I didn't even look at other lines, I just clicked the first product lines that would do the stuff in the question, eg push 32 bits around moderately fast.
I'm pro-government, and I probably hate toll roads even more than the other guy! LOL
But the more serious answer to the question is, if it is an "engineering project" then your engineer should be telling us, you shouldn't be asking slashdot.
Are you going to need cooling? Yes, you're going to need cooling. Assuming that you have money, since you don't have an engineer you must still have the money, so you should buy a refrigerated water cooling system, and you're done asking about that part.
Since you're in Texas, you definitely want a TI-based ARM SOC, like from Octavio.
Or just buy a BeagleBone and put AC in the case, and done. That uses the Octavio.
Anybody thinking they can buy non-compromised telco equipment is kidding themselves. That is why anybody with a clue insists on end-to-end encryption and is aware that it is obvious who talks to whom to the usual creeps (NSA, GCHQ, etc...)
Toeing the line, but not as in standing nice and neat so you're all the same.
The line is the rule that you're not supposed to cross. "Toeing the line" means you're trying to get as close as you can to breaking the rule, without breaking it.
If they were toeing the line for the US, that means they're just barely complying with demands that they didn't really want to follow.
If they were trying to be nice and neat just the same as everybody like a good boy, they'd be standing well back from the line, following the intent of the rule. You don't follow the intent of the rule at the edge; the recommended best practices will always be well back from the lines.
Well, both of those are hard to do when every President sets a different goal for NASA. Most NASA projects take longer than the average President's term in office; every President comes in and completely changes what it is he wants NASA to do. How is NASA supposed to operate successfully if their mission and goals change every 4 to 8 years?
It is worse than that. The President can tell them what to do, to a certain extent, but their funding comes from Congress, who can definitely also tell them what to do.
You'd have to fix multiple similar but orthogonal problems before you'd see any results.
What if they haven't been holding us back, they've just been bloating their project budgets at the government's request to hide all the black-box funding that Congress gives the military and intelligence communities?
Never attribute to malice what can be reasonably attributed to incompetence.
And Aighearach's Corollary: Never attribute to incompetence what can be reasonably attributed to known primary motivations.
Special forces already have a space plane, it is like a miniature space shuttle for LEO missions. It can fly in space, reenter, land, deploy forces, and fly home as a drone airplane.
That's the first innovative, technically-reasonable plan I've heard in a long time.
Maybe we could find some Unlawful Enemy Combatants to volunteer? They don't really need to get home alive, they just need to get returned to their family for a religious burial, and their family needs to get some compensation.
I hope you don't mind, but Pence might end up getting all the credit; the Pence Launcher!
It just means they have to pay a little more to get bumped up on the SpaceX launch schedule for the BFR.
I wonder how many SEC lawyers they'll have to agree to fire to make that happen?
I'm not saying launch schedules can only ever be delayed, I'm just saying, it is like moving the heavens. Sure, Musk the engineering team to pull it off, but they'd have to really feel motivated. From the top.
Who, you called me a name, that MUST make you right! You don't need to do actual research, you can insult people!
I never said they could overrule the Berne convention, there's no conflict between being given copyright, and allowing the world to use it for free with no strings attached.
You're unable to continue thinking, because I called you a name. That calls for another one! LOL
You don't seem to comprehend that "Public Domain" isn't a name you can call something, it is an actual legal status of the work, and you can't use words to cause that legal status to magically appear; doing so, if successful, would violate the Berne Convention.
Insisting you're doing it for a good cause doesn't cause it to be the law. Only a fucking idiot would think that. See how easy it is to prevent you from thinking for yourself?
Please try to write something to convince me you have sufficient intellectual integrity to engage in an actual discussion of computer security.
No thank you.
I intentionally phrase my comments to be abrasive to people who judge the person, instead of the idea. It is a form of IP protection that works entirely by mutual consent; People who are not authorized to consider the ideas I stated, or implied, are denied understanding. By themselves.
