So? The recipe doesn't change: yell very loud at your phone's manufacturer that they have to cut the crap and start delivering updates. Outdated kernels are a security liability.
Isn't this technically protection money? "That's a nice webapp you have there; it'd be a shame if someone sued you and forced you to close. Become an Azure paying customer and you'll be safe!"
"Success percentage" means nothing, as everyone who has studied a little bit of statistics knows well. There are well-established methods to tell if a result is meaningful or not. In other words: P-values or GTFO.
How is that news? Choosing the download location is a feature that should have been there from the start; it is trivial to implement and deserves at most a mention in their changelog.
Or do apps programmers suck so bad at their job that we can't expect even basic functionalities from them?
So, apart from a meaningless renormalization that is only a display issue, everyone makes the same amount of money. Because they can buy the same amount of things, right? Congratulations, you have just invented communism.
I think it's outdated to use it on a web page -- that's a different thing. I'm sure it works great in its own field.
(Do browsers have high-quality MIDI samples anyway?)
You do know that most of those attacks are retaliation against the European military intervention agains ISIL, right? It's just war - the oldest game in the world. A kills B, B kills A.
Oops - you are right, maybe your post was not the best one to answer to among the two-three that made similar claims. Anyway, it still applies to what you wrote in point 2: I meant to say that Google here is in a significantly stronger position than "the operators of most networking equipment between Alice/Bob and OWS's servers", because it has access to both endpoints. The attack I have described would not work for Alice's ISP (unless it also happens to be Bob's ISP).
It is significantly easier for Google to match up senders and receivers. Even if you they go through millions of messages per second, in an exchange of, like, 20 IMs they can see if the timestamps of Alice's sent messages pair up almost perfectly with those of Bob's received messages. My ISP cannot do that, unless they see both halves of the conversation.
So, IANACryptographer, but if I understand correctly: Google gets metadata when Alice sends a message (because connect to its server using this "fronting"), and when Bob receives one (because Signal delivers messages using GCM). It doesn't look too hard for them to reconstruct that Alice is exchanging messages to Bob.
This is a circular argument. To quote GP, why would energy be constant? Maybe the variability is beyond our ability to observe. Maybe thermodynamics is wrong, and free energy can be produced but only in very small quantities.
Using the webcam images (which do not show my face 99% of the time) and a bleeding-edge lip-reading AI seems a bit overkill, since, you know, phones also have microphones...
Slashdot Mirror
So? The recipe doesn't change: yell very loud at your phone's manufacturer that they have to cut the crap and start delivering updates. Outdated kernels are a security liability.
Isn't this technically protection money? "That's a nice webapp you have there; it'd be a shame if someone sued you and forced you to close. Become an Azure paying customer and you'll be safe!"
"Success percentage" means nothing, as everyone who has studied a little bit of statistics knows well. There are well-established methods to tell if a result is meaningful or not. In other words: P-values or GTFO.
Do you have a link? That is a very interesting Matlab trivia for an user like me.
And then people say Apple does not innovate and just copies ideas other people had. Take that, haters!
How is that news? Choosing the download location is a feature that should have been there from the start; it is trivial to implement and deserves at most a mention in their changelog. Or do apps programmers suck so bad at their job that we can't expect even basic functionalities from them?
So, apart from a meaningless renormalization that is only a display issue, everyone makes the same amount of money. Because they can buy the same amount of things, right? Congratulations, you have just invented communism.
This is basically what has been happening for years with "international editions" of university textbooks.
Dogs? Cats? Seriously, I need one for women...
It's the Messiah! Bow down before them and adore them!
I think it's outdated to use it on a web page -- that's a different thing. I'm sure it works great in its own field. (Do browsers have high-quality MIDI samples anyway?)
Dude, how can I make my Geocities home page without my favorite repeating MIDI background music?
You do know that most of those attacks are retaliation against the European military intervention agains ISIL, right? It's just war - the oldest game in the world. A kills B, B kills A.
Oops - you are right, maybe your post was not the best one to answer to among the two-three that made similar claims. Anyway, it still applies to what you wrote in point 2: I meant to say that Google here is in a significantly stronger position than "the operators of most networking equipment between Alice/Bob and OWS's servers", because it has access to both endpoints. The attack I have described would not work for Alice's ISP (unless it also happens to be Bob's ISP).
It is significantly easier for Google to match up senders and receivers. Even if you they go through millions of messages per second, in an exchange of, like, 20 IMs they can see if the timestamps of Alice's sent messages pair up almost perfectly with those of Bob's received messages. My ISP cannot do that, unless they see both halves of the conversation.
So, IANACryptographer, but if I understand correctly: Google gets metadata when Alice sends a message (because connect to its server using this "fronting"), and when Bob receives one (because Signal delivers messages using GCM). It doesn't look too hard for them to reconstruct that Alice is exchanging messages to Bob.
Have you RTFA? They blocked Skype, Viber and Whatsapp in 2015.
I was speaking about the battery of the earbuds. They need one, too.
Because I don't want to have to recharge it every 5 hours of use? I know it's just a first-world problem, but we are speaking about Iphones after all.
There is a shortcut for that, it's called "Print Screen".
You mean my ad hasn't been seen by 10 billion people in the last month?
This is a circular argument. To quote GP, why would energy be constant? Maybe the variability is beyond our ability to observe. Maybe thermodynamics is wrong, and free energy can be produced but only in very small quantities.
If it's curved that's not an Apple, it's a Banana Phone!
Using the webcam images (which do not show my face 99% of the time) and a bleeding-edge lip-reading AI seems a bit overkill, since, you know, phones also have microphones...
Does it really take less time to "proofread" a machine-generated translation than to write one from scratch?