Jewish is as much a race as any of the other human races.
It's also a religion.
Differentiate between the two. If you want to attack religions, be my guest, but don't go attacking people because they have a different genetic background to you. That's racist and makes you an ignorant cunt.
The whole thing only has capability of confusing the mid-range double digit IQ's anyways. They still try it. Dummies can yell on the web in all caps too and its just dummies.
Your position on the self-awareness scale appears to be a new record low.
Why would the architect of micro-managing opinions put you off preventing people from micro-managing opinions?
Surely the best counter-Goebbels is the ability to draw attention to his manipulation of the public debate?
This is precisely why conflicting views are so important. Extremism arises from echo chambers and too many people these days refuse to listen to any dissent. That's not healthy for them or for society.
What's this "white nationalist" bullshit going around ? Where, and who are these white nationalists that are threat to anybody ? Not counting those 5 dudes.
Browse this discussion at -1 and you'll find an irritating amount of it.
Of course, you do need to browse at -1 because those views are generally regarded as extreme, stupid and/or obnoxious and get modded down.
What's harder to assess is how many of the posts are by people that believe what they're writing, and how many are merely trolling.
I think it is lazy to call them Nazis. Sure, they are vile and share similarities, but real Nazis had differences
I concur. Call out these people accurately using correct terms, and it's a lot easier to then address the challenge.
Labelling them with a catch-all slur isn't just lazy, it provides a shield too. "Of course I'm not a Nazi, I don't.." means they get to reject your entire attack because they're not actually a Nazi.
I hadn't heard of this and you've been too oblique in your description. Could you name the individual in question to aid me in finding out more information?
Racist has become so watered down that it has lost all of its emotional punch.
That happened a few years ago in the UK. After a decade of being told that expressing legitimate concerns about immigration was being racist the country responded by voting to leave the EU.
When politicians ignore genuine concerns they force extreme responses.
It's not enough that someone is Racist; now they're a White Nationalist despite not being white nor advocating for a white-only nation.
Yeah, I've been called a white supremacist on here for daring to hold non-white people to the same standards to which I hold everybody. I've been called a racist by a journalist for suggesting that England is over populated and should thus seek to reduce net immigration.
Meanwhile I've visited six continents, lived in three countries and don't know my own genetic ancestry. Like I give a fuck about skin colour.
So more white people are arrested than any other single racial group. A whole 38% of arrests. It's almost as though 86% of the population are classed as 'white'.
Of course, since you're the racist focussing on 'white' people, we can look at this another way: Even though 86% of people in the UK are 'white', 62% of terror arrests are for other demographics. Seems to me the white majority are being extremely tolerant of representatives of the 14% getting arrested for 62% of the terror.
It depends how you slice it.
I try to slice it in a way that doesn't demonise primarily innocent demographics. I try to slice it in a way that doesn't push a racist narrative. I try to slice it differently to you for both of those reasons.
Who are these Marxists committing all these terrorist acts?
Perhaps you should ask the US Department of Homeland Security and Federal Bureau of Investigation, as they're the people that designated Antifa a terror organisation.
If there are traffic lights then there isn't also a stop sign. Lanes are painted on the road. You give way to people that have the right of way ahead of you, and that's rarely a cause for confusion.
how come there were no repercussions for people posting it?
You're making an assumption there. I don't use Facebook so I have no idea.
why not block it being posted in the first place? That's what YouTube does, when you upload a video it immediately tells you that parts of it are blocked
No, that's not what YouTube does. You've even admitted it yourself: YouTube blocks it. The content is still on YouTube, it just can't be shared.
Facebook tell us they removed the content.
Anyway, you can't block or remove content until you know what the content is. That means allowing at least some of it to be uploaded before your content matching logic can even attempt to match it, because until you've received the data there's nothing to match.
So using content matching algorithms supported by human checkers they removed over a million copies, and you're upset that they didn't immediately spot and prevent them all?
