Lets see now, if we will be able to find a similar behaviour pattern, anywhere anytime in the world.
Hmmm.
Mohandas Kharamcad Gandhi and his followers - people who have not resisted their opressors, and despite totally being capable of retaliating (even if with sticks) and/or running, have suffered in the hands of british opressors.
Interesting, with your approach, we should classify these people as 'not smart' - in the most politically correct meaning as the saying can be.
"Stay clear of q4 of any year" - and that is a fantastic proposition, in a world of abundance and merriment of course, as it does not take into account the fact that for over 60 years now human race has been eradicating oceans of their fertility with hi-tech troll boats. when species have younglings to feed, they take utmost risks. however in the case at hand, the japanese who are stabbing them to death have no immediate need for feeding their younglings - neither the japanese fishermen who troll oceans to death do.
Yea, a threat no bigger than the threat posed by allowing anybody with the money to acquire guns.
Due to the sheer perversity of this issue, kiddie porn is being used as a surefire joker card by people/interest groups all around the world to bring censorship to internet.
If there wasnt any effect of what japanese did, the breeding-ground heaven for new viruses would be amazon area - lush, warm, humid, zillions of kinds of living creatures to infect and get carried about by, perfect fauna.
But instead we have horrendous amount of new flu coming out of china. only population ?
this was said in order to draw attention to the problem of youth in japan about that matter.
many chinese and japanese look alike. this seems to be annoying them much, so we see them employing extravagant hairdos, garments to differentiate themselves. hair portruding from right side whereas looking down from the left, absurd trousers and jackets.
on top of that, these societies are much traditionalist, also they require their people stick to hard working, traditions, be orderly and so on. This is creating another motive to break up from the society and be different.
All kinds of extravangza follow such needs. Eating starfish shit, wearing titanium jackets, you name it. all for being different and unique.
If you are so ignorant that you dont know the japanese bio warfare program started in 1932 or so to 'weed out' the 'unwanted' in new big japan (chinese lands), you go spread your bullshit around.
even first graders know that, as it has been even run in mainstream documentaries, and japanese prime ministers are apologizing from china for every single bomb that was dropped in 1932-45 with each passing year.
As far as herding animals to their death--that's happened throughout our history. It's a common technique used by hunter-gatherer societies that would herd animals over cliffs to their death.
So were the aristocracy, slavery, supression of the overpowered, conquest and plunder, as well as human sacrifices, killing of female-born infants and so on.
Some thing having had happened during the course of history does not make it right or justifiable. It only provides we learn from our mistakes. Japanese, apparently, do not want to learn.
And that's far more humane than the way industrial farms treat their animals today--and yet you're complaining about this?
Im not complaining about the civil war in sri lanka either. Why ? because it is NOT the subject. if someone brought up the case of the barbaric dairy industry, i would complain comparably.
Also, I did specify a preference for human survival in my post. Dolphins are often valued due to their intelligence compared to other animals, but humans are never measured on such a scale. Call it specism if you want, but it's a part of what's made us successful.
What made us successful was the development of tools, and wanton killing of other species for benefit. dolphins and some other species on the other hand, do not treat humans equally.
is this a good thing ? 'darwinist' ? if so, then we should apply 'survival of the fittest' to its fullest extent then - kill the infirm kids, the sick, the lower strata of the society, the unsuccessful, 'losers', those who can be overpowered, and so on. why not take a successful and proven practice further ? after all, its to the best of our species to get it rid of the infirm and weak.
And I won't address your last two paragraphs because it's obvious you don't know much about Japanese history, and what lead Japan into its hyper-aggression during that period. I don't have any particular penchant for Japanese culture, but your words are just plain racist.