I have no motivation to convince you of anything about myself other than that I'm a flawed messenger. And that is enough to reserve knowledge and understanding to the you from being able to understand my point. You're physically restrained from doing that; you can only defend yourself.
They have patents and aggressive lawyers, you probably can't build a competing tractor for a long time.
Patents? What could there possibly be to patent on a fucking tractor? IIRC
Stop trying to recall, and go look it up. Modern tractors that farmers actually use are not merely powered plows. Fucking duh.
Also, patent law doesn't care about what makes sense to you. There is no need for you to try to "figure it out." Stop fucking figuring and look shit up; educate yourself about the subject.
Look up the legal debate on the issue, Dunderhead. Don't just assert opinion as fact, on the hope that you're right.
People have said those words. That doesn't mean their words overrule the Berne Convention. It doesn't mean their works are "in the public domain." They advertised an impossible promise. That doesn't guarantee you shit, but it sure as hell isn't a law that can supersede anything.
A smartphone developed by Oracle? I've been fortunate enough never to have crossed paths with Oracle's infamous licensing terms, but I could picture it now:
Every time you used your phone for any purpose whatsoever, you'd have to pay a fee to Oracle.
Also, for not using it when they thought you should have.
Slashdot Mirror
This isn't true. Check out Texas Instruments. For example, all their Sitara processors are available up to 105C.
http://www.ti.com/processors/s...
I didn't even look at other lines, I just clicked the first product lines that would do the stuff in the question, eg push 32 bits around moderately fast.
I'm pro-government, and I probably hate toll roads even more than the other guy! LOL
But the more serious answer to the question is, if it is an "engineering project" then your engineer should be telling us, you shouldn't be asking slashdot.
Are you going to need cooling? Yes, you're going to need cooling. Assuming that you have money, since you don't have an engineer you must still have the money, so you should buy a refrigerated water cooling system, and you're done asking about that part.
Since you're in Texas, you definitely want a TI-based ARM SOC, like from Octavio.
Or just buy a BeagleBone and put AC in the case, and done. That uses the Octavio.
It is all about the case, not the computer.
Anybody thinking they can buy non-compromised telco equipment is kidding themselves. That is why anybody with a clue insists on end-to-end encryption and is aware that it is obvious who talks to whom to the usual creeps (NSA, GCHQ, etc...)
Wait, which of those are the Swedes, again?
If I were driving Hauwei at this point I would open-source all the software running on my devices.
You would be executed for corruption. Literally.
For a US 5G supplier you can try to go to HP, but the work is really being done by a German partner company.
Toeing the line, but not as in standing nice and neat so you're all the same.
The line is the rule that you're not supposed to cross. "Toeing the line" means you're trying to get as close as you can to breaking the rule, without breaking it.
If they were toeing the line for the US, that means they're just barely complying with demands that they didn't really want to follow.
If they were trying to be nice and neat just the same as everybody like a good boy, they'd be standing well back from the line, following the intent of the rule. You don't follow the intent of the rule at the edge; the recommended best practices will always be well back from the lines.
There are two European companies already selling competing hardware.
You've already been informed of that in other threads, can you please dial down the stupid at least 2 notches?
Sorry Boris, that's really weak. No, I'm not going to click stupid links. No, Quora is not where I go for education.
I have a better idea. I use my sources for data that I trust, and you use your sources of data that you trust.
Setting bold goals and staying on schedule.
So I guess, they sacrifice safety.
Well, both of those are hard to do when every President sets a different goal for NASA. Most NASA projects take longer than the average President's term in office; every President comes in and completely changes what it is he wants NASA to do. How is NASA supposed to operate successfully if their mission and goals change every 4 to 8 years?
It is worse than that. The President can tell them what to do, to a certain extent, but their funding comes from Congress, who can definitely also tell them what to do.
You'd have to fix multiple similar but orthogonal problems before you'd see any results.
What if they haven't been holding us back, they've just been bloating their project budgets at the government's request to hide all the black-box funding that Congress gives the military and intelligence communities?
