Of course that's what the bible says. And since the author of said bible is a person (being, whatever) with a vested interest in people taking it as truth, everything in it should be considered highly suspect and corroborated with other sources, which just happen to be conspicuously absent.
If the bible is the only evidence you have that points to the existence of a creator, you should really consider if you want to live your live based on one flimsy piece of suspicious evidence.
Slashdot Mirror
Of course that's what the bible says. And since the author of said bible is a person (being, whatever) with a vested interest in people taking it as truth, everything in it should be considered highly suspect and corroborated with other sources, which just happen to be conspicuously absent.
If the bible is the only evidence you have that points to the existence of a creator, you should really consider if you want to live your live based on one flimsy piece of suspicious evidence.