On the contrary, history is my hobby. and i have spent much time on japan alone through its ages to the end of ww2. i very well know what led japan to the hyper aggression, and it was none other than your relegating the running of the country to samurai warrior class in baroque era and the exagerration and divination of the position of 'emperor'. you have quite succeeded in creating a society very similar to prussian military understanding, and this have led to what you did during 30-45. very sad that your people are still unaware of this, and more sad is that apparently the brutal thoughts still linger on deep down inside your people so that you are able to speak about a massacre as something 'natural'.
Japanese have dropped down 'bombs' containing engineered 'flu' viruses (among other diseases) in china starting from 1932 or so until 1945. an estimated 10 million died if you count in the massacres done by the army.
and today, china is the breeding ground of the most formidable flus.
This is the first time i ever talk in an offensive manner and probably be the last, (i hope) and its because of this idiotism :
Firstly, many dolphin species aren't even threatened, much less endangered, and so therefore don't need protection
This sentence implies that if some species do not need protection, it is o.k. to drive them in HERDS to a shallow cove and STAB THEM TO DEATH WITH SPEARS.
Secondly, apparently because you are stupid, or you are disfunctional to the teeth, you have chosen to disregard the iq factor of either squids, or dolphins.
Which concludes to the fact that killing dolphins would be not much different from killing stupid people, newborn babies, and any tribe around the world that is not par with modern civilization's iq standard.
'Massacres' being local does not change a single bit of a shit. Massacre, is massacre. I guess because of stupidity again you chose to put it in quotes. I would like to warn you that putting quotes around a word does not immediately disqualify the event that its describing to be non-equivalent of that word.
If you are stupid as in the above analysis, that is acceptable and forgivable.
Whereas if you are not, and you are sharing the 'nationality' quirk that is abundant in japanese and chinese cultures that causes you to do ANYTHING to be different from each other in your nations - eat anything you come accross, paint your hair in hues of pink and turqouise and all - as ALL of you seem to be similar to each other, and also have strongly and suffocatingly traditional societies that they cause you to do ANY SHIT to be different. and that is VERY bad if that is so, because this is unforgivable.
Also your approach, if you are not stupid of course, explains the fact that with what kind of logic japanese was able to kill around 10 million chinese during 1930-1945 with biological weapons in forms of 'flus', and why the world is STILL suffering from new 'flu' types coming out of china due to the abhorrent amount of germs and viruses your genocide with those bi-weapons caused to breed there over time.
only big label companies and their sponsored software developers believed to be so, maybe, for a short while.
It was stupid right from the start - digital environment, internet is a free medium. freedom is its nature and its result. monopoly, impending 100-year old control schemes for distribution of intellectual property was a 'clueless' idea at best, if not stupid.
Given the big label company ceos, execs are now of a generation that is in their 60-70s, it is no surprise that they have misjudged that we were still in 1950s.
Gramps, you are of a dying generation. you are passing away.
then, instead of trying to screw your label and your shareholders with dinosaur-worthy 'measures', embrace the new digital/internet revolution and leave a good name behind.
or, leave your chairs to younger ones, who are actually able to understand the contemporary times and participate in it.
It is amazing how arrogant the people/parties/groups that think nothing but reaching their own ends by any means (negativity) can be.
I amaze at how this 'diebold' firm can come up and object to some documentary about their intendedly faulty product, when their product's flaws were exposed with visual proof in a spectrum ranging from state investigations to high-profile late night tv shows.
And more amazing is that how these people have not been sued and punished yet.
This phrase has been used before to develop information and methods that helped interest groups, big capital, governments to manipulate and dominate public.
it always go with the bait "better" word.
In this context it will provide an understanding of how the web is, so that some can manipulate the web to their own profit.
NOONE needs anyone to build a 'better' web. THE WEB builds itself, it is an entity... and its free.
you are talking like there is no fishy goings-on around.
Like the 2000 election was not fishy, leave aside that, like in the 2004 election there werent abundant haywire-going election machines with NO paper trails that were manufactured by the surprisingly republican supporter corporations (and tightly knit with the 'boys' in fact) widely used and even after that were tried to be made a standard all over u.s., and only havent been made so because so many suspicious vulnerabilities have popped up in their design.