Never attribute to malice what can be reasonably attributed to incompetence.
And Aighearach's Corollary:
Never attribute to incompetence what can be reasonably attributed to known primary motivations.
You can't change the Berne Convention by calling it false. The United States Congress joined it in the 1980s. It is the Law.
Doesn't Oracle already have the old BSD network stack, though?
Special forces already have a space plane, it is like a miniature space shuttle for LEO missions. It can fly in space, reenter, land, deploy forces, and fly home as a drone airplane.
That's the first innovative, technically-reasonable plan I've heard in a long time.
Maybe we could find some Unlawful Enemy Combatants to volunteer? They don't really need to get home alive, they just need to get returned to their family for a religious burial, and their family needs to get some compensation.
I hope you don't mind, but Pence might end up getting all the credit; the Pence Launcher!
It just means they have to pay a little more to get bumped up on the SpaceX launch schedule for the BFR.
I wonder how many SEC lawyers they'll have to agree to fire to make that happen?
I'm not saying launch schedules can only ever be delayed, I'm just saying, it is like moving the heavens. Sure, Musk the engineering team to pull it off, but they'd have to really feel motivated. From the top.
Who, you called me a name, that MUST make you right! You don't need to do actual research, you can insult people!
I never said they could overrule the Berne convention, there's no conflict between being given copyright, and allowing the world to use it for free with no strings attached.
You're unable to continue thinking, because I called you a name. That calls for another one! LOL
You don't seem to comprehend that "Public Domain" isn't a name you can call something, it is an actual legal status of the work, and you can't use words to cause that legal status to magically appear; doing so, if successful, would violate the Berne Convention.
Insisting you're doing it for a good cause doesn't cause it to be the law. Only a fucking idiot would think that. See how easy it is to prevent you from thinking for yourself?
Please try to write something to convince me you have sufficient intellectual integrity to engage in an actual discussion of computer security.
No thank you.
I intentionally phrase my comments to be abrasive to people who judge the person, instead of the idea. It is a form of IP protection that works entirely by mutual consent; People who are not authorized to consider the ideas I stated, or implied, are denied understanding. By themselves.
I have no motivation to convince you of anything about myself other than that I'm a flawed messenger. And that is enough to reserve knowledge and understanding to the you from being able to understand my point. You're physically restrained from doing that; you can only defend yourself.
JFK wanted the military to have ICBMs.
What is Pence's excuse? Is he going to install Darth Cheney's Moon Mirrors?
They have patents and aggressive lawyers, you probably can't build a competing tractor for a long time.
Patents? What could there possibly be to patent on a fucking tractor? IIRC
Stop trying to recall, and go look it up. Modern tractors that farmers actually use are not merely powered plows. Fucking duh.
Also, patent law doesn't care about what makes sense to you. There is no need for you to try to "figure it out." Stop fucking figuring and look shit up; educate yourself about the subject.
Look up the legal debate on the issue, Dunderhead. Don't just assert opinion as fact, on the hope that you're right.
People have said those words. That doesn't mean their words overrule the Berne Convention. It doesn't mean their works are "in the public domain." They advertised an impossible promise. That doesn't guarantee you shit, but it sure as hell isn't a law that can supersede anything.
I thought the problem was that it was slow on x86, but worked fine on RISC platforms? Phones are mostly ARM.
That wouldn't be the problem. The problem would be, where would apps come from, and where would security come from?
And by "qualities" we're talking about, millions of jr. level programmers around the world already know it, and so they can spew out Appy Apps.
A smartphone developed by Oracle?
I've been fortunate enough never to have crossed paths with Oracle's infamous licensing terms, but I could picture it now:
Every time you used your phone for any purpose whatsoever, you'd have to pay a fee to Oracle.
Also, for not using it when they thought you should have.
Android is an operating system not a programming language.
And it might actually be just a Linux distro.
All the way back to the 70s, too.
Everything you thought was unencumbered would be a longtime violation.