Slashdot Mirror
YouTube Disabled Comments On Livestreams Of A Congressional Hearing On White Nationalism Because They Were Too Hateful (buzzfeednews.com)
Tuesday's hearing was meant to examine the rise of white nationalism and white supremacy and the role social media plays in its spread. Then the comments got hijacked. From a report: YouTube moderators disabled comments on livestreams of the House Judiciary Committee's hearing about hate crimes the rise of white nationalism on Tuesday, deeming them too hateful for the platform. The comment sections quickly flooded with hate speech and white nationalist memes before the hearing had even started. The comments included derogatory remarks about women on camera, anti-Semitic slurs, far-right memes with references to "white genocide," and pro-Trump slogans. The channels' comments sections were deactivated within an hour. [...] YouTube's disabling of comments is ironic: House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat from New York, made special reference in his opening statement of the role social media platforms play in spreading hate speech and extremism in his opening statement.
I don't know if these "You Tube Moderators" have looked around much, but you can find hateful comments on pretty much any video. Why block comments on just this one?
If YouTube wants to block "hateful comments" why do they allow comments anywhere?
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Free Speech. Guaranteed by the first (foremost) amendment to the supreme law of the land.
Anyone who would knowingly abridge it is an enemy of the United States of America.
Period. Full Stop.
The more speech is suppressed the stronger the suppressed will react. Censorship is a loser's game
By what standards?
So it looked like the typical slashdot post comments then?
YouTube blocked comments on this video because it's politically sensitive. They want to maintain control of the narrative, and having the congress look at the comments is likely to impact their control of the narrative.
I understand what a "white supremacist" is. I understand what a "French Nationalist", or a "Argentinian Nationalist" would be. However, the term "White Nationalist" is semantically and massively wrong (but then, so would "Black Nationalist" or "Asian Nationalist"...) After all, what nation is titled as "White"?
I get that stamping out racism is a good thing, but seriously, folks - at least don't mangle the language while you do it.
Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
I'm no babe in the woods (I completed my 100th trip around the block last week), but I've seen some comment threads on news sites that would convince you Neanderthals didn't go extinct; they're alive and well. You just hope the comments are more troll/bombastic in nature and not what people truly believe (OK, maybe I am still a bit naive).
I have a new theory for what's going on now. Among other real-world effects, it explains such extremist reactions on YouTube.
Actually it's not really Trump's idea, but must be coming from Stephen Miller and his associates. Trump is just the puppet. Again.
The Department of Homeland Security is under reconstruction.
Coming soon: The Department of WHITE Homeland Security. #DWHS
Don't think of it as the largest piece of the federal government running amok.
It's just color coordination. White House and White Homeland.
Not sure who coined the term "slow-moving coup". Perhaps Bill Maher? But they are shifting out of first gear now. I'm even beginning to think Trumpism has some of the potential of Stalinism. Depends on the depth of the purge. If the Trumpists start purging the "weaklings" among themselves, that would be an exceedingly bad sign. (I had to wrestle with that "If" for a while...)
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
nAZIS aRE pEOPLE tOO1
Surely there will be an investigation that links this to Russian Trolls, right? Right?!
Tried slipping that one in along with the rest, eh?
Seriously .... it's amazingly bad, how often online conversations or comments on social media devolve into utter garbage. I imagine in this instance, it was egged on because of the political topic of discussion. Furthermore? I'm fairly confident the vast majority of "white supremacist" comments were made by teenagers trying to get a rise out of people.
I mean, sure -- you really DO have these racist hate groups around. But they're generally rather disorganized or lack enough membership to do anything significant. You have FAR more people who are just angry and like to talk trash than you do people who are truly committed to promoting neo-nazis or some kind of white supremacy movement.
Not sure why Trump would do anything like that with his approval numbers among minorities increasing steadily.
After a few years most minorities have started to realize that living is prosperity is far better than living on a Democratic plantation being mined for votes...
You want bitter white nationalism, look no further than the majority of Democrat presidential candidates. If Hillary had won for sure we'd see a DWHS, not a surprise from an elderly southern white woman.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
It's nearly the 10 year anniversary of John Gabriel's groundbreaking theory. https://www.penny-arcade.com/c...
Well.... that be different! Diversity Is Our Greatest Strength!