Man. you fail to see one single point that have always been true way back in world history :
In politics there are no intended mistakes. If something a political entity produces or does (a plan, a deal, a law) is TOO fishy, then it is meant to be fishy. And in a situation like this election machine vulnerabilities, only the overly stupid people do phletora of mistakes in just only one topic - but overly stupid people cant get elected and hold office for that long in the first place. so it is certain that it was planned to be so, but the abundant talks that are being made in talk shows, media, expert circles about the vulnerabilities of voting machines were not.
A company can have a bad or flawed design without malicious intent.
No company squeezes that much amount of flaws into one single box without intent. And this is no local area small business type machine, it is a nationally serving machine, and in a very delicate matter too - deadly for a company's, yet leave aside that, programmers' reputation. however, curiously, there are innumerable flaws in ELECTION machines that are produced in u.s.
if there isnt something fishy here, i am a bunch of bananas on a banana tree.
which had everything to do with touch screen calibration (and the need to recalibrate from time to time) and nothing to do with some right-wing conspiracy.
It is not rocket science to deduct the machines were intentionally miscalibrated - especially when the producer of voting machines happens to be a republican backing company.
Slashdot Mirror
You keep assuming I'm Japanese
I might have done that, in the heat of the moment and from your manner of speaking. i apologize for the mistake.
also, 10 million people is not 'some skeleton in the closet'. it is unparaleled in world history. everything should be put in its place.
and, no. im just very reactive against people who strongly advocate inhumane approaches to issues.
Lets see now, if we will be able to find a similar behaviour pattern, anywhere anytime in the world.
Hmmm.
Mohandas Kharamcad Gandhi and his followers - people who have not resisted their opressors, and despite totally being capable of retaliating (even if with sticks) and/or running, have suffered in the hands of british opressors.
Interesting, with your approach, we should classify these people as 'not smart' - in the most politically correct meaning as the saying can be.
"Stay clear of q4 of any year" - and that is a fantastic proposition, in a world of abundance and merriment of course, as it does not take into account the fact that for over 60 years now human race has been eradicating oceans of their fertility with hi-tech troll boats. when species have younglings to feed, they take utmost risks. however in the case at hand, the japanese who are stabbing them to death have no immediate need for feeding their younglings - neither the japanese fishermen who troll oceans to death do.
Yea, a threat no bigger than the threat posed by allowing anybody with the money to acquire guns.
Due to the sheer perversity of this issue, kiddie porn is being used as a surefire joker card by people/interest groups all around the world to bring censorship to internet.
Please.
If there wasnt any effect of what japanese did, the breeding-ground heaven for new viruses would be amazon area - lush, warm, humid, zillions of kinds of living creatures to infect and get carried about by, perfect fauna.
But instead we have horrendous amount of new flu coming out of china. only population ?
this was said in order to draw attention to the problem of youth in japan about that matter.
many chinese and japanese look alike. this seems to be annoying them much, so we see them employing extravagant hairdos, garments to differentiate themselves. hair portruding from right side whereas looking down from the left, absurd trousers and jackets.
on top of that, these societies are much traditionalist, also they require their people stick to hard working, traditions, be orderly and so on. This is creating another motive to break up from the society and be different.
All kinds of extravangza follow such needs. Eating starfish shit, wearing titanium jackets, you name it. all for being different and unique.
If you are so ignorant that you dont know the japanese bio warfare program started in 1932 or so to 'weed out' the 'unwanted' in new big japan (chinese lands), you go spread your bullshit around.
even first graders know that, as it has been even run in mainstream documentaries, and japanese prime ministers are apologizing from china for every single bomb that was dropped in 1932-45 with each passing year.
maybe i should have said 'first on this scale'.
im anti-drm, if you may have confused me.
