Gashing your leg open and needing stitches is an emergency. You are more than capable of bringing a laptop on your way out. Sorry to break it to you, but the emergency room doesn't exist solely for gunshot victims and people who lost their limbs in tragic accidents, despite what you might see on TV.
The emergency room is also far from free in the United States. They might treat you up front, but you still owe them a severely exaggerated amount of money for the effort, which they aim to collect.
When I was in school, chemistry was not a requirement. It was an elective you could take.
To be honest, I don't see why it's a requirement either. It should certainly be available for those who wish to take it (I did), but forcing everyone to take it and pinning your ability to graduate on passing it just doesn't sound beneficial to everyone but those who will be aiming for jobs related to chemistry.
I think traditional schooling gives you a good well rounded education (or, it's supposed to, at least), but the higher level courses like chemistry, calculus, etc, should remain electives. You should be able to pick more fields you're interested in studying further to further prep yourself for college life. I don't know about having things like HTML courses specifically, but choice should definitely be offered more. Being able to cut the stuff you will never use (within reason) definitely sounds like a better solution than forcing it on everyone regardless of their future endeavors.
Because there's a daytime curfew in effect during school hours on business days. If you're caught outside during a school day, a cop is going to stop you. I was a part of a school program that had irregular hours and my student ID card made explicit reference of this so that I could show police officers that I wasn't just skipping school.
Mine was similar only when attendance was taken, the teacher would hand one of us the book and we'd take it to the central office. The teachers wrote the attendance information in pencil for some reason, as if to tempt us, so any student could just erase notes that certain students were absent.
I highly doubt this. The views held by the average christian and those held by Westboro are hardly alike. Calling themselves Christians doesn't mean other Christians would rally behind action being taken against Westboro. In fact, I have a feeling they would support such an action. The message Westboro sends is certainly not the message Christianity as a whole is trying to spread. They're nothing but a black mark on the bigger picture.
My list: Web browser - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Mozilla Firefox Web Browser — Free Download — mozilla.org Opera browser | Faster & safer internet | Free download Chrome Browser Apple - Safari - Browse the web in smarter, more powerful ways.
Then it goes into random stuff. Mine seems pretty good, actually. IE doesn't show up at all as of page 5, though Mosaic did on page 3.
If that ever even happened (which honestly, I think hell has a better chance of freezing over), that has nothing to do with this iteration. There is no reason to apply this workaround to this version of secure boot. If you're going to render the whole thing irrelevant anyway and make it inconveniencing to boot, there is no point to leaving it enabled in the first place.
Just turn secure boot off FFS. You are able to disable it. If you're going to go through all the trouble to use this work around, what is the actual benefit to the system anymore? Just turn it off.
If you can't, when your health gets bad enough, just call 911 and an ambulance will come pick you up and you'll be treated until you are stabilized.
Of course, your definition of "stabilized" will likely be much different from that of the hospital before they kick you to the door here. You can forget getting cured of whatever caused your critical condition unless getting you stabilized cures you.
Well, the fact of the matter is that far more people are not colorblind than are. Those who are not can use these extra color hints to do what we want to do quicker. Do we absolutely need color? No, we don't, but that doesn't mean we should just forego color altogether when there is a proven benefit to it because ~9% of others can't discern the same differences. I know you said you aren't trying to make the whole societal change argument; I merely am responding to the piece of text suggesting we don't need the extra hints.
I say this with the most respect to those who are colorblind. It's early in the morning (for me), so if anything I said reads as offensive, please understand that was entirely not my intent.
You should be able to see a handful of reasons why that would be a very bad idea. Aside from the extremely momentary novelty that you can do it, there are so many potential problems with that which would make it nothing more than a flat danger.
I used to be really into Pokemon back in the 90s, and one of the things I remember was that Ash loved the hell out of Pikachu so much that hearing his dialogue in this game was really funny. Peta got his portrayal so comically wrong, having Ash himself suggest he never once showed any sign of caring for Pikachu and never gave Pikachu the choice not to go into his pokeball as a sort of "What do you expect from me?" conversation as Pikachu tries helplessly to get the apparent circus ringleader Ash to see the error of his Pokemon abusing ways.
