No, the onus is on you. You present facts as to why she is a good person, and we're all assholes for calling her out. You show why she's not an ignorant bitch that is doing much more harm than possible good.
I never said anything about her love for her son, or her past. Nice strawman, cocksucker.
However, actions speak louder than words. Her actions have been that of an attention whore. Like I said, if she truly was wanting to help her son, she's be looking to find the actual cause, not latch on to some horseshit conspiracy theory.
No she's not. She's not helping anyone. She's made up her mind, and is throwing money at proving that. If she really wanted to help, she would be donating money to actual research going into finding the cause of autism. As it is, she's just being an attention whore with a pulpit and a fake crisis.
I'm sure the official Debian repositories have someone overseeing what goes into them. And just like with the new Mac Store, you can always go somewhere else to get apps that they don't have.
It quite possibly could help others. But at the same time, this guy has limited resources, and those are better spent working with his autistic child, instead of speculating what caused something that can't really be changed. Not saying others shouldn't research this, but the guy who already has an autistic child already has his hands full.
Do the world a favor and stop talking. Vaccines do prevent a full blown infection. They cause a minor one to build immunity, thus increasing the chances of not developing a full blown infection. As for developing the immunity naturally, this is a much lower chance, as to develop it naturally, you would have to get sick first. And you wouldn't be developing that from a weakened strain.
When the merits of their offering are denied just because its "not Microsoft", then there is a problem, and its not with Google.
You can try to bitch and moan about taxpayer waste all you want, but at the end of the day, Google is still entitled to a fair shake. If they feel they aren't receiving that, then their only remedy is to go to the courts.
Why would you? If you're just making a box of wood screws for the Home Depot, it is highly unlikely that anyone will ever need or want that information. So why go to the expense of keeping it?
On the other hand, the military (and some other applications) may not need that information either, if everything goes just fine. However, they are willing to pay to make sure that information is kept, just in case. That, and the rigerous amount of testing that those parts go through is what causes the price bump.
Slashdot Mirror
Hey, due to the recession, they repossessed my refrigerator box.
selling locked-down featureless hardware, which is guaranteed to be forever crippled isn't a winning strategy.
Apple's sales numbers and stock price would disagree with you.
No, the onus is on you. You present facts as to why she is a good person, and we're all assholes for calling her out. You show why she's not an ignorant bitch that is doing much more harm than possible good.
Name something she's done for autism besides bitching about vaccines.
I never said anything about her love for her son, or her past. Nice strawman, cocksucker.
However, actions speak louder than words. Her actions have been that of an attention whore. Like I said, if she truly was wanting to help her son, she's be looking to find the actual cause, not latch on to some horseshit conspiracy theory.
No she's not. She's not helping anyone. She's made up her mind, and is throwing money at proving that. If she really wanted to help, she would be donating money to actual research going into finding the cause of autism. As it is, she's just being an attention whore with a pulpit and a fake crisis.
No its not. Now quit your goddamned fearmongering, you stupid twat.
You don't have to use it. If you never open it up, then you'd never know it was there.
No they haven't. No more than Apt has replaced getting software from any other place for Debian systems.
Take off your tinfoil hat and go outside. Enjoy the sun. Or snow, depending on where you are.
Can you create an Apt repository that exists for pay for software? As in, software the user has to pay for to use?
It could just be a temporary sale, meant to draw attention to the App Store. I believe Pixelmator is doing something similar.
Either that, or maybe it is cheaper to do business on the App Store than Steam.
I'm sure the official Debian repositories have someone overseeing what goes into them. And just like with the new Mac Store, you can always go somewhere else to get apps that they don't have.
A lot of netbooks don't come with optical drives either.
You're going to have to show some evidence that Climate Change is all a hoax. Evidence that hasn't been completely discredited.
It quite possibly could help others. But at the same time, this guy has limited resources, and those are better spent working with his autistic child, instead of speculating what caused something that can't really be changed. Not saying others shouldn't research this, but the guy who already has an autistic child already has his hands full.
Did they ask him what he cited for evidence now that his main source of dogma was discredited?
You've been the one saying that we should ignore the good they do because of the bad stuff the perpetuate.
Do the world a favor and stop talking. Vaccines do prevent a full blown infection. They cause a minor one to build immunity, thus increasing the chances of not developing a full blown infection. As for developing the immunity naturally, this is a much lower chance, as to develop it naturally, you would have to get sick first. And you wouldn't be developing that from a weakened strain.
You're an idiot. Look up Herd Immunity, and then go thank each and every person you know that has gotten a flu shot.
Ideally, there would be more money in almost anything than in Junk Science.
But Junk Science takes much less effort to pay off.
Because she's using that money and going on a gut feeling, not actually trying to find a solution.
When the spec specifically said the only solution being considered was MS Office, then no, Google did not get a fair shot.
When the spec itself calls for a specific vendor's product, then its not a spec, and its not giving anyone else a fair shake.
When the merits of their offering are denied just because its "not Microsoft", then there is a problem, and its not with Google.
You can try to bitch and moan about taxpayer waste all you want, but at the end of the day, Google is still entitled to a fair shake. If they feel they aren't receiving that, then their only remedy is to go to the courts.
Why would you? If you're just making a box of wood screws for the Home Depot, it is highly unlikely that anyone will ever need or want that information. So why go to the expense of keeping it?
On the other hand, the military (and some other applications) may not need that information either, if everything goes just fine. However, they are willing to pay to make sure that information is kept, just in case. That, and the rigerous amount of testing that those parts go through is what causes the price bump.