As far as herding animals to their death--that's happened throughout our history. It's a common technique used by hunter-gatherer societies that would herd animals over cliffs to their death.
So were the aristocracy, slavery, supression of the overpowered, conquest and plunder, as well as human sacrifices, killing of female-born infants and so on.
Some thing having had happened during the course of history does not make it right or justifiable. It only provides we learn from our mistakes. Japanese, apparently, do not want to learn.
And that's far more humane than the way industrial farms treat their animals today--and yet you're complaining about this?
Im not complaining about the civil war in sri lanka either. Why ? because it is NOT the subject. if someone brought up the case of the barbaric dairy industry, i would complain comparably.
Also, I did specify a preference for human survival in my post. Dolphins are often valued due to their intelligence compared to other animals, but humans are never measured on such a scale. Call it specism if you want, but it's a part of what's made us successful.
What made us successful was the development of tools, and wanton killing of other species for benefit. dolphins and some other species on the other hand, do not treat humans equally.
is this a good thing ? 'darwinist' ? if so, then we should apply 'survival of the fittest' to its fullest extent then - kill the infirm kids, the sick, the lower strata of the society, the unsuccessful, 'losers', those who can be overpowered, and so on. why not take a successful and proven practice further ? after all, its to the best of our species to get it rid of the infirm and weak.
And I won't address your last two paragraphs because it's obvious you don't know much about Japanese history, and what lead Japan into its hyper-aggression during that period. I don't have any particular penchant for Japanese culture, but your words are just plain racist.
On the contrary, history is my hobby. and i have spent much time on japan alone through its ages to the end of ww2. i very well know what led japan to the hyper aggression, and it was none other than your relegating the running of the country to samurai warrior class in baroque era and the exagerration and divination of the position of 'emperor'. you have quite succeeded in creating a society very similar to prussian military understanding, and this have led to what you did during 30-45. very sad that your people are still unaware of this, and more sad is that apparently the brutal thoughts still linger on deep down inside your people so that you are able to speak about a massacre as something 'natural'.
very 'darwinist' indeed.
'huh' definitely.
Japanese have dropped down 'bombs' containing engineered 'flu' viruses (among other diseases) in china starting from 1932 or so until 1945. an estimated 10 million died if you count in the massacres done by the army.
and today, china is the breeding ground of the most formidable flus.
Coincidence ?
Do i REALLY need to elaborate WHY that aint so ?
This is the first time i ever talk in an offensive manner and probably be the last, (i hope) and its because of this idiotism :
Firstly, many dolphin species aren't even threatened, much less endangered, and so therefore don't need protection
This sentence implies that if some species do not need protection, it is o.k. to drive them in HERDS to a shallow cove and STAB THEM TO DEATH WITH SPEARS.
Secondly, apparently because you are stupid, or you are disfunctional to the teeth, you have chosen to disregard the iq factor of either squids, or dolphins.
Which concludes to the fact that killing dolphins would be not much different from killing stupid people, newborn babies, and any tribe around the world that is not par with modern civilization's iq standard.
'Massacres' being local does not change a single bit of a shit. Massacre, is massacre. I guess because of stupidity again you chose to put it in quotes. I would like to warn you that putting quotes around a word does not immediately disqualify the event that its describing to be non-equivalent of that word.
If you are stupid as in the above analysis, that is acceptable and forgivable.
Whereas if you are not, and you are sharing the 'nationality' quirk that is abundant in japanese and chinese cultures that causes you to do ANYTHING to be different from each other in your nations - eat anything you come accross, paint your hair in hues of pink and turqouise and all - as ALL of you seem to be similar to each other, and also have strongly and suffocatingly traditional societies that they cause you to do ANY SHIT to be different. and that is VERY bad if that is so, because this is unforgivable.