Z^-1
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
" The comments included derogatory remarks about women on camera, anti-Semitic slurs, far-right memes with references to "white genocide," and pro-Trump slogans."
Wait. pro-Trump slogans the same as anti-Semitic slurs?
Quality editing at its finest!
How about the role Islam plays in spreading hate speech and extremism?
How about the role that the Internet plays? How about the role that the English language plays? How about the role that keyboards play? How about the role that computers play? How about the massive role that oxygen plays?
Lots of things are used by lots of people to do lots of things that lots of people don't agree with. Social media are media; the message comes from the people who use it.
Microsoft is guilty! Linux is guilty! SGI is guilty! (I'm using an SGI-branded keyboard.) Intel and AMD are guilty! Ban them all.
yes yes the hate full 'pro Trump'. Deep State detected...
any place at all where speech is truly free is going to be flooded with hatred trying to drown out everything else.
It's unfortunate, and I don't have a solution, but it is an incontrovertible fact of life.
Why is your comment nearly invisible? Yes, your Subject: line isn't greatly illuminating, but I don't see the basis for the current score of 1. Some kind of troll moderation effect?
The comic you linked to is rather insightful. My favored solution approach would involve MEPR (Multidimensional Earned Public Reputation) so that people who have a track record of not acting like that would acquire additional visibility, while the trolls would be helped in rendering themselves less and less visible. Anonymity has limited justification. Near as I can tell, almost all secrecy can only be justified based on prior and ongoing secrecy, and circular justifications are weak.
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
What YouTube staff did here was stop this instance of their social media platform being used to foment white nationalism (Why are we using that term anyway? I thought those types hated political correctness?). That it still happened in the first place is a case in the point that the spread of such antisocial ideology is endemic to social media. No irony, just evidence of the issue that the hearing is about.
How come nobody is calling out the Japanese for their overt racism?
You just hope the comments are more troll/bombastic in nature and not what people truly believe (OK, maybe I am still a bit naive).
I used to believe this, but that belief has been thoroughly debunked by the US Executive branch, and its supporters, over the last two or three years.
Not least of which today, when a white nationalist should, according to the Orange one, be given a free pass because of his religious ethnicity, and anyone criticizing his racism, bigotry, and extreme immigration policies shall be tarred with the "anti-semetic" brush for having the audacity of calling said bigot out.
Upwards of 4% of European DNA is Neanderthal DNA; black Africans have zero Neanderthal DNA.
The point is not that one group is "better" than another, but this idea that all humans are clones of each other, and that race is a social construct, makes no sense; it makes no sense in the raw numbers, and it makes no sense in everyday life.
People know it's bullshit.
Now, look into average IQ measurements. Come on; you can do it. Stare into that deep abyss, and know reality for what it is.
YouTube's disabling of comments is ironic
If by "ironic" you mean "totally fucking predictable" then yeah, I suppose it was.
Nope, no sig
These are considered 'hate' these days? I suppose having HQs of major technology companies close to each others just reinforces hysteria already present in the society by blowing one view of imminent right wing overtake while punishing every doubtful voice as racists, homophobic or what else.
No, Nazism was not a variant of Italian Fascism. Nazism grew out of a certain brand of socialism that came to the fore in Germany in the 1920s, in particular with the rise of the SA. Mussolini himself at first determined to stay neutral in WWII, but thought that by backing Hitler, Italy would keep and enlarge its embryonic African empire (it was deeply stung by the League of Nations determining the invasion and annexation of Ethiopia was illegal). They may have grown out of similar sentiments in both countries (I'd chunk Hungarian nationalism and Spanish Falange in the same boat), but the SA, the progenitor of the Nazis, was in many ways a very different movement ideologically from Mussolini's.
Nazism itself was always a moving target. Hitler was primarily interested in achieving power. He allied with Rohm and his SA thugs because it gave him a private army to go after the softer elements of the Weimar republic. But as soon as the SA ceased to be useful to Hitler, it was absorbed into the SS and other units, and Rohm, who, bizarrely enough, still seemed to love Hitler right up until the end, was shot. After that, Nazism became basically a full-on personality cult. It was whatever Hitler said it was.
Ironically enough, Churchill actually plead with Mussolini to either join the Allies (as Italy had done in WWI), or at least to stay out of the war. Churchill actually took the time to praise some of Mussolini's accomplishments. While he didn't approve of the methods or the form of government, the Italian Fascists were a different creature from the SA or the Nazi Party.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
But I don't see anyone banning Che Guevara shirts.