Maybe this isn't so easy after all. Perhaps you could show them how to do it, because trust me, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and a dozen others will immediately starting bidding against each other for your magical technology.
We don't get four way stops in the UK but when traffic lights fail people cope very well. The behaviour is less rigid but comparable in nature to how US four way stops work.
Can confirm, there's no fucking point trying to watch a film on Air New Zealand flights anyway. Constant fucking interruptions.
Not as bad as Virgin flying into Hong Kong though. Those cunts interrupt you with an announcement from the pilot, which they repeat in a different language, then follow that with the same announcement from the cabin crew, which is also repeated in a different language.
Meanwhile I already knew what they were trying to tell me because the fucking seatbelt light had already silently swiftly efficiently conveyed that information.
India is the 7th largest country in the world and offers 100Mbps (with unlimited data) for under $15/month but don't let that stop you posting nonsense in bold.
I can fly to a small island in the sea on the other side of the continent for less than the cost of a train to London, and I live only a 90 minute drive from London.
I know. It's almost as though the browser manufacturers aren't consistent in where they choose the balance between security and providing a user experience.
You should write to them all suggesting they sort it out.
Slashdot Mirror
Recognize this: Jewish is not a race
Jewish is as much a race as any of the other human races.
It's also a religion.
Differentiate between the two. If you want to attack religions, be my guest, but don't go attacking people because they have a different genetic background to you. That's racist and makes you an ignorant cunt.
The whole thing only has capability of confusing the mid-range double digit IQ's anyways. They still try it. Dummies can yell on the web in all caps too and its just dummies.
Your position on the self-awareness scale appears to be a new record low.
Why would the architect of micro-managing opinions put you off preventing people from micro-managing opinions?
Surely the best counter-Goebbels is the ability to draw attention to his manipulation of the public debate?
This is precisely why conflicting views are so important. Extremism arises from echo chambers and too many people these days refuse to listen to any dissent. That's not healthy for them or for society.
What's this "white nationalist" bullshit going around ? Where, and who are these white nationalists that are threat to anybody ? Not counting those 5 dudes.
Browse this discussion at -1 and you'll find an irritating amount of it.
Of course, you do need to browse at -1 because those views are generally regarded as extreme, stupid and/or obnoxious and get modded down.
What's harder to assess is how many of the posts are by people that believe what they're writing, and how many are merely trolling.
I think it is lazy to call them Nazis. Sure, they are vile and share similarities, but real Nazis had differences
I concur. Call out these people accurately using correct terms, and it's a lot easier to then address the challenge.
Labelling them with a catch-all slur isn't just lazy, it provides a shield too. "Of course I'm not a Nazi, I don't.." means they get to reject your entire attack because they're not actually a Nazi.
I hadn't heard of this and you've been too oblique in your description. Could you name the individual in question to aid me in finding out more information?
Racist has become so watered down that it has lost all of its emotional punch.
That happened a few years ago in the UK. After a decade of being told that expressing legitimate concerns about immigration was being racist the country responded by voting to leave the EU.
When politicians ignore genuine concerns they force extreme responses.
It's not enough that someone is Racist; now they're a White Nationalist despite not being white nor advocating for a white-only nation.
Yeah, I've been called a white supremacist on here for daring to hold non-white people to the same standards to which I hold everybody. I've been called a racist by a journalist for suggesting that England is over populated and should thus seek to reduce net immigration.
Meanwhile I've visited six continents, lived in three countries and don't know my own genetic ancestry. Like I give a fuck about skin colour.
Oh, you fucking make me laugh with https://fullfact.org/crime/eth...
So more white people are arrested than any other single racial group. A whole 38% of arrests. It's almost as though 86% of the population are classed as 'white'.
Of course, since you're the racist focussing on 'white' people, we can look at this another way: Even though 86% of people in the UK are 'white', 62% of terror arrests are for other demographics. Seems to me the white majority are being extremely tolerant of representatives of the 14% getting arrested for 62% of the terror.