I think even cursory familiarity with the subject should be a requisite if you're going to attack it in such a dedicated manner.
It's not **me xyz, it would just be **xyz in that instance. No, it's really not hard to dial that.
The whole purpose aside from pure vanity is to ease situations where it is easier to give an alphanumeric name opposed to digits of numbers. Obviously there are going to be situations where this does not really help anything, but people can more easily digest this type of information than numbers. It's not as though it's replacing the old number system.
The whole concept of "vanity numbers" is not extremely easy to deal with anyway. Have you tried to get a number in the past 10 years? I know where I live, the free numbers that are available for the taking would rarely qualify for "vanity". You can't just demand a specific whole number (you can try, but the odds of getting it are zilch). Numbers and combinations of numbers are often reserved for different types of use such as commercial or residential.
What exactly are they going to have at this museum? Seems the property is the only thing they really have, with Tesla's work resting soundly at his other museum abroad. Even then the photo development company covered over most of the original building.
I disagree. I don't think any religious affiliation should bar someone from public office. However, I do think using said office to push agenda for said religious affiliation should be illegal. Lets keep any and all matters of church and state separate, please. If you want your kids learning about God in Heaven, have them attend a private school. There are many religions practiced in the United States. Attempting to push only one of them as the One True Answer and as such having it taught to all students is unacceptable and a good reason why things like evolution and the big bang theory should remain as a religion-independent theory. Theists must resist the urge to push their religion on other people, especially through the government.
I am Christian. I believe in God. I do not believe in taking my beliefs and forcing everyone to view them.
Slashdot Mirror
Gashing your leg open and needing stitches is an emergency. You are more than capable of bringing a laptop on your way out. Sorry to break it to you, but the emergency room doesn't exist solely for gunshot victims and people who lost their limbs in tragic accidents, despite what you might see on TV.
The emergency room is also far from free in the United States. They might treat you up front, but you still owe them a severely exaggerated amount of money for the effort, which they aim to collect.
When I was in school, chemistry was not a requirement. It was an elective you could take.
To be honest, I don't see why it's a requirement either. It should certainly be available for those who wish to take it (I did), but forcing everyone to take it and pinning your ability to graduate on passing it just doesn't sound beneficial to everyone but those who will be aiming for jobs related to chemistry.
I think traditional schooling gives you a good well rounded education (or, it's supposed to, at least), but the higher level courses like chemistry, calculus, etc, should remain electives. You should be able to pick more fields you're interested in studying further to further prep yourself for college life. I don't know about having things like HTML courses specifically, but choice should definitely be offered more. Being able to cut the stuff you will never use (within reason) definitely sounds like a better solution than forcing it on everyone regardless of their future endeavors.
No you can't. You can't even reliably get broadband everywhere. What the hell are you talking about?
That's not what this system does. You're as bad as the article.
I couldn't see the reason why a six year old would need a cellphone in the first place.
They were, because they played the devil's music.
Because there's a daytime curfew in effect during school hours on business days. If you're caught outside during a school day, a cop is going to stop you. I was a part of a school program that had irregular hours and my student ID card made explicit reference of this so that I could show police officers that I wasn't just skipping school.
Mine was similar only when attendance was taken, the teacher would hand one of us the book and we'd take it to the central office. The teachers wrote the attendance information in pencil for some reason, as if to tempt us, so any student could just erase notes that certain students were absent.
I highly doubt this. The views held by the average christian and those held by Westboro are hardly alike. Calling themselves Christians doesn't mean other Christians would rally behind action being taken against Westboro. In fact, I have a feeling they would support such an action. The message Westboro sends is certainly not the message Christianity as a whole is trying to spread. They're nothing but a black mark on the bigger picture.
The same could be said for you.
You have quite a strange internal definition for the use of smileys.
My list:
Web browser - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mozilla Firefox Web Browser — Free Download — mozilla.org
Opera browser | Faster & safer internet | Free download
Chrome Browser
Apple - Safari - Browse the web in smarter, more powerful ways.
