The big question is, could the Tesla then drive a few hundred miles after that, or did it need to be completely recharged? Other reviews of the model X towing something says it does it with aplomb - but you get a ~100 mile range whilst doing so.
They removed it because 3.5mm is a lot when you're making a phone that's only 7.1mm thick.
Note that budget-Chinese-brand Gionee figured out how to go thin AND have a 3.5mm jack back in 2014 with their eLife S5.1. It was 5.2mm thick and had a 3.5mm jack. I owned one for about 8 months, but the reality was that it was simply too thin to hold comfortably. I think something around 8mm is a realistic thickness from a user-interaction standpoint. Thicker and it can get bulky, thinner and it feels too delicate and is almost too thin to wrap your fingers around comfortably.
But if thinness is the excuse - er, courage - that Apple wants to use, it's kind of damning on them that someone else figured it out 3 years ahead of their move to no jack...
Oh, I have! Most of it is in nice dividend stocks with a 10%+ yield... I'm not going to risk on an emotionally-driven stock like TSLA. Having a price manipulated by pronouncements of a CEO, or buoyed up irregularly by irrational investors is something I do not want to play around in. My guess is we get near the end of the year, TSLA is down to 3-4 months of cash and credit left in the room, and probably is bought out by another major brand. But we'll see...
I guess you're forgetting that Samsung, back in March 2016, released the S7 Edge. It's as thin as the iPhone X (7.7mm), it has a headphone jack - and it's IP68 rated. That kind of technology is normal. Only Apple couldn't figure out how to do that magical combination of thin, headphone jack, and IP68 rating.
The question is whether or not it's worth having a true all-screen smartphone if it means there's no front-facing camera, ambient light sensors, or stereo speakers.
Absolutely NOT!
Until Apple does it, then it is a must-have and an obvious requirement.
Tesla is not hitting any of their estimates for Model 3 production. Not even close. Considering they estimated 20K/month min to "break even", there is no surprise at all they are still losing billions of dollars - BEFORE capital and NRE expenses.
Ohreally? Ifothersdidn'tcallitAssist you might have a point. Pretty much EVERYONE else calls it Driver Assist; only Tesla is brash (and stupid) enough to call it "Autopilot".
How about not having drone strikes at all. Stop helping to create terrorists by supporting terroristic states in the Middle East, and live our lives in peace.
We're trying to do that right now by withdrawing from any and all support from Iran - a huge sponsor of terror - and we're being castigated for it. So do we support them, or not?
Nope. May 2010 you're up at ~57% wrong track, as compared to ~53% wrong track now. So the end points have a general trend down. The wrong track also spikes through most of 2011 and again in 2013. It rises again through 2015 to mid-2016, before it finally starts falling. In no way is that neutral.
Hmmm... Looking at the graph, it seems to me people are generally moving towards happy with the direction of the country. Check the graph's trend since 2010 - 8 years ago - it's getting better, slowly. And it's really increased fast since President Trump's election - and it's average for the entire Trump administration is lower than most of the entire Obama administration (and lower than any 1.5 year period of that administration). No lie needed - the data is the data.
Slashdot Mirror
So wait, your vehicle can't pull a 747 like a Volkswagen Toureg can? Note the 747 is a solid 100 tons more weight than the 787 the X managed here...
The big question is, could the Tesla then drive a few hundred miles after that, or did it need to be completely recharged? Other reviews of the model X towing something says it does it with aplomb - but you get a ~100 mile range whilst doing so.
Stay inside and breath 2 to 5 times the CO2! Imagine the warming going on inside, too!
Obviously it's fake. If Apple couldn't do it - no one could!
/sarc
False. When a tech site believes it is "supposed to deliver full self-driving", then I would proffer the majority would as well.
That explains the shortage of unicorns and leprechauns!
They removed it because 3.5mm is a lot when you're making a phone that's only 7.1mm thick.
