If that is true then wasn't her job, quite specifically, to delegate authority and have that email system changed via official means? Ignore the side show that is the whole email server thing and concentrate on the mishandling of classified information (which has been indicated as true per the on-going FBI investigation according to a variety of news sources) and on the failing to retain data properly is required by the Federal Records Act. Either way, it was her responsibility to have the system fixed and her obligation to not work around it.
Umm... I think they have records laws that insist she do just that - leave the data on it IF they were official. From what I've read there have been some instances of classified information in the recovered emails. If true then she's likely violated the laws regarding the handling of secure information. Even FOUO data has handling requirements. To me the issue isn't the email server -that's a distraction and the laws covering it may not have been in place until a couple of years after she left office. The issue is the improper handling of classified data which was certainly covered as well as the data retention laws IF applicable. I'm not sure if we'll ever see anything come of this but I will not be voting for her. I have ample other reasons to not vote for her but I'll stick to the topic at hand.
You can vote in a presidential election. Only a few states still restrict voting in State elections (or local elections) due to felony convictions but you're able to vote for the president. Look into your local voting laws. For the most part the whole being unable to vote due to a felony conviction is a myth and one is still able to vote for the president in all states as far as I know. I'm not a researcher of the subject nor an expert but I do have a vested interest in election laws and have actually paid someone to answer a variety of questions for me and to advise me on campaigning.
If you're unable to answer the questions you may have on your own then, if you wish, you can provide me with the name of the state that you live in and your residency status (you must be a citizen and a resident of the state, of course, for me to get information). As I already will be paying for the time then it is trivial to ask them an additional question and I can get more information to you.
As it currently stands, restricting votes based on using felony status for entitlement is probably legal. It is my opinion, and not necessarily a popular opinion, that felons should be allowed to vote. I am not a fan of restricting rights due to past actions when we've already had the chance to restrict their freedoms.
Another opportunity may be to petition the State (typically a single well-worded letter to the governor of your state is all that is required) stating your desires, years since convictions, changes you've made, and maybe including some letters from members of the community to vouch for your current behaviors is adequate. They may, or may not, return your right to vote. This is most often seen with firearms but it is *likely* to be applicable to vote restrictions as well.
Again, I'm already paying someone an hourly wage to answer and advise me. For them to review the applicable laws and opine on them would be trivial and a minimal expense that I'm more than willing to pay on your behalf. If you're willing to share the information required then I'm more than happy to get them to opine on your situation.
You see it as a good thing, an easier thing, and such. That's fine too. However, if you wish to change this you may be able to, almost certainly can in most states, and you may not even be restricted at all but may have been subjected to misinformation.
I was visiting a site with a comments section, as I am wont to do, and I read those comments. Somehow Liberace managed to be the topic in the thread. There were a number of people who claimed Liberace was not really gay. They had links and citations and evidence. I did not check a single bit of their evidence no click on a single link. However, it turned into a rather large discussion and a surprisingly large number of people were adamant that Liberace was not gay.
I am not sure where I'm going with this but, yeah... It was one of the oddest topics (and I read a bunch) I've ever discovered on the internet. It isn't the oddest - I am unable to rank them - but it was certainly odd.
That makes me wonder... Who the hell shares needles in this day and age? I no longer abuse opiates and was an IV drug abuser for years and years. Never, not once, did I share a rig with anyone. For two bucks you can get a ten pack. For twenty bucks you can find someone who gets insulin rigs regularly and buy a box of 1000 from them. I hadn't shot up much prior to the AIDS scare but I had and even then we didn't share rigs. I may have reused my own rig from time to time but sharing it? That's straight up retarded.
I have no idea? LOL I only get 5 at a time? I have 'excellent' karma. I once got ten and was kind of surprised by it. They appear randomly, though I'm sure they're not truly random.
That's well and good but the statement really indicated that they didn't want people to be punished without due process - due process itself allows punishment prior to prosecution - ie. the 72 hour hold.
Yeah, I have the information for the land that was replanted by the paper company. I may get the gumption up to do your 1/100 of an acre count. I could do that in some random areas and it might not take too much time.
You're mistaking "need" for "going to be facing." You won't need new laws. You're going to get new ones with harsher maximum penalties even if you don't need them. I tried mentioning this and was modded to oblivion quite some time ago when people were first insisting that they could do anything they wanted with them. Good luck with that.
I am going to suggest you try that with braided line and not mono-filament. You're going to actually want to tighten up your drag too, assuming you're spin casting. This is most certainly not a good idea for those who fly cast for the fish I am usually after.
For a stupid ass animal that is a fish, they're sure tough to please sometimes. I expect a train to be a bit easier to hook but you're going to have an 'interesting' time reeling it in.