Then it goes into random stuff. Mine seems pretty good, actually. IE doesn't show up at all as of page 5, though Mosaic did on page 3.
If that ever even happened (which honestly, I think hell has a better chance of freezing over), that has nothing to do with this iteration. There is no reason to apply this workaround to this version of secure boot. If you're going to render the whole thing irrelevant anyway and make it inconveniencing to boot, there is no point to leaving it enabled in the first place.
Just turn secure boot off FFS. You are able to disable it. If you're going to go through all the trouble to use this work around, what is the actual benefit to the system anymore? Just turn it off.
How exactly is it taking away your freedom for someone to download BSD licensed code and not provide their modifications? What freedom is lost?
Your analogy has no basis in reality. The two have nothing to do with each other.
If you can't, when your health gets bad enough, just call 911 and an ambulance will come pick you up and you'll be treated until you are stabilized.
Of course, your definition of "stabilized" will likely be much different from that of the hospital before they kick you to the door here. You can forget getting cured of whatever caused your critical condition unless getting you stabilized cures you.
Well, the fact of the matter is that far more people are not colorblind than are. Those who are not can use these extra color hints to do what we want to do quicker. Do we absolutely need color? No, we don't, but that doesn't mean we should just forego color altogether when there is a proven benefit to it because ~9% of others can't discern the same differences. I know you said you aren't trying to make the whole societal change argument; I merely am responding to the piece of text suggesting we don't need the extra hints.
I say this with the most respect to those who are colorblind. It's early in the morning (for me), so if anything I said reads as offensive, please understand that was entirely not my intent.
Not everything they choose to do is successful so suddenly they're not a successful company? What kind of logic is that?
You should be able to see a handful of reasons why that would be a very bad idea. Aside from the extremely momentary novelty that you can do it, there are so many potential problems with that which would make it nothing more than a flat danger.
I used to be really into Pokemon back in the 90s, and one of the things I remember was that Ash loved the hell out of Pikachu so much that hearing his dialogue in this game was really funny. Peta got his portrayal so comically wrong, having Ash himself suggest he never once showed any sign of caring for Pikachu and never gave Pikachu the choice not to go into his pokeball as a sort of "What do you expect from me?" conversation as Pikachu tries helplessly to get the apparent circus ringleader Ash to see the error of his Pokemon abusing ways.
I think even cursory familiarity with the subject should be a requisite if you're going to attack it in such a dedicated manner.
It's not **me xyz, it would just be **xyz in that instance. No, it's really not hard to dial that.
The whole purpose aside from pure vanity is to ease situations where it is easier to give an alphanumeric name opposed to digits of numbers. Obviously there are going to be situations where this does not really help anything, but people can more easily digest this type of information than numbers. It's not as though it's replacing the old number system.
The whole concept of "vanity numbers" is not extremely easy to deal with anyway. Have you tried to get a number in the past 10 years? I know where I live, the free numbers that are available for the taking would rarely qualify for "vanity". You can't just demand a specific whole number (you can try, but the odds of getting it are zilch). Numbers and combinations of numbers are often reserved for different types of use such as commercial or residential.
This just gives you some options.
People will probably refer to it as "star me"
What exactly are they going to have at this museum? Seems the property is the only thing they really have, with Tesla's work resting soundly at his other museum abroad. Even then the photo development company covered over most of the original building.
I disagree. I don't think any religious affiliation should bar someone from public office. However, I do think using said office to push agenda for said religious affiliation should be illegal. Lets keep any and all matters of church and state separate, please. If you want your kids learning about God in Heaven, have them attend a private school. There are many religions practiced in the United States. Attempting to push only one of them as the One True Answer and as such having it taught to all students is unacceptable and a good reason why things like evolution and the big bang theory should remain as a religion-independent theory. Theists must resist the urge to push their religion on other people, especially through the government.
I am Christian. I believe in God. I do not believe in taking my beliefs and forcing everyone to view them.