Note that budget-Chinese-brand Gionee figured out how to go thin AND have a 3.5mm jack back in 2014 with their eLife S5.1. It was 5.2mm thick and had a 3.5mm jack. I owned one for about 8 months, but the reality was that it was simply too thin to hold comfortably. I think something around 8mm is a realistic thickness from a user-interaction standpoint. Thicker and it can get bulky, thinner and it feels too delicate and is almost too thin to wrap your fingers around comfortably.
But if thinness is the excuse - er, courage - that Apple wants to use, it's kind of damning on them that someone else figured it out 3 years ahead of their move to no jack...
Oh, I have! Most of it is in nice dividend stocks with a 10%+ yield... I'm not going to risk on an emotionally-driven stock like TSLA. Having a price manipulated by pronouncements of a CEO, or buoyed up irregularly by irrational investors is something I do not want to play around in. My guess is we get near the end of the year, TSLA is down to 3-4 months of cash and credit left in the room, and probably is bought out by another major brand. But we'll see...
I guess you're forgetting that Samsung, back in March 2016, released the S7 Edge. It's as thin as the iPhone X (7.7mm), it has a headphone jack - and it's IP68 rated. That kind of technology is normal. Only Apple couldn't figure out how to do that magical combination of thin, headphone jack, and IP68 rating.
Zero. Thus it's a non-issue - unlike the naming of "autopilot" by Tesla.
How many deaths in the US are attributable to the use of Imperial, rather than Metric, units?
The question is whether or not it's worth having a true all-screen smartphone if it means there's no front-facing camera, ambient light sensors, or stereo speakers.
Absolutely NOT!
Until Apple does it, then it is a must-have and an obvious requirement.
If your "being different" causes confusion and leads to injury or death of others, then yes - you ARE wrong for daring to be different.
We just need to discard them faster, then!
Tesla is not hitting any of their estimates for Model 3 production. Not even close. Considering they estimated 20K/month min to "break even", there is no surprise at all they are still losing billions of dollars - BEFORE capital and NRE expenses.
Oh really? If others didn't call it Assist you might have a point. Pretty much EVERYONE else calls it Driver Assist; only Tesla is brash (and stupid) enough to call it "Autopilot".
So then Autopilot does???
How about blowing up our embassy in 1998? is that a military target, not a civilian terror attack on US soil?
You can ask that religious crazy named Hillary Clinton about why we should put the embassy in the capitol of the country.
Oh, and there's this call to bomb the new US embassy in Jerusalem with a $100,000 prize to the first one to bomb it...
Other than regularly calling for the death of America, sponsoring terror including the USS Cole and other attacks on US citizens and property, and detaining US citizens on fake charges, yeah Iran is perfectly cool with the US!
How about not having drone strikes at all. Stop helping to create terrorists by supporting terroristic states in the Middle East, and live our lives in peace.
We're trying to do that right now by withdrawing from any and all support from Iran - a huge sponsor of terror - and we're being castigated for it. So do we support them, or not?
Well, given the dimensions of the trench, and the average mass of a grocery bag is around 9 grams, and the density of LDPE is around 0.94 g/cc, it would take about 1.87 * 10^22 bags to fill the trench to the surface of the ocean.or about 2.4 trillion bags per person on the face of the Earth.
Nope. May 2010 you're up at ~57% wrong track, as compared to ~53% wrong track now. So the end points have a general trend down. The wrong track also spikes through most of 2011 and again in 2013. It rises again through 2015 to mid-2016, before it finally starts falling. In no way is that neutral.
Hmmm... Looking at the graph, it seems to me people are generally moving towards happy with the direction of the country. Check the graph's trend since 2010 - 8 years ago - it's getting better, slowly. And it's really increased fast since President Trump's election - and it's average for the entire Trump administration is lower than most of the entire Obama administration (and lower than any 1.5 year period of that administration). No lie needed - the data is the data.