The Motorola 6800 was next. And after that came the MOS Technology 6502, which was a variation of the 6800.
Well according to wikipedia and the book, the two aren't related at all, the 6501 (predecessor to the 6502) was pin compatible with the 6800, but used a different instruction set, etc. Since MOS Technology got sued for using the same pin layout the 6502 is the (almost) the same as a 6501 but it wasn't pin compatible to avoid another lawsuit from Motorola.
Strikes me as odd that the browser would make a new connection for each request, isn't the bottleneck that unneeded requests created the reason HTTP/1.1 introduced Keep-Alive?
Easy
Used GNOME lately?
And while we're at it, lets hold programmers legally and financially responsible for bugs in their code!
Well according to wikipedia and the book, the two aren't related at all, the 6501 (predecessor to the 6502) was pin compatible with the 6800, but used a different instruction set, etc. Since MOS Technology got sued for using the same pin layout the 6502 is the (almost) the same as a 6501 but it wasn't pin compatible to avoid another lawsuit from Motorola.
-oohal
I always figured having RMS' head on a box would scare people off.
-oohal
Strikes me as odd that the browser would make a new connection for each request, isn't the bottleneck that unneeded requests created the reason HTTP/1.1 introduced Keep-Alive?
-oohal