How does that relate to the topic at hand? Beating up straw men is easy. You'll win this way, for sure. I'm really curious what your point is, as you might have one. Initially I was going to just ignore you but I figure I'll ask.
That may be true but I think your statement is a little overly broad. This person should not be in jail, he's a kid. (He's not on some public facing list, either.) I don't have much of a problem with that - we keep police records regardless of convictions and typical background checks only cover convictions, at least in my country. The UK may have a different policy.
Then, there are exceptions. There are folks who have been accused of crimes so terrible that we have chosen to give up rights in order to incarcerate them for the protection of the rest of society. Your view doesn't include those folks and I'm afraid you're definitely in the minority on this one. I'm a pretty damned big fan of liberties and, well, even I can see the sense in this policy. Not that it isn't abused nor is the UK's system free from abuses. However, I see the logic behind it and tend to agree.
Nah, they have multiple classes. His would not be considered a predator so would end up on the list for a shorter time frame at least that's what the various lists I've checked indicate. I'm not sure why your post is moderated as informative when it is factually incorrect. They have life-time registrants but those are for predatory offenses in every list I've ever looked at.
Also, few of those other things you mention are laws (in most states) but are probation conditions. They're generally free to live most anywhere (and certainly are after they've been removed from the list in cases like this), attend school, etc... Notification is the law, that much is true I think?
This could have changed but I was recently checking an area where I was thinking about buying some property and it was still the same there.
Hmm... So if I murder someone and have not yet been proven guilty then I should be allowed to roam the street freely? The sentiment is nice but I don't think it works well in the real world.
If I'm understanding the comments properly and recall the history of these such things in the UK then I'm pretty sure this is not a public list at all but a private list maintained internally by the UK police departments. Obviously, I did not read the article but someone was kind enough to quote it above.
We'll start doing that when we start reading the article. I've read a couple of articles but I'm a heretic - you're not the boss of me! However, I do use preview and skim my replies. I even edit some replies before submitting them. Hell, I end up editing some of the novellas I write. Unfortunately, it often makes them even longer.
Agues against draconian laws and promotes draconian laws. Argues against arbitrary laws and promotes arbitrary laws. Umm... So, I don't say this often but I'm pretty sure you're an idiot.
They post on every story. Browse at -1 and you'll see what I mean.
Data or it's not an argument. In fact, I can prove you are making data up - there are plenty of articles without racist comments. But, seeing as you made the claim, provide proof.
Not that I'm a racist (I'm actually racially mixed) but I think I've found someone who's pretty damned dishonest. Which is funny because you've then the temerity to claim a moral high ground. "I'm not as wretched as them!" That does not make you a good person. I dare say that you disgust me.
Curious. You didn't tell them to supply data when the vast majority of your other replies to speculation contained exactly that request. Methinks you're too emotionally invested to offer a valid opinion.
Going to spell the return is one of the magic for any reason AyrLine or abandoned persons of Yaadein for dayanlmas have AC and kind skntlarn solution adn preferred magic spell to bring back the outgoing one Ceiter much preferred. Going to bring back the magic of one of the abandoned AyrLine couples preferred to lie magic lovers reunite. What is the outgoing how to bring back the magic are due to http:// gidenigerigetirmebuyu of... [gideniger of... magic.com] abandonment of the detailed information from our website if you want to bring back the magic going as you alabilece Bonds or ayrlmann details should be known and balatlmald play accordingly. According to where they stand in the Ksacas playing different persons may be adjusted.If you want to bring back the magic Bonds is going to pass it enables communication with persons are advised to have sufficient knowledge experience to this spells. Aldatldk from the side of many of fake psychics who want to bring back the magic going kandrldk Bonds are known.So to bring back the magic or psychic choice for any play is very important. Especially going to bring back the magic of the virtual environment is not far from claiming yaptklarn medyumlarn closely Connection for a portion with the great psychic.These people are well-informed even if they claim they are expressions unintended and steal Fixture for many of these persons playing side made from the actual medium is not the slightest information about it. Fake medyumlarn not Madura our site http:// gidenigerigetirmebuyu of... [gideniger the... buyusu.co I] can visit.You can get information on our website for information and details bring back the magic of going about it. but also for going to or leaving the Fixture lover you can share about this spell CEI yorumlarnz hesitation.
That doesn't help but it looks like a Markov chain bot in a different language. My browser add-on indicates it is Turkish and the translation was done with Google's engine.
Slashdot Mirror
If that is true then wasn't her job, quite specifically, to delegate authority and have that email system changed via official means? Ignore the side show that is the whole email server thing and concentrate on the mishandling of classified information (which has been indicated as true per the on-going FBI investigation according to a variety of news sources) and on the failing to retain data properly is required by the Federal Records Act. Either way, it was her responsibility to have the system fixed and her obligation to not work around it.
