually does fit the mantra
the federal government SHOULD be doing as little as possible. Keeping politics local means less oppression as mission creep seeps in
also - term limits
dang coyote and his wacky acme schemes!!!!
i live in an area that is being bombarded with thee ads daily, and yet i havent seen any new businesses pop up in the hudson valley
are we REALLY going to start with that garbage already??? disagree with hillary and all of a sudden SEXIST!!!!
Grow up
we have that now in obama, no we dont need even more of it
i generally dont bother responding to ACs with comments like this but I will in this case
the other poster specifically said he wouldnt answer the question only because it was posed by an AC.
therefore I came in and asked him about it (not the AC he was responding to)
Give me proof of something that she has done that is worthy of praise, ill give it. im not blinded by partisanship like some others here.
As I said above, living in NY while she was our senator, having met the woman (believe it or not in 2004 I was a fan of hers) I simply dont see a single good thing she did for NY as senator, nor have I seen anything good from her time as SoS.
the difference being that they were not running their own servers, having access to wipe it without government oversight.
if you can show me any of them (or anyone else) who was running their own mail server, and keeping it away from government oversight, im keen to listen and change my opinion, but based on those links, there is a HUGE difference between them and hillary
did you even read those links???? Because there is a big difference legally between not wanting to release publicly, and hosting and scrubbing your emails. the one about jeb bush even points out that they know what they know because the emails were made public.
having said that, not one of your links says that any of them broke any laws, while it is clear as day that clinton did in fact break the law