Also your approach, if you are not stupid of course, explains the fact that with what kind of logic japanese was able to kill around 10 million chinese during 1930-1945 with biological weapons in forms of 'flus', and why the world is STILL suffering from new 'flu' types coming out of china due to the abhorrent amount of germs and viruses your genocide with those bi-weapons caused to breed there over time.
only big label companies and their sponsored software developers believed to be so, maybe, for a short while.
It was stupid right from the start - digital environment, internet is a free medium. freedom is its nature and its result. monopoly, impending 100-year old control schemes for distribution of intellectual property was a 'clueless' idea at best, if not stupid.
Given the big label company ceos, execs are now of a generation that is in their 60-70s, it is no surprise that they have misjudged that we were still in 1950s.
Gramps, you are of a dying generation. you are passing away.
then, instead of trying to screw your label and your shareholders with dinosaur-worthy 'measures', embrace the new digital/internet revolution and leave a good name behind.
or, leave your chairs to younger ones, who are actually able to understand the contemporary times and participate in it.
already !
"far left" says that, "far left" fears that.
This has long gone out of something that is "far left" annoyance. This is now a MAJOR problem, bush & co is.
What do you need to realize that they are turning u.s. to a ransomed kingdom ? Declaration of Lifetime Presidency ?
you are right. so instead we will turn back to believing what we are said in churches then ?
Definitely, when the flaw is second-by-second captured and demonstrated in live tv.
It is amazing how arrogant the people/parties/groups that think nothing but reaching their own ends by any means (negativity) can be.
I amaze at how this 'diebold' firm can come up and object to some documentary about their intendedly faulty product, when their product's flaws were exposed with visual proof in a spectrum ranging from state investigations to high-profile late night tv shows.
And more amazing is that how these people have not been sued and punished yet.
ease up man. you have fallen into one major ironic gig.
also you got me going there : and the 700,000 Iraqis who are now dead because Haliburton shares needed a boost.
you are going to give them a slap in the face.
I hope all republicans are as conscious as you.
This phrase has been used before to develop information and methods that helped interest groups, big capital, governments to manipulate and dominate public.
it always go with the bait "better" word.
In this context it will provide an understanding of how the web is, so that some can manipulate the web to their own profit.
NOONE needs anyone to build a 'better' web. THE WEB builds itself, it is an entity... and its free.
How many countries there are in the world that outsources their defensive software ?
"insatiable megalomaniac that has screwed the french revolution's ideals" would be the more fitting description for napoleon.
you are talking like there is no fishy goings-on around.
Like the 2000 election was not fishy, leave aside that, like in the 2004 election there werent abundant haywire-going election machines with NO paper trails that were manufactured by the surprisingly republican supporter corporations (and tightly knit with the 'boys' in fact) widely used and even after that were tried to be made a standard all over u.s., and only havent been made so because so many suspicious vulnerabilities have popped up in their design.
Man. you fail to see one single point that have always been true way back in world history :
In politics there are no intended mistakes. If something a political entity produces or does (a plan, a deal, a law) is TOO fishy, then it is meant to be fishy. And in a situation like this election machine vulnerabilities, only the overly stupid people do phletora of mistakes in just only one topic - but overly stupid people cant get elected and hold office for that long in the first place. so it is certain that it was planned to be so, but the abundant talks that are being made in talk shows, media, expert circles about the vulnerabilities of voting machines were not.
A company can have a bad or flawed design without malicious intent.
No company squeezes that much amount of flaws into one single box without intent. And this is no local area small business type machine, it is a nationally serving machine, and in a very delicate matter too - deadly for a company's, yet leave aside that, programmers' reputation. however, curiously, there are innumerable flaws in ELECTION machines that are produced in u.s.
if there isnt something fishy here, i am a bunch of bananas on a banana tree.
yea. unproven like the the gig they pulled in the last election.
which had everything to do with touch screen calibration (and the need to recalibrate from time to time) and nothing to do with some right-wing conspiracy.
It is not rocket science to deduct the machines were intentionally miscalibrated - especially when the producer of voting machines happens to be a republican backing company.