you seem to forget that radiation stays. many millions around black sea coast died of cancer, and the cancer rate among the youth has gone up since chernobyl.
its due to morons like you that these people are dying still, its due to morons like you that an earless bunny is born near fukujima. its due to morons like you that many children will suffer into the future in japan.
this is a verdict on nuclear energy itself. keeping catastrophically dangerous devices as a source of energy was moronic from the start. it was only a matter of time when these would start to pop disasters, and it hasnt even been 50 years.
one of my long time friends who has been living in japan for over 15 years is now packing her bags in tokyo. she says things are not right there. (not talking about the earless bunny).
as far as votes go, i would want to have a vote to have the idiots who talk about progress through terminally dangerous nuclear devices out of this planet, shipped to some place they wont be able to harm anyone.
and dumping of silverlight. there is a saying here, that goes 'the coming of wednesday is apparent from thursday' (yes its backwards). i think you can get what it means.
i WAS telling that anyone who banked on microsoft, including net thing, could get shafted, and a lot of microsoftbots had slammed me. fast forward to > now.... and ?
an armored personnel carrier is an armored vehicle that is designed to carry infantry. this has been as such from the end of world war i, until now. it wont change soon into the future. a vehicle that is designed to withstand small weapon fire. that's it. blahblahblah but the shoulder-launched whatchamacallit anti tank ammunition can.... -> yes, it can. the question is, whether the average infantry that goes against the apc carries that - and the answer is, he does not. that is why apcs are produced.
examine world war ii. you will find that most of the biggest battles of world war ii were fought with vehicles much lighter than what you see in this article. and, you will be surprised that the average infantry assault rifle does not have more penetrating power than average world war ii rifle against such armor thickness.
it IS an apc. doesnt matter how you name it, doesnt matter what you compare it with. it is an armored vehicle that stands firearms, carries heavy weaponry. the drug cartels can field it.
and as you say - it stands against small arms - not anti tank rifles or heavier weapons - the point is, it DOES stand against the majority of weapons on the scene.
most of combat in world war ii was fought with similar, even weaker vehicles.
you cant put predator patrols over a city and start shooting suspicious vehicles with anti tank ammunition. that is the real deal here. you are joking when you say MLRS. what are you going to use MLRS against ? neighborhoods ?
this is city warfare. you are not fighting in open desert. predators, mlrs are out of question unless you want to destroy entire neighborhoods.
the person who wrote the article apparently doesnt know shit about military technology and history.
an armored personnel carrier is an armored personnel carrier. the fact that these are produced, and used means that the party using them has the means to produce them and use them. this shows an escalation of the situation.
you mean, each and every time in which the party which you are defending (capitalism) have either directly attacked, or indirectly intervened or created a military standoff in order for it to not succeed ?
ironic how the 'leader of the free world' britain lands with 18 other nations that deem to be there for freedom, in order to suppress free people revolting against monarchy, with a clear and stated goal to reestablish monarchy.
that he is a horse's ass ?!!?! all these terms about asses are so confusing. he might as well get mistaken for an asswipe in this confusion. someone needs to clear the confusion about termage and measure the ass situation, to any extent there is, if any.
what you dont seem to understand is that boosting something you deem as a 'human nature problem' by institutionalizing and encouraging that problem is not the way to solve that problem.
there is no difference in between feudalism and capitalism. latter is just a 'free for all' version of the former, until an established hierarchy totally settles.
in a capitalist system, the ones with the money makes the rules..... what made you think that it could have been otherwise ? saying 'even if you have the money, dont make the rules'.... ?
a system which amasses 71% of everything on average (with good estimates) at the hands of 5% of the population, who are in power to decide what they want to do with this 71% ~ power/wealth of our civilization at their own whim.
there is no history of me being a 'fan' of you. i dont 'fan' people. however there is no point in discussing that. you defend an argument when it is worth defending. you dont defend an argument depending on person.
Slashdot Mirror
you seem to forget that radiation stays. many millions around black sea coast died of cancer, and the cancer rate among the youth has gone up since chernobyl.
its due to morons like you that these people are dying still, its due to morons like you that an earless bunny is born near fukujima. its due to morons like you that many children will suffer into the future in japan.
this is a verdict on nuclear energy itself. keeping catastrophically dangerous devices as a source of energy was moronic from the start. it was only a matter of time when these would start to pop disasters, and it hasnt even been 50 years.
