Slashdot Mirror


User: commodore73

commodore73's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
114
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 114

  1. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1

    Those words describe my perspective, which is not judgmental. Cancel that, you are right, I was being judgmental. Now I'm being sarcastic. And/or sardonic.

  2. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1

    CONTROVERSIAL : of, relating to, or arousing controversy controversy : a discussion marked especially by the expression of opposing views : dispute There is no implication of judgement in this definition. If you add something to the definition, or put words like wonderful in my mouth, that is your perception (problem), Clearly we dispute as a result of controversy. Your perceived context is just wrong.

  3. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1

    Everyone on slashdot is trying to demonstrate their intelligence by proving their ignorance, including me. I have met some winners recently.

  4. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1
  5. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1

    No. Calling something controversial is not a judgement statement. It is a statement that there is complexity and more than one opinion.

  6. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1

    They're already there.

  7. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1

    Surprised how many people interpreted my comment that way. I don't find having this IFV treatment to be controversial. I find *not* having it to be controversial.

  8. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1

    I would appreciate any solutions to my social problems.

  9. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1

    Or just adopt.

  10. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1

    Wha...? Reread the summary and what I wrote. It's the opposite of your interpretation.

  11. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 0

    I don't me seeing something as controversial as controversial. Explain to me how having a child with issues is better for the world, for the parents, or for me than having or adopting a child without? I predict no response.

  12. Re:At long last on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1

    Why a banana in the photo?

  13. Re:Who says scientists don't get action? on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 1

    I should have been a doctor.

  14. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 2

    One thing that worries me is that this choice seems to be on the rise, especially with Downs Syndrome (possibly due to the trend of more births late in life, where that lateness reduces the chances of another successful pregnancy). I see it everywhere now in the progressive community in which I live. I would go so far as to speculate that in centuries past, child sacrifice may have been nature's way of dealing with such defects. Humans that would not have survived in the natural world are kept alive in our increasingly artificial world. Nice talking to you.

  15. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 2

    Watch the daily show from last night to see what unnatural things are natural. And I didn't mean any offense to anyone who has children with "defects". It's just a choice I would have trouble making.

  16. Re:easy non-controversial fix on UK Government Backs Three-Person IVF · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What's controversial to me is choosing to have a baby with defects.

  17. Re:Zero on How Much Is Your Gmail Account Worth To Crooks? · · Score: 1

    And another benefit - when you find an email address being used for spam, you can disable it, or worse.

  18. Re:Zero on How Much Is Your Gmail Account Worth To Crooks? · · Score: 1

    Another issue is that setting up a catchall/default increases spam. I get spam at addresses on my domain that I certainly never used; spammers seem to guess/make them up.

  19. Re:I've a suggestion to keep you all occupied... on Was That A Tsunami? · · Score: 1

    I actually have more trouble getting into Canada for some reason (I am a US citizen). One time customs or immigration or whatever asked me to search my hard latop for "media" files. I think they were looking for child porn or maybe copyright violations? It definitely felt like a violation to me. What would have happened if I had refused? What would they have done if they found something? I hate what has happened to this country in such a short time, not that it was perfect when I was a kid (I just wasn't aware of the issues).

  20. the most important thing on How Much Is Your Gmail Account Worth To Crooks? · · Score: 1

    Don't use the same password for any two accounts. Second most important: don't use the same email address for any two accounts.

  21. Re:Zero on How Much Is Your Gmail Account Worth To Crooks? · · Score: 1

    What about when you need to send a message, do you create a real email account for the organization then, or use a real account? I tend to use a real existing account when working with real people.

  22. Re:Zero on How Much Is Your Gmail Account Worth To Crooks? · · Score: 1

    I do the same thing, but more like company@mypersonaldomain.com. I don't think that most companies sell or give away my email addresses, but they give lists to their MARKETING PARTNERS, which certainly do pass them on, or get hacked. I found this out by checking the to lines in spam and seeing united (airlines) and a CMS vendor. I also saw something from a company mailed to the email address associated with one of its competitors; from talking to people I found that a marketing person left the second and apparently took a contact list to the their new job at the first. It is a very worthwhile thing to do.

  23. Re:I've a suggestion to keep you all occupied... on Was That A Tsunami? · · Score: 0

    Trust me, we are on the same page. I claim credit for the phrase "peeping obamas". I believe that even this conversation will be tracked.

  24. Re:I've a suggestion to keep you all occupied... on Was That A Tsunami? · · Score: 1

    How do government contractors make money from that though?

  25. Re:Oh, gag me. on Why Engineering Freshmen Should Take Humanities Courses · · Score: 1

    And tiping. My fingers still ain't tiping write.