Umm... I think they have records laws that insist she do just that - leave the data on it IF they were official. From what I've read there have been some instances of classified information in the recovered emails. If true then she's likely violated the laws regarding the handling of secure information. Even FOUO data has handling requirements. To me the issue isn't the email server -that's a distraction and the laws covering it may not have been in place until a couple of years after she left office. The issue is the improper handling of classified data which was certainly covered as well as the data retention laws IF applicable. I'm not sure if we'll ever see anything come of this but I will not be voting for her. I have ample other reasons to not vote for her but I'll stick to the topic at hand.
Something something something. It's the way of their kind... *nods*
You can vote in a presidential election. Only a few states still restrict voting in State elections (or local elections) due to felony convictions but you're able to vote for the president. Look into your local voting laws. For the most part the whole being unable to vote due to a felony conviction is a myth and one is still able to vote for the president in all states as far as I know. I'm not a researcher of the subject nor an expert but I do have a vested interest in election laws and have actually paid someone to answer a variety of questions for me and to advise me on campaigning.
If you're unable to answer the questions you may have on your own then, if you wish, you can provide me with the name of the state that you live in and your residency status (you must be a citizen and a resident of the state, of course, for me to get information). As I already will be paying for the time then it is trivial to ask them an additional question and I can get more information to you.
As it currently stands, restricting votes based on using felony status for entitlement is probably legal. It is my opinion, and not necessarily a popular opinion, that felons should be allowed to vote. I am not a fan of restricting rights due to past actions when we've already had the chance to restrict their freedoms.
Another opportunity may be to petition the State (typically a single well-worded letter to the governor of your state is all that is required) stating your desires, years since convictions, changes you've made, and maybe including some letters from members of the community to vouch for your current behaviors is adequate. They may, or may not, return your right to vote. This is most often seen with firearms but it is *likely* to be applicable to vote restrictions as well.
Again, I'm already paying someone an hourly wage to answer and advise me. For them to review the applicable laws and opine on them would be trivial and a minimal expense that I'm more than willing to pay on your behalf. If you're willing to share the information required then I'm more than happy to get them to opine on your situation.
You see it as a good thing, an easier thing, and such. That's fine too. However, if you wish to change this you may be able to, almost certainly can in most states, and you may not even be restricted at all but may have been subjected to misinformation.
I was visiting a site with a comments section, as I am wont to do, and I read those comments. Somehow Liberace managed to be the topic in the thread. There were a number of people who claimed Liberace was not really gay. They had links and citations and evidence. I did not check a single bit of their evidence no click on a single link. However, it turned into a rather large discussion and a surprisingly large number of people were adamant that Liberace was not gay.
I am not sure where I'm going with this but, yeah... It was one of the oddest topics (and I read a bunch) I've ever discovered on the internet. It isn't the oddest - I am unable to rank them - but it was certainly odd.
That makes me wonder... Who the hell shares needles in this day and age? I no longer abuse opiates and was an IV drug abuser for years and years. Never, not once, did I share a rig with anyone. For two bucks you can get a ten pack. For twenty bucks you can find someone who gets insulin rigs regularly and buy a box of 1000 from them. I hadn't shot up much prior to the AIDS scare but I had and even then we didn't share rigs. I may have reused my own rig from time to time but sharing it? That's straight up retarded.
I have no idea? LOL I only get 5 at a time? I have 'excellent' karma. I once got ten and was kind of surprised by it. They appear randomly, though I'm sure they're not truly random.
That's well and good but the statement really indicated that they didn't want people to be punished without due process - due process itself allows punishment prior to prosecution - ie. the 72 hour hold.
Yeah, I have the information for the land that was replanted by the paper company. I may get the gumption up to do your 1/100 of an acre count. I could do that in some random areas and it might not take too much time.
Nope. Thanks but no.
You're mistaking "need" for "going to be facing." You won't need new laws. You're going to get new ones with harsher maximum penalties even if you don't need them. I tried mentioning this and was modded to oblivion quite some time ago when people were first insisting that they could do anything they wanted with them. Good luck with that.
This, being in NYC, is one of those times I'd have not shot the drone.
I just wonder if this will slow the comet down or alter its course. I doubt it has enough mass to do so, but...
Also, I did a quick run in my head and your math looks okay. Physics was not my major, however.
I am going to suggest you try that with braided line and not mono-filament. You're going to actually want to tighten up your drag too, assuming you're spin casting. This is most certainly not a good idea for those who fly cast for the fish I am usually after.
