Actual repeat offender? Sure take that into account.
Projected repeat offender on grounds of 'young man' ? Sorry but that's ageist and sexist, and very much grounds for challenge as basing sentencing on that runs very counter to provision of equal justice.
In all other cars, you can tell by feel or by position of the shift lever whether it's in PARK or not.
Cars with a manual gearbox don't have a PARK position, so immediately you're talking nonsense.
Perhaps the issue is that people aren't learning how to operate complex dangerous machinery, and adopting simple basic practices like applying the fucking brake.
It's a design flaw, but it's only a dangerous one when combined with fuckwits.
As Scotland is part of the UK, part of the debt belongs to Scotland.
Fucking Scottish independents, they want all the income and none of the costs. Their lack of economic sense is one reason they lost the first referendum, I guess it would be too much to expect them to have embraced reality.
No, that's for other reasons, including primarily education.
Writing secure software can be hard; writing mostly secure software is trivial but the security experts spend their lives demanding the impossible and not making it easy for developers to get the basics right.
Trading is good, and a slow but useful way to improve standards of living. Mass migration doesn't solve the problem at source, and causes problems at destination.
Migration through force requires excess force. Nukes aren't a terribly useful medium in this context as they destroy rather than help capture, and the countries with the high standards of living also tend to be those with the conventional means to defend themselves.
In Poland a loaf of bread costs 4.45 zloty. In the UK a loaf of bread costs 1.66 pounds.
There, does that help avoid your offtopic rant born from an inability to recognise the benefits of using a common comparison point to aid reader comprehension?
Using data that's 4 years old prior to the oil crash no less
So you're blaming immigration and not the oil crash for change in salaries, but demand that the oil crash impact is included when assessing change in salaries?
This doesn't feel like a terribly reliable use of statistics.
A Polish plumber will be every bit as skilled, experienced and competent as their British counterpart, but the Polish undercut UK rates when they came over here.
You're conflating passport-less travel with the automatic rights to live and work somewhere.
The UK currently supports the EU freedom of movement, while being outside of the Schengen area - although the one land-border between the UK and another EU country does operate indistinguishably from a Schengen border.
And yet the population of Britain hasn't grown that much past projections since 1970.
"It is estimated that net migration plus births to foreign-born parents has accounted for 85% of UK population growth since 2000." - http://www.migrationwatchuk.or...
Projections or not, migration is very much responsible for population growth, and people just don't want to live in a sardine can packed tight against their neighbours.
Get rid of them all by changing welfare criteria.
Erm. That's what Cameron tried to do earlier this year, and the EU said 'no'.
Unless almost all 60 of those are minimum wage call center staff, in which case tax revenues are more than offset by in-work benefits, the costs to the NHS, child support, etc..
Or maybe they're all Indian IT staff, in which case they're paying their own way - but at the same time, helping destroy the British IT industry. I've seen that too often.
Why couldn't they just employ British people and avoid needing to build new housing, expand public services and suffer the congestion caused by a rising population?
Debt is still debt, whatever currency you adopt as your national medium of exchange.
seeing as they never elected any of the governments that caused it
Given the steep rise in national spending that's caused the debt (and much of the debt) occurred under Labour governments that got into power only because of the Scottish votes, you're very much wrong.
They did elect those governments, they do have a share of the debt and if they choose independence, they get to restart living life alone from a very negative economic beginning.
A lot of the people who voted leave are out-and-out racists. Leave was particularly popular in areas which saw their industries destroyed in the 1980s when Thatcher and the free market tore up the social contract in which the aim of the economy was to provide jobs, homes and pensions for the UK's citizens.
You even contradict yourself. Do you have any evidence of broad scale racism, because I haven't seen it.
I have heard a lot of people discussing why they voted 'leave'. None of them have used racism as a reason. None.
Change isn't inherently bad. Work to deliver good change.
Accepting a status quo that involves losing your way of life, your income, your autonomy and your freedom is inherently bad, so at a minimum the change can't be fucking worse.
Slashdot Mirror
Actual repeat offender? Sure take that into account.
Projected repeat offender on grounds of 'young man' ? Sorry but that's ageist and sexist, and very much grounds for challenge as basing sentencing on that runs very counter to provision of equal justice.
Well, obviously if the algorithm treats race as a sentencing factor then that too needs to be removed.
Nobody's suggested so far that it does take race into account. Good. Criminals need appropriate sentencing, irrespective of gender, race or age.
Hmm. All of the automatic cars I've owned have neutral between reverse and drive.
Depends whether he means manual linkages, or whether he'd be happy with an electronically linked brake with a manual switch.
The latter is pretty common these days, but still gives the certainty that a brake is in operation irrespective of the gearbox setting.
In all other cars, you can tell by feel or by position of the shift lever whether it's in PARK or not.
Cars with a manual gearbox don't have a PARK position, so immediately you're talking nonsense.