As in earless bunnies ? dickless dicks ? brainless iditos - wait we already have a lot of those. like the summary of the article.
http://www.google.com/search?q=earless+bunny+born+in+japan&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
one of my long time friends who has been living in japan for over 15 years is now packing her bags in tokyo. she says things are not right there. (not talking about the earless bunny).
as far as votes go, i would want to have a vote to have the idiots who talk about progress through terminally dangerous nuclear devices out of this planet, shipped to some place they wont be able to harm anyone.
what he said
It will satisfy all your needs, and more, with plugins. its there to stay.
silverlight is gone. if i suggested it a month ago, i would be modded down. look at how it turned out recently ...
and dumping of silverlight. there is a saying here, that goes 'the coming of wednesday is apparent from thursday' (yes its backwards). i think you can get what it means.
i WAS telling that anyone who banked on microsoft, including net thing, could get shafted, and a lot of microsoftbots had slammed me. fast forward to > now .... and ?
an armored personnel carrier is an armored vehicle that is designed to carry infantry. this has been as such from the end of world war i, until now. it wont change soon into the future. a vehicle that is designed to withstand small weapon fire. that's it. blahblahblah but the shoulder-launched whatchamacallit anti tank ammunition can .... -> yes, it can. the question is, whether the average infantry that goes against the apc carries that - and the answer is, he does not. that is why apcs are produced.
examine world war ii. you will find that most of the biggest battles of world war ii were fought with vehicles much lighter than what you see in this article. and, you will be surprised that the average infantry assault rifle does not have more penetrating power than average world war ii rifle against such armor thickness.
or, arms trade, disguised as a poorly designed sting ...
it IS an apc. doesnt matter how you name it, doesnt matter what you compare it with. it is an armored vehicle that stands firearms, carries heavy weaponry. the drug cartels can field it.
and as you say - it stands against small arms - not anti tank rifles or heavier weapons - the point is, it DOES stand against the majority of weapons on the scene.
most of combat in world war ii was fought with similar, even weaker vehicles.
you cant put predator patrols over a city and start shooting suspicious vehicles with anti tank ammunition. that is the real deal here. you are joking when you say MLRS. what are you going to use MLRS against ? neighborhoods ?
this is city warfare. you are not fighting in open desert. predators, mlrs are out of question unless you want to destroy entire neighborhoods.
the person who wrote the article apparently doesnt know shit about military technology and history.
an armored personnel carrier is an armored personnel carrier. the fact that these are produced, and used means that the party using them has the means to produce them and use them. this shows an escalation of the situation.
the guy got so accustomed to good that his standards seem to have perpetually got raised. he thinks google's state is 'bad'. lucky him.
you mean, each and every time in which the party which you are defending (capitalism) have either directly attacked, or indirectly intervened or created a military standoff in order for it to not succeed ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_intervention_in_the_Russian_Civil_War
ironic how the 'leader of the free world' britain lands with 18 other nations that deem to be there for freedom, in order to suppress free people revolting against monarchy, with a clear and stated goal to reestablish monarchy.
would weee noooow. and your logic for that is ?
that he is a horse's ass ?!!?! all these terms about asses are so confusing. he might as well get mistaken for an asswipe in this confusion. someone needs to clear the confusion about termage and measure the ass situation, to any extent there is, if any.
with your proposed logic, we should have never gotten out of stone age.
what you dont seem to understand is that boosting something you deem as a 'human nature problem' by institutionalizing and encouraging that problem is not the way to solve that problem.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z9WVZddH9w
there is no difference in between feudalism and capitalism. latter is just a 'free for all' version of the former, until an established hierarchy totally settles.
and the right wing shill drops by. no surprise there either.
in a capitalist system, the ones with the money makes the rules ..... what made you think that it could have been otherwise ? saying 'even if you have the money, dont make the rules' .... ?
will you prevent publishers from modifying that tag on the fly ? its just a simple text replacement operation.
a system which amasses 71% of everything on average (with good estimates) at the hands of 5% of the population, who are in power to decide what they want to do with this 71% ~ power/wealth of our civilization at their own whim.
http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html (it is worse in world averages)
in such a system, no population size is sustainable.
there is no history of me being a 'fan' of you. i dont 'fan' people. however there is no point in discussing that. you defend an argument when it is worth defending. you dont defend an argument depending on person.
except for being a 'fan' of you. what was not given, cannot be taken back.
phase out by dying of old age, will you, pops.
what is given before, can easily be taken back.