For a stupid ass animal that is a fish, they're sure tough to please sometimes. I expect a train to be a bit easier to hook but you're going to have an 'interesting' time reeling it in.
How does that relate to the topic at hand? Beating up straw men is easy. You'll win this way, for sure. I'm really curious what your point is, as you might have one. Initially I was going to just ignore you but I figure I'll ask.
That may be true but I think your statement is a little overly broad. This person should not be in jail, he's a kid. (He's not on some public facing list, either.) I don't have much of a problem with that - we keep police records regardless of convictions and typical background checks only cover convictions, at least in my country. The UK may have a different policy.
Then, there are exceptions. There are folks who have been accused of crimes so terrible that we have chosen to give up rights in order to incarcerate them for the protection of the rest of society. Your view doesn't include those folks and I'm afraid you're definitely in the minority on this one. I'm a pretty damned big fan of liberties and, well, even I can see the sense in this policy. Not that it isn't abused nor is the UK's system free from abuses. However, I see the logic behind it and tend to agree.
Nah, they have multiple classes. His would not be considered a predator so would end up on the list for a shorter time frame at least that's what the various lists I've checked indicate. I'm not sure why your post is moderated as informative when it is factually incorrect. They have life-time registrants but those are for predatory offenses in every list I've ever looked at.
Also, few of those other things you mention are laws (in most states) but are probation conditions. They're generally free to live most anywhere (and certainly are after they've been removed from the list in cases like this), attend school, etc... Notification is the law, that much is true I think?
This could have changed but I was recently checking an area where I was thinking about buying some property and it was still the same there.
Hmm... So if I murder someone and have not yet been proven guilty then I should be allowed to roam the street freely? The sentiment is nice but I don't think it works well in the real world.
If I'm understanding the comments properly and recall the history of these such things in the UK then I'm pretty sure this is not a public list at all but a private list maintained internally by the UK police departments. Obviously, I did not read the article but someone was kind enough to quote it above.
We'll start doing that when we start reading the article. I've read a couple of articles but I'm a heretic - you're not the boss of me! However, I do use preview and skim my replies. I even edit some replies before submitting them. Hell, I end up editing some of the novellas I write. Unfortunately, it often makes them even longer.
A philosophical question and rhetorical... Is this mythical boy regretting his decision or is he regretting the punishment?
Agues against draconian laws and promotes draconian laws. Argues against arbitrary laws and promotes arbitrary laws. Umm... So, I don't say this often but I'm pretty sure you're an idiot.
They post on every story. Browse at -1 and you'll see what I mean.
Data or it's not an argument. In fact, I can prove you are making data up - there are plenty of articles without racist comments. But, seeing as you made the claim, provide proof.
Not that I'm a racist (I'm actually racially mixed) but I think I've found someone who's pretty damned dishonest. Which is funny because you've then the temerity to claim a moral high ground. "I'm not as wretched as them!" That does not make you a good person. I dare say that you disgust me.
Curious. You didn't tell them to supply data when the vast majority of your other replies to speculation contained exactly that request. Methinks you're too emotionally invested to offer a valid opinion.
Going to spell the return is one of the magic for any reason AyrLine or abandoned persons of Yaadein for dayanlmas have AC and kind skntlarn solution adn preferred magic spell to bring back the outgoing one Ceiter much preferred. // gidenigerigetirmebuyu of ... [gideniger of ... magic.com] abandonment of the detailed information from our website if you want to bring back the magic going as you alabilece Bonds or ayrlmann details should be known and balatlmald play accordingly. According to where they stand in the Ksacas playing different persons may be adjusted.If you want to bring back the magic Bonds is going to pass it enables communication with persons are advised to have sufficient knowledge experience to this spells. Aldatldk from the side of many of fake psychics who want to bring back the magic going kandrldk Bonds are known.So to bring back the magic or psychic choice for any play is very important. Especially going to bring back the magic of the virtual environment is not far from claiming yaptklarn medyumlarn closely Connection for a portion with the great psychic.These people are well-informed even if they claim they are expressions unintended and steal Fixture for many of these persons playing side made from the actual medium is not the slightest information about it. Fake medyumlarn not Madura our site http: // gidenigerigetirmebuyu of ... [gideniger the ... buyusu.co I] can visit.You can get information on our website for information and details bring back the magic of going about it. but also for going to or leaving the Fixture lover you can share about this spell CEI yorumlarnz hesitation.
Going to bring back the magic of one of the abandoned AyrLine couples preferred to lie magic lovers reunite. What is the outgoing how to bring back the magic are due to http:
That doesn't help but it looks like a Markov chain bot in a different language. My browser add-on indicates it is Turkish and the translation was done with Google's engine.
No, I have no idea why I bothered.