You probably missed this bit. "Shane Coughlan, a consultant based in Western Japan and a co-founder of OpenRelief says he took his inspiration for the project from that LinuxCon discussion last year."
plus the chances of any earthquake are quite high in Japan because of their location on a fault, it may be of use to have these planes in reserve.
nope, but if suggested that i put 2 books in front of you and one has sharp corners and the other had rounded corners, you'd say one or both should be patented?
"People left England because of religious oppression.."
No they didn't, they left because they could not force everyone to believe in their religion, thats why they wanted to go to US and set up as you then correctly explained.
"To me, I supposed God created things....I mean, science hasn't come up yet with an explanation how things started. The big bang...well, what was there before that? So, until they can explain how things really all started, I supposed God is as good of an explanation as any. If God was here in the beginning"
No No No. its "not as good an explanation as any" its a lazy excuse to say "if we don't understand it then God did it" The majority of those "rationalisations" have been explained i.e. thunder and lightening is NOT god being angry.
"I believe in God and that he created humans." - Now which God would that be? the one worshiped in the part of the world you were born in, or the Aboriginal, the Norse,, the sun god Mithras (jesus life was modeled on his life )?
we'd probably be a lot more advanced if religion hadn't got in the way. The Egyptians and and the Arab world were driven to going backwards by religion after demonstrating such advances in Mathematics and engineering way before the western world caught up.
You're showing that you don't understand us at all." - thats the point - how can we understand your point of view with all the evidence that exists that creationism is not a valid proposition. Claiming to believe in micro-evolution does not excuse the Fred Flintstone argument.
"At home i choose to use windows because thats what the games run on." aahhh bless... we have a 12 year old posting on /.
since when does "but GNOME's ctrl+space+"fi"+enter is significantly faster" imply using a mouse?
Web based apps are shit, a desktop app is sooo much better
If people are STUPID enough to use Beta software in a live environment, they deserve all the crap they get. How can people be so stupid?
Because it was a structural change, they had to release ti so the app devs could redo their applications.
i don't know why people still don't get this. Kde released KDE 4.0 as a developer release, teh distros fucked up by releasing it.
This complaint is so boring
launch a terminal, su to root, type "init S" - that gives you the least crap
You probably missed this bit. "Shane Coughlan, a consultant based in Western Japan and a co-founder of OpenRelief says he took his inspiration for the project from that LinuxCon discussion last year."
plus the chances of any earthquake are quite high in Japan because of their location on a fault, it may be of use to have these planes in reserve.
nope, but if suggested that i put 2 books in front of you and one has sharp corners and the other had rounded corners, you'd say one or both should be patented?
"The Examiner looked at the Vaio and properly determined that this design was different and not obvious in view of it."
then the Examiner is a fucking arse...
most of us are getting there, its just the fundamentalist religionists dragging down the stats
they can't do that as they have a museum in kentucky (i think) that show humans co-existed and rode them
"People left England because of religious oppression.."
No they didn't, they left because they could not force everyone to believe in their religion, thats why they wanted to go to US and set up as you then correctly explained.
"To me, I supposed God created things....I mean, science hasn't come up yet with an explanation how things started. The big bang...well, what was there before that? So, until they can explain how things really all started, I supposed God is as good of an explanation as any. If God was here in the beginning"
No No No. its "not as good an explanation as any" its a lazy excuse to say "if we don't understand it then God did it" The majority of those "rationalisations" have been explained i.e. thunder and lightening is NOT god being angry.
"The real man is an idealist who sticks to their beliefs in the face of all facts and reality." change "real man" to "politician" and that it works
"I believe in God and that he created humans." - Now which God would that be? the one worshiped in the part of the world you were born in, or the Aboriginal, the Norse,, the sun god Mithras (jesus life was modeled on his life )?
"BUT absent a time machine, I can't rule out that evidence being created as is 10,000 years ago." -
of course you can. read this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating
yep, they can think for themselves and not "ask" a fictitious being for guidance
we'd probably be a lot more advanced if religion hadn't got in the way. The Egyptians and and the Arab world were driven to going backwards by religion after demonstrating such advances in Mathematics and engineering way before the western world caught up.
" It seems to me that not all vestiges of religion have been "sanitized" from the public square." - do you mean Christian religion?
"The First Amendment protects everyone, whether religious or not religious", yes but the religious have more privileges
Here's a start
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17769529
that old chestnut. Here's something for you to read instead of parroting creationist nonsense
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
and now something for you to watch
Irreducible Complexity (bacterial flagellum) debunked by a christian
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_HVrjKcvrU
You're showing that you don't understand us at all." - thats the point - how can we understand your point of view with all the evidence that exists that creationism is not a valid proposition. Claiming to believe in micro-evolution does not excuse the Fred Flintstone argument.
and they are teaching the kids.... its a dangerous race to the bottom of the pit. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/30/christian-fundamentalists-plan-teach-genocide?cat=commentisfree&type=article
yes, i think the EU will jump on this one, at least i hope so. The US's justice dept. is useless at dealing with this sort of nonsense.