You can keep downmodding; I'll just keep reposting.
If I were a leftist (you know, somebody who thinks he has a moral obligation to overthrow the existing system at any cost and by any means), then I would pretend to be a rabid, right-wing, racist, white nationalist. That's the easiest way to get people on board with general censorship, and it's the easiest way to label as a "Nazi"* anybody with even a hint of support for the "patriarchy".
* By the way, "Nazi" means "National Socialist", and is a racist variation of Italian fascism, which was itself an nationalist variation of Marxism, which is of course a left-wing, topple-the-existing-system ideology.
That anyone would think they are making a point by starting off with fake laughter and the word "seriously"
If you can't deal with talking about issues own it and and own the rest of your mental health problems.
People can do their own research. Here's Wikipedia to get you started:
Now, as is well known, and is as noted there, Hitler viewed "Marxists" as the enemy of Fascists, but of course he did! Fascists were nationalist, while Marxists were transnationalist; they were 2 sects of the same deranged religion, killing each other in the same that the various Christian sects of yore hacked through each other, or in the same way that Sunnis and Shiites murder each other today.
If even wikipedia with its quite strong means of control for bias has a problem with groups of well organized 'activists' then I do not think any scheme like MEPR would work. Maybe we can get something almost working and maybe that is MEPR but that will not, on its own, fix the problem.
I'm wondering if it was all true haters, all astroturfing, all trolls, or a combination of all? We do know that both sides aren't above faking the opposition's tactics in order to make themselves look good or build a false narrative that supports their views.
Hell, the trolls or the astroturfers (or both) could have been the first ones to do it and that encouraged the haters to start up, kind of like priming a pump. The sad part is we will never know for sure. My money is that most was true but there was some astroturfing going on as well, but nowhere as big as the true f**ktards.
Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
I am unable to interpret that as a request for clarification, not does it suggest the slightest awareness of my earlier writings on the general topic. Therefore I can only congratulate you on your remarkable mind-reading or other psychic capabilities and beg you to explain what is wrong with the idea. Surely you can share a tiny bit of your infinite wisdom with us peasants?
(Yes, I'm overreacting, but it might be triggered by your handle.)
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
None of this proves you're smart or right. Your definition of imaginary "leftists" is absurd. Your spamming repetition just makes you look even stupider. All you're doing is annoying people and embarrassing yourself.
Mussolini was a socialist. He was a leading member of the Italian Socialist Party (PSI).
I find it amusing and interesting that the "conservatives" want businesses to have rights and religion when they are discriminating against gays, but freak out when some business decides they don't want said "conservatives" as a customer.
It's a bit like the "tolerance" groups that only have tolerance for the groups/religions/etc. THEY like.
Left/Right, D/R, doesn't matter. They are all stupid. :)
Is it just me, or does this seem somewhat contrived? Almost as if someone put the word out to prove the point.
I'm sure the subtlety of this genius move by YouTube will slip by many here. Disabling the comments was not the genius move in this case. It was allowing them in the first place. YouTube knew what the comment section would turn into. By allowing and then disabling it accomplished a couple of things. First it added a form of "evidence" and validity to the congressional hearing showing all the mean white nationalists. Second it showed that they could handle the situation without government intervention. Third by disabling after the fact it made news out of what would have been a non issue had they disabled them from the start. Yes the congressional hearing would still be news but YouTube would miss out on the lime light. Lastly it made YouTube look like the white ...no POC knight in shining armor to their beloved advertisers. Well played.
It's right there:
Here:
And here:
Also, read the Nazi platform, which Hitler helped craft. The rift in the early Nazi party was between 2 factions: Hitler wanted to make Germany a strong military power first, and then implement socialism once Germany was secure; the others wanted to implement socialism first, and then go about building a strong military power.
Like, seriously. What's wrong with you?
You can keep downmodding; I'll just keep reposting.
If I were a leftist (you know, somebody who thinks he has a moral obligation to overthrow the existing system at any cost and by any means), then I would pretend to be a rabid, right-wing, racist, white nationalist. That's the easiest way to get people on board with general censorship, and it's the easiest way to label as a "Nazi"* anybody with even a hint of support for the "patriarchy".