It depends how you slice it.
I try to slice it in a way that doesn't demonise primarily innocent demographics. I try to slice it in a way that doesn't push a racist narrative. I try to slice it differently to you for both of those reasons.
Who are these Marxists committing all these terrorist acts?
Perhaps you should ask the US Department of Homeland Security and Federal Bureau of Investigation, as they're the people that designated Antifa a terror organisation.
Looks like a few in India:
https://storymaps.esri.com/sto...
Looks like mosques are synagogues are being attacked by quite a lot of people, but that's ok, you keep blaming white nationalists.
So you want to shut down Facebook. They can't manually check everything a third of the planet posts to a website.
I'm not saying that's a bad thing, just putting it more simply than you did.
If there are traffic lights then there isn't also a stop sign. Lanes are painted on the road. You give way to people that have the right of way ahead of you, and that's rarely a cause for confusion.
how come there were no repercussions for people posting it?
You're making an assumption there. I don't use Facebook so I have no idea.
why not block it being posted in the first place? That's what YouTube does, when you upload a video it immediately tells you that parts of it are blocked
No, that's not what YouTube does. You've even admitted it yourself: YouTube blocks it. The content is still on YouTube, it just can't be shared.
Facebook tell us they removed the content.
Anyway, you can't block or remove content until you know what the content is. That means allowing at least some of it to be uploaded before your content matching logic can even attempt to match it, because until you've received the data there's nothing to match.
So using content matching algorithms supported by human checkers they removed over a million copies, and you're upset that they didn't immediately spot and prevent them all?
Maybe this isn't so easy after all. Perhaps you could show them how to do it, because trust me, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and a dozen others will immediately starting bidding against each other for your magical technology.
I know people that'd pay for that.
We don't get four way stops in the UK but when traffic lights fail people cope very well. The behaviour is less rigid but comparable in nature to how US four way stops work.
That's not the airline. That's a badly run airport.
Can confirm, there's no fucking point trying to watch a film on Air New Zealand flights anyway. Constant fucking interruptions.
Not as bad as Virgin flying into Hong Kong though. Those cunts interrupt you with an announcement from the pilot, which they repeat in a different language, then follow that with the same announcement from the cabin crew, which is also repeated in a different language.
Meanwhile I already knew what they were trying to tell me because the fucking seatbelt light had already silently swiftly efficiently conveyed that information.
How fucking ignorant are you?
I mean, shit, this guy is pushing an agenda, but the photographs aren't exactly invented:
https://www.theguardian.com/co...
Yeah, I don't understand that chain of logic either.
"That content can not be shared" isn't just failing to breach of privacy, it's pretty much helping assure it.
The NZ terrorist's video could easily be blocked if they really cared.
How? Which real life terrorist video did it exactly replicate, including frame rate, encoding and sound?
Look at how good YouTube is at recognizing someone merely humming a few bars of some copyrighted song.
I haven't seen that. But it's much much easier to spot patterns in sound and YouTube manages to fuck that up regularly anyway.
the ones Daesh showed on social media many times of people getting beheaded, downed, or immolated
The ones illegal to view and share in the UK? I'm not sure I understand your point.
a WORD is two BYTEs, or 16 bits
Ah, I see you've gone for the 8 bit byte option. Nonetheless a WORD does not have to be 16 bits. Your nitpicking is wrong.
India is the 7th largest country in the world and offers 100Mbps (with unlimited data) for under $15/month but don't let that stop you posting nonsense in bold.
Really?
I can fly to a small island in the sea on the other side of the continent for less than the cost of a train to London, and I live only a 90 minute drive from London.
I thought the US had competitive airlines?
I know. It's almost as though the browser manufacturers aren't consistent in where they choose the balance between security and providing a user experience.
You should write to them all suggesting they sort it out.
Actually no, I spend more on water than on my mobile phone.
I have 'unlimited data' on my phone.