He may be a genius, but he is a fucking tool as well.
He claims credit for the woodward-hoffman rules:
Says Corey: "You [Hoffman] cannot deny that despite the possibility of appalling dishonesty at the roots of your collaboration with Bob [Woodward], you elected to close your mind. ..please consider that history many not deal leniently in this matter, taking seriously the possibility not only of Bob's dishonesty, but of your own not unwitting participation in the extension of fraud."
I think the most notable thing about this paper is that the last sentances read "It is our hope that the process described herein will be of value in improving the opply of oseltamivir and in reducing the cost. With regard to the latter, the process described herein in in the (unpatented) public domain."
Slashdot Mirror
He may be a genius, but he is a fucking tool as well. He claims credit for the woodward-hoffman rules: Says Corey: "You [Hoffman] cannot deny that despite the possibility of appalling dishonesty at the roots of your collaboration with Bob [Woodward], you elected to close your mind. . .please consider that history many not deal leniently in this matter, taking seriously the possibility not only of Bob's dishonesty, but of your own not unwitting participation in the extension of fraud."
and I obviously mistyped supply
I think the most notable thing about this paper is that the last sentances read "It is our hope that the process described herein will be of value in improving the opply of oseltamivir and in reducing the cost. With regard to the latter, the process described herein in in the (unpatented) public domain."