Natural for me means nothing else than normal nature behaviour. For example placing a road through rain forest is not natural. In overall all I wanted to say is that we're destroying nature everywhere around, that's it.
I have such feeling (and that's not only me) because people are doing a lot of things that are not natural to life on earth. Modifying vegetables, air pollution, melting artic ice, playing with nuclear power etc. You can't deny that... but of course it's not going to happen in our lives, will take maybe thousands of years.
He used Windows for past 10 years, so I'm not surprised it was too complex for him. Will be same for long time Linux user to switch to Windows (who never used Windows before). And imagine spyware/malware nightmare:)
But still if you have to take care of 3-4 different browsers, it's a lost time you can easily avoid if all browsers were w3c compliant... In my opinion people should start making only w3c compliant web pages, and browsers should be improved to render them properly.
Happy now?:)
Anyway I was posting my comment and wifi security in same time... and my comment didn't appear?! Strange:(
In overall access point vendors should start producing APs with better security defaults, preferably with firewalls.
Except OSX, it is very easy for FreeBSD to fight with Linux on desktop as most software will require minimum changes when porting to FreeBSD from Linux (except those relying on kernel or something Linux specific too much).
Slashdot Mirror
Why?
Natural for me means nothing else than normal nature behaviour. For example placing a road through rain forest is not natural. In overall all I wanted to say is that we're destroying nature everywhere around, that's it.
I have such feeling (and that's not only me) because people are doing a lot of things that are not natural to life on earth. Modifying vegetables, air pollution, melting artic ice, playing with nuclear power etc. You can't deny that... but of course it's not going to happen in our lives, will take maybe thousands of years.
It's just.... when you think in longterm. People are slowly destroying its mother earth. Not saying that modified rice will cause it :)
He used Windows for past 10 years, so I'm not surprised it was too complex for him. Will be same for long time Linux user to switch to Windows (who never used Windows before). And imagine spyware/malware nightmare :)
That is exactly what I'm afraid of :( In near future everything will be genetically modified ... this planet will die.
But still if you have to take care of 3-4 different browsers, it's a lost time you can easily avoid if all browsers were w3c compliant... In my opinion people should start making only w3c compliant web pages, and browsers should be improved to render them properly.
He told us that 640kb of RAM will be enough for future also ;-) But I have to agree, PCs are here and will last for long...
I agree ... but still I'm curious what did hit Pentagon :(
I agree with this... third might be some antivirus company afraid of loosing some money with upcoming Vista and M$ antivirus program :)
Until they squash all WiFi problems out... I'm not going to fly with such plane ;-)
Happy now? :)
Anyway I was posting my comment and wifi security in same time... and my comment didn't appear?! Strange :(
In overall access point vendors should start producing APs with better security defaults, preferably with firewalls.
Except OSX, it is very easy for FreeBSD to fight with Linux on desktop as most software will require minimum changes when porting to FreeBSD from Linux (except those relying on kernel or something Linux specific too much).