But then you run into problems where people feel they have to have a full time job while studying just in case they don't do well, and they aren't able to afford that. Thus, because of that extra bullshit, they aren't able to focus on their studies as much, and their grades drop.
I absolutely disagree. The inevitable result of low tuition is lowering the bar, vastly more students who don't take it seriously, and a drastic educational quality reduction for everyone, diluting all degrees.
They could simply price the credit hours differently based on what type of class it is. Gen ed credits are a base price, STEM credits are a discount of that, and some other stuff will be at a premium.
Republicans who are against abortion are almost always also against any kind of welfare or assistance program that would help the mother actually raise the child in something other than complete and abject poverty.
I'm sure you would. I'm sure your fantasy world also has banks not fucking students over. But here in reality, stuff like this is necessary to allow lower income students to go to school without working themselves to death while doing it, allowing them to actually do some LEARNING while in school, and pull themselves up compared to how they grew up.
Loans would only end up going to people that banks actually thought would be willing an able to pay back the loan.
So not a single poor person would get one. I can't see any way that would be bad/s.
And I find this idea that, "I got completely fucked, so you should be fucked as well" to be absolutely retarded. Doing what would be better for the country and the economy should take precedence over some dick measuring contest over who paid more that you seem to be obsessed with.
Gone are the days where the typical Mac user was a power user, why do you think the Pro line has been all but forgotten?
Because 1. The Mac Pro is still alive, just a little bit stagnated. And 2. Most people who thought they needed Mac Pros are being served just fine with MacBook Pros and iMacs.
That's why you specifically buy devices with unlocked bootloaders now, and be vocal about the opposition to locked bootloaders. That way companies will see there is still a market for them.
Because the members of the union decided they wanted it that way. Unions are a democratic institution; don't like what the union is doing? Then vote for better leaders.
That is absolutely false. The members of the union get to decide on the rules. Why does it automatically have to be seniority based unless the people who work there want it that way?
No they can't, and by making that statement, you've shown that you're a complete idiot. A single mother with multiple kids who has to work multiple jobs is NOT going to be able to afford to home school.
Or if you give parents a choice with vouchers since anyone can afford a private school when given the same funds public schools get.
And those that can't afford to go to the private schools get stuck with public schools with even less funding. Sounds like a great recipe for improving education in this country.
Except that statement is horse shit. For one, charter schools and private schools get to select who they educate. Public schools do not. So private schools can take the best students around, and leave the public schools with all of the special needs and problem kids.
I am anti-union when it comes to goods and services that are not a critical need for society and should survive by their own objective merit and quality.
Why? Why can the company band themselves together to negotiate against individual workers, but the workers can't band together to restore some kind of balance of power?
Sounds nice in theory, but in reality it doesn't really work like that. Most employers won't give a shit if one guy leaves; they'll just overwork the rest of the staff while the guy struggles to find work.
Slashdot Mirror
The economy doesn't grow because it has 10 more scientists
It grows because the research those 10 scientists do creates new areas of industry and new technologies for products.
and ... that's why Minnesota is trying to ban them.
This has been debunked completely.
But then you run into problems where people feel they have to have a full time job while studying just in case they don't do well, and they aren't able to afford that. Thus, because of that extra bullshit, they aren't able to focus on their studies as much, and their grades drop.
I absolutely disagree. The inevitable result of low tuition is lowering the bar, vastly more students who don't take it seriously, and a drastic educational quality reduction for everyone, diluting all degrees.
That only happens if those people graduate.
They kinda do, because in most companies, the engineering track dries up after a few years.
I think it's better to do nothing and let the market decide.
Quite possibly the worst possible idea.
They could simply price the credit hours differently based on what type of class it is. Gen ed credits are a base price, STEM credits are a discount of that, and some other stuff will be at a premium.
Except reality doesn't allow that to happen. Social issues still come up, and they are still going to have to have a stance on them.
Republicans who are against abortion are almost always also against any kind of welfare or assistance program that would help the mother actually raise the child in something other than complete and abject poverty.
I'd rather see no government loan backing at all.
I'm sure you would. I'm sure your fantasy world also has banks not fucking students over. But here in reality, stuff like this is necessary to allow lower income students to go to school without working themselves to death while doing it, allowing them to actually do some LEARNING while in school, and pull themselves up compared to how they grew up.
Loans would only end up going to people that banks actually thought would be willing an able to pay back the loan.
So not a single poor person would get one. I can't see any way that would be bad /s.
Sounds like short sighted bad parenting
Or a case of not having piles of money sitting around.
And no, college should not be a "privilege". Unless you want to remove any kind of competitive advantage this country has.
And I find this idea that, "I got completely fucked, so you should be fucked as well" to be absolutely retarded. Doing what would be better for the country and the economy should take precedence over some dick measuring contest over who paid more that you seem to be obsessed with.
If your future plans include replacing BSD UNIX with your shitass iOS, I am so fucking gone
And nothing of value would be lost.
Also, you might want to look into what iOS actually is. It's running the same fucking kernel as your Mac Mini.
Gone are the days where the typical Mac user was a power user, why do you think the Pro line has been all but forgotten?
Because 1. The Mac Pro is still alive, just a little bit stagnated. And 2. Most people who thought they needed Mac Pros are being served just fine with MacBook Pros and iMacs.
Space?
That's why you specifically buy devices with unlocked bootloaders now, and be vocal about the opposition to locked bootloaders. That way companies will see there is still a market for them.
Because the members of the union decided they wanted it that way. Unions are a democratic institution; don't like what the union is doing? Then vote for better leaders.
Further, no one said that the union has to dictate pay scales. The union could simply negotiate for better working conditions and benefits.
That is absolutely false. The members of the union get to decide on the rules. Why does it automatically have to be seniority based unless the people who work there want it that way?
And at the same time, they pay the teachers less
Why is that seen as a good thing?
Anyone can afford to home school.
No they can't, and by making that statement, you've shown that you're a complete idiot. A single mother with multiple kids who has to work multiple jobs is NOT going to be able to afford to home school.
Or if you give parents a choice with vouchers since anyone can afford a private school when given the same funds public schools get.
And those that can't afford to go to the private schools get stuck with public schools with even less funding. Sounds like a great recipe for improving education in this country.
And I'd estimate that you're full of crap.
Except that statement is horse shit. For one, charter schools and private schools get to select who they educate. Public schools do not. So private schools can take the best students around, and leave the public schools with all of the special needs and problem kids.
I am anti-union when it comes to goods and services that are not a critical need for society and should survive by their own objective merit and quality.
Why? Why can the company band themselves together to negotiate against individual workers, but the workers can't band together to restore some kind of balance of power?
Sounds nice in theory, but in reality it doesn't really work like that. Most employers won't give a shit if one guy leaves; they'll just overwork the rest of the staff while the guy struggles to find work.