the point isnt that NASA should not launch these satellites, its that it shouldnt come out of the NASA budget, it should come out of the other federal orgs
really??? so the HEAD of NASA says that the single most important thing he has been tasked to do is muslim outreach... and all you can say is yawn and make up excuses???
have NASA launch them of course, but the money for it should come out of the EPA and NOAA (or whatever other ABC wants the sat lifted) and not NASAs pocket
the EPA can worry about the environment, leave NASA to what NASA is supposed to do. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Not the climatechange administration. not the muslim outreach administration but the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Please give NASA more money, but make sure it is used for space exploration as intended. I dont see why this is getting so much heat
the problem is they use the stingray to gather evidence. After they have it all, they only use the evidence they can claim they collected the old fashioned way to avoid talking about the sting ray. its an end run around the constitution is all it is
he doesnt realize (along with all the other candidates) that one if the easiest ways to get a front runner status in this election is privacy concerns. We need another snowden, but we need one to blow the lid off things even bigger and even faster. At first i liked the slow trickle but now i want the dump
I believe you need to read Rosseau. There is something called "The Social Contract", which is something of a "shrink wrap license" you agree to by being born
We have gone over this time and time again that EULAs are unenforceable. therefore Rosseaus "social contract" is bunk.
As we do not know what happens after death, we do not know what these people actually get.
and frankly, I dont care, they could be reincarnated as a powerb all jackpot winner for all I care
killing somebody is not a form of punishment and hence cannot be "deserved"
If that were true, wouldnt you see more people in prison for life appealing for death instead of the other way around? If it was not a punishment these DR inmates would not be wasting money and time on appeal after appeal (unless you are mistakenly believing that EVERYONE on DR is innocent)
Slashdot Mirror
the point isnt that NASA should not launch these satellites, its that it shouldnt come out of the NASA budget, it should come out of the other federal orgs
manned spaceflight is way more useful than alot of the stuff that politics are having NASA do now
really??? so the HEAD of NASA says that the single most important thing he has been tasked to do is muslim outreach... and all you can say is yawn and make up excuses???
Good little sheep you are
except for the studies dont back your claim up. Cali seems to be the biggest anti vax state - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
so what do you propose?? shut down the car washes, and put 10s of thousands on unemployment??
not the point i was getting at at all. In fact quite the opposite.
NASA should continue to do all those things... however the funding for them shouyld come from the other orgs that are using them, not NASA.
try harder. the highest rates of vax are in the south while the lowest levels are in cali. Its a fact that democrats tend to be the anti vaxers
correct. Somehow i clipped NOAA out of my post and overlooked it.
have NASA launch them of course, but the money for it should come out of the EPA and NOAA (or whatever other ABC wants the sat lifted) and not NASAs pocket
nearly all anti-science people are Republicans
Explain anti vaxxers
i dont believe we are there yet. close, but not there yet.
the EPA can worry about the environment, leave NASA to what NASA is supposed to do. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Not the climatechange administration. not the muslim outreach administration but the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Please give NASA more money, but make sure it is used for space exploration as intended. I dont see why this is getting so much heat
the problem is they use the stingray to gather evidence. After they have it all, they only use the evidence they can claim they collected the old fashioned way to avoid talking about the sting ray. its an end run around the constitution is all it is
which is exactly why they fight so hard to chip away at it. see the new ammo ban as one more in a long line of abuses
WWE action figures???? You are over thinking things. Everyone fantasizes, whats wrong with it???
would be a shame if something happened to that perfect reputation you got there Mr Reporter... Why dont you go find something else to look into....
because wont SOMEONE Think of the CHILDRENN!!!!! It really is that simple
or, they market toys to people who want to buy them. clearly they are doing something right if they are still around.
Face it, men and women tend to like different things, and thats ok!
he doesnt realize (along with all the other candidates) that one if the easiest ways to get a front runner status in this election is privacy concerns. We need another snowden, but we need one to blow the lid off things even bigger and even faster. At first i liked the slow trickle but now i want the dump
Also, don't give me shit about "you can leave if you don't like it". No you can't.
Really??? tell that to all the illegal immigrants who make it to america that they couldnt leave....
flaimbait for stating timothy mcveigh deserved it.... wow slashdot.... wow
even when the evidence was circumstantial.
you answered your own question. if the evidence is circumstantial, DP is off limits
umm, the income tax is actually found in the constitution, not any "social contract"
Better yet. where is this social contract so i can have my lawyer take a look at it and see if it stands up
I believe you need to read Rosseau. There is something called "The Social Contract", which is something of a "shrink wrap license" you agree to by being born
We have gone over this time and time again that EULAs are unenforceable. therefore Rosseaus "social contract" is bunk.
As we do not know what happens after death, we do not know what these people actually get.
and frankly, I dont care, they could be reincarnated as a powerb all jackpot winner for all I care
killing somebody is not a form of punishment and hence cannot be "deserved"
If that were true, wouldnt you see more people in prison for life appealing for death instead of the other way around? If it was not a punishment these DR inmates would not be wasting money and time on appeal after appeal (unless you are mistakenly believing that EVERYONE on DR is innocent)