* By the way, "Nazi" means "National Socialist", and is a racist variation of Italian fascism, which was itself a nationalist variation of Marxism, which is of course a left-wing, topple-the-existing-system ideology.
Where have you been? To the city hall meeting but couldn't get in Pussy Cat Pussy Cat Why was that? It was all about cats and their habitats But they only admitted dogs and rats
Seeing hateful comments online does not bother me, even if the targets are me, my family, or my friends.
Censorship bothers me though.
Perhaps a better solution would be to filter comments client-side by default, and if you are OK with seeing shocking content, allow the user to disable the filter.
White Nationalism is the radical notion that we whites have human rights.
Specifically:
we have the right to ethnicity
we have the right to nationality
we have the right to our culture
we have the right to national self-determination
we have the right to self-government
Visualize a Free White Nation!!!
> Well, US interference in the Russian election got the Russians Boris Yeltsin instead of Vladimir Zhirinovsky which is going from catastrophic to merely terrible. Russian interference in the US election got the Americans a completely senile, corrupt businessman, money launderer, tax cheat, bank fraudster, slum lord, pussy grabber and serial liar (basically Trump is American Yeltsin) instead of a controversial but generally competent female politician.
So your real problem with the so-called interference is who won? I see, it's telling that you don't believe it's bad or something, you just hate the results, and it only completely undermines your attempt to take a moral high ground here. But, honestly, I guess that does explain why you're not bothered by Mueller working with Joseph Mifsud (Maltese Professor, FBI/CIA asset), Alexander Downer (Australian Diplomat), Stephan Halper (U.K. Academic and FBI/CIA asset), or Charles Tawil (Israeli CIA asset) and Oleg Deripaksa, despite there seeming to be a criminal referral over some of that.
> I'm not quite sure who got the shorter end of the stick here but since Zhirinovsky would not have hesitated to start WWIII but Trump merely might start WWIII I think the we all probably benefitted more from American interference in Russa's elections than vice versa.
It's weird that you think that Russia is going to start WWIII with someone you think they cheated to install as leader, no? Just how dumb do you think we are to let you have things both ways? It was Hillary mumbling about war with Russia, not Trump, anyhow. You guys just tried to spin it around after it started hurting your poll numbers by claiming that he was going to nuke someone, but you'd have to be a complete moron to fall for that by now, given that instead he's helping create peace in NK. But I see how you folks don't give a crap about the people there who have been suffering for decades, so yeah... I'm not really surprised that you fall for that ridiculous propaganda. Then again, your username appears to be German, and that whole country has a way of falling for socialist propaganda over and over again....
CEO OF YOUTUBE (JEW)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Wojcicki
FOUNDERS OF GOOGLE (JEW, You already know them.) (Brin,Page)
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-google-is-more-jewish_b_1272245
You all better start shouting everywhere for Jews to get the fuck out or you will just do it later after you're screwed by the Jews.
You have to log in to even comment on YouTube. You are already censored by Jews by doing so.
Recognize this: Jewish is not a race, Christianity is not a race, Buddhism is not a race, Islamic is not a race, etc. BUT HERE IS THE DEAD GIVEAWAY. Jews (and Trump) make laws against Jews because "antisemitism" is "racist". It is not a fucking race wake up people THEY LIED because the JEWS LIE. The whole thing only has capability of confusing the mid-range double digit IQ's anyways. They still try it. Dummies can yell on the web in all caps too and its just dummies. JIDF perfect example. Jewish internet defense force, look it up. They are doing all of this shit on purpose they literally have nothing else to live for. Are they striving for "salvation" no. Any reason except making believe their dumb asses are smart because they get away with lies when nobody decent would lie? no.
Pay attention now or later but they want to take away your guns and control your speech. Think hard about it. Seen the sneaky red flag gun bill just passed without much news by Lindsey Graham? Kinda snuck it by eh? More gun checks oh yeah save the children yeah. But there is a problem with that shit isn't there.
https://twitter.com/superzar2000/with_replies
Mangling the language is one of the most important tools of the professional liars. Basic ontology of lies:
Level 0: Self-contradiction. Something is obviously wrong. Only amusing variation is when both halves are false.
Level 1: Counterfactual. As the famous saying says, any fool can check the facts.
Level 2: Partial truth. Two basic variations. One is to omit parts so as to deny actually lying, but the higher form involves actively creating a false perception of reality based on the gaps.
Level 3: Reframing. This is where the best liars work, distorting reality until you have no idea what color the sky is. Mangling the language is one of their best tools, and "white nationalism" is merely a deliberately confusing repackaging of a brand that has become too toxic.
Amusingly enough, Trump is a rather poor liar, usually bumbling about at the low levels and rarely getting as high as Level 2. However, Trump does have some excellent liars working for him. Right now I think his best (= worst) one is Kellyanne Conway. Many of the best (still = worst) liars are most effective at arm's-length, often using Trump as a facade or MacGuffin. That includes such brilliant liars as Roger Stone and Steve Bannon.
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
words in the comment section to get your smackdown. Don't even need to include the witnesses/
Because this could have been used to guage just how big the problem is.
But of course, feelings come before anything practical.
Can Spain call in for the same support when any Catalan separatist is found to be talking online?
The Germany gov on politics and history?
Can a faith request the same for blasphemy, idolatry, people talking about how to escape their faith?
A faith that has no way for a person to escape that faith?
A movie company demands bad reviews of their new movie not be presented in any way online? An actor wants a review of their movie removed?
China over the freedoms of Taiwan? No talking about the real China, Taiwan?
China on a cartoon bear, a book like 1984, the Tiananmen square protests, the history of the Communist party.
New Zealand on media reporting?
Canada on the use of French politics online and another October Crisis?
A nation with illegal immigration?
Everyone in power is going to have a topic that SJW have to stop people from talking about.
Thats what makes the US freedom of speech and freedom after speech so great.
The right to publish and the right to talk.
The right of the press to report and the right of the people to read such reporting and talk about any topics they want.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Of the 5 pioneers who are the core components in the formation of Fascism, 1 was anarchist, 2 were socialist, 1 was arguably socialist.
Many people who use the term don't even know the history behind how it came to be and can't even name the pioneers and creators, they just throw their half-baked superifical brainlet impressions of the term, and in 90% they are Americans resulting from the degraded education system over there.
Is this the thing now? We're just gonna make up shit to make history like we like it eh? Unless there's some sly reference you're alluding to, you just straight pulled some bullshit outta your ass. Obama doesn't have fuckall to do with what trump told kirstjen nielson to be doing. He also didn't have her stuffing her stupid face full of mexican food while caging mexicans. You're 100% unequivocaly lying.
How about it? Nobody is saying that social media platforms play the sole role in spreading hate speech. But right now, we're talking only about their role.
If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
The goyim know. Shut in down!
Can't live with em
There is an awful lot of anger out there.
Those of Caucasian decent have been told for years that they are racists simply because of their skin color.
They can't be discriminated against because they aren't the right color.
They have something called " White Privilege " that, apparently, is some sort of " I win " button available on tap.
They get turned down for jobs and education slots because the Company or University has to have enough minorities lest they be called racists too.
Standardized tests are all racist because, apparently, minorities have issues with them. So they just get rewritten to make the numbers look better.
Slavery is still their fault apparently, irregardless of the fact the last " slaves " in America were freed ~150 years ago.
( The reparations movement, and all the politicians using it to further their political career, can just f*ck off. )
Starting a #WhiteLivesMatter movement would instantly be classified as some White Nationalist Klan Nazi Terrorist Group and the media would just lose it.
Given the above:
Is there anyone out there who doesn't think a very small percentage of impacted folks might be just a tad bit angry about it all ?
Is there anyone out there who doesn't think an even smaller percentage of that small percentage might even be REALLY angry about it ?
And of that laughably tiny percentage, a few folks might actually do something rather radical ?
This is shocking why ?
Maybe they're just tired of being the " Bad Guy " for nothing more than their skin color.
The Neanderthals were the smarter, stronger, more advanced, but slower reproducing kin to the Cro-Magnon. In the process of their interbreeding with their cousins (Cro-Magnons) they gave them just enough added intellect to ethnically cleanse them, resulting in the humanity we have today.
Prove me wrong.
White Nationalism is the radical notion that we whites have human rights.
Specifically:
we have the right to ethnicity
we have the right to nationality
we have the right to our culture
we have the right to national self-determination
we have the right to self-government
Visualize a Free White Nation!!!
Tear down the Empire!
this is what it looks like.
someone who wants to form a whites only ethno-state. This is a thing that exists and is growing and therefore needs a name. What else would you call that? And how is it mangling the language?
It reminds me of one of my mainframe buds who couldn't wrap his head around the concept of metadata. "It's just data!". Well, no, it's not. It's data about data. "But that's just data". Yes, but it's a kind of data, and it became increasingly common and important to discuss so we made a term for it so that we could discuss it more clearly and succinctly.
Same thing here. I could say "Persons who advocate for a White Ethno-State" but if I'm going to be talking about them a lot "White Nationalist" is easier. Now, that I'm stuck talking about them a lot shows how bad things have gotten....
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
The Problem is that when you cut programs for fighting domestic terror in a country where white supremacists account for a disproportionate amount of attacks and then say both sides are bad when literal Nazis are rallying, well...
There just comes a time to call a Spade a Spade. I don't care of Trump really drinks the Kool-Aid or is just doing it for the votes or even the lulz. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and hiel Hitler's like a duck, it's a White Nationalist. Sooner we stop living in denial the better. This will not end well for us otherwise. Ignoring reality never does...
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
I wonder why people get so mad when people talk about white nationilsm. It's truly a fucking puzzle that nobody can solve.
I hadn't heard of this and you've been too oblique in your description. Could you name the individual in question to aid me in finding out more information?
no u r.
Sure, he was the star of The Saint.
1."How do you raise the minimum wage to 15/hr while simultaneously allowing an endless flood of people in that will work for $5/hr ?"
Easy, you only care about your profit and you manipulated 'suckers' into not being too annoyed, since you clearly given them 15/hr raise. (haha)
2. "If sexual preference is biologically determined, just how is gender a social construct ?"
Who said its biologically determined? For example in prisons/army there is not much choice so... i'll let you figure that one out by yourself.
3."Or the simple If it's OK for the U.S. to interfere in Russian elections, why wouldn't you expect them to return the favor ?" ... everything THEY do is bad, evil, satan made them do it, they are subhuman monsters, dogs,... Its common propaganda intensified in wartime.
Rules for US are different from rules for THEM.
Everything WE do is good, nice, 'given by god', democratic, we spread freedom
In other words, white people aren't allowed to be concerned about our coming MINORITY status, in our OWN countries, which obviously means we won't have our own countries any more. Which is somehow a good thing. Anybody care to tell me why?
White people are supposed to accept mass immigration until it is irreversible without tens of millions of people being killed. When did white people ask for mass immigration? Why would we want to become minorities in our own countries? I thought being a minority was a bad thing?
Any 'hate' in my words above? This is what Youtube has been banning - any speech that doesn't go with the narrative.
Those white people reading these words who actually want more immigration obviously want to live as a white minority in a non-white majority country, so why don't you just MOVE to Africa, or India, or Brazil, or China, and become a white minority instantly?
The government sent armed men to the baker and told him he had to bake the gay cake.
Where are the armed men forcing youtube to allow comments they don't agree with?
captcha: HYPOCRISY
No serious* person in the Progressive movement
You invalidate your entire post by opening with the No True Scotsman fallacy. You use it more than once.
And I don't think you speak for the whole "Progressive movement". Did they elect you Queen of the Progressives?
We'll just leave identifying all the other logical fallacies your post is overflowing with as exercise for other readers.
What's really interesting is this:
1. In spite of the amount of hate going *down* for the last fifty years, recently since about 2012 the number of neo-nazi posts and comments have skyrocketed
2. The english language level of these posts is around grade 5
Where are all these neo-nazis coming from? I personally don't know any and have only ever ran into one person in my entire life who is openly racist.
Answer: they are fake and coming from a combination of russians, bots and the far left who have an agenda to get anti-neo nazi laws put in place with such a broad reach they can shut down the opinion of anyone right of center left by deeming it neo nazi.
Meanwhile every single western white majority nation is facing an immigration crisis, which has been condoned if not outright urged on by corporate media and politicians eager to participate in social engineering at a national level. The more fractured a society is, the easier it is to exploit and subvert it. This is happening.
Whites in the US are already projected to be in the minority status within several decades, and yet NGOs funded by certain billionaire 'jewish philanthropists' are promoting open borders and involved in organizing massive migrant caravans.
This replacement theory has a foundation of verifiable evidence.
Came for the garbage comments -- wasn't disappointed. Wouldn't do again, too nauseating...