Perhaps the issue is that people aren't learning how to operate complex dangerous machinery, and adopting simple basic practices like applying the fucking brake.
It's a design flaw, but it's only a dangerous one when combined with fuckwits.
No, the debt belongs to the UK Government.
http://www.economicshelp.org/b...
As Scotland is part of the UK, part of the debt belongs to Scotland.
Fucking Scottish independents, they want all the income and none of the costs. Their lack of economic sense is one reason they lost the first referendum, I guess it would be too much to expect them to have embraced reality.
No, that's for other reasons, including primarily education.
Writing secure software can be hard; writing mostly secure software is trivial but the security experts spend their lives demanding the impossible and not making it easy for developers to get the basics right.
They'd still put the fucking brake on when they left the car though.
Trading is good, and a slow but useful way to improve standards of living. Mass migration doesn't solve the problem at source, and causes problems at destination.
Migration through force requires excess force. Nukes aren't a terribly useful medium in this context as they destroy rather than help capture, and the countries with the high standards of living also tend to be those with the conventional means to defend themselves.
I disagree, that wasn't the purpose of Brexit at all.
It may be the outcome though, especially if there isn't a general election called.
What fucking refugee crisis? You mean the economic migrant crisis, caused by Germany publicly shouting "Come and live here"?
Refugees stop being refugees the moment they reach a safe state. For most of them that's somewhere in Africa, at worse Greece or Turkey.
Not Germany, not Sweden, not the rest of the fucking EU.
Sorry to be so brutally honest, but you need to get a reality check.
Comically the British gave the EU mandarins a reality check on Thursday.
Let me translate for you.
In Poland a loaf of bread costs 4.45 zloty.
In the UK a loaf of bread costs 1.66 pounds.
There, does that help avoid your offtopic rant born from an inability to recognise the benefits of using a common comparison point to aid reader comprehension?
With the obvious irony that it isn't immigration from the EU that's caused some of the high profile challenges in Rotherham.
Using data that's 4 years old prior to the oil crash no less
So you're blaming immigration and not the oil crash for change in salaries, but demand that the oil crash impact is included when assessing change in salaries?
This doesn't feel like a terribly reliable use of statistics.
Not in the UK.
A Polish plumber will be every bit as skilled, experienced and competent as their British counterpart, but the Polish undercut UK rates when they came over here.
You're conflating passport-less travel with the automatic rights to live and work somewhere.
The UK currently supports the EU freedom of movement, while being outside of the Schengen area - although the one land-border between the UK and another EU country does operate indistinguishably from a Schengen border.
And yet the population of Britain hasn't grown that much past projections since 1970.
"It is estimated that net migration plus births to foreign-born parents has accounted for 85% of UK population growth since 2000." - http://www.migrationwatchuk.or...
Projections or not, migration is very much responsible for population growth, and people just don't want to live in a sardine can packed tight against their neighbours.
Get rid of them all by changing welfare criteria.
Erm. That's what Cameron tried to do earlier this year, and the EU said 'no'.
Unless almost all 60 of those are minimum wage call center staff, in which case tax revenues are more than offset by in-work benefits, the costs to the NHS, child support, etc..
Or maybe they're all Indian IT staff, in which case they're paying their own way - but at the same time, helping destroy the British IT industry. I've seen that too often.
Why couldn't they just employ British people and avoid needing to build new housing, expand public services and suffer the congestion caused by a rising population?
Debt is still debt, whatever currency you adopt as your national medium of exchange.
seeing as they never elected any of the governments that caused it
Given the steep rise in national spending that's caused the debt (and much of the debt) occurred under Labour governments that got into power only because of the Scottish votes, you're very much wrong.
They did elect those governments, they do have a share of the debt and if they choose independence, they get to restart living life alone from a very negative economic beginning.
A lot of the people who voted leave are out-and-out racists. Leave was particularly popular in areas which saw their industries destroyed in the 1980s when Thatcher and the free market tore up the social contract in which the aim of the economy was to provide jobs, homes and pensions for the UK's citizens.
You even contradict yourself. Do you have any evidence of broad scale racism, because I haven't seen it.
I have heard a lot of people discussing why they voted 'leave'. None of them have used racism as a reason. None.
Lets face it, Nicola Sturgeon just loves losing referendums doesn't she.
I suspect this is the primary reason she's reluctant to push full steam for another one..
Prices are still higher than two weeks ago. The media focus on the markets plummetting is sensationalist rather than informative.
Oh come on, what's the fucking worse that could happen? Nuclear exchange between France and the UK?
Shrug.
If I spent my life worrying about the small shit, I'd end up looking like you.
Change isn't inherently bad. Work to deliver good change.
Accepting a status quo that involves losing your way of life, your income, your autonomy and your freedom is inherently bad, so at a minimum the change can't be fucking worse.
Maybe not the current level of access, but yes. Otherwise they're fucking themselves over.
Some of the politicians might want to do that, but the